nadler: i grant an additional 15 seconds. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman is recognized for 15 seconds. ms. jackson lee: i'm delighted -- thank you, mr. chairman. i'm delighted this bill includes an important provision of mine offered last year during the committee markup which requires the administration to report to congress on the impacts, positive, negative, unintended of any action by the president, pursuant to executive orders. we know, we know that banning nigeria was the wrong thing to do. i support the no ban act. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from ohio is recognized. mr. jordan: thank you, madam speaker. i yield two minutes to the gentleman from mr., mr. steube -- from florida, mr. steube. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from florida is recognized for two minutes. mr. steube: this is a dangerous piece of legislation that comes at a time when our national security and our public health are being threatened by a dire crisis at our southern border. only democrats would bring a bill to the flo

nadler. mr. nadler: madam speaker, i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and insert extraneous material on h.r. 1333. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. nadler: madam speaker, i yield myself three minutes. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. nadler: madam speaker, h.r. 1333, the national origin base anti-discrimination for nonimmigrants act, or the no ban act, is an important step of reining in executive overreach and preserving the power of congress to establish our immigration laws. the i.n.a. authorizes the president to suspend the entry of noncitizens when the president finds their entry would be detrimental to u.s. interests. from 1952, when this provision was enacted, until january, 2017, presidents of both parties invoked section 212-f to exclude only narrow groups of individuals, such as human rights violators, north korean officials, individuals seeking to overthrow governments. the re

i plan to ask how judiciary committee chairman jerry nadler sponsoring this bill whether it has the backing of democratic leadership. without that and filibuster reform it wouldn't have a serious shot of passing. chuck schumer is asking his caucus to ramp up conversations with the gop to find common ground on other issues. the expectation is that won't go far. more democrats will be willing to reform the filibuster that could give this an avenue. it would bring the total number of justices to 13. one of the sponsors jones tells fox the majority doctrine is clear. if the law suppresses the right to vote, if a law protects the right to vote especially for black and brown voters it is unconstitutional. the american people have had enough to restore power to the people we must expand the supreme court. but republicans are lining up against it. >> the things the biden add min is wants to do on executive orders on gun, illegal immigration, things they try to get through the house hr1 that violates the constitution. they know their one stopping point to getting all this stuff done is the u.s. supr

nadler, chairman of the house court subcommittee mr. johnson, vice chair of the court subcommittee mr. jones and senator markey whose experience consistently demonstrated the existential crises demands existential solutions. we have a supreme court that is tilted to partisan bias corporate interests and we must restore balance by adding four seats to the court. no one can argue that a 6-3 ultra conservative republican supermajority is a balanced court. a court with five white men that is never had a black woman justice, and asian-american justice, a native american justice is not balanced. a court that has not had a lawyer as a justice who has defended criminal defendants since thurgood marshall more than three decades ago is not balanced. we have a looming crisis of legitimacy in the supreme court but the existential crisis we have is much greater. it's an existential crisis or democracy itself. these republican justices have consistently undermined voting rights and fair elections, from gutting the voting rights act to the citizens un

. >> jerrold nadler is not for for go-ahead. smith they flew there in airplanes shoulder to shoulder not to refer to succeed but maybe 6 inches. until that's why it's all theater what is the message were sending? this is just ridiculous, kennedy we need to get back to normal not a new normal. kennedy: yes we do. people are capable of internalizing important advice, but not everything just because it equates to control is important congressman massie thank you so much for a >> you kitty. kennedy: maintained the far left trying to dictate when state should and shouldn't (here's another duty-free film maker michael moore demanded michigan governor gretchen whitmarsh sutton on the state of michigan over recent coverts by currency to see director said michigan should go back to a lockdown, watch. >> when you have an acute situation, extraordinary number of cases like we have in michigan, the answer is not necessarily to give a vaccine for the answer to that is to really close things down to go back to our basic spectacle back where w

