nadine: very much so. it would be difficult to argue that anyone can feel intimidated or threatened by the expression because of they did not know it was going on. it was also a rally among supporters. it was a membership meeting of people who shared the same view exercising their freedom of the --freedom of association. under the statute it did not make a difference because the statute criminalized mere expression, advocating certain ideas. when this case was appealed to the ohio supreme court, a new lawyer came in. he was jewish as many of brandenberg's comments were anti-semitic. >> i looked him up. he was a the aclu for many years. he was a civil rights, civil liberties lawyer. he served in world war ii and seems like a smart and honorable man. you agree to take this case, even though clarence brandenburg himself was not thrilled to be represented by a jewish attorney but he felt committed to the cause of free speech. susan: i had the opportunity to meet him in cincinnati in the mid-90's. there were so

nadine: pretty much. the language in the ohio statute was typical in that it criminalized advocacy of violence that was geared toward bringing about social change or economic change. they also used the word terrorism. host: interesting that our case, we are looking at deals with the ku klux klan, but it is the fear of communism that got it started. what was the country worried about as all these states were passing laws? katie: the brandenburg case in general is interesting because it reflects a lot of cultural fears happening around the 20th century. these laws were passed in many states as a result of a fear of communism and the international workers of the world and a fear of immigrants, bringing in ideas from the outside to try to attack capitalist democracy. host: there were three cases that the supreme court dealt with before brandenberg. one of them we talked about in our first programs, schenck v. u.s., it involves the phrase clear and present danger. hy are these cases all part of the lesson we n

nadine maybe you can answer this question.'ve read a lot about what's been called the he canler's veto. where you say people can engage in free speech if it's likely to stipulate violence. what about the people trying to sometime l speech, threatening violence? where does the original demonstrator, where does his rights end and the other begin? >> the chief has recognized -- we do not allow hecklers who disagree with the speech's message and offended and angry by it we do not allow them to in effect veto the free speech rights of the speaker and the speaker's audience members because that violates their first amendment right. i think it's important to know the supreme court crafted that doctrine in the context of the civil rights movement and civil rights demonstrations where many southern towns tried to stop martin luther king and other civil rights advocator from arguing there are a lot of people in the community who hate that message and threadened by it. they were throwing bottles and rocks and the supreme court said, no,

for the last five years, nadine has seen her son only one day a week. >> for them it's the law.ight to decide how many hours you have to see your son. i had this shock, psychological shock. >> just to be clear, a mom does not get custody of her child? >> no. if it's a boy, he can stay with his mom until he reach the age of 2. and if it was a girl, she would stay with her mother till she reaches the age of 7. >> but he was determined to have the child? >> yes. >> so how does that work with your boy, then? you see him once a week for 24 hours. i assume 12 of those hours he's asleep. >> yes. so it's basically 12 hours. i spend most of the week missing him. my thoughts on the time, what is he doing? is he safe? is he good? is he sick? because i'm not allowed even to call him by phone or i'm not allowed to ask him, to ask about him in the school or visit him in the schoo >> really? no. whenever i walk in the street and i see children with their parents coming back from school, i start crying. i see him every friday afternoon till saturday afternoon. so i wake up from the morning. tod

my name is nadine wild, the executive director of the thorn foundation. we have a partner of the environment. we are concerned this bio diversity resolution will threaten public safety unless amended. we would be grateful if the committee could please consider four small amendments. one, please add a one to one tree replacement rate. right now any trees failed under this policy will fall through the cracks causing deforestation and climate change. climate change is the number one threat to bio diversity. two, please add back the urban forest plan. it was in the original resolution twice, other plans like green connections are still in but the urban forest plan was deleted. please add it back as trees are our best defense against climate change. three, please ensure that this will not lead to any tier one pesticide use. applications increased 411% last year. it was because of bio diversity policies just like this one. other cities like seattle and portland have pesticide free parks where san francisco is falling further behind. these pesticides are poisoni

