on cue susan in arizona check in their troves of your pieces of love that what a great collection mustafnd and they give you one quick historic this so funny when at the dinner and it's a change so that when the accord bracelet on the queen wants minces allow the bracelet math residences and given the change in chile to mannesmann megumi again she has a boyfriend in in her annual is the kit of it as great and face my son was so funny and nice great in the blues also have wait and and did an anemone that and in so far off on this story and winston spent a lot of it 10 here and in 67 men intend the ingredients here to limit one of the just purse her and some will see in this deflower in selling can snowflake a new chairman and many species and 67 and in an and the princess cuts and know nothing susan again for that education and she blew me away and in knowing that her on ring and when diamonds permanent and general marshall and for the parade today guarantees afraid to start err messina's colors and to loosen the of the vikings the purple and use it with everyone in a very unusual and the

. -- of mustaf or members of the public request. the items are as follows. item one, case number 2010 that 0.10.1038c, 1735 polk street was said between washington and clay streets. the project would convert they can speak to a rest from within the polk street neighborhood district. item two is case number 2011 .1233c for 2255 polk street. the tenant improvements are proposed for the tenant's space, however the size of the space will not change. item number three, case number 2011.0679z 1120-1130 kearny street. item #4 case number 2011. 0680q 1145 green street. following public comment, which would automatically remove these items from the consent calendar, these items are before you for your consideration. >> any public comment on items on the consent calendar? which items? >> item one. commissioners, item one is removed from the consent calendar. are you going to consider items 2-4? president miguel: any other public comment? if not, public comment is closed? >> i move to move a items 2, 3, and 4. >> second. moved to second the consent calendar items? thos

i want to thank mustaf for putting this hearing together. colleagues, thank you for the indulgence this is incredibly important, so i think this was a productive beginning to any discussion today. with that, mr. chairman, i move to continue this to the call of the chair. supervisor campos: we have a motion to continue to the call of the chair. supervisor avalos. supervisor avalos: thank you, chair. i think it is good that we initiate this conversation here. certainly, this is of great import to san francisco in the future of high-speed rail. i think if we were going to continue this conversation, i would prefer to continue its in plans and programming. i would like to see if we can actually modify the motion to do that. >> i agree. supervisor campos: ok, so we have a motion to continue. supervisor wiener: send it back to plans and programs to the call of the chair. supervisor campos: we have a motion in the second. i want to thank all members of the public who have been waiting for this item, and thank you to commissioner wiener and his staf

>> they mustaf focus group -- must have focus grouped htis to death, because it seems crazy what they are doing. no the finer points of the law. it seems to be more about politics than a lead of the bid they must think that women will lap this up. >> nina, your beat is the supreme court. >> well, i am not the supreme court, but the supreme court ruled, and justice scalia wrote, as long as the law is neutral unequally applied to everybody, it is constitutional. the court has made rulings that if -- more recent rulings that give the catholic church's some hope that it might prevail. but this has been the law for over 10 years, in the federal government, in 28 states. but it comes up because of the affordable care act, what has to be offered as a basic service for women. >> charles krauthammer, md, is the obama administration's mandate medically sound? >> they make it into a medical issue. it is not a medical issue. the idea that women are denied contraceptives is preposterous. it is not illegal to get birth control. are you going to force the catholic church to distribute contraceptives