extensive jewellery on his equipment and clothes that was available to him because of the conquests of naderobably in the 17th century for portraiture and decorative painting. so it came there as an inheritance from the past. during the 19th century, there were a number of really interesting painters who emerged in iran — and one of them was isma'iljalayir. the painting that we have in the exhibition shows the harem of an important person. they are having tea on a balcony overlooking a park with very large trees. the portraits of the women — their faces have an incredible stillness. i think what's happened is that isma'iljalayir wouldn't have had access, and so he's been given photographs of them in order to create the painting. that sort of leads us through to the 20th century — and there, we show examples of the art of iran after the introduction of art school training in the western—style in the 19405, and how iran in the 19605 and '705 developed a form of modernism that was in tune with international movements, but also had artists who were creating specifically iranian works of art. and

people nader no inflation hedge and it's sitting there like a dead duck. what the heck is wrong with it? lack of knowledge. i mean, so few people think of it as an asset class. they want to be involved it. i mean, if wall street was bitcoin really took off, i was riding the more than a florida course and i've made the not so adept statement that wall street has caught on. the bitcoin watcher or wall street gets behind something. it's really going to go, went from 11000 what they had test year 60. i wasn't surprised at all when you get what the wall street ever got behind silver were ago. but it's basically something you have to ferret out on yourself on your own. there's all the sexy criptos out there. some merit some without. but it's a new place in the course. the social media has such a wide base, especially among millennials in gen g. and it's kind of fashionable people wise to work and heard even though they think they're independent, most aren't their followers, not leaders. and if everybody's by an x, y, z crypto, that's the place to be forget about

we have at least one candidate, ross perot and then ralph nader, and then later even some democrats like president obama and hillary clinton, and by 2016, both hillary clinton and donald trump were critics of nafta, calling for its we negotiation or elimination. when donald trump came into office and made clear he intended to actually renegotiate or scrap nafta, it was very unsettling for canadians. in the end, we came up with an agreement, the usmca, and i think it is a good agreement, and i am glad we continue to have market access for canadians, but it was very unsettling. one thing about canadians is they often have lower risk appetite, as they stay in the stock, than average americans do. . that is what i meant. . in the end. , it was a tumultuous period. it was donald trump who, on his way to his next big meeting in asia, called premise or trudeau weak and two-faced. this led to many canadians to feel that that was just plain rude. it was certainly something justin trudeau didn't take particularly well. so not an easy time. on the question of chinese troops, there had been an arran

i'm wondering when you reach nader's in your life or felt the soft 3 or your big locker because i i times in my life when i have gotten so confused, bath older stumbled into a bad place. i remember it's like forrest gump, i just think keep move and find a hill and go up, but keep room and that's it. that's the easiest way to lock your brain, right? and i, and that's it. just the movement. if it's the movement step, right is everything step. so when a dog that's a move, you see aggression fear, anxiety, and security, he doesn't listen why? because he's blocked. but once it's movement look at that does with the homeless people, 9 out of 10 homeless people have a pitiful off leash. why? because they're constantly moving. so why they're homeless practice and natural, simple, profound and the rest of the people don't. it's just, you know, it's movement. that's all it is. i'm intrigued to see how you are now with hard case dogs. i assume you run across some real hard cases like anybody who's in the behavior modification gree. their dogs who have been, as you say, trained into a worse state than

nader, we will talk about -- later, we will talk about things. as always, you can watch on c-span.org. or you can listen with them c-span radio app. >> this monday, labor day, on c-span. a congressional hearing on workers rights and 1:00. business and economic experts testify before the urban affairs committee on the opportunity it provides, and the role of the government. as we approach the 20th anniversary of the september 11 attacks, watch at 8:00, as officials offer their testifying about the consequent as of the terrorist attack. watch, monday, on c-span. or listen on the c-span radio app. >> this year marks the 20th anniversary of the september 11 attacks. join us for live coverage from new york, the pentagon, and shakes phil pennsylvania, saturday, september 11 on c-span. watch online at c-span.org. or listen on the c-span radio app. >> c-span is your unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more, including medco. medco support c-span as a public service, along with these other television providers. th