strossen, are nadine the former head of the american civil liberties union, and professor at new yorkaw school in manhattan. and katie italo, a senior at institute.iversity's watch "landmark cases" monday and join the conversation. and follow us on c-span. websiteresources on our for background on each cases. the companion book on a link to the national constitution center 's interactive constitution, and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmarkcases. aremong the issues that near and dear to me is this idea of having conversations across party lines and political ideologies. feel that common sense requires common experience. of having adea sharing point of information we can all rely on as opposed to be -- suspiciouss of of. that is something we are working on as educators and citizens. >> affordable housing, making sure we have a diversion -- diversity inclusive city. we want to address homelessness, which many cities are struggling 21stnationwide, and century policing and making sure that our police bureau respect the cities that we live in. >> one of the most important iss

four years ago nadine nora took part in these protests in the occupied west bank town of beit hanoun yesterday he was one of the group of young men and teenagers throwing stones towards israeli security forces israel says they were instructed to use rubber coated bullets but when the seventeen year old was shot he collapsed and was rushed to hospital where he was pronounced dead later an autopsy on his examined body would show he'd been shot through the chest with a regular bullet medical volunteer mohammad saleem was there that day he arrived in time to see a second teenage boy shot through the chest right next to him throw a stone and he was like walking so his face was toward this their accent and when he reached almost here he was shot in the back and then he turned around and fall he gave first aid to the victim muhammad but he too died no proceedings were brought in the case of one would i would die here but the killing of nadine was different at one stage israeli border police officer who pulled the trigger was indicted for manslaughter. ben derry was initially accused of deli

our guest to discuss this case are nadine, the former head of the american civil liberties union, and law professor at new york law school in manhattan, and katie fowler, a senior attorney at columbia university's wrist amendment institute. watch landmark cases, monday and joined the conversation. our #is landmark cases. follow us at c-span. on our websitees for background on each case. the landmark cases companion book, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmark cases. c-span, where history unfold daily. as a79 c-span was created public service by america's televisione companies. today, we continue to bring you unfiltered coverage of congress, the white house, the supreme and public policy events in washington, d.c. and around the country. announcer: we continue our turmoil968 america in with a look at conservative politics 50 years ago, perceived liberal excesses and disenchantment with government gave rise to the political right, richard nixon, and republican presidential victory. ronald reagan made hi

four years ago nadine nora took part in these protests in the occupied west bank town of beit hanoun yesterday he was one of the group of young men and teenagers throwing stones towards israeli security forces israel says they were instructed to use rubber coated bullets but when the seventeen year old was shot he collapsed and was rushed to hospital where he was pronounced dead later an autopsy on his examined body would show he'd been shot through the chest with a regular bullet medical volunteer mohammad saleem was there that day he arrived in time to see a second teenage boy shot through the chest right next to him throw a stone and he was like walking back so his face was sort of this their accent and when he reached almost here he was shot in the back and then he turned around and fall he gave first aid to the victim muhammad but he too died no proceedings were brought in the case of one would i would die here but the killing of nadine was different at one stage israeli border police officer who pulled the trigger was indicted for manslaughter. ben derry was initially accused o

her guest is nadine stross and a law professor at new york law school and katie, senior fellow. watch tonight and join the conversation. i # is landmark cases. follow us on c-span. there are resources on our website for background. in the landmark cases podcasts. at c-span.org. >> washington journalist live everyday with new some policy issues that impact too. on tuesday morning we'll talk about u.s. military action against syria. glenn will talk about the farm bill and propose changes to the snap program. chris edwards will discuss tax policy. watch live at 7:00 a.m. eastern. join the discussion. >> british prime minister mr. theresa may talked about the airstrikes in syria. you'll find her full remarks on c-span.org. here's a portion. >> were cooperating with our partners to alleviate further humanitarian suffering. this was a limited targeted strike which is being used before. a decision which uses the evaluation of intelligence much of which information cannot be shared. the government has the right tech quickly and the government's interests. it is parliament's responsibili

role in the overnight strikes that hit syria mainly in damascus and homs overnight let's bring in nadine barber nadeem the prime minister made it very clear that the strikes were not about getting involved in a civil war were not involved about regime change it was about halting any capability by the syrian regime to develop enhance or use again chemical weapons. that's right what she's been saying in the last twenty minutes or so really just expanded on what we had in that video the recorded video statement put out in the early hours of saturday highlighting that this was a very targeted operation specifically to to as she puts it degrade the capability of the syrian regime to use chemical weapons in attacks then she did actually give us some more detail of what she has been sharing with her cabinet colleagues they met on thursday when they gave the green light for for joining us and french military action she did say. that there were open source those open source information that shows barrel bombs were actually used in that part of eastern ghouta or a week ago and that that there were

