the top democrat on your committee, jerry nadler, over the weekend, let me may you what he said.e said this, and this is if democrats regain control of the house. watch this. >> we would have to investigate any credible allegations certainly of purgy and other things that haven't been properly looked into before. >> if kavanaugh is confirmed, do you still want to investigate him? >> well, i think we're going to have to proceed on two tracks, and our primary focus is house democrats will be fighting for the people, lowering health care costs, increasing pay, cleaning up corruption in washington, d.c. that's what we promised the american people we would do should we be successful in achieving the majority in the house of representatives. we have to keep our word to the american people. we also have a constitutional obligation as a separate and coequal branch of government to be a check on an out of control executive, which could include the possibility of appointing someone who is unfit to sit on the supreme court of the united states of america. and so that will have to be examine

>> jerry nadler will do what he does. i'm totally focussed with all the angry women and men who listen to women who support the credible accounts of sexual harassment and sexual assault that i'm focussed like a laser beam on the elections. all these angry people know that these people sitting in the senate that they elected are making these decisions. they're going to go to the polls and vote differently. >> can you rule out the idea of impeaching kavanaugh? >> it all starts with the house. i view so many of these things as basically -- i don't blame you for asking these questions, jon. i know you tried with kellyanne conway. it's hard to get a word in edge wise with her. all these angry women who saw what was going on and how the senate was not able to deal fairly with the entire issue of sexual assault clearly this idea that dr. ford was given all accommodation is really -- i have to say -- baloney. >> you won't rule out impeachment? we've on the had one justice -- >> jerry nadler is not ruling it out. >> is that a mist

one that would be proposed by your democratic colleague in the house, joe nadler. is that a wise idea or is it better to just move on? as has been suggested by many on this broadcast thus far? >> well, one of the smartest members of the democratic caucus. he is brilliant. and most of us are awed by his intelligence. and -- so i think he's not prone to make stupid statements, particularly on the air. however, i think that at this point, 31 days out, whatever we are, from the november elections, maybe we ought to talk about the issues that we intend to promote. more so than the individuals who will be investigated. i don't think that's in our best interests at the moment to do that. in fact, it may be something that will hurt us by talking about investigations and impeaching donald trump. all of those things i think are further dividing the nation. and then more importantly, i think that it might create an inspiration for the republicans that i don't want to give them. >> but i think at the root of what gerald nadler is suggesting, sir, i want to give the quote, we h

new york congressman nadler, talk about the left. he made it very clear no matter what the fbi finds, congressional dems will not be satisfied. they will not stop their smear campaign against judge kavanaugh. >> this has got to be thoroughly investigated. i hope the senate will do so. if he is on the supreme court, and the senate hasn't investigated, then the house will have to. lou: isn't he eloquent? the house will have to. with only 36 days to go, until the midterms, statements like nadler's make it clear what the radical left is and that the radical left will stop at nothing to undermine president trump's agenda and destroy a great american jurist and a great american. well, joining us tonight, top strategist for great america pack, former reagan white house political director, fox news political analyst, ed rollins, new york post columnist, fox business contributor michael goodwin. thank you for being here. i have to ask you, watching those people in the white house press corps, ignorantly behave as they have, what in the world

that he would make a judgment therein. >> i mentioned jerry nadler. he sidestepped answering this question, but i guess if you follow the bouncing ball, should democrats take back control of the house, the possibility of pursuing impeachment against brett kavanaugh. a. is that a viable possibility? and when you talked about tarnishing the reputation of, or at least these institutions that we have here in this country by all of this process, would that not then tarnish the supreme court? >> what i think we should do, as i said, the american people would need to know all of the facts. one of the things that should happen first is, all of -- this investigation, the fbi had, whatever they did or did not do, should be made public to the american public. it should not remain secret. that might be a great step forward so we know what the next step would be. we should open it up. let everybody know. why is it going to be a secret what, you know, what was the narrow scope that the president put in? >> can i ask you -- do you even know everything that was in th