i listened to jerry nadler earlier. he was saying this is about choice. it's about a woman's right to choose. this is about climate change. just sort of nakedly laying out the fact that we have issues that we care about and we want the judges to find in these cases the way we want them to. >> it's unvarnished. they're not hiding anything. they say they don't like the way the court is stacked right now. that's about winning elections and winning the white house. democrats do have the house, the white house and the senate. and they see an opportunity here. but the reality of politics is that this is not moving forward any time soon. first of all, nancy pelosi as you mentioned is not bringing it forward. she wants to wait for this commission. second of all, you have these people in the senate, joe manchin number 1 who has said he's not for breaking up the filibuster. in order to get something this through, they have to do that. no republican will vote for this bill. unless that breaks down somehow, the kyrsten sinema, joe manchin, maybe a few others, it's no

after this effort goes down in flames, jerry nadler can retire and move to florida.vr every monday through friday at 10:00 p.m. eastern so you don't miss "the ingraham angle." greg gutfeld takes it from here. >> so people can go to work, that's investing in infrastructure. ships like the one i have here, these chips, these wafers, batteries, broad band, it's all infrastructure, this is infrastructure. >> greg: no one has the heart to tell president no, that is the lid to your pasta. - [cheers & applause] >> greg: it was day two of protests

kennedy: you would be right little tiny jerry nadler.he is in my the other night wearing a pin that said trump. that really happen he's a tiny person. not tiny he is like -- okay kid this is for stephen but which of these donkeys has appeared in five batman movies? near governor and a coma, former california governor jerry manor vermont senator patrick leahy? who is it stephen? >> that is patrick leahy and lebron james a silly moral coward. >>. kennedy: i'm going to give an extra port for being right about both. no i'm not i'm joking. [inaudible] our good stuff you got that right. >> come on man don't pick on the property. >> patrick leahy and showed a sweet moment and passionate kiss investment on hinge. read this is very which of these donkeys officiate await marianne williamson, former california boxer, california congressman ted is no good anything and he's the congressman california and i don't like it, go ahead marie. >> i think ted lieu is great. i think lebron could beat up anyone on the show. i would love for it to be marianne w

tomorrow house democrats will now introduce the bill we warned you about this sponsored by jerry nadler to pack the u.s. supreme court reportedly democrats want to expand the number of justices from nine to 13. this is nothing but an unbridled, unconstitutional, authoritarian power grab. the future of our public is at stake. we have a lot more coming up this hour but first tonight americans in multiple major cities now across the country, they are bracing for a fourth night of chaos following the police-involved shooting death of daunte wright. we've seen widespread looting, arson and vandalism and violence directed towards police. now the brooklyn center minnesota officer who fired that fatal shot, a 25-year veteran, she has resigned and is now charged with second-degree manslaughter. there will be a full investigation and trial if, in fact, she's convicted she could face up to 10 years in prison and a $20,000 fine or both. but instead of calling for calm and justice, the left in this country continues to pour fuel on the fire. multiple democratic members of congress now referring to p

we asked jerry nadler, is this the truth? he wouldn't answer the question. now we are hearing there's a press conference tomorrow where they are going to brag about taking over the court. this is how radical the left is today and every single one to stand up and defend the values and principles that made our country special. this is scary where they want to go. >> sean: let's talk about where they want to go. >> sean, jim is exactly right. jim's exactly right. what they are doing right now is tearing down the very institutions that they started to blame donald trump about tearing down. this is the democrat left that has become the norm. moderate joe biden is no longer -- what they want to do is they couldn't beat donald trump at the ballot box so they change the election law. they couldn't actually get the rule of law to go in their favor and support their leftist agenda, so they're going to pack the courts to get the kind of ruling there. americans won't stand for it. i'm glad we've got people like jim jordan on the judiciary committee and his fellow collea

the effort reportedly being led by house judiciary chairman jerry nadler and senator ed markey.s some breaking news. we knew this would probably happen, but we did not think it would be this quickly. what do you know? >> yeah, we know there's a commission president biden set up a commission to study things about the judiciary, including expanding courts and that kind of thing, but what we are seeing now is something being done at the legislative branch, where in congress they are talking about trying to expand the supreme court. now listen, it has not been done since 1869. the constitution does not outline exactly how many justices there have to be at any one time. the court started with six, and the theory has always been that the founders thought it wouldn't be used to decide really tough questions on a regular basis. that is why they gave it an even number instead of odd when it got started, but over the years, the seats have been changed many times, so now we are going to see if congress is serious about that. democrats control the house. they also have a very thin margin wi