i heard nadine strossen who was a former president at aclu who speak your time recently.mentioned what, there is an organization the heterodox academy and essentially it was, my understanding is what jonathan, professor liberal and nadine, also professor has said is that from the '60s in academic world, two out of three professors would be classified as to the left. today at somewhere around 20 to one. their concern is the ability of students to engage in critical discussion and free speech and what the effect has been on the academic community and wanted to get the thoughts of the panel on that. >> i actually don't think the students are facing many barriers to critical discussion of freedom of speech. i think by large universities face problems on the edges by large, in classrooms and and student groups, students are engaging in really fundamentally they conversations in universities. i think that's a bit of a red herring, but i do agree that universities have changed substantially. just like we were talking but with the media, in the 1940s and 1950s universities were s

in the coming hours waking up there on it then as we can thanks very much nadine for the moment charles until further is the former advisor to the director of central intelligence for iraq w m d he says president trump is trying to use syria to send a message to north korea and iran. but it's worth recalling back in twenty sir team when president obama you know drew this famous red line about the use of chemical munitions and bottles like you are asked after which the russians really put the screws to bashar al assad they said listen you know your regime depends on you you know satisfying the shoes is a shoe in a different way and the russians really pushed to have arms control disarmament and inspectors you know take a take a handle at the at the syrian passy which was very extensive and you know largely the work of this organization o.p.c. w. was quite successful things could be much worse right now if they had not gone after the large stocks of the syrians had what seems to have happened always as washer al assad has become more confident in his own survival is also become you know l

nadine strossen and katie fallow, a senior attorney at columbia university's knight first amendment institute. watch "landmark cases" monday. and join the conversation. our hashtag is landmarkcases and follow us on c-span. and we have resources on our website. the landmark cases companion book, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution, and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmark cases. agriculture secretary sonny perdue testified on the 2019 budget request for his department. concern about trade disruptions, commodity prices, and recent natural disasters. this is about an hour and 25 minutes. >> we'll call this meeting of the ag appropriations meeting to order. we want to thank you very much for being here. we truly appreciate it. we're here today to discuss the department of ag's fiscal year 2019 budget. we also in addition to welcoming secretary perdue want to with el come dr. johansen. thank you for being here. and also mrs. jones, thank you as well. >> before we begin, i want to extend a welcome to our newest membe member, senator hyde smith who was

too died no proceedings were brought in the case of one would i would die here but the killing of nadine the warrant was different at one stage israeli border police officer who pulled the trigger was indicted for manslaughter. ben derry was initially accused of deliberately placing live rounds in the magazine of his assault rifle which should have been firing only rubber coated i mean in a plea deal that accusation was dropped and he was convicted instead of negligence his sentence nine months in prison now dims father has fought a long legal battle on behalf of his son from the moment he says he found alive bullet in the backpack nineteen was wearing when he died and a kid in nor i have proven that israel has no justice or fairness when it comes to palestinians i prove this with evidence because the cares of the d.m. is one of the strongest piercers in the israeli palestinian conflict by evidence of proven today most intentionally killed palestinian activists say a double standard is at play highlighted by the case of i had to mimi the palestinian teenager convicted of assault and inci

our guests to discuss the case are nadine extrassen -- strassen. and katy fallow, a senior attorney at columbia university's ninth first amendment institute. join the conversation, our hash #landmark cases and we have background on each case. the landmark cases companion book. a link to the national constitution centers interactive constitution and the landmark cases podcat at c-span2.org/landmark cases. >> connect with c-span to personalize the information you get from us. just go to c-span.org/connect, and sign up for the e-mail. the program guide is a daily e-mail with the most updated primetime schedule, and upcoming live coverage. word for word gives you the most interesting daily video highlights, in their own word with in commentary. the booktv newsletter sent weekly is an insiders look at upcoming authors and book festivals and the american history tv weekly newsletter give you the up coming programming exploring the nation's past. visit

