of hiroshima and nagasaki. people -- for people to understand, greg, these scientists that came together at los alamos, the secret community that was built for them to build a bomb, but then nazi germany surrenders. where is beaten, is defeated. if you can explain further, this is something you're so steeped in, what it meant then to decide to use this bomb on japan and also the soviet union came into this, where russia came into this? >> right. the motivation for making the bomb was largely hitler and nazi germany. it is really the main reason we beat hitler to the bomb. germany surrendered. we were still fighting japan. very bloody battles and bombing their cities that spring into the summer. of course the target became japan and the focus. there were scientists who did circulate a petition that asked people to ask other scientists to sign the petition, to at least delay using the bomb. oppenheimer is one of those people who squelched that petition, incidentally. basically, the decision was made , even though

he never apologised for hiroshima and nagasaki or expressed shame to tip all_ and nagasaki or expressedall of his actions after 1945 other actions to meet me somebody... the start— other actions to meet me somebody... the start of— other actions to meet me somebody... the start of the film appeared at the premiere last night but, as the news came that actors would be joining writers on the picket line, left before the film started the nolan is ready on strike. so you will not be writing another film while this track is on for the absolutely not. this is not about me, this is aboutjobbing actors and staff writers on tv shows trying to raise a family, trying to keep food on the table. these companies have not yet accommodated how they are going to, in this new world of streaming, pay appropriately. any dela for streaming, pay appropriately. any delay for nolan is a loss to cinemark. forthe delay for nolan is a loss to cinemark. for the director behind critically acclaimed blockbusters like inception, and epics including the second world war drama dunkirk. oppenheimer is his latest movie t

that either there will be negotiations or there will be a nuclear strike. mentions hiroshima and nagasakiow the americans actually ended the war with japan . we have a fragment of what the deputy chairman of the security council of the russian federation of the former russian president dmitry medvedev said . the special military operation would have ended in just a few months . finally, the third, in general, any war, even a world war, can be ended very quickly, well, either if the peace treaty is signed or if you do what the americans did in 1945 when they used their nuclear weapons and bombed the two japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki, they really ended the war the company, mr. general medvedev is talking about the winding down of the military company on the territory of ukraine, but if you take a mirror and reverse what he says, it may seem that russia may end up in the role of japan and uh, because the russians are an aggressor country that is trying to destroy ukraine and thanks to a possible pre-emptive strike, russia may also suffer , why do you think the russians behave so

he mentions about hiroshima and nagasaki about how the americans actually ended the war with japan . america, their vassals stopped supplying weapons and means of defeat to ukraine, then the special military operation would end, well, literally in a few months . if the peace treaty is signed or if you do what the americans did in 1945 when they used their nuclear weapons and bombed the two japanese cities of hiroshima and the nagasaki really then closed down the military company, mr. general medvedev talks about the closing down of the military company on the territory of ukraine, but if you take a mirror and reverse what he says, it may seem that russia may end up in the role of japan and because the russians are an aggressor country which is trying to er destroy ukraine and it is er thanks to a possible preventive strike that russia may also suffer, why do you think the russians behave so defiantly in this situation and do not think about the consequences for them because it is it can turn over in a mirror in relation to russia in relation to the leadership of the russian federatio

reid: a few years after the end of the war, i saw the raw footage of hiroshima and nagasaki. the kimonos burned into their skin and bodies floating in the river. it was so shocking. and i thought, "they're all my friends' fathers. did they know what they were doing?" none of it seemed to make any sense to me that this was so horrible. (geiger counter clicking rapidly) carr: as reports of that devastation started to come back to los alamos, obviously this weighed on the scientists. yes, it had been a horrible war but still, tens of thousands of people were killed in these attacks. cities were destroyed. and that was difficult on a lot of the scientists. and i certainly think that it was difficult on oppenheimer for the rest of his life. trelegy for copd. ♪ birds flyin' high, you know how i feel. ♪ ♪ breeze driftin' on... ♪ [coughing] ♪ ...by, you know how i feel. ♪ if you're tired of staring down your copd,... ♪ it's a new dawn, ♪ ♪ it's a new day... ♪ ...stop settling. ♪ ...and i'm feelin' good. ♪ start a new day with trelegy. no once-daily copd medicine has the power to trea