arthel: so why nadler and company, why the pushing the issue now?mething i'm not aware of? >> they are very well aware of what the speaker and president think. what they are doing is trying to push both of them to deal with this, to show the progressive side of the democratic party isn't going to let it go, they want to do this and talk about it, they want to push democrats, democratic leaders and they want to gather support around the country. there are some many people in the country that may not want to go round they are trying to do all that but remember, republicans are going to make it a midterm election issue. we've already seen it at least one conservative group running ads on this idea of expanding the supreme court said democrats are saying look, it's already out there, we got to fight back and talk about this, it's going to be one for the next 18 months. arthel: about it doubt about that. you think democrats are listening to public opinion on this? >> i do think they are listening but i think the president is very busy with other things h

nadler: madam speaker, i yield myself three minutes. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman is recognized. mr. nadler: madam speaker, h.r. 1333, the national origin base anti-discrimination for

laura: we learned legislation will drop tomorrow sponsored by jerry nadler and senator ed marky to packrtedly the plan is to add four more justices to the existing nine and that means four rubberstamps to give democrats absolute power. you can't say donald trump didn't want us. >> they will pack the supreme court with far left radicals who will unilaterally transform american society and impose a socialist vision from the bench that could never pass about box. >> he was right. what do democrats want? he hinted at it, it is simple. when they get together and agree on a policy on climate change or anti-gun policy immigration, lockdown, they want those policies to become law as soon as possible, no constitutional scrutiny, no oversight by the judicial branch and this move makes it official, democrats don't care about checks and balances, they were all for protecting our norms from donald trump, they are normal busting, they hate our history, traditions, biden's un ambassador didn't mince words how racist to the core america is. >> we have to acknowledge that we are an imperfect union. the

. >> you are jerry nadler say they are unpacking the court. do you see it that way? >> clearly not.fort to expand the supreme court's, more liberal and conservative. this is just like what fdr tried to do during the new deal where he didn't like having a conservative court and was rejected by his own party, the same happening here again. republicans are post because it doesn't make sense, the same members of the supreme court for over 150 years, it is not sensible. >> the 30 person panel, and prominent conservatives honest. it is more left-leaning. >> the dc circuit, muted conservative, and a number of prominent conservatives in the panel and by far, the law academy is liberal, i worry they may advise the president on the court packing plan and these are sensible people, we are in controversial political times, the president himself, was opposed as a senator and on the campaign trail, committed during the campaign to the commission and we will see what happens but not a good sign for the country. >> call me crazy but it seems like there are some things that are few and far between t

now, it's going to be led by senators ed markey and senator jerry nadler. with hank johnson and jones. and they are going to bring the total number mo it from 9 to 13. now, here is the current makeup of our court just so everyone is clear about it. nine justices and six justices. barrett, kavanaugh, gulch, alito, thomas and chief justice roberts. three liberals, sotomayor, kagan and breyer. president biden's sudden change of heart on their about packing the court is far cry from his views when he was in the 180s a senator on the senate judiciary committee and even as a candidate last october. watch. >> it was a bone-head idea. it was a terrible, terrible mistake to make. >> it you will know my opinion on court-packing when the election is over. there has never been a court appointment once an election begun. will. griff: make no mistake this is a progressive dream to take this action. but conservatives, republicans are staunchly opposed. last night the former white house chief of staff mark meadows had this to say. >> they have gone so far left they have go

we get them, but as of right now, we know these things: the bill is being led by congressman jerry nadlerarkey of massachusetts. again, packing the supreme court, remember president biden said he was inin paneling some kind of blue

nadler's legal analysis. i don't mean to be cruel but if you want to hide something from him, put it in a law book. i mean, this issue was settled in 1790. our founders did not want the seat of the federal government to be influenced by any particular state so they created a district of columbia, a non-state. and the land was given by virginia and maryland. it is not in the constitution, but our founders talked in terms of having a district that was i think the language was 10 miles square. now, can that be changed? sure, but you have to amend the constitution. their bill also, i think, is probably going to be found unconstitutional on the 23rd amendment. they create this new mini district and give it which will have a couple hundred or a couple thousand people and give this mini district three electoral votes, which is going to disenfranchise a lot of other people. so i'm not especially worried about it. i think it is anybody who knows a law book from a j. crew catalog knows it's unconstitutional. >> harris:

we get them, but as of right now, we know these things: the bill is being led by congressman jerry nadlernew york, that's in the house. and in the senate by senator ed markey of massachusetts. again, packing the supreme court, remember president biden said he was inin paneling some kind of blue ribbon commission to consider this now, elected democrats in the congress are trying to force it. joining us now to react is judge jeanine pirro, the host of "justice with judge jeanine." judge, thanks so too much for joining us tonight. packing the supreme court, this is something franklin roosevelt tried, had to back off because c it was considered too radical in the middle of the most radical legislative.ro in american history, the new deal, this was too much? what would this mean if it were to happen? >> what this would mean, tucker, is that we would have another legislative body in the united states. congress has historically -- the supreme court has historically been filled by presidents who, when they are there, if there is a vacancy, they appoint someone in line with their thinking. so, som

so republicans rejoice that jerry nadler is handling strategy for 2022. well, it all depends on doing away with the filibuster. there are a number of things that tie to that take a listen to chuck schumer answering a question on that and then the key vote, joe manchin. >> what do you see getting done in the senate in a traditional 60 vote margin? >> well, as i said we are going to try to work with republicans wherever we can. but we must get bold change and if our republican friends block it, we're going to put our heads together and figure out the best way to go. everything's on the table. it's plain and simple. >> whether it be packing the courts or ending the filibuster, i will not vote to do that. i will not vote to pack the courts. i think and i will note vote to end the filibuster. >> bret: jonathan, where do you think this goes? >> well, biden has tried to defer it with this commission. that was just, you know, him trying to buy himself some time, you know, the left is not really buying it. they are coming out and doing this regardless. but it all

elizabeth: what was your reaction when you saw house democrat jerry nadler, senator ed markey, trying to pack the supreme court with liberal justices, adding four justices possibly biden would nominate put on there via the senate. it is 50-50 in the senate. house speaker pelosi says she has no intention moving forward this. it seems it will be entombed in bide's commission. what do you think about this? >> court packing is a textbook example of a partisan attack on the rule of law and the judiciary. it is amazing and appalling that anyone would be supporting this. that said right now it is a feeble effort on the part of a handful of democrats. you have a bill introduced in the senate by ed markey that is a sign of weakness, not strength. and i think it is clear that the leftists who are pushing this are trying to show some sign of life for this proposal, given that president biden's, commissioner he set up clearly is not going to be interested in this. i think this is really a way to agitate the base of the democratic party. elizabeth: yeah. we hear what you're saying. we know what it

i am a little surprised that jerry nadler decided to jump on board this. to me that adds a patina of legitimacy of this. before pelosi could have just said like she does with the squad yeah, please two and too something else. you are berg me. i have got things to do over here. the fact that the republicans are now going to be able to press every single democrat and say do you support this? do you support this? and they are all going to have to be on record saying it, it's a completely unforced error and i think joe biden doing the commission was sort of like basically trying to placate but now he is going -- i think he is going to have to take a much stronger stance and say i'm not doing it. >> greg: dagen, as you heard dana mentioned the patina, the patina of whether a? >> legitimacy. >> greg: legitimacy sounds like the name of a mystery novel the patina, i don't know what i'm talking about at this point, dagen. save me, tell me what you think of this court-packing. san diego taking patina is my safe word so that's a little weird. i think that -- i think

a few days ago, jerry nadler introduced a bill to pack the u.s.reme court in a proposal that would add four new active justices there. that would be a move that would ruin the integrity and the function of our judicial branch forever. jerry nadler is lying and calling it "unpacking the supreme court." joe biden said it was a boneheaded idea then but now he and the blue state bailout relief bill, that was a lie and just like democrats referring to child care and pre-k and medicare, medicaid expansion and massive tax increase infrastructure. everything is infrastructure. we would say packing the courts is infrastructure. naturally, in order to get the radical plans through congress, democrats are also working on a way to abolish the legislative filibuster in the senate. so we are watching, the status, authoritarian measures that are insane and forever change the country in ways people cannot imagine. by the way, last year, candidate joe biden flatly told we come of the american people, that yeah,e supported none of these proposals. maybe he forgot.