living on our streets, and some, you know, i have to say, in my neighborhood, you know, i worry about nadine wong, chronically homeless and find her a place and she refuses to go. and as an older chinese woman myself i can relate to her as an older woman being cold and hungry and just living marginally, and i have great empathy for her and if we were to have her under a, you know, conservatorship, i would not want her to be incarcerated. i would want her actually to be in a place where she's getting some service. and i think that i don't know also the budgetary implications of this. i have heard again through all the testimony exactly what supervisor ronen said, we don't have enough resources, we don't have enough beds, we don't have enough shelters, don't have enough supportive housing and this is what the individuals need. i think that i understand about the problem, i get it, i think that something has to be done. i'm just saying i don't know enough. and so i also welcome more of a conversation about this, but especially because senate bill 1045 does not have any resources attached to it.

our guest to discuss this case are nadine strossen and katie fallow. watch landmark cases monday and join the conversation. our #is landmarkcases and follow us at c-span. we have resources on our website for background on each case. there's a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution, and the landmark cases pod cost at cspan.org/landmarkcases. >>> next weekend n the festival of books. starting saturday add 1:00 p.m. eastern with a journalist and the book "stranger the challenge of a latino immigrant in the trump era. ♪ the author of "loaded". a book, the view of fly overcountry. dispatches from the forgotten america. on sunday our live coverage continues at 1:30 p.m. eastern with a journalist with "russian roulette". black lives matter co-founder with her book "when they call you a

too died no proceedings were brought in the case of one would i would die here but the killing of nadine nora was different at one stage israeli border police officer who pulled the trigger was indicted for manslaughter. ben derry was initially accused of deliberately placing live rounds in the magazine of his assault rifle which should have been firing only rubber coated i mean in a plea deal that accusation was dropped and he was convicted instead of negligence his sentence mine months in prison now deems father has fought a long legal battle on behalf of his son from the moment he says he found alive bullet in the backpack nineteen was wearing when he died and a kid in nor i have proven that israel has no justice or fairness when it comes to palestinians i prove this with evidence because the cares of the d.m. is one of the strongest piercers in the israeli palestinian conflict. proven today mustn't actually killed palestinian activists say a double standard is at play highlighted by the case of i had to mimi the palestinian teenager convicted of assault and incitement to slapping an

our guest to discuss this case nadine straussen, former head of the american civil liberties union, and law professor at new york law school in manhattan. nd katie fallo, a senior attorney at columbia university's knight first amendment institute. watch landmark cases tonight. join the conversation. our #is landmark cases. follow us at c-span. we have resources on our website for background on each case. the landmark cases companion book, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution, and he landmark cases podcast at -span.org/landmarkcases. >> as a follow-up to the recent hearings with facebook c.e.o. mark zuckerberg, the communicators looks at the privacy issues raised by the spread of personal data by the president and c.e.o. at the certainty for democracy and technology and lee goodman, attorney and former chair of the federal election commission. >> all of those politicians who asked mark zuckerberg questions for 10 hours, every one of them has been using data mined from american citizens to communicate with with their constituents, to build mailing lists, t

before keith answers i have to say on may 7 seventh cato is gg to have another book forum with nadine strossen and she is a book on this very topic, so please keep your eyes on the kid a website and sign up and come back on may 7 and we will talk about this further, but for now, professor whittington. >> there's a section in my book on hate speech. it's true there's a lot of people thinking about it because it's a serious problem that calls for some serious thinking, in part because the conflicts here are real. there are some retentions and the values that we want to recognize. briefly, we should be very cautious about the label of hate speech. huge number of things can fly under that label and it's often unclear what exactly people are talking about when you want to use the label and sometimes it sweeps very broadly and sometimes it sweeps much more narrowly. i think we should be particularly cautious about a sweeping broadly. when some people talk about hate speech, what they really are wanting to suppress or a set of ideas they find particularly disagreeable, and that they think mi