and i will leave fixing the car out of the picture, but for those who are familiar with it, ralph nader was not just a presidential candidate, but he wrote "unsafe at any speed." and in 1960s we got airbags and seat belts and everything that we are living in this automobile cocoon that we drive. but back in the 1930s following the publication of "and sudden death" the automobile industry did get involved in the rhetoric of driver safety, and they began to advertise their vehicles the safety components and they have better brakes, or a turtle top of safer roof so it won't crush when you rollover. so, you know, the autocompanies were terrible, and gm was the worst and lead glas and safety glass and we can talk about that, but not in the 1930s, research into the crash survival and some of the research made the way to studebaker and a guy by the name of paul hoffman and he turned it over to the automobile safety foundation, and this is different from the 1960s solution, and this is what we do to fix the foundation, and this is the right of the set of traffic rules set up in new york city, a

ralph nader used to call washington occupied territory.occupied by corporations, occupied and controlled by donors, so the american people aren't asked to bear much of anything about anything whether it is immigration, going to war come intervening somewhere militarily, none of those things are done so we know that is already a huge problem. i just want to make one point very clear, though. president trump is not someone who is prepared to launch a nuclear strike out against anyone. that is absurd nonsense absurd nonsense. >> tucker: the whole thing is b.s. trump is the first president since jimmy carter who didn't launch a war. right, yeah, the whole thing is a lie. a lot of things are lies, we are learning. thank you. out of nowhere, we told you last night a rap star called nicki minaj just became a huge problem for the democratic party. she represents a lot of democratic voters but she wasn't going along with the propaganda on covid and the vaccine. that story gets started, we will tell you how next. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tucker: well, if you've b

for those of you that are familiar with it, ralph nader wasn't just a presidential candidate.wrote "unsafe at any speed" and from the 1960s, we got seat belts, air bags, all of the things that we now live with in this kind of automotive cocoon that we drive. in the 1930s following publication of "and sudden death" it was called the auto industry did get involved at least in the rhetoric of driver safety and advertise their vehicles, the safety components, so they would say we have better brakes. turtle top, a safer roof so it won't crush when you roll over. so you know, and the auto companies were american auto companies were terrible. gm was the worst, lead gas, safety glass, seat belts, air bags, every turn, we can talk about that if you want but there really was in the 1930s research into crash survival, and some of that research made its way particularly the studebaker, a guy named paul hoffman, but he turned that over to something called the automotive safety foundation. that's different than the 1960s solution. what are we going to do to fix the driver? 1903 on the right

book and movie reviewer and author before he found his life as a paramedic in addition the ms courtr nader at the hospital and burlington connecticut let's welcome peter. hi peter. there you go. >> thank you for that wonderful introduction and thank you for attending. >> thank you for joining us. before we get started tell us about killing season if they are not familiar with your new book. >> killing season is a book that just came out and it is about my experiences as a paramedic the last 25 years following the opioid epidemic. and once i get through in my presentation i will tell you the things i've learned in the course of my work and i wanted to bring my experiences and the voices of my patients to other readers so they can be changed in the way i was changed in my view about the opioid epidemic. >> thank you so much i'm looking forward to seeing your presentation so go ahead and screen on —- share your screen i will be in the chat and then we will come back to audience questions. >> this is a picture in hartford where i work i have been there as a paramedic over 25 years i've become

. >> and nader who i didn't know but ÃÃin the 40s all women, all knitting during class and one male professord said, ladies, the sound of your knitting is driving me crazy, drop your needles. which i loved. so we kind of didn't ask this directly and i'm sorry for that. you got this idea, tell us again, i didn't give you the chance to, tell us how and then so well researched.it's amazing. how long did it take you to write? i just love all the very basic questions. i got the desire to write a book far proceeded the topic. i was applying for journalism fellowships and there's a few that give you an academic year to work on a project. i came up with one project that it was good enough but i pretty rapidly dropped it. in the finals for one of the fellowships one of the board members for night wallace said what you like to do for fun? i was like i do new orleans things i read i cook i cook a lot. she said the university of michigan library has this amazing culinary collection. i just felt myself light up. then when i was thinking about reapplying for the next year i thought, i just remembered that

people i was talking to people that participated attached to their neighbors which became weber versus nader enter neighbor, on another level i wondered how different what i have acted and how different would any of us act in those situations and that gave me a pause in the stories i've heard people 18 to 19 years old and to do things that they were told and had to leave for the nation to survive. i got interested in the stories that go along in the price not only society pays for the conformity, the people to get swept up in these situations and this wanted to be a book about america and who is allotted the most morally and it's not powerful as people with choices and opportunities and let me give a little example the book opens with the story of harriet and she is a mental health aid who gets a job the correctional institution. harriet has no prior experience and corrections this is after 2008, the great recession the markets crash and it was very hard in florida. and she doesn't really know what she's getting into but she quickly comes to discover and hear stories from the patients in the