he never apologized for hiroshima and nagasaki. he never expressed individual shame about that.emely cautious in the way he talked about it. and yet all of his actions post—1945 to me are the actions of somebody wracked by guilt, feeling a tremendous and overwhelming sense of responsibility. and it's that disparity between what he allowed the world to see outwardly and what seems to have been driving him that i wanted to to drill down on. and it's what makes his story the most dramatic i've ever encountered. it does feel like a very timely film. i wonder if it does for you with... we haven't talked about nuclear threats for a while and then with what's going on in the world right now, suddenly the the fear of it has risen up again. yeah. i mean, our relationship with the fear of nuclear weapons, with the threat of nuclear weapons is very complicated. i grew up, you know, in england as a teenager in the eighties. nuclear holocaust was very much on our minds. it was in the popular imagination, things like sting's song russians that refers to oppenheimer�*s deadly toys. it was one

the fact that america, in order to stop the war from japan, they threw rockets at hiroshima and nagasaki, this is how they put an end to this war, but in this situation, the americans fought the japanese with the aggressors. and the story was completely the opposite that is, in this situation, the aggressor who attacked ukraine threatens to drop a nuclear weapon, a nuclear bomb. that is, well, if we extrapolate to the events of 1945, it is as if the union threw nuclear missiles at the united states of america, isn't the same medvedev and putin afraid that something like this can happen in the reverse order but not from the side of ukraine, of course, because we do not have nuclear weapons, asbek from the west, two questions were issued, let's give portraits of the first reason for the historical parallels. i would like to remind that on september 30, 22 the moment when the occupied territories of ukraine became part of the russian federation, because the dictator then says that the countries from the west opened pandora's box at one time and gives just the example of hiroshima and nagasa

reid: a few years after the end of the war, i saw the raw footage of hiroshima and nagasaki.everse patterns of the kimonos burned into their skin and bodies floating in the river. it was so shocking. and i thought, "they're all my friends' fathers. did they know what they were doing?" none of it seemed to make any sense to me that this was so horrible. (geiger counter clicking rapidly) carr: as reports of that devastation started to come back to los alamos, obviously this weighed on the scientists. yes, it had been a horrible war but still, tens of thousands of people were killed in these attacks. cities were destroyed. and that was difficult on a lot of the scientists. and i certainly think that it was difficult on oppenheimer for the rest of his life. ♪ tourists tourists that turn into scientists. tourists taking photos that are analyzed by ai. so researchers can help life underwater flourish. ♪ i brought in ensure max protein with 30g of protein. those who tried me felt more energy in just two weeks. uh... here i'll take that. -everyone: woo hoo! ensure max protein with 30

said that america, in order to stop the war from japan, they threw the missiles on hiroshima and nagasaki an end to this war in this way, but in this situation the americans were fighting the japanese with the aggressors. and the story was quite the opposite , that is, in this situation, the aggressor who attacked ukraine threatens to drop nuclear weapons. bomb. that is, well, if we extrapolate to the events of 1945, it is as if the union threw nuclear missiles at the united states of america, isn’t putin afraid of the same bear that something similar can happen in reverse order, but not from the side of ukraine, of course, because we do not have nuclear weapons , asbek from the west , two questions, water, give us portraits, first, historical parallels . then he says that the countries from the west at one time opened pandora's box and gives just the example of hiroshima and nagasaki - this is the first and the second, respectively, he talks about the strikes of the allied air force during the second world war in the free cities of germany , and he talks about the in the hydraulic struct