why people like jerry nadler are stuck on idea of doing it? >> you would have to talk to congressman nadler why he is stuck on doing it. david: jerry nadler, if the democrats win house ever congress he would become head of judiciary committee. >> yes, where all impeachment proceedings would originate. i suggest he is probably saying this because polls are at thing them their left-wing base wants to hear it but impeachment would have to be based on, same as impeachment of president, treason, bribery, other high crime or misdemeanor. ordinarily impeachment is cop fined to behavior in office but there is authority that says behavior that gets you into office could be the subject of an impeachment. majority vote in the house. 2/3 in the senate. simply not going to happen. david: to give democrats their due, it is true that for the first time in my lifetime anyway we have, we could have more justices in the supreme court who rather than picked by a supermajority in the senate, have been picked by a simple majority, in some cases simplest majority,

he needs to read the constitution. >> jared nadler has this to say.he senate having failed to do it proper constitutionally mandated job of advise and consent have to do something about a check and balance to protect the rule of law and legitimacy of one of our most important institutions. >> read the constitution. is the job of the senate, they will have done their job today and another case of the left not accepting the results of an election. >> the job of the senate is to advise and consent as laid out in the constitution and that is what collins is saying in the function they serve. the judicial record of brett kavanaugh, found nothing but a sound record, i have reviewed the report, found nothing that corroborates sexual misconduct and i support this nomination. this specifically is an enormous problem for lisa murkowski. >> michelle mountain is saying this is just getting started. >> the senate democrats wrecking machine is not going to give up after brett kavanaugh is nominated and approved. they will go all the way through the midterms and 202

. >> one test will be whether they make good on jerry nadler, who had the house judiciary committee, that he pursue impeachment against justice kavanaugh, which could certainly backfire against democrats if they were to do that. >> i think he said an investigation. i don't think he promised impeachment. >> fair enough. >> and, you know, i did a piece for "the new yorker" about impeachment and jerry nadler and nancy pelosi and they are very aware of the republicans problem in 1998 with regard to impeachment. i think they'll be very aggressive about investigations in general. impeachments, i think -- before they have 67 votes in the senate it's going to be -- >> let's come back to that for a second. david, you said something interesting here. mitch mcconnell, in the word that jeffrey brought up, i didn't bring it up, is hypocrite, being a bit of a hypocrite here, but he doesn't care. it doesn't matter to him. what matters to him is on the bench. and i think you're absolutely correct, one of the reasons he doesn't care is that he knows that the voters who matter to him support him in th

. >> what about the reports that jerry nadler, he's promising to investigate judge could you have gnaw, he has directly sidestepped the issue of impeachment, but what are you hearing on that front? >> it's an intrigue -- maybe they were -- judge kavanaugh as a way of swaying republicans of moving forward, obviously that didn't seem to work, if it was intendeding to an be mement tha the fbi investigation not thorough enough. they also feel like there could be something here. maybe if they take the house. i don't know how likely that is, given the nature of the allegation, but that's an effort that many? the democrat ecparty are anxious to see right now. there are many people within the party that are anxious to give the base what it wants. >>> thank you so much for weighing in on all of this. in just a moment, a former yale classmate of brett kavanaugh will explain why she wanted to speak to the fbi, and why she wasn't able to. y she wasn't able to oh, milk. another breakfast, another dilemma. am i willing to pay the price for loving you? you'll make my morning, but ruin my day. complic

moore capital, chris coons, sheldon whitehouse and congressman darrell issa, doug collins and jerry nadler was going to be here, he couldn't make it. i don't know what happened to him. i'm shocked, i'm shocked. we're also joined by truly amazing artists and people i've known for a long time, people everywhere knows, including, kid rock, kid, thank you. do you like this legislation or do you hate it? >> like it. >> been fighting for a long time. i want to welcome christian rock group, mercy me. also joining me is, gee, so many of these people i've been with them are famed guitarist from the doobie brothers and steely dan, jeff baxter, thank you very much. >> and where-- right i knew you were here. mike love, i've heard him many times, many times. he's the beach boys, where is mike? >> right here. >> mike. do you like this, right? >> i love it. >> good. mike love. been a friend of mine. the beach boys are, look, what can you say about the beach boys? great music. we have some great country artists with us, including craig morgan, and my good friend, john rich of big and rich. he happened to

