bret gladstone aside from me is david nale my