reid: a few years after the end of the war, i saw the raw footage of hiroshima and nagasaki.ng in the river. it was so shocking. and i thought, "they're all my friends' fathers. did they know what they were doing?" none of it seemed to make any sense to me that this was so horrible. (geiger counter clicking rapidly) carr: as reports of that devastation started to come back to los alamos, obviously this weighed on the scientists. yes, it had been a horrible war but still, tens of thousands of people were killed in these attacks. cities were destroyed. and that was difficult on a lot of the scientists. and i certainly think that it was difficult on oppenheimer for the rest of his life. somedays, i cover up because of my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. now i feel free to bare my skin, thanks to skyrizi. ♪(uplifting music)♪ ♪nothing is everything♪ i'm celebrating my clearer skin... my way. with skyrizi, 3 out of 4 people achieved 90% clearer skin at 4 months. in another study, most people had 90% clearer skin, even at 5 years. and skyrizi is just 4 doses a year, after 2 star

nagasaki was also named a best book of the year. the washington post's the economist, kirkus reviews and the american association. nagasaki has also been published in england, spain, denmark, china, taiwan and japan. and excerpts of the book have appeared in journals around the world. susan's work has also appeared in the new york times. the washington post and the los angeles times and politico, among others. she holds an mfa in creative writing from antioch university, los angeles and was a nonfiction fellow at the norman mailer center in provincetown, massachusetts susan has spoken before united nations and continues to at international disarmament conferences universities and public forums around the united states and abroad. she teaches graduate level nonfiction seminars and directed a three year creative writing program at a federal prison for women outside phenix. susan was founder and artistic director of the phenix essential theater, serving communities across the southwest for 32 years. susan the 2016 dayton literary peace

what was dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki. so oppie was against the hydrogen. did he try to cordon any scientists not working on it. that was the charge. he might have talked. some people saying that atomic bombs are powerful enough and we don't need to unleash a thousand times more powerful bombs. but nonetheless in a public humility 18 way, his top security clearance yanked newspapers across. the country had front page articles about this. and so he went from 45 being this hero that ended world. war 2 to 1954, being villain that maybe was a was a communist spy. so when oppenheimer nuclear physics west to berkeley and caltech and to new mexico he changed particularly new mexico into what had been a very poor part the country that actually even today some people don't know that new mexico is part of the united states. they think it's part of mexico. i mean i get that all the time. oh, you have much of an accent. it's because i'm from the united states. when i when i say i'm from new mexico. but but it brought this this state that was poor had, very little infra

say anything about the bombing of dresden, germany by england, the destruction of hiroshima and nagasakiey don't have mercy on themselves , they don't help me at all, they not only mourn for our dead, and to respect our painting, why won't i be silent for a minute? we have to wait and the installation of thousands of thousands of thousands of amol's population will be the headlines of local newspapers. we will that the history of maral should be different. the first page was that you said that you were coming to amol and the elderly women ready to give birth were calculated to the nearest city of amir sasan . there is no guarantee since the last month. it doesn't last for a year, the siege is prolonged, there are famous men and valiant warriors, mothers accompany them, mothers who feed men with a piece of garlic bread and take their children to bed under the pretext of better food, women who raise the voice of a lullaby rather than crying. in dubai, showing children's medicine behind men isth khordad 93 is the honeymoon month of isis, deir al-zor oil was their driving engine and their ad

it was fdr, supreme court justice 37, douglas had rushed to say no nagasaki after he saw what it did. hiroshima the supreme court justice said, don't drop one in nagasaki just as would go and climb the himalayan sand, become a buddhist supreme court justice, collecting buddhism his all season hero is henry david thoreau. you know who else was against the mom after first one was dropped on catholic moral reasons joseph kennedy, who gets a lot of bad for being a business guy. he wanted to get the pope involved and bishops involved, henry luce involved to make sure there wasn't a second bomb drop for moral reasons, but another one. so john f read part one and i glad the war's over, but immediately took to a named norman cousins head of the saturday review and norman cousins wrote the first book, big major called is obsolete due to nuclear weapons, a critical if you read it today it's a pretty mild but nevertheless he was saying this is not something we should be it's a big problem. kennedy loved it. jack kennedy, when you study like i have closely his career in the navy years beyond bein