world's biggest executioner and for middle east countries regime capital punishment last year as nadine barber reports. amnesty international says the global picture is continuing to improve last year they counted at least nine hundred ninety three executions that's four percent fewer than in twenty sixteen and thirty nine percent fewer than in twenty fifteen and there's been a marked drop in death sentences passed at least two thousand five hundred ninety one were recorded in twenty seventeen a yearly fall of seventeen percent but there's a major caveat to these figures don't include china amnesty says it's by far the world's biggest executioner carrying out thousands of death sentences last year but statistics are considered a state secret now eighty four percent of all recorded executions took place in just four countries iran saudi arabia iraq and pakistan iran executed at least five hundred seven people last year more than half the recorded global figure amnesty says courts very often rely on confessions made under torture when passing death sentences and several countries in the m

weapons use in syria parliament voted no and that a bomb or retaliation never happened and of course nadine what we're finding obviously as time is progressing that we're now. analyzing exactly how the british prime minister is thinking and you've touched on a lot of points there how much has the scriptural case that the poisoning in souls three really you might say solidified backing within the cabinet for this action for theresa may to be given the green light certainly by the cabinet but not by parliament at the moment as you say she will come under a lot of criticism once the sun rises and the politicians from across the british spectrum can actually you might say weigh in on the argument of what's just happened within the last six hours. well that's right certainly the cabinet backing that she got in a meeting on thursday wasn't guaranteed i think though perhaps more than the influence of the script of cases is what to reason may well have been saying in terms of the evidence coming out initial evidence coming out from syria of course those inspectors from the organization for the proh

our guest to discuss the case are nadine, the former head of the american civil liberties union and lawrofessor at new york law school in manhattan and katie fellow, a senior attorney at columbia university first amendment institute. watch landmark cases monday and join the conversation. our # is landmark cases. follow us at c-span. we have resources on our website for background on each case. the landmark cases companion book. a link to the national constitution center interactive constitution and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmark cases. next daniel mark, chairman of the u.s. commission on international religious freedom looks at the current state of religious liberty here at home and around the world. the centennial institute at colorado christian university hosted the event. >> unfortunately religious freedom is worsening across the globe for all religion. for years i helped represent open doors usa in washington d.c. and we worked with congress to strengthen america's work internationally

unanimously ruled the state law violated his first amendment record our guest to assist the gays are nadine- former head of the american civil liberties union union and law professor new york law school in manhattan. and katie -- a senior attorney at columbia university ninth first amendment to city. watch landmark cases monday and during the conversation. # landmark cases follow us at c-span. we have resources in our website for background on each case. landmark cases companion book. a link to the national constitution center is interactive constitution and the landmark cases podcast. at c-span.org/landmark cases. ...

one of the authors you will hear from is nadine strasser, head of the aclu for about 20 years. live coverage of the la times book there on the tv. >> good afternoon. welcome to the la times festival of books. this is the speaking out in the fighting back panels if you came to talk about empowerment and action you came to the right place. little housekeeping stuff. this is being aired live on the tv so we will be hearing time schedule to the second. we are doing a question toward supply in up to mid answer it's because were done because of the tv schedule. your cell phones are on, please check and make sure they are turned off or set on silent or vibrate. because this is a book tv there's no personal recording of allowed. the book signing "after words" will be signing area one which is somewhere up there with better description as you go. a lot of times folks want to talk to the panelists immediately "after words". please meet us at the book signing area because we have to clear this room out. the panel will be putting a formal and ask a few questions of folks and then open ques

nadine strossen and katie fallow, columbia university's knight first amendment institute, watch landmark cases monday and join the conversation. our hashtag is landmark cases, and follow us at c-span. we have resources for background on each case, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution, and the landmark cases podcast at

ku klux klan leader was -- our guest to discuss there case are nadine tros sent, the former head of -- and katie fallow, a senior attorney at university's knight institute. watch landmark cases next monday and join the conversation. our hash tag is land mark cases. we have resourcings on our site for the background of the cases. a link to the constitution center's interactive constitution. and landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmark cases. >>> c-span washington journal live and every day with news and case that is impact you. coming up tuesday manage, author kessler shares his book about the warehouse. and martin steel of nasa on the latest search for earth-like planets. be sure to watch c-span washington journal live 7:00 a.m. eastern tuesday morning. join the discussion. >>> tuesday, a hearing with state enkiernl agency leaders on the impact 1970 clean air act. speaking in front of the senate environment and public works committee, live here on c-span three. >>> this week, facebook ceo mark zuckerberg will testify by senate and house committees on facebook's handling of user i

