for example, from of the history of ukraine and russia illustrated by mykhailo hrushevskyi or mykola arkas, but imagine that he did not know what it was and it was a willful decision when the assistants therefore accepted the trident as a hep because we were talking about hrushevskyi was in this regard a rather brilliant person who wrote the history of ukraine, not ukraine the rusyns adopted the coat of arms as a trident - this is also a matter of succession. imagine that when the trident, which was known to less than 1%, appears on banknotes at the beginnings of state institutions on the chevrons of the ukrainian army, then what is it in principle today, we imitate that trident. the people of neriv saw the trident as more than just an inheritance and then explained that it was the sign of volodymyr the holy. they saw that under this coat of arms the cathedral unity of ukraine was fighting for independence, and in two years this symbol came to mean ukraine , a cathedral, an independent state. imagine what we had enough of . this is just a small, small spark that just ignited in ukrainians