myrna, you're first? >> i think for the prosecution, i think it's gone in well for the prosecution. many people beg to differ and say that the prosecution's case is based primarily circumstantial and there is no reasonable doubt. but i think based on what they have, the information that they have, they put on the best case they possibly could. >> alex, do you agree with that? >> i am one of the people who would beg to differ. i think the prosecution's case is very weak, not because of circumstantial, i have no problem with circumstantial cases, but because every witness they called became a defense witness. they gave more for the defense on some cases than the prosecution got. i don't believe they've proven second-degree murder. i don't know they can prove manslaughter, because of the self-defense evidence that's in the record already, without the defense finishing, is very strong. >> by your analysis, should the defense have even put on a case? >> oh, yes, because if he gets convicted of manslaughter, it's 30 years maximum in state prison. i think they are right to put on a case. i