slogan if you want to call it that, that the top democrat in the house judiciary committee, jerry nadler is using to try to galvanize the base. he is promising to reinvestigate kavanaugh if democrats take control. let me get your thoughts on that. do you support an investigation of now justice kavanaugh? and what would be the focus for you? >> thank you, ayman, for your question. i'm a former prosecutor. i've never seen a law enforcement or background investigation where they don't actually interview their accuser or the person being accused. so this fbi investigation really was a whitewash. i'm on the house judiciary committee. if we flip the house, we will look at the witnesses and interview them. and we will subpoena the relevant documents and see where the evidence takes as you say no mincing words there. the senate democrat and judiciary member chris coons was asked about impeachment. to listen his zblons house democrats are talking about reinvestigating kavanaugh, possibly looking at impeachment. what do you make of those pledging coming from some house democrats? >> i think that's

>> jerrold nadler would be the chair of the house judiciary committee were the democrats to take the house and he has said he wants to continue an impeachment fight. >> he has indeed. remember, if impeachment were to happen the constitution specifies that it begins in the house. and it begins in the house judiciary committee which could draw up articles of impeachment. so what the democrats have done here with this threat is take what has been a senate issue and kavanaugh will be an issue in some of these states like north dakota with heidi heitkamp and indiana with john donley, both of whom voted against kavanaugh. it will be an issue in senate races but it appears that democrats want to make it an issue in house races as well, where i would assume that a number of republican candidates are going to be asking whether their rival supports impeaching the newly-installed supreme court justice. >> the last big impeachment battle involved bill clinton. that seemed to backfire against republicans even though in that case there was, as you recall, physical evidence. it just seems like demo

the question why are people like congressman jerry nadler suggesting if he gets control of the judiciaryommittee in the house will proceed with impeachment hearings which will be another circus. i can understand why the protesters are doing it, but profession a.m. democrats themselves seem not be able to pull away. david: dan, leads to a question, if you're in a hole you're supposed to stop digging. a lot of republicans, and democrats believe the they have dug themselves into a hole, that are transparent, the so-called protests. are they genuinely worried? >> the event pulled in a lot of trump voters from the old trump coalition. a lot of people voted for trump because of the supreme court. they have gone through a rocky year. not sure whether for trump or against him. all those people are coming together. meanwhile the democrats seem to be contracting into their progressive base. they aren't really broading their coalition. and you're right, keep digging the hole deeper but they don't seem to be able to stop doing it. david: it might be, it is anecdotal over weekend. i talked to some so

liz: democratic representative jerry nadler says if democrats do take the house, nadler would do that because he would be house judiciary committee chair. so they are talking impeachment here on kavanaugh and trump. there are 27 toss up house races democrats need and that's 23 to regain the house. the other thing that's going on, alan, is president trump is blasting senator murkowski for saying she will never recover from voting no on kavanaugh. he also went off script at the mississippi rally, alan, calling on christine blasey ford, he said he made fun of her to even the playing field. he was mocking her. critics are saying that was wrong for the president and it was unkind of him to mock her. when even republicans like susan collins say something did happen to dr. ford? >> uh-huh. i have no doubt something happened to dr. ford. and having watched her, it seemed to me that she was try her best to tell the truth. whether she remembered everything, whether it was a proper identification, it is a long time ago. people can disagree. but the president is wrong to mock her. the president i

raking house judiciary committee democrat jerry nadler, vowing that if his party takes back power in midterm election, the plan to launch a new investigation on the works. how minority leader nancy pelosi is saying she wants more information on the fbi probe of kavanaugh, including any communications between the white house and the fbi. president trump spoke to reporters. let's bring it back for this. >> president trump: i have been here and now they thinking about impeaching a jurist, a man who does nothing wrong. a man who was caught up in a hoax that was set up by the democrats using the democrat's lawyers. and now they want to impeach him. i've heard this for many people. i think it is an insult to the american public. >> harris: peter doocy is live on capitol hill. peter? >> harris, democratic leaders don't want their rank and file members to be discouraged by the kavanaugh confirmation, so nancy pelosi just wrote them all a letter. all of her colleagues a letter, where she explains this -- "to preserve the record of this dark chapter, i am filing a request of the republic can s

