najarzadeh and the question , mr. najarzadeh, basically, why do you agree that this organization is part of the judiciary ? be separated you're welcome. in the name and memory of god, greetings and have a good time, dear viewers, respected colleagues of the good program above, and mr. dr. keshavarz. i am very happy to be at your service. i hope you had a good time and i hope tonight's program is useful. in the end, whatever the result will be for the benefit of the people of our nation. let me say now , i think it would be more appropriate if mr. keshavarz starts the discussion because of his appearance and because he is actually against the current situation , i think it would be more appropriate if we start with him. very well, mr. keshavarz, please tell me why. the opponents basically want this organization to be transferred from the judiciary to the government, in the name of allah, the most merciful , the most merciful. greetings, politeness and respect, your excellency , your respected colleagues and all dear vi

najarzadeh . regarding the effectiveness of the registered organization, see, first of all, in response to dr. keshavarz, i will tell you about the legislative history that you mentioned. all records legislation is our normal legislator, even if our normal laws indicate that these duties are assigned to the head of the judiciary or any other institution , this will not create an obstacle. on the way to this path, our legislator will come again and approve another law and say that this organization or any other organization should be transferred to another institution. therefore, the situation that you described does not create an obstacle in the way of our parliament, the parliament can make another decision and join any organization it wants, but i will return to my main argument, which is called the concentration of power. judiciary over judicial affairs, in my opinion , is a fundamental principle in the definition. and organizing the jurisdiction and powers of the judiciary according to the sam

najarzadeh. see, first of all, in response to mr. dr. keshavarz, i will tell you the history of what you said. the legislation that you mentioned is all the legislative records of our ordinary legislator, even if these ordinary laws of ours indicate that these duties are assigned to the head of the judiciary or any other institution, this does not create an obstacle. the only way is for our legislator to come back and pass another law and say that this organization or any other organization should be transferred to another organization , so the situation you described is an obstacle in the way of the parliament. it doesn't create us, the parliament can make another decision and annex any organization it wants, but back to my original argument, the focus of the judiciary on judicial affairs, in my opinion , is a fundamental principle in defining and organizing the jurisdiction and authority judiciary, according to the same philosophical basis that i mentioned, see this important principle in our constitution as well we can see a trace of

najarzadeh, please continue with your reasons. regarding the implementation of the registration organization and the effects it can have , i would like to tell you that i will start again from the orders of dr. keshavarz. the executive is doing it, while the work of the parliament is the work of legislation. see, i think the basic point and the starting point of your argument is that the islamic council is facing a problem in the system. our semi-parliamentary semi-presidential has two dignity , it has legislative and legislative dignity and also has the dignity of monitoring the implementation of the law. the court of accounts is also a specialized institution created and attached to the parliament under the supervision of the parliament for this second function, which is to monitor the implementation of the law, but not all. the laws only supervise the implementation of the budget law by the institutions receiving the budget from the country. hint you said that, well, our constitution mentions the prevention of crime as one of t

najarzadeh, please continue with your reasons for the implementation of the registration organization and the effects that it can have , and i will start again from the orders of dr. keshavarz. calculations are doing executive work , while the work of the parliament is the work of legislation see, i think the starting point and the starting point of his argument. we are faced with a problem in our semi-parliamentary and semi-presidential system, the islamic council has two dignities : it has legislative and legislative dignity and it also has the dignity of supervising the implementation of the law . the second function is monitoring the implementation of the law, but not all laws , only about monitoring the implementation of the law. the budget is monitored by the budgeting agencies of the country . therefore, we cannot say that the work of the court of accounts is executive work. by no means fully possessed there is a supervisory function. another point you mentioned was that our constitution mentions the prevention of crime as one of the duties of the judiciary . yes, it is. but if