there are certain generalized allegations of nahyan structural compliance. and denounce the new intimation. i except the department's explanation of their due diligence. i would not support a rehearing. >> i would concur. in denying the rehearing. >> do you have a motion? commissioner fung: to deny the rehearing. president garcia: if you could call the roll. >> president garcia, aye. vice president hwang, aye. [calling roll] this is denied. vice president hwang: mosquito llc. this is 37 grant ave. address to -- 1337 grant ave. requesting that action taken to -- be taken to remedy a conflict between our recently issued place of entertainment permit. the matter is on for hearing and we will start with the appellant. or his agent. you have seven minutes. >> thank you for hearing our appeal this evening. i run tecolote at 1337 grant ave and i am a longtime san francisco blues magician. i am joined by my partners. their friends and founders of the investment bank based in the city. we are serious business people trying to operate a model establishment and that is

nahyan-sfusd after-school program providers. we have tried to take into account all the different concerns that have been raised and i think the effort to try to address as many concerns as possible has led, unfortunately, to a timeliness issue. we're late but i think the news that will go out is not as bad as we had thought earlier in the spring. if we could just have a little more time. i do not have-specific information to share tonight. -- route specific information to share. president yee: you were on the list and somehow i missed your name. that was my fault. maybe that is what it was. how do you pronounce this one? thank you. dr. murase: i am getting lots of mail on the transportation plan. on our website it says we will have a plan in march, it will be brought before the board. if that is not correct taken off the website. this is another example of people racing to me of not delivering on our promises and i understand there are mitigating factors. maybe there should be an update on the website. we expect to have a trans

and authorize the general manager -- by other city agencies and to issue licenses for full use 2 nahyan visible entities and authorize the power enterprise to develop a procedure for reviewing and approving the use of sfpuc light poles for non-lighting purposes. >> what we have before you is our recommendation for establishing a policy that allows us to move forward with letting non-3 light purposes on our street light poles when there not generating-revenue generating -- when they are not revenue generating activities. we would like to work with them to allow use of the polls as appropriate under the guidance listed here. i am happy to take any questions. thank you. >> did you consider charging for the capability? >> we could. there will be expenditures on the part of the project proponent. there will need to demonstrate to us that the structural integrity of the poll is not compromised -- pole is not compromised. there will need to meet the ceqa compliance. there will need to invest some time in order to demonstrate to as the appropriateness of the use. it will not be free to the coun