chairman of the constitution committee, my ranking member for six years was none other than jerry nadler who is now ranking member of the full judiciary committee and mister nadler is from new york, very liberal, i'm very conservative but we get along quite well but he indicated that if the democrats take over the house this year, one of their intentions is to investigate this matter all over, potentially impeach this man if possible. >> we are trying to keep the time roughly balanced. you want to respond? >> i would like to respond. i'm running for congress to make a real difference for people and to improve their lives, not to settle political scores or frankly become a career politician whose priority is to get reelected. you only need to look at my record when it comes to believing women and empowering them. i worked at the legal a domestic violence representing women who couldn't afford an attorney and as hamilton county clerk of courts we invested first of its kind technology in the state to make sure women who are seeking temporary restraining orders are safe. unfortunately we dis

they have never really gotten along nadler, schiff on intelligence. consider it full employment act for white house lawyers every member of the white house staff would need a cot in the capitol because they would be testifying so much. that would be the disruption that the three of them could cause specifically nadler to your point in terms of subpoenaing documents imagination sure everybody in the white house has to spend time testifying. pete: you mentioned investigations and subpoenas. the two committees that could do a lot of that are oversight committee that chairman man shop could go to trey gowdy to elijah couple minutes. devin nunes could be replaced by adam schiff. what happens if it's a chairman adam schiff as far as how the house uses its powers to go after this administration? >> great question, what we have seen with nunez is a focus on scandals that i would say have been more on the bipartisan side where adam schiff is a very partisan democrat like couple minutes and nadler is. you can see them begin to use their power in ways that i thi

be the senate judiciary committee chairman if republicans hold the senate and congressman jer you nadler, a democrat from new york, promised to investigate justice kavanaugh. >>> emily, i want to go back to kevin's point. after friday's cloture vote that move on.org when they severed ties with manchin, which senate races will you be watching in the weeks ahead as a result of this kavanaugh fight? >> the senate race is where republicans are said to be endangered because -- democrats are endangered because states in -- i will be watching arizona and nevada where there's a potential very much for a democrat to take office, particularly arizona where there's early voting. that's probably one of the tightest contests on the ballot ground right now. >> kevin, what about you? >> texas. centrist democrat down there in texas and giving senator ted cruz a run for his money. >> stay with us. we'll talk about the 2020 election coming up. we'll be back with that. >> he's been confirmed and sworn in. how long before he shows his true colors on the supreme court? that's up next. when their windshield g

. >> sreenivasan: niels, finally there, has also been talk from, say, gerald nadler of new york, saying if the democrats take over the house this coming election, that this inhastigation is not over,t this nomination could still-- actually, i should say this confirmation or this confirmed justice could still beig inveed? >> certainly there might be some talk of that in the house. i'm not getting really that much of an appetite for it on the senate side. dick durbin, the number two democrat who is from illinois, portersling a group of re yesterday that, really, there's too much work to be done in the coming weeks and probably after k e election. he wants to get bto work on appropriation bills and things that can be done inbi partisan manner. and the other thing yo viewers should know quickly is that impeachment and removal is really not something that's going to be on the table. it takes 67 votes, really, in sena to convict in an impeachment trial. >> sreenivasan: all right, as le, senior writer at roll d all c"q,"anks for joining us. i'm joined here in the studio with jami floyd, local

my current representative, jared nadler, he will win the upcoming election by 75%. so, it's a lopsided situation. i would like to say for those people who are interested in voter participation, i believe donald trump is going to increase voter participation to heights never seen before and that is both pro and against him. for that he voter participation, i think him. >> host: okay, paul, thank you. >> guest: i think that it certainly is true that one of the things donald trump is done in a distinctive way with what the caller suggested is that he's given individuals a choice on some policies and a variety of important public policies, immigration, economy and such. he's making very clear choices and taking distinctive stands that in years past presidential candidates have either not offered or weren't willing to make the claims or offer the arguments that he has made. citizens do have a choice. m >> host: you teach a number of students who are may be voting for the first time, some of them, what you hear from them? you hear some won't vote. >> guest: american unive