that bomb at nagasaki, you would have taken out ten square miles or a bit more if there had been ten square miles to take out, because it is known that the project cost $2 billion. we dropped just two bombs. it is easy to think they must be very expensive, but for any serious undertaking, an atomic armament and without any elements of technical, novelty, whatever, just doing things that have already been done, that estimate of cost would be high by something like a factor of a thousand atomic weapons. even with what we know, today can be cheap. even with what we know how to do today without any of the new things, the little things and the radical things, atomic armament will not break the back of any people that want. atomic armament. the pattern of the use of atomic weapons was set at hiroshima. they are weapons of aggression, of surprise, and of terror. they are ever used. again, it may well be by the thousands or perhaps by the tens of thousands. their method of delivery may well be different and may reflect new possibilities of interception and ufo. it's to outwit them. the strat

atomic bombs that were later dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki in japan during world war ii, killing thousands of people. >> he was the person in the seminar who always came up with the best idea. all these people report having been in these meetings with him, going along about this or that and then somebody raises a really hard question. oppenheimer suddenly speaks up with his great lucidity and depth of insight and says something that, if it doesn't solve the problem, it moves the conversation to another place. reporter: this person is currently a theoretical physicist at uc berkeley. he believes oppenheimer helped solidify uc berkeley physics as one of the top programs in the world but cautions putting him in certain categories. >> he must have been genuinely a charismatic leader. that's fascinating. einstein or those people. >> oppenheimer is a very important figure in world history. reporter: some scenes from the movie were filmed on uc berkeley's campus. just down the street from the theater that plans to throw -- show the film. j.r. stone, abc7news. dan: tonight, there's a gro

nagasaki and hiroshima. is that truthful? guest: that is not a fair statement. the bomb could not be micro targeted to these facilities. there were industrial facilities that were manufacturing military equipment and missions in both cities. there were stations for army and other military personnel. it just happens that the plants were surrounded by civilian residences and homes. and that the bomb created a huge blast and thousands of degrees of temperature created a firestorm. most of the people were killed by fire. the buildings were knocked down by blasts. host: we are trying to get to as many calls as we can, beth, you own with cindy kelly. you are on the air. caller: thank you. i'm calling, i am from a very large family and i had a lot of people in world war ii. my future husband who are married in 1962, his uncle was dr. david lyons, who graduated from the university of missouri. he was part of the manhattan project. and he lived in los alamos

forty-fifth year, when they used their nuclear weapons and bombed the two japanese cities of hiroshima and nagasaki, they really then curtailed the military campaign, the price is the life of almost 300,000 civilians . it's not our american method , just so that there are no people who are not ours, because peaceful citizens. but who should be contacted from the other side, who should receive this information? we realize that the world is changing we are at war in europe we need to move to martial law. we are involved in that we have mobilized acquisition processes. we provide equipment. we need to meet russia face to face, and not leave ukraine all the work, if we see that russia wants to take more action, for example in the baltic, then there will be expectations that we will take part in this. this will be required from our ground air force and naval forces. of course it would require. yes, he said on the thirtieth of january, she generally understands. how many minutes, a high horse will pass, declare war and poseidon and not the army will work, nothing else will be needed. well, it's just that

