n. charles in seat four. >> i did appreciate the way we are fitting it in, but i think amanda would be greatuld be great, too, for those seats three and four. we have a letter for you. it is amanda we do not have. i am real uncomfortable of appointing someone who has not shown on up, and may be the better way to go would be to give amanda a chance to continue this so the rev. ken show of and give me a chance to vent the rev. verses amanda. i do not want to blindly go with someone who has not been here. 3 and 4 i would like to hold on to greater >> what about item six sonoma -- 3 and 4 would like to hold onto. >> what about item six hamas -- item 6? >> i am fine with will daily for a seat five. >> great. do we have a motion? >> mr. cases only qualified for two, three, and fou region -- mr. pitts is only qualified for two, three, and four. >> i do work with another organization. i am not sure i can get a letter from them, but it is possible i can ask a. >> i would like to continue. it seems there is a lot of incompleteness. if we could make decisions, that would be my preference. >> there is n