she started her life in politics as a member of the green party, supporting ralph nader.upposedly a very conservative democrat. it's a little bit hard to credit the substance of that shift as being purely about principle. to john's point about arizona being a purple-ish state, you have a control case here in senator mark kelly of arizona, who is doing very well in arizona by strongly backing president biden's agenda. sinema is doing worse than kelly by just about every measure by taking this position. so it seems like she's sort of putting the erraticness of her position first, and this desire to be front and center ahead of policy, principle, and responsibility, and in many respects, ahead of good politics. because kelly is doing better than she is. >> adam and john, thank you both for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >>> coming up, the breaking news of the january 6th committee is that they're issuing new subpoenas. congressman jamie raskin of that committee will join us, next. llt it's understated, yet over-delivers. it is truly the mercedes-benz of sports sedans. lea

her political past in arizona as a ralph nader supporter and a post-9/11 anti-war protest organizer drewater when she ran for senate. >> kyrsten sinema was protesting us in a pink tutu. >> reporter: an arizona state legislator, she fought for lgbtq rights and against arizona's immigration law. >> they passed an unconstitutional immigration bill that does nothing to solve our state's problems. >> reporter: her politics began to shift as she sought higher office. after winning her first congressional campaign in 2012, she joined the blue dog coalition, a group of centrist house democrats. >> the american public doesn't care much about republican or democrat. they just want solutions. >> reporter: and with her ascent to the senate she attempted to take over the late senator john mccain's mantel of maverick. t. was senator mccain's example lighting the way and with the trust of the people of arizona shaping my service. i recommit to ignoring political games. >> reporter: her maiden speech on the senate floor foreshadowing how far she has come from her leftist roots. opposing abolishing the f

are opposed to restoring taxes on the wealthiest people in this country, although she's to be ralph nader'spaign had in arizona. what do you make of this as she goes back and forth from fundraisers to the oval office but they don't lay out alternative plan versus as aoc puts it, 96% of the democrats? close first of all, you' right, we have to stop using this language. this is not about that. this is about a moral isis in our nation, a crisis of our democracy. if you think right now, we have two senators blocking voter suppression, dealing with voter suppression and protecting the process to vote at 56 million americans used in the last election. those same two senators are working on behalf of corporate greed and the corporations to block the economic investment in the lives of poor and low wealth people in this country -- by the way, is not even what we need. we need $10 trillion over 10 years. then you have these two senators, one from arizona, sinema, over 3 million people in her state are poor 1.2 million make less than $15 an hour. and it was virginia, 42% of the state is poor and low

specifically, now they must report breaches, designate cybersecurity gordon nader's, and self assess their compliance with tsa security guidance. this is an important first step but there is clearly more than needs to be done. we must resource and empower tsa to add boldly and swiftly to ensure operators of pipelines and all other forms of transportation hard in their systems. meanwhile, it is similarly important that other agencies in the federal government respect tsa and the experience and expertise on these matters. the cybersecurity of our critical infrastructure is too serious for us to reinvent the wheel by assigning duplicate authorities to be department of energy. they have the is sick -- existing statutory authority and technical challenge to tackle the challenge. finally, before i conclude, i must note my disappointment that the fbi declined an invitation to attend this meeting. it is critical that members fully understand the fbi's role and efforts to cadre cyber threats. i look forward to their participation in future events on these topics. that said, i am looking forwa

we have at least one candidate, ross perot and then ralph nader, and then later even some democrats likedent obama and hillary clinton, and by 2016, both hillary clinton and donald trump were critics of nafta, calling for its we negotiation or elimination. when donald trump came into office and made clear he intended to actually renegotiate or scrap nafta, it was very unsettling for canadians. in the end, we came up with an agreement, the usmca, and i think it is a good agreement, and i am glad we continue to have market access for canadians, but it was very unsettling. one thing about canadians is they often have lower risk appetite, as they stay in the stock, than average americans do. . that is what i meant. . in the end. , it was a tumultuous period. it was donald trump who, on his way to his next big meeting in asia, called premise or trudeau weak and two-faced. this led to many canadians to feel that that was just plain rude. it was certainly something justin trudeau didn't take particularly well. so not an easy time. on the question of chinese troops, there had been an arrangement