one potential future democratic leader in the house that stuck out to me on all of this was jerry nadler who would lead the house judiciary committee. he told "the new york times" yesterday if he becomes the head of the judiciary, he would look into the allegations of judge kavanaugh. that could be major and could be another rallying point for democrats after this confirmation in order to get those votes they need to take back the house. but it also could be a rallying cry for republicans as well. while republicans can be fired up right now, a lot can happen in a month. i don't think kavanaugh will be on their minds. to bring up yet another donald trump tweet yesterday, he said, mark my words, democrats could move to impeach kavanaugh, so make sure you get out and vote. very poignant cry in all of this. >> very quickly, the president is going to be hitting the road and this could be a point he certainly brings up when he does go to that campaign rally. thank you so much. i appreciate your time today. julia manchester, reporter for "the hill" at this housz. >>> so what does dr. ford think

. >> to that extent, chris, if democrats win the house, we've heard congressman jared nadler vowing tottee investigation is into kavanaugh. what threat does that really pose to kavanaugh if already confirmed and sitting on the court? >> not much of a threat i don't think, and i think it would be a huge mistake to keep fighting the last battle. it's time for them to move on. i disagree with what some have said here. i think much more galvanizing for democrats than for republicans, but having said that, it would be a huge mistake for democrats to focus on fighting this war over kavanaugh again. what the democrats, you know -- i think, look, the ronan farrows and jane mahers of this year and others may come up with a bombshell. barring that, short of that, democrats need to focus on a couple of things, like a laser. they 23450need to focus on protg the mueller investigation and develop a clear message for the primaries and for the re-election, and i think that message needs to be, making the economy work for more than just the top 1%. protecting health care, protecting coverage for pre-ex

the jerry nadler potential house judiciary chairman.y can say that is at the president was saying. >> that is what i have been saying that is the best thing from the 2020 reelection that they could lose to the democrats by a small majority he is at his best fighting viciously brutally with the other side to prevent democrats in this election. >> but it's too soon to say but because it has been added to that map but it is probably helpful. >> but what about the argument that you hear some republicans think the democrats overplayed their hand in this case? and the backlash will hurt the democrats quick. >> be careful. when kavanaugh was nominated we did not have to vote to prevent him from getting onto the court and it isn't a winning argument. they don't vote on the same way that republicans do. they need to stay focused on 2018 and then we have to be careful and focus on winning elections and then to have more of that with those people acting for the cameras. look at all of that agreement you just got.te [laughter] chris: one quick ques

and jerry nadler in charge of judiciary. >> lou: trying to run out the clock. they have done pretty well. >> they have. >> lou: they kept a special counsel going on its face illegitimate. it's conflict and it is without question an thet call to the -- anithetical to the president and the government of ours and it still appears to be in the hands of barack obama. the justice department is paralyzed. it's toxic, the corrupt leadership, the scum on the top of the cesspool that is the justice department has been moved aside. officials taken away including james comey. the list goes on but we haven't heard much about loretta lynch, have we? we haven't heard much of the holdovers from the obama administration. this is an intact justice department put in place principally by eric holder and president obama. >> right. i can't agree with you more. for all that the president has accomplished he could have accomplished more without the "a," distraction; "b," destruction from the job and people not doing their jobs. it's been a huge disappointment. i think it will be a whi

congressman nadler saying we'll have to do something to provide a check and balance to protect the rulef law and protect the legitimacy of one of our most of important institutions. but democratic senator chris coons suggesting his colleagues should pump the brakes. >> we are less than a month away from an election. folks who feel strongly one way or the other about the issues in front of us should get out and vote and participate. there has only ever been one justice who has been impeached. i think talking about it isn't necessarily healing us and moving us forward. arthel: we are joined by gayle trotter. ways your reaction to judge kavanaugh's confirmation and the process to get him there. >> it's great to call him justice kavanaugh today. while we saw the difficulty he and his family underwent during this confirmation process, today is a great day for all americans and those who believe in the rule of law. thearthel: do you believe and do you think americans believe the constitution will be the vanguard of the supreme court or will politics tip the scale of justice. >> that's why we

