i mean, you had sort of the n g o u. s. a times you also had communists. you also had the bad party. you had a lot of different people, the traditional major political parties, the national m, a party and others. i mean, it really was treatment, all sued in the sort of movement, which is why i think it was successful. and more so than the other challenges that president bush year had phased which were, you know, more sec torrell and less sort of all encompassing year. and i think that is actually part of the challenge of what is basing now is many people are agreed on what they knew. they did not work, but then in the wake of that you've got these challenges. but if you're a part of the move in on the streets, i think it's very difficult to be considered legitimate ends to data. if you are continuing to move against with a lot of people, especially young people have seem to be potentially problematic. i mean, the selling of the country to the washington consensus type of policies, the fact that there's not a significant oversight in regulation around minin

i mean, you have sort of the n g o u. s a and types. you also had communists. you also had the bad party. you had a lot of different people, the traditional major political parties, the national m a party and others. i mean, it really was sort of in the ball suit and the sort of movement which is why i think it was successful. and more so than other challenges that president bush year had faced, which were you know, more sec torrell and less sort of all encompassing year. and i think that is actually part of the challenge of what is basing now is many people are agreed on what they knew they did not want. but then in the wake of that you've got these challenges. but if you're a part of the move in on the streets, i think it's very difficult to be considered legitimate in sudan if you are continuing to move against with a lot of people, especially young people have seemed to be potentially problematic. i mean, the selling of the country to the washington consensus type of policies, the fact that there's not a significant oversight in regulation around mining aro

u. s. and the e u a r t. and this makes it, they have 40 c in a distributed, and hum, gillian sherman rights wash the n g o for the national lead, good defense surveys that have officer and documented the regulation. so can gary asked right? leaving sup costs for sup carports in are now, in many is cases that the increase the page long report, it came to the conclusion of ukraine severely violating the rights of in the janice tongue gear. he is living in step car frontier, both in a guy, dave, f, nick, my notice 2 nights and the person on camino right now. finally, i just want to get your thoughts on one last thing door. if i may, installed some back set and the statements, that's all members of the nato alliance must accept that ukraine's future is within the military block. now, where does that leave member states who have the own different opinions to that? i need to raise the military and political alliance with the concepts that's making decision making. so if there is a really strong pressure strong to lead there. so the alliance, the member states has their own it in opinion and they have, has to give,