for dostoevsky, it is connected precisely with myshkin; this is not a dialogue.nation even in them is there in general for the author. well, the last question then. and we have identified so many forks, yes, and the question is this, and it is clear that every time every generation, yes, it reads such great books in its own way. and he learns something about himself, including about his time. that's how you think that today, with the help of donka laughter, we learn about our time and about ourselves. well, are we mired in consumerism? i now as already accusatory paphos yes. yes, it is necessary to get-anguish, yes, to slap in the final really to carry out. yes, but actually in fact, it is true that a person, uh, for the sake of an idea , let there be the most crazy uh, for the sake of ideals, let's say, uh, he is ready for anything, for any sacrifice and leave all his property, all his opinion. eh, that's another matter. here again, i repeat, what follows after this, how wise it is, how correct it is, but here is his inner readiness for a feat. such is the e, wh

yes, this is don quixoteism, for dostoevsky it is conjugated with myshkin, this is not a dialogue.in general for the author. well, the last question then. and we have marked so many forks, yes, and the question is this, and it is clear that every time every generation, let them read such great books in their own way. and he learns something about himself, including about his time. so, what do you think today, with the help of don quixote, we learn about our time and about ourselves? well, are we mired in consumerism? i now as already accusatory paphos yes. yes, it is necessary to slap the pastoral. we really need to make it to the final. yes, but he really is, that a man, uh, for the sake of an idea, let there be the most crazy uh, for the sake of ideals, let's say, uh, he is ready for anything for any sacrifice and leave all their possessions. all all your property. eh, that's another matter. here again, i repeat, what follows after this, how wise it is, how correct it is, but here is his inner readiness for a feat. such is the e, which we now clearly lack for everyone, i first of

way, by the way, yes, you definitely see how we turned around, but still, our dear lev nikolayevich myshkin and here is he in what kind of dialogue with don quixote is the prince lived with us , poor wind hmm complicated dialogue, but rather it is for dostoevsky the same for three daughters. uh, such a kind of landmarks with which they constantly compare the prince, and well, dostoevsky of course, prince christ named the manuscript and uh. similarly, he saw, uh, income. and of course, his famous words that if everyone always proved to me that the truth is not with christ, then i would have dragged the truth to remain. yes, this is a long hotizom. for dostoevsky, he is conjugated by heirs. this is not a dialogue. it's like, he's more of an emanation even in them for the author. well, the last question then. and we have marked so many forks. yes? the question is this, and it is clear that every time every generation reads such great books in its own way. and he learns something about himself, including about his time. here, what do you think today, with the help of don quixote, we learn about

god will then echo in russian culture there was a knight in the world poor dostoevsky and there is myshkins associated with a high christian sense , eternally feminine, mother of god, of course, in its stances, but also deified with. still, i would not strongly overcome this biat here from the troubles of speech. so, uh, it's just serious there. and here it is a little bit in the playing field of don quixote partly 300 of that, dante who visited dante's purgatory paradise, these images are attributed. that is, the tenth and don quixote, of course, we will attribute yes, with a dant, because it’s just that cultural language that the sideboard has undoubtedly mastered. of course , today we gathered our thoughts about the great cervantes novel don quixote , archimandrite semyon tomachinsky vadim vladimirovich polonsky, vladimir igor, and we continue. but about a-and don quixote and sancho yes, two points. we still can't do it anymore. but but really e, today we have already heard. what is rustic? maybe even stupid there greedy or just greedy, sancho by the end of the second volume is turning.