to stop nancy pelosi, chuck schumer, prevent maxine waters and that liar adam schiff and jerrold nadlerrom becoming committee shares. if you vote for any democrat in the house, you are voting for pelosi. any democrat in the senate you are voting for schumer, couldn't be more clear. the good news from 12 days away, the president's real clear politics average job approval just hit a 20 month high. john mclaughlin the pollster says new data shows tonight it's tight, but republicans still hold onto the house and you have the power to make that happen. we have full analysis just moments away. but first we continue to track the mail bomb and scare. two more were discovered today targeting joe biden and actor robert de niro. that brings the total of explosives up to ten. thankfully none of these packages detonated and thankfully no one was injured. so you have to feel horrible for anyone who was threatened. sadly in my life i have been through similar situations. i deplore like most americans what is happening here. i hope we catch and i hear we might be catching soon, the monster responsible

but congressman nadler who would be the chair of the judiciary committee if they took back the house said it is not something we are eager to do but the senate having failed to do its constitutionally mandated job of advise and consent we have to do something to provide a check and balance to protect the rule of lie and legitimacy of one of our most important institutions. you touched on this. a lot of people think if you can somehow put this, taint on brett kavanaugh it is illegitimate as well. >> wasn't that long ago there were real institutional lists, people of integrity in congress in both parties who would have denounced this immediately. i was shocked leading democrats didn't immediately say this is wrong, bridge we won't cross. there seems to be a new development where we have given license for people to be enraged and feel they no longer have to be fair or empathetic. people have to remember, revolutions like saturn devour their young. democrats have to be careful. that they unleash this they may find it comes back to hunt the menus to come. shannon: i want to play what bret

oversight of the house and facing him will be to lame-duck chairman, trey gowdy, bob goodlatte and jerry nadler cummings the ranking democrats. they have just turned oversight into a four-person proposition and frank lee i don't trust any one of those four to do anything correctly in probing the deputy attorney general's conduct, his excuses and his failures. your thoughts? >> i thought from the beginning lou the best thing we could have here in terms of the investigation and not only mueller's investigation but the investigation of the fbi tactics that were used in the run-up to the election is transparency. i think that we should be arguing in favor of the open door hearings at this point. the more disclosure, the better. the more information put out, the better and the more people participating in it the better. i really don't see anything productive that comes out of the closed-door session with a very limited number of people from congress and in particular not the people who have been pushing this investigation aggressively. i'm very worried about the way this is unfolding. lou: do we hav

. >> you mentioned the fbi and you're aware congressman nadler, the ranking member of your judiciary committee says if the democrats regain control of the house he'll call an investigation into how these allegations were handled by the fbi and the white house. what are the main questions you want to ask? >> well, the main thing that we need to know, this episode fits a pattern, there are two patterns. one is the fact that every time the president wants to do something, wherever he feels he needs to rile up his base he tends to demeaning others. he mocks women, it wasn't just dr. ford, he mocked senator feinstein, he mocked the female reporter, he mocked the me too movement. that's a sad go-to for this president time and time again but the other is the way he treats law enforcement and the way this administration views law enforcement. we have a right to know what the communication was with the fbi and whether the white house specifically gave them orders not to talk to judge kavanaugh, to dr. ford, to the diddens of witnesses who wanted to come forward. that's something we'll look at

get into any of the -- not interested in taxes, they want trump taken down and so you've got jared nadlerbelieve it or not, adam schiff will look at russia, elijah cum i thinkcummings, bet, accuse these people of conflicts of interest, it is just going to be wall to wall hammering of the trump administration. paul: kim, big wild card the mueller probe which seems to be in advance and likely to really start to -- to come out with whatever else is going to conclude after the election, that could be the galvanizer for impeachment potentially. >> yeah, i mean, from everything we are hearing he has been quiet which is is good thing up to the election but we are hearing that he's potentially writing a report and even if he does not find or does not seem to be any evidence that he could present to make a credible case for collusion with the russians or obstruction in any way, he will submit report to congress and you can trust the democrats will take anything that he's got in there and highlight that as well to as dan said pound this presidency. paul: all right, thank you, kim, when we come back

