. >> commissioner nageswaran. >> here. >> commissioner pearlman. >> here. >> commissioner so. >> here. >> first is general public comment. members of the public may address the commission on items within the subject matter of the commission. on agenda items you will be afforded at the time the item is on the agenda. press star 3 for general public comment. no requests to speak from members of the public. general public comment is closed. i take that back. it does appear one person is requesting to speak. you have three comments. >> i am henry. i open abs seafoods in san francisco. i would like to thank the historic preservation for considering my company as legacy business in san francisco -- legacy president in san francisco. >> i am sorry to interrupt you. this is general public comment and that is on today's agenda. you will have an opportunity to speak when we call that item up shortly. commissioners, that places us on department announcements, item 1. >> there are no announcements. that places under under item 2. president's report apannouncements. >> thank you. i believe that yo

commissioner nageswaran. >> commissioner: so, of course i looked at it and i read the letter from sfai attorney and got me to thinking about and so a couple of things i wanted to mention for everybody to hear so there's the four different diego rivera murals that are going to be coming up and i want to be careful how we approach this one so that as we go to the other ones that there aren't similar conditions. the stock exchange tower is a private tower and in the other three are relatively public spaces. coit tower which is a private institution presumably and university of california building is what i'm gleaning. and then, with landmarks hbc's landmark one fresco which is similar from what the planning department said, it's similarly done with movable panels and with this mural is within the states it's originally done. i'm not totally clear on the city attorney that it isn't personal property just to have it be movable. but what i want to understand is that when it was originally done was at the property of the university of california or the property of sfai, that's one thing to un

commissioner nageswaran. >> commissioner: so of course i looked at it and i read the letter from sfai got me to thinking about and so a couple of things i wanted to mention for everybody to hear so there's the four different diego rivera murals that are going to be coming up and i want to be careful how we approach this one so that as we go to the other ones that there aren't similar conditions. the stock exchange tower is a private tower and in the other three are relatively public spaces. coit tower which is a private institution presumably and university of california building is what i'm gleaning. and then, with landmarks hbc's landmark one fresco which is similar from what the planning department said it's similarly done with movable panels and with this mural is within the states it's originally done. i'm not totally clear on the city attorney that it isn't personal property just to have it be movable. but what i want to understand is that when it was originally done was at the property of the university of california or the property of sfai that's one thing to understand and th