n. g. though we have to put it into liquid and again into gas, you know, it's costly. so we are not only going to going to pay for the atrocities, but we are going to pay for more expensive, i guess at all it's all combined in the competitiveness then we are in the future. it was very, very difficult for us to be competitive to china and the other markets where the guys was cheap and was going to wait for housing. the future, we are very easy. replaceable, you know, it's like a veteran. we are a small market to the markets and the resar can. so of course the, for those guys from the overseas, the don't the ranking somehow and they, they, they try very hard to break to the relations between china, india and the rush of course. well, quick. so i know you've probably seen colonel douglas mcgregor on youtube. these days basically telling the truth about the conflict in ukraine. he's the latest comments posted on line blog 24 hours. he says russia has won this war. and now there's not a question of kind of russia move for the west. it's a matter of will day and how far will

though europe claims to be a leader in environmental protection. the great deputy defense minister has said that if the us replace this russian gas with its own l. n g that could threaten europe, we can just take a quick listen. you're being analysts estimate to the new us and ministration will probably use the energy supplies as a liver of pressure towards europe. it is estimated that it will try to expand ellen's. you facilities in the united states and the rates experts to be you creating an even greater danger of dependence. since your is distance interest self from a russian guest by schedule. this will threaten the energy security of the you creating a new dependence on a single supply. some of us will call out hyperbola because the us and the your close allies. so are those concerns justified as well? i think we need to look at the, the background reality here. the background reality is that europe has placed its reliance upon an energy power. the united states that is seen declining production from shale formations of natural gas and is going to prioritize its own domestic interest over europe. whereas the russians had proven over many years

though europe claims to be a leader in environmental protection. the great deputy defense minister has said that if the us replace this russian gas with its own l. n g that could threaten europe, we can just take a quick listen. you're being analysts estimate to the new us and ministration will probably use the energy supplies as a liver of pressure towards europe. it is estimated that it will try to expand ellen's. you facilities in the united states and the rates experts to be you creating an even greater danger of dependence since your existence interest self from a russian guest by schedule. this will threaten the energy security of the you creating a new dependence on the single supply. some of us will call out hyperbola, because the us and the your close allies. so are those concerns justified as well? i think we need to look at the, the background reality here. the background reality is that europe has placed its reliance upon an energy power. the united states that is seen declining production from shale formations of natural gas and is going to prioritize its own domestic interest over europe. whereas the russians had proven over many years