house -- we don't know but generic ballot polling pointing in that direction, representative jerry nadler who would chair the house if dems get the majority says he plans to launch an investigation of kavanaugh. it's interesting. one of his colleagues in the senate chamber, chris coons, seemed to push back on impeachment talk yesterday. take a listen. >> only one justice has ever been impeached and talking about it at this point isn't necessarily healing us and moving us forward. >> you know, josh, there's been some disagreement debate about whether impeaching president trump would be good or bad politically for democrats. how about judge kavanaugh? >> there seems to be increasing chatter about that. but among many of the house democrats i think there would be other rich targets as well. you might see them go after to the president's ties to businesses, cabinet members, different episodes in the administration. there will be a variety of targets for house democrats. it's premature to say in six months or three months what they'll want to investigate first. a month-long -- month could be a

all we can do is hope that jerry nadler is eating his wheaties because he's going to have a lot of work to do. >> cynthia, since you were here for the testimony, let's talk about the victims. i found is so interesting that senator murkowski's vote is a fluid matter tonight because, like so many senators, victims have come from alaska to washington to say this matters to us, to say -- >> right. >> -- in ways that grassley can't understand, that hearing was a triggering event. seeing her, seeing him was a triggering event. this has given an electric charge to the community of victims across this country. >> right. people come up to me and want to tell me -- and i had somebody the other day want to come tell me about her story. i can't imagine the numbers of people that are going to see murkowski and collins and flake and manchin. it's one of the problems with us spending a lot of time on the process of the fbi investigation which i do think is important. but we have gotten away from the core -- the core issue here, which is what do we think about the credibility of dr. ford versus the cre

jerry nadler, chair of the house judiciary committee, said we're going to look into that investigationould put it in the air quotes. it was a joke what the fbi did. he's not talking about impeachment. some are, i will concede that. chris coons. cooler heads are saying it's a waste of time. if the senate is close to where it is now, it's futile. >> tucker: continuing to the investigation into brett kavanaugh, to what end? i don't think as a political matter it's working for democrats. as of tonight, doesn't seem to be winning new voters for the democratic party. how does it help the country exactly? >> the whole point of what the democrats will do in the house is be a check on trump that has not been in effect. whether that's his dealings personally with women, whether it's his tax strategies, whether it's dealings with the russians, both his staff and frankly -- >> tucker: democrats are going after trump on his personal life? is this a new theme?n have you been naughty? [laughing] >> do you remember when there was bill clinton? >> tucker: i remember it well and smart republicans regret

democratic congressman jerry nadler of new york who would if the democrats take the house, become theudiciary chairman has already talked about launching an investigation into alleged misconduct by brett kavanaugh. nancy pelosi says she wants to see the fbi interviews and the second background check.it doesn't some like this will end. >> we will know in november if that makes sense. i hope everybody running for the house in his purple districts willasked , will be asked the question, will you support in teaching brettin imp kavanaugh. i never campaigned against the colleague in my life. that's about to change. i'm going to go throughout the country, and let people in these purple states, red states where trump won, know what i think about this process. >>chris: we were talking before we came on the air and i see you have a list of all the people that the president said were on the list of potential nominees. what's your point? >> here's my point. this was a list compiled in november but he put it out during the campaign.there are twentysomething people on this list. i'm asking chuck s

jerry nadler gets the gavel in the house judiciary committee. already been talking about doing impeachment. elij elijah cummings will bombard the white house with the investigation and drop the investigations that jim jordan and gowdy has been doing and devin nunes. that all gets drops. adam schiff gets the gavel. he gets the intel committee. this is what you vote for, america. when you look at scott tipton of the western part of colorado, that's important. if we don't win that seat back, mike coffman in denver area, guess what? nancy pelosi gets to make those decisions. >> sean: congressman, there's no positive agenda. we've had record low unemployment, 14 states. african americans, hispanic americans, women in the workplace, asian americans, youth unemployment, 4.2% gdp growth. are we going back? people understand the importance here. >> under obama, democrats at the local and state level lost 1,000 seats. don't hand it back over. america is smarter than that. >> americans want solutions and legislation to improve our lives. remove government