back this legislation. >> do you support jerry nadler's bill for expanding the supreme court to -- >mmission to study such a proposal. >> the bill will also unlikely to gain much momentum on the senate side, all republicans and senate democrats oppose expanding the court. >>> next hour on capitol hill, very important testimony, the u.s. capitol police inspector general michael bolton testifying before the congressional committee about the intelligence and operational failures that led to the january 6th insurrection. what are we looking for? >> john, we're looking for details about the operational failures as well as the intelligence failures leading up to and on the day of the insurrection. let's talk about the operational challenges they faced. the i.g. has pointed out that they had operational problems for months concerning their civil disturbance unit. the unit that would have been responsible for a riot. they did not have a standard operating procedure in place that had been rescinded in summer of 2020. they were supposed to come up with a new one. they never did. we will also l

last week, we twheached chairman of the house judiciary, jerry nadler, at the supreme court, pushing to add four more justices to the bench. upending a framework that's been in place since 1869. yesterday it was reported 100 democrats signed a letter urging senate democrats to abolish the filibuster. in essence the democratic party is pushing to silence the voice of millions of americans. today the house democrats are moving on d.c. statehood. another ploy to consolidate power so they can jam through socialist policies like the green new deal, court packing and defunding the police. they are not even denying that that is their objective. if you watched congressman raskin, he is on record saying this. there is a national political logic for d.c. statehood too because the senate has become the principal obstacle to social progress across a whole range of issues. that doesn't exactly support the representation argument that some try to falsely state. make no mistake, h.r. 51 is just democrats' latest attempt for a power grab. while democrats try to control the lives of the american peop

and congressman jim jordan and the republican and you've heard it, they'll they have had jerrold nadler has unpacked the court because mitch mcconnell and president trump packed it in a way that conservatives can for now in decades and years to come. >> this is about raw political power. why not just go from -- because four gives them a 7-6 majority. this is raw political power from the left and it was no accident, they introduced this bill one day after they passed through the oversight committee and the bill to get them to more democratic senators by making d.c. estate. it's all about raw political power and think about this, the left can controls everything. and they control hollywood, and the one institution in this house, they don't control the court. this is the quest for power that the left had, and i don't think they will stand for it. be one he doesn't think is a good idea and neither does philip hamburger who wrote an op-ed of "the threat of court packing is vandalism far beyond the scale of destruction of statute. it undermines judicial duty and independence and destroy the l

so it may play well for marquee and nadler not so well for biden and pelosi.an issue for 2022 that republicans can push. >> dana: there should have been a communications czar if you think about it. just kidding. >> trace: i want to ask you, chris, you look at steveer breyer against court packing and progressive groups saying he should resign. would that have been the reaction to ruth bader ginsberg who was also against court packing. would they have called for her to step down? >> there isn't any relationship between groups calling for breyer to step down and the court packing issue. it's all about the fact that because of ruth bader ginsberg they are keenly aware when you have a member of the court in their 80s, they can pass away and they don't want a republican congress. remember, if one democratic senator were to die and a republican governor were to appoint a republican replacement now you have senate majority leader mitch mcconnell again and suddenly it becomes a lot harder for joe biden to put a liberal democrat on the court. i think this is all about t

new york congressman jerry nadler says as the country grows so too, should the supreme court have found is understood. as the country in the judicial system involved. the court needs to evolve with it. >> massachusetts senator ed markey says republicans have done damage to the judicial branch making americans lose faith in the high court. and make no mistake about it, the court is broken because leader mitch mcconnell, his senate republican colleagues and donald trump broke it. but republicans like south carolina senator lindsey graham say this is a terrible idea you make the supreme court. basically a political football. >> it loses independents is consistency and senate minority leader mitch mcconnell says it is an attempt to threaten current supreme court justices and responsible people across the political spectrum. >> have an absolute duty. good enough says. >> now during his campaign, president biden said he was not a fan of expanding the courts. but he is allowing this commission to look into the idea reporting live in washington. i'm basil john. >> is there any likelihood of the

