najafi menesh, let me start and this question, mr. najafi menesh, basically, why are you against the government's entry into car pricing ? the world is being produced by you give an example of a country whose government has interfered in pricing, does it say that we are second to it or not? now let's assume that we are very innovative. it's good for us to do this too, we don't have any examples in the world, that is, this is something that goes against all economic principles, and we didn't have one until 1990, that is, the industry started to grow . the price difference between the factory and the market had increased at that time he made a very wise decision, he said, sir, the price of the car is 5% below the market price due to the government's difference. i mean, if i remember at that time, my shipment was, for example, 20,000 tomans for the factory, for example , 600,000 tomans for the market, the government would take the difference from the car manufacturer, until slowly, the prices came closer to each other. until the 1390s, t

najafi menesh, let me start and this question, mr. najafi menesh, is basically why you are against the government's involvement in car pricing. now, cars are being produced all over the world, not in iran . give an example of a country whose government has interfered in pricing. are we the second or not? now let's assume that we are very innovative. we started this work . give an example of a country that came from us. he regretted saying that what was done in iran is a good thing, we should do it too , there is no example in the world, that is, it is something that goes against all the economic principles and until 2019 we didn't have it, that is, the automobile industry started to grow until the 1990s, and there was no mention of mandatory pricing in the 1970s, because the price difference between the factory and the market had increased. at that time, the economic council made a very wise decision and said, sir , the government would take the price of the car 5% below the market price, the difference. that is, if i remember at that

najafi menesh, who is against pricing. you are a car dealer look, now cars are being produced all over the world, not in iran. give an example of a country whose government has interfered in pricing. we are the second. or not, now suppose we are very innovative, we started this work, give an example of a country that came and was influenced by us and said that what was done in iran is a good thing , we should do it too , we have no examples in the world, so this is a work contrary to all economic principles, we did not have it until 1990, that is, the automobile industry started to grow until 1990. because the price difference between the factory and the market has increased at that time, the economic council made a very wise decision and said, sir, the price of a car is 5% below the market price, and the government will take the difference . if i remember at that time, for example, the factory price was 200,000 tomans, for example, the market was 600,000 tomans, this is our difference. he said that the government was taki

najafi, mr. menesh, they even raised a point, why if these cars are causing so much damage, they will not be removed from the peak. it is very simple. the government appoints its manager, and if so, it is the government itself tell saz to do this to me , sir, they will cut it tomorrow morning. we have a law, paragraph 90 , article 44, which says that if the government comes somewhere and sets a price , it will cause loss and damage, and that amount should be the difference in order to make a profit. clause 90 of article 44h, even one of our khodazai managers came and made this claim and even included it in my account. he said mr. government, you now owe me so much according to this clause . what was the result? that's why we say that if the government is on the side and the private sector is on the side, it can talk about what happened now. they are using the term self-adjustment to cover their losses with the method of revaluation, and twice exclude themselves from article 141, and then continuing the