before keith answers i have to say on may 7 cato is going to have another book forum with nadine and she is a book on this very topic, so please keep your eyes on the cato website and sign up and come back on may seventh and will talk about this further. but for now, for fso whittington. >> there's a section in the book on hate speech. a lot of people think about it because it's a serious problem causes for serious thinking. apart the conflicts here are real. there are some tensions in the valleys we want to recognize. we should be very cautious about the label hate speech, huge number of things can fly under that label and is often unclear what exactly people are talking about. sometimes it suites are broadly and sometimes it sweeps much more narrowly. i think we should be particularly cautious about its sweeping broadly. when some people talk about hate speech what they really are wanting to suppress are a set of ideas defined particularly disagreeable. and they think might be leading to particular social and political consequences. that has to be resisted. universities all about h

our guest to discuss this case are nadine strossen, law professor at new york law school in manhattan, and katie fallow from the first amendment institute. watch landmark cases monday and join the conversation. our #is landmarkcases. follow us at c-span. we have resources on our website for background on each case. the landmark cases companion book, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution, and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmarkcases. >>> next, a four rum on the iss of robo calls. this was co-hosted by the fcc and the federal trade kplig commission. it's close to three hours. >> good morning, everyone. and welcome to the fcc, ftc policy forum on fighting the scourge of illegal robo calls. i'm patrick weber, chief of the consumer and governmental affairs bureau. we're very pleased to join forces with the ftc to further the fight against illegal robo

nadine strossen and katie fallow, a senior attorney at columbia university's knight first amendment institute. watch "landmark cases" monday. and join the conversation. our hashtag is landmarkcases and follow us on c-span. and we have resources on our website. the landmark cases companion book, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution, and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmark cases. agriculture secretary sonny perdue testified on the 2019 budget request for his department. concern about trade

nadine strossen and katie fallow, a senior attorney at columbia university's knight first amendment institute. watch "landmark cases" monday. and join the conversation. our hashtag is landmarkcases and follow us on c-span. and we have resources on our website. the landmark cases companion book, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution, and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmark cases. agriculture secretary sonny perdue testified on the 2019 budget request for his department. concern about trade disruptions, commodity prices, and recent natural disasters. this is about an hour and 25 minutes. >> we'll call this meeting of the ag appropriations meeting to order. we want to thank you very much for being here. we truly appreciate it.

guests, nadine strauss and, and katie fellow. cases" monday, and join the conversations. #landmarkcases, and follow us on c-span. we have research for background on each case, and a link to the interactive constitution, and the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmarkcases. >> "washington journal" continues. host: california democrat barbara lee has long been a key voice in debate over when and how the united states government exercises war powers. france now saying it has proof chemical weapons were used in that attack in syria. would you support a new u.s. military strike there? guest: what is very important for us to realize in our own country is that congress has the authority and responsibility to authorize the use of force. that is based on our constitution. we need to have an international inspection regime go in, which i think there are now inspectors -- to determine the validity of -- we know, we believe who conducted these horrific attacks, but one country verifying versus the international community coming together, i think, is the distinction we need to m

nadine strasman, liberties of civil fallow, from ie columbia's knight institute.mark cases," tonight, join the conversation, our hashtag is us dmark cases" and follow at c-span. and we have resources on our background on each case. the "landmark cases" companion national to constitution center, nternational constitution and pwebsite.cases" facebook c.e.o. mark uckerberg privacy issues with o'connor and lee goodman. >> they asked mark zuckerberg hours, every 10 one of them has been using data from american citizens to communicate with constituents to mailing lists, to target oters and a lot is for good reasons. >> really the meta-issue for me used, data is collected, secured and processed by the companies with which we engage in a very ne world comprehensive and pervasive way. > watch the communicators tonight 8:00 eastern on c-span2. >> "washington journal" continues. ost: michael eisenstadt joins us, director of the military and ecurity studies program at washington institute for near east policy military and security studies program. last week before the latest