at 11:30 jerry nadler on set adding they want to add four more justices. >> i'll be behind the microphone for three hours and then on "outnumbered." >> dana: good morning. supreme court takeover. democrats in congress set to lay out plans to expand the high court allowing them to pack it with liberal justices and take over the majority. >> trace: good morning. i'm trace gallagher in for bill hemmer. this is "america's newsroom." we're expecting a group of house and senate democrats to announce a bill that would add four justices to the supreme court bringing the total number to 13. >> dana: republicans are slamming the move as another proer grab by democrats. >> this is frightening where they want to take the country. it is a dangerous direction where they are going with immigration policy, with the court policy. they want to control everything and it is scary. >> they know their one stopping point to getting this stuff done is the u.s. supreme court. they'll change the rules and change the game and add four more people. >> they couldn't get a bill passed in congress or passed by state le

in congress including ed markey on the senate side and mondaire jones, new york congressman jerry nadler, the chairman of the house judiciary committee, offered this proposal to add four seats to the supreme court. it is not in the constitution the number of justices on the court. it is up to congress to set that number. congress has changed the number seven times in history. it is the most constitutional way to achieve violence and undo the lopsided super majority. i wrote that op-ed the other day to draw attention to new polling to show that the proposal is supported by a plurality of the american voters. more people support adding seats than do not. host: you mentioned the late justice bader ginsburg. you have probably seen stories that she had said that may be expanding the court was not a good idea. justice breyer is saying so in recent days. what you think about members of the court being hesitant? guest: i have been asked about a -- that a lot. i was a, what do you expect them to say? as sitting justices, they are going to say there is nothing illegitimate about the institution an

generation and also this , this is utterly wrong, the chair of the house judiciary committee jerrold nadler proposing legislation to expand the supreme court from nine to 13 members. that is not court reform, that's a takeover for political purposes of the supreme court for her we will talk to senator ted cruz a few minutes from now. the great senator from texas on this show about court packing, but there is more. eli manning will join us bringing with him his own and ft. we do politics, we do money and it's a big day for both, thursday, april 15, "varney & co." is about to begin. ♪♪ ♪♪ [laughter] stuart: i could use a rally. a minister with coinbase. it made its highly anticipated debut on the nasdaq closing at 328 and is currently 348, that's a run up again. what you think? susan: that 420 peak we saw during the day one debut and remember it opened at 381, so a bit of catch-up needed, but there still a balance after cathie wood guru of the moment loading up on coinbase shares. she bought a quarter billion dollars worth to include in three of her etf's, including flagship fund. she still h

new york congressman jerry nadler says as the country grows so too, should the supreme court have foundunderstood. as the country in the judicial system involved. the court needs to evolve

so this bill to change the size of the court is led by massachusetts senator ed markee and jerry nadlers co-sponsored by congressman hank johnson and mondaire jones t. will face push back from both sides. president biden said he is not a fan of packing the court although next week he introduced a new commission of liberals and conservatives to study the structure of the court and the lercht of justice's terms. currently life terms senator mitch mcconnell, the minority leader, has warned democrats not to add seats to the court. he calls this a dangerous, antiquated idea. we will learn more when it's introduced on the steps of the u.s. supreme court just before noon today. >> interesting arguments on both sides. tracie, thank you. >>> will the u.s. add a 51st star to the flag the house is set to vote on statehood for washington, d.c., later this month after the legislation cleared tai key committee hurdle yesterday it is expected to pass party lines. the slow national guard response to the capitol riots sparked renewed calls to statehood. >>> let's turn and get a look at today's weather w

new york congressman jerry nadler says as the country grows so too should the supreme court have found is understood. as the country in the judicial system involved. the court needs to evolve with it. >> massachusetts senator ed markey says republicans have done damage to the judicial branch making americans lose faith in the high court. and make no mistake about it, the court is broken because leader mitch mcconnell, his senate republican colleagues and donald trump broke it. but republicans like south carolina senator lindsey graham say this is a terrible idea you make the supreme court basically a political football. >> it loses his independence is consistency and senate minority leader mitch mcconnell says it is an attempt to threaten current supreme court justices and responsible people across the political spectrum. >> have an absolute duty could announce this. >> during his campaign. president biden said he was not a fan of expanding the courts. but he is allowing this commission to look at this idea reporting live in washington. i'm basil john. >> appreciate a basal. other nati