[000:00:00;00] the west we can't destroy the whole city we can't do the second vietnam gerasim nagasaki we can't otherwise we'll stop shaking and it won't allow us no matter how much we don't want to do it to me, too, maybe tomorrow i want to do it and say, turn off all the bridges and all the railway stations in kiev между николаевом Одессой we will return to the port e-e buildings of odesa misha, but the second such topic is to suddenly cut off ukraine from the sea immediately, the only thing that comes to mind of the ukrainian regime is not there should be access to the black sea odessa, nikolaev should be russian cities and kherson, you understand that it is already part of our constitution, of course , at least we need to go to transnistria until we take control of the coastal strip from tachakov to e-e ismaila ukraine under our control, all this will continue. they just need to cut off the sea so that they don't have any sea . such a russian ideologue got out and began to tell that there is no need to defend the bridge at all, let them continue to bomb and there is no need to defe

prejudice of which the prince brings about, because once he struck , the american was struck by the nagasakithing was normal. it was his nuclear weapon to answer the alternatives . естапе well, and actually further, how the russian military imagines a small nuclear war , you can briefly say: how can a limited nuclear conflict of russia look like? limited nuclear conflict consists in the fact that russia and the usa specifically do not carry out nuclear strikes on their territories , we attack them, they attack us, no matter what they do, it does not lead to a nuclear exchange. in a special article , in this case , they are talking about non-nuclear countries. aviation, yes, the poles forget the article of nato , they forget who is well adjusted, intervenes, no, they don’t wait, they don’t wait, they start, they start hitting our troops already with possible nuclear weapons on the territory of ukraine. here we are carrying out nuclear strikes on poland, this is a small, such a hateful nuclear war within the limits of one-and-done taken poland and parts of the territory of ukraine more claim t

the american was hit by nagasaki . nothing was normal. there was a nuclear weapon to answer.e could be no alternative at this stage. a small nuclear war is not enough for you, can you briefly say what a limited nuclear conflict in russia looks like, nato will start it, who will finish it, how the essence of a limited nuclear conflict is that it is russia and the united states specifically, they do not launch a nuclear attack on their territories, we are against them, they are against us, no matter what they do, it does not lead to a nuclear exchange. but let's say a conflict on the territory of poland, on the territory of ukraine, anything, france , great britain, eh, here is a separate article, in this case, they are talking about non-nuclear countries, germany poland, polish troops enter the territory , we do not naturally carry out strikes there, the poles will use their aircraft, we will attack the airfield. because there is interference no, they are not waiting, they are not waiting, they are starting, they are starting to hit our troops already with possible nuclear wea

agree to the peace offered by the kremlin , or they will arrange, relatively speaking, hiroshima and nagasaki, well, at least he drew parallels between the americans striking japan, 300,000 people were injured there in as a result of these strikes in the 45th year and between what could happen in ukraine, for example, it is normal to look at respectable people who were really respected in the world, and the same putin, we, medvedev , for example, were perhaps more afraid there, understood who they really are, but still i was with them respect, now they have become just such clowns who, in fact, did not create anything in their lifetime in the same russian federation, but imitated nuclear weapons from the soviet union, the creation of which also took part , in particular, our specialists, especially carriers ukrainians did it and now they are threatening the whole world, they are just funny dwarfs who are trying to charm and make fun of what in fact we did not participate in at all , we only robbed this country and now they are trying to threaten the world, they are like that now, in principle

gerasim nagasaki.ridges and all the railway stations between nikolaev odesa and others . these are the port buildings of odesa misha. to ukraine from the sea immediately, the first thing that comes to mind of the ukrainian regime is that there should be no access to the black sea, odessa, nikolaev should be russian cities, and kherson is understood , including that it is already part of our constitution, of course, at least we need to go to transnistria until we will not take the coastal strip of ukraine under our control from tachakov to ee ismaila, all this will continue and we just need to cut off the sea so that they don't have any sea. denys has a sea near lviv and swims there. well, there are even arcs there . such a russian ideologue got out and began to say that there is no need to defend the bridge at all. the answer, especially after russia's withdrawal from the grain deal, would be first of all to establish control over the access of this terrorist nazi state to the maritime zone and then th