our guest to discuss this case are nadine strasser, former head of the american civil liberties union and law professor at new york law school in manhattan. and katie follow, senior attorney at may 1st amendment institute. much landmark cases tonight and join the conversation. our hashtag is #landmark cases. follow us@c-span. we have resources and our website. the landmark cases companion book, a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution in the landmark cases podcast at c-span.org/landmark cases. >> this week the u.s. supreme court takes up the case with internet sales tax. the goal experts offer a preview of the oral argument in south dakota v. wayfarer. live coverage from the heritage foundation begins at noon eastern here on c-span2. until then comes some of today's "washington journal." >> michael eisenstadt joins us now, director of the military studies program at the washington is to tear it for nearst east policy. mr. eisenstadt, before the latest coalition strikes, you wrote w that the problems in sya will not end with a single set of strikes. what di

to discuss this case are nadine strosman, head of liberty union and law katiessor in manhattan and fallowlumbia university amendment t institute. watch "landmark cases" monday and join the conversation. hashtag is "landmark cases" and follow us at c-span and we website urces on our for background on each case. companion book, link to interactive constitution "landmark cases" podcast cases.an.org/landmark continues. journal" host: this is open phones until 10:00. brandon buck counselor to the speaker of the house, which reads as such. this morning speaker ryan shared with his colleagues this will be his last year as member of the house. he will serve his full term, run through the tape and retire in nearly 20 years in the house, the speaker is proud of all that has been accomplished and ready to devote time to being a husband and father. he did not seek the position, he colleagues serving as speaker has been professional honor of his life and thanked trust they placed in him. he will discuss his decision membertely following the meeting. that will take place at 10:00 this morning. that is

our guests to discuss this are nadine strasman of the civil katie es union and fallow, senior attorneyight firstersity amendment institute. watch landmark cases monday. join the conversation. our hashtag is "landmark cases" and follow us at c-span. resources on our website for background on each case. the "landmark cases" companion book, a link to the national constitution center's theractive constitution and "landmark cases" podcast at c-span.org/landmarkcases. this week, facebook c.e.o. will testify on facebook's handling of user information and data privacy. 2:15 p.m. eastern on -span3, he'll answer questions during a joint senate judiciary and commerce committee hearing. a.m. on , 10:00 c-span3, appear before the house, energy and commerce committee, watch live coverage c-span3 and online at c-span.org and listen live with c-span radio app. >> "washington journal" continues. host: you can post on this open on our twitter feed at c-span wjf. there are comments facebook, go to facebook.com/c-span. you can call the line, democrats, for 202-748-8001 for republicans and for independents

one of the authors you will hear from is nadine strasser, head of the aclu for about 20 years.live coverage of the la times book there on the tv. >> good afternoon. welcome to the la times festival of books. this is the speaking out in the fighting back panels if you came to talk about empowerment and action you came to the right place. little housekeeping stuff. this is being aired live on the tv so we will be hearing time schedule to the second. we are doing a question toward supply in up to mid answer it's because were done because of the tv schedule. your cell phones are on, please check and make sure they are turned off or set on silent or vibrate. because this is a book tv there's no personal recording of allowed. the book signing "after words" will be signing area one which is somewhere up there with better description as you go. a lot of times folks want to talk to the panelists immediately "after words". please meet us at the book signing area because we have to clear this room out. the panel will be putting a formal and ask a few questions of folks and then open quest

law professor at new york law ool in manhattan, nadine strossen. and katie knight. watch "landmark cases" tonight. landmarkcases. and the landmark cases companion book. a link to the national constitution center's interactive constitution. and the landmark cases podcast markcases.org/land >> as a follow-up to the recent hearings with facebook c.e.o. mark zuckerberg, the communicators looks at the privacy issues raised by lula o'connor at the center for democracy and lee, attorney and former chair of the federal election commission. >> look at all of those politicians who asked mark zuckerberg questions for 10 hours. every one of them has been uses data mind from american citizens to communicate with their constituents to build mailing lists, to target voters and a lot of this is for good and sound reasons. >> really, the metaissue for me is how data is collected, used, secured and processed by the companies with which we engage in the online world in a very compress hencive and pervasive -- comprehensive and p

and hate speech under ohio law and the supreme court unanimously ruled state law, and nadine, the former head of american in