journalism in crimea, which is honestly a bit of an oxymoron for me, because , unfortunately, mykola semena or iryna danylovych are exceptions. these are either community journalists or journalists who cooperate there with adequate global ukrainian media, and everything else is we have to admit that crimea 24 and many other local media are essentially daughters of russian tv channels, and this is not journalism - this is essentially a propaganda activity, a propaganda machine, that's why , here we must really be very careful when considering each individual participant in this process because so that we do not simply rely on the condemnation of people who, with their faces and their mouths, denied the existence of the ukrainian state, i'm sorry, and supported the russian aggression, but these are also the cogs in this system. this is also very important history and it will be necessary to actively investigate. to be honest, i can't even imagine how many people we will need to involve in order to qualitatively check uh and hmm to carry out such filtering measures in a healthy good sense when