the just gave me to trace of a close to us, dropped the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki however, was so immense. they've never been used in war again. nations have pledged together to keep them in check. and it's a model campaign is going to repeat through a tunnel with weapons and the this time catching a destructive new technology before it proliferates many of the people in both in the nuclear program. look back on that some thoughts rather than opening pandora's box, which is just a picture which just kept a shot. and the advocates of the, of a band cycles on, on this weapons that claim is. and it's a very plausible one which needs to be taken seriously. we are at the same moment in history with the system, so we need to keep the box close to complement backend. if we didn't open the box, we went see these, these risks. some simpson is an oxford university philosopher drools from his background to the british marines. to explore the moral complexities of force. we have a fear of being per day to the i think what else all of us weapons raised, but i think they raised that fee

person, a little insult we cannot destroy the entire city we cannot do the second vietnam gerasim nagasakihink, we didn't want to do it, tomorrow i want to do it too port e-e buildings odessa misha we will come back, but here is another such topic - it is to suddenly cut off ukraine from the sea immediately the first thing that comes to mind of the ukrainian regime should not be access to the black sea, this odessa nikolaev should be russian cities and kherson, you understand, including that is already a part of our constitution, it is certainly necessary for us to go to transnistria at least until then

atomic bombs that were later dropped on hiroshima and nagasaki in japan during world war ii, killingands of people. >> he was the person in the seminar who always came up with the best idea. all these people report having been in these meetings with him, going along about this or that and then somebody raises a really hard question. oppenheimer suddenly speaks up with his great lucidity and depth of insight and says something that, if it doesn't solve the problem, it moves the conversation to another place. reporter: this person is currently a theoretical physicist at uc berkeley. he believes oppenheimer helped solidify uc berkeley physics as one of the top programs in the world but cautions putting him in certain categories. >> he must have been genuinely a charismatic leader. that's fascinating. einstein or those people. >> oppenheimer is a very important figure in world history. reporter: some scenes from the movie were filmed on uc berkeley's campus. just down the street from the theater that plans to throw -- show the film. j.r. stone, abc7news. dan: tonight, there's a growing g

tactical nuclear weapons , the use of tactical nuclear weapons. conventionally speaking, hiroshima and nagasaki well, at least he drew parallels between how the americans struck japan, 300,000 people were injured there as a result of these strikes in 1945, and between what could happen in ukraine , it is usually a shame to see respectable people who were really respected in the world and i have the same putin, medvedev, for example, maybe they were more afraid, understood who they really are, but still respected them, now they have become just such clowns who, in fact, in their lifetime did not create anything in the same russian federation a imitated nuclear weapons from the soviet union, in the creation of which they also took part , and in particular, our specialists, especially the carriers of ukrainians, did this. and now they are threatening the whole world, they are just funny dwarfs who are trying to charm and make fun of what, in fact , we did not participate in at all they just robbed this country, and now they are trying to threaten the world, so now, in principle, everyone accepts i

then a second one on nagasaki. >> we had split at up.ged the world. >>. >> reporter: the war was over and oppenheimer was the most famous scientist in the world. but that is only half the story. >> he shortly afterwards plunged into deep depression. i think having read some of the news accounts of what had happened, actually, on the ground at hiroshima and nagasaki. >> reporter: oppenheimer had built the weapon that ended the war, but he had also created a monster which he warned would one day cause the world to curse the names los alamos and hiroshima. >> if there is another world war, this civilization may go under. >> the national security establishment appalled that the father of the atomic bomb is coming out in public giving speeches against these weapons. >> reporter: the chairman of the atomic energy commission played by robert downey jr. was bent on building more and bigger bombs than the russians. and oppenheimer was in his way. >> the russians have a bomb. we are supposed to be years ahead of them, but what were you guys doing