the idea of jerry nadler that were moving toward impeachment causes these people to say, the system isroken and allows a smart republican to say the system is broken - - >>chris: i don't think they're necessarily talking about impeachment but there's that were going to match our passion with their passion. >> it doesn't come across that way. that mob screaming and shouting around brett kavanaugh, - - >> they were protesting. >> let's go through paint on the republican headquarters in manhattan and say that's normal. it's not normal! our politics is broken and the american people will decide. they will vote for more republicans than they should because a republican will say i will go to washington and find a way to make this work. when you have a democrat that says i will create problems for the country by going after president trump. people are sick of it. >>. [indiscernible] you had a candidate on the other side that was the one person donald trump could be. her comments the other day about instability. what is she saying? this is brutal. >>chris: your stealing time for the next battl

jerry nadler takes over the gavel in the house judiciaryry committee. we've already been talking about doing impeachment, elijah coming, some when i served with will be the chairman of the oversight committee and will just bombard the white house with investigations, and drop the investigations that jim jordan and mark meadow and nick gaudi and radcliffe have been doing and devon nunez has been doing. all of that gets dropped. adam schiff gets the gavel for the intel committee. so when you look at like, scott tipton of the western slope ofpo colorado, that's important. then guess what, nancy pelosi gets to make those decisions. >> congressman there is no positive agenda. two years a record low unemployment in 14 states, african-americans, hispanic americans, women in the workplace, asian-americans, that's youth unemployment. look at 4.2% gdp growth. really, we have to go back? people understand the real importance of mistakes here. >> under obama the democrats at the local state and federal level, don't hand it back over to them, it drove us into the gr

i don't want to hypothesize or buttoo far ahead of myself, congressman nadler has said he was to haveons on justice kavanagh. if there is a split government, republicans will use that argument to help motivate the base. francine: at 30 days until the we heard you saying the republicans are trying to keep momentum. what does that mean? president trump is going to be in upstate pennsylvania this week. he also has another series of rallies.he will be heading that trail hard . the map for the congressional races is very different. look for the president to try and keep that enthusiasm, but also look for him to try to close the gap in suburban districts as well. tom: the change last week was even a possibility that the democrats would not take just the house, but also the senate. that is a remarkable statement that was last week. is it still there? kevin yes. the palpable frustration from democrats with senate minority leader chuck schumer as well as senator dime -- dianne feinstein. , is new wave of democrats think that frustration with democratic leadership for how this entire situation

becauseor they are going to dismiss those and you will get elijahan cummings and you will get jerry nadlerthe power of subpoena to go after this administration day after day. >> sean: ronna mcdaniel's, i feel better about the senate.da i don't have a crystal ball, as i do about the house. 82 percent chance the republicans keep the senate, 86 percent chance they lose the house. he was wrong in 2016, is he wrong tonight? k >> i think he is wrong, sean. they've been talking about this blue wave over and over and over again. we are not seeing it. we are not seeing it in the early voting in florida, nevada, states that we arere already seeing results come in, and certainly on the senate side, we are seeing leads open up in north dakota and missouri and indiana, so there is great opportunities to pick up seats, but you are right, we have to get out and vote. what you just talked about, what would happen if we losese the house, i know it is not halloween yet, but a shiver just went down my spine. we have to get all of our voters out there. it is not a done deal, the democrats are energized, the o

get into any of the -- not interested in taxes, they want trump taken down and so you've got jared nadlerh nomination believe it or not, adam schiff will look at russia, elijah cum i thinkcummings, bet, accuse these people of conflicts of interest, it is just going to be wall to wall hammering of the trump administration. paul: kim, big wild card the mueller probe which seems to be in advance and likely to really start to -- to come out with whatever else is going to conclude after the election, that could be the galvanizer for impeachment potentially. >> yeah, i mean, from everything we are hearing he has been quiet which is is good thing up to the election but we are hearing that he's potentially writing a report and even if he does not find or does not seem to be any evidence that he could present to make a credible case for collusion with the russians or obstruction in any way, he will submit report to congress and you can trust the democrats will take anything that he's got in there and highlight that as well to as dan said pound this presidency. paul: all right, thank you, kim, when