new york congressman jerry nadler says the court should reflect the country. our founders understood. as the country in the judicial system evolved. the court needs to evolve with it. >> massachusetts democratic senator ed markey says the court is broken. >> mitch mcconnell, his senate republican colleagues and donald trump broke it. >> but hse speaker nancy pelosi said thursday she is not ready to support the bill. >> i don't know that that's a good idea or bad idea. i think an idea that should be considered. >> pelosi does support president biden's plan creating a bipartisan commission to study expanding the high court republicans like south carolina senator lindsey graham and senate minority leader mitch mcconnell called the idea a power grab by democrats. >> if they tried to expand the court to dilute a conservative majority. the next time republicans in power we change the number. >> and responsible people across the political spectrum. have an absolute duty could announce this. >> now the bill is unlikely to become law given the slim majority democrats h

effort goes down in flames jerry nadler can retire and move to florida like every other new yorker i know. that is all-time we have tonight. set your dvr every monday through friday at 10:00 pm eastern, never miss an episode of the ingraham angle, greg goodfeld takes it all from here. carley: democrats expected to release their plan to pack the supreme court, live outside the high court, what president biden called the bonehead idea. jillian: a fourth night of chaos in minnesota, 2 dozen arrestors protests over the death of doctor a right rage on. the latest unrest as the officer involved heads to court today. new video shows another migrant child dropped over the border wall so where is the president and vice president. republicans want to know, "fox and friends first" want to know. ♪♪ where have you been ♪♪ >> they pick the funniest song. i haven't heard this song in 10 years. who picked it? i demand to know. good morning. you are watching "fox and friends first" on thursday morning. ashley: we start with this today, democrats announce a plan to add four justices to the supreme cou

steps of the high court to unveil their legislation to do just that, pack the court, led by jerry nadlernson and jones. the legislation would add four justices bringing the total from 9 to 13. currently the nine, six conservatives, brett cavanagh, neil gorsuch, thomas, chief justice roberts and 3 liberals, sotomayor, alana kagan and breyer, the change of heart a significant, as a senator on the judiciary committee he had this to say about the idea. >> it was a bonehead idea. it was a terrible terrible mistake to make. >> reporter: as recent as the campaign trail, october of last year he wasn't one to embrace it. >> you will know my opinion on court packing when the election is over. there has never been a court appointed once an election has begun. >> reporter: doesn't sit well with former and current justices, ruth bader ginsburg, liberal icon famously said 9 seems to be a good number and last week justice stephen breyer shut it down, saying politics would erode trust in the institution. last night republican congressman jim jordan blasted it. watch. >> the left controls everything beca

it was very surprising, to be frank, that jerry nadler would take up a court-packing bill.along with this. todd: congresswoman nicole malliotakis thank you for your time this morning, great insight. thank you very much. >> thank you. jillian: it was a busy morning it will continue now with "fox & friends." thank you. see you back here tomorrow 4 to 6:00 a.m. have a good day. ♪ ♪ >> we, the jury, in the above entitled manner as to count 1 find the defendant guilty. count 2 guilty. count 3 guilty. >> america has a long history of systemic racism. >> systemic racism is a stain on our nation's soul. >> protests erupting in columbus, ohio after a teenage girl is shot and killed by police. >> body camera showing one girl trying to stab another and the officer fires four shots. >>the progressives are ready to roll out the green new deal. the full green new deal is 9 trillion. >> i guess that's part of the green plan going to go it the money tree to find this. >> woke school principal caught admitting the c

looking for a new district to represent. ( japanese villager ) watashi-tachi no mura o dete, jerry nadler! now, aside from new york getting screwed, the big news out of the census is that america's population grew at the slowest rate since the 1930s. basically, immigration is down and the birthrate is falling, primarily due to this photo. and i don't know what exactly that says, but i do know that the 1930s sucked for america. i mean, there was the great depression, the dust bowl, everything was black and white, and if you wanted somewhere to sit, you needed to climb a half-built skyscraper. it was a shitty time to be alive. moving on to news about the news. if you watch cnn, first of all, congratulations on being basic. and, second, you may have seen a political pundit named rick santorum, former republican senator and what you get if you sucked the handsome out of mitt romney. he's known for his reliably conservative opinions on the big issues of the day, but now one of his lesser-known opinions about american history has slipped out. >> rick santorum, since losing his pennsylvania sena