having read some of the news accounts of what had happened actually on the ground at hiroshima and nagasakier had built the weapon that ended the war, but he had also created a monster, which he warned would one day cause the world to curse the names los alamos and hiroshima. >> if there is another world war, this civilization may go under. >> the national security establishment is appalled that the father of the atomic bomb is coming out in public, giving speeches against these weapons. >> reporter: lewis straw is the chairman of the atomic energy commission played by robert downey jr., was bent on building more and bigger bombs than the russians. and oppenheimer was in his way. >> the russians have a bomb. we're supposed to be years ahead of them, but -- what were you guys doing at los alamos? was security tight? >> straws managed to draw up an indictment that made it appear that oppy's advice was politically motivated, that maybe he was a subversive, that maybe he was a secret communist, that maybe he was a spy. >> reporter: meeting behind closed doors, an atomic energy commission securi

the mastermind behind the atomic bomb that destroyed hiroshima and nagasaki . in 1945 the, the distributors of oppenheimer had yet to decide to release date for the film in the country that's off. hundreds of thousands of people died in the black and 78 years later, sensitivities remain the same with you guys. uh, at the end of the day they're still victims and re families around. so i think it's possible for the film not to be shown out of consideration for those people's feelings. i spun, you'll find me back and i think that among others that'll be plenty of people who wouldn't want to see it. i think there are a lot of people like debrief families who would be critical and wouldn't agree with showing it the film has been criticized for not showing the devastation that was caused by j. robert oppenheimer is invention. although some people say there is value in showing the movie to a japanese audience to better understand an american perspective. i think people so interested in the film they be interested in. the american suspect to the whole of this. i think

this is how a prejudice would bring a prize, because once struck, the american struck with the nagasakias normal, it was its nuclear weapon so that ответить альтернативу может быть и была было даном естанов well, actually further, how do the russian military imagine a little small nuclear war, you can briefly say how can a limited nuclear conflict of russia look like, nato will start, who will end it, how a slightly limited nuclear conflict consists of russia and the usa specifically does not carry out nuclear strikes on its territories, we are against them, they are against us, no matter what they do, it does not lead to a nuclear exchange . france, great britain, here is a special article, in this case, they are talking about non-nuclear countries, germany, poland, polish troops enter the territory, we do not naturally carry out strikes there, the poles will operate their aircraft, we will hit the airfield. where is this polish aviation, and the poles forget the nato article. they forget that it is good that something intervenes, they don't wait, they start, they start hitting our tro

he never apologised for hiroshima and nagasaki, he never expressed individual shame about that.lt. the film's stars appeared at the premiere in london last night, but as the news came that actors would be joining writers on the picket lines, they left before the film started. nolan, who writes his own movies, is already on strike. so you will not be writing another film while this strike is on? no, absolutely. and this is not about me, this is aboutjobbing actors, about staff writers on tv programmes trying to raise a family, trying to be able to, you know, keep food on the table. these companies have not yet accommodated how they're going to, in this new world of streaming, pay appropriately. any delay from nolan is a loss to cinema. from a director behind critically acclaimed blockbusters like inception and epics including the second world war drama dunkirk, oppenheimer is his latest movie to take on big themes, and with the film focused on the nuclear arms race, what does he think of the other existential threat to humankind, ai? when you talk to leaders in the field of ai, a

yours deeply, this is how a prejudice would bring a prize, because once struck, the american struck nagasakimal, there was a nuclear weapon in order to answer the alternative, there may be and it was not at this stage, well, yes. a small nuclear war, you can say in short how can a limited nuclear conflict of russia look like? specifically, they do not carry out nuclear strikes on their territories, we are on them, they are on us , not doing so does not lead to a nuclear exchange . but let's say a conflict on the territory of poland, on the territory of ukraine, france, great britain, uh , here is a separate article, in this case, they are talking about non-nuclear countries, germany, poland polish troops enter the territory, we do not naturally carry out strikes there, the poles will attack their aircraft, we will attack the airfield. they intervene, they don't wait, they start, they start hitting our troops already with possible nuclear weapons on the territory of ukraine. here we are launching nuclear strikes on poland, this is a small , hateful nuclear war within the borders of unilateral