seems so shortsighted what they're doing and by the way the republicans can filibuster it but jerry nadlereasons saying republicans broke the court and they got confirmed conservatives oon the court and their calling that court packing. >> that is just playingor with words in court packet is when they arrive there has been aggressive in confirmation battles going back on both sides and maybe that's regrettable and we should turn down w the temperature of how we fill vacancies but there's nothing illegitimate about it and no attempt to completely subvert the court as were talking about hereas. liz: nancy pelosi says she has no plans to bring the legislation to the floor, she did say is not completely out of the question and kevin mccarthy doesn't trust nancy pelosi on this. >> do not trust nancy pelosi when she said she will not move it, that so she said about impeachment before she moved impeachment twice, we watched her time and time again to come to what the socialists asked for, she surrendered to the socialist many times before and she will do it again. liz: in the biography about nanc

nadler and ms.and senator schumer and others trying to consolidate liberal power. >> this is a moral imperative, economic imperative. also a moment of extraordinary possibilities. >> while statehood for the district may prove a political long shot, the biden administration's international green policies will very likely be paid with your taxpayer green. the white house and global climate summit plays the country will cut greenhouse gas emissions in half in the not-too-distant future and a challenge top polluters china and india to do more to reduce carbon output. mr. biden renewed the u.s. pledged to rejoin the paris climate accord which according to some estimates could cost the u.s. up to $3 billion annually. speaking of money, there are new reports tonight that the administration is preparing a major cash grab on wealthy investors planning to raise federal tax rates on capital gains for some investors to as high as 43.4%. for new yorkers, the combined state and federal capital gains rates could b

. >> house judiciary chair there, jerry nadler obviously tried to step in. val demings is no joke. she knows the job and the politics have gotten ugly around policing. it's the hardest job in the world even in columbus, ohio. how do you think that officer feels tonight after having to do the job that he had to do there? she believes there's a strategy behind play ing police as pawns and she also believes there's a better way forward. so let's have that conversation, next. allergies don't have to be scary. spraying flonase daily stops your body from overreacting to allergens all season long. psst! psst! all good hey lily, i need a new wireless plan for my business, but all my employees need something different. oh, we can help with that. okay, imagine this... your mover, rob, he's on the scene and needs a plan with a mobile hotspot. we cut to downtown, your sales rep lisa has to send some files, asap! so basically i can pick the right plan for each employee... yeah i should've just led with that... with at&t business... you can pick the best plan for each employee and only pay for t

. >> it's called the judiciary act of 2021, jerry nadler and ed markey are the sponsors.l comes a week after the white house announced the commission to study court reform. nancy pelosi says she is not ready to bring the bill to the floor. yet. >> it's not out of the question, in spin done before. speak of the president is also not taking a stance on this call to pack the court. >> the president has an executive order creating the bipartisan commission on the supreme court, he's going to wait for that to play out and wait to read the report. >> as expected, the crowds get to do the move to pack the court. >> if you want to destroy evidence of the court of law they are suggesting. >> the most conspicuous voice that was absent is president biden. this is when the president shows that he's not just a politician, you step forward and you say we can talk about reforms, but what you're talking about, that will not happen. >> strong analysis thereby jonathan turley, now critics have argued that this is really about intimidating the court in fact just today, one of the sponsors s

flames, jerry nadler can retire and move to florida. that's all the time we have tonight. set your dvr every monday through friday at 10:00 p.m. eastern so you don't miss "the ingraham angle." greg gutfeld takes it from here. >> so people can go to work, that's investing in infrastructure. ships like the one i have here, these chips, these wafers, batteries, broad band, it's all infrastructure, this is infrastructure. >> greg: no one has the heart to tell president no, that is the lid to your pasta. - [cheers & applause] >> greg: it was day two of protests following the deadly shooting of a young black man. meanwhile, a cnn reporter portrays herself as in the thick of it and got the thick part right. >> you may notice that my eyes are watery. that is because they have just like shot a huge amount of gas. it's c.s. gas. really the strongest i have ever had stood in before during a protest. we were all consumed by it. now you can see -- you want to talk to me? cool. don't take my mic. tell me what you think about what's going on. >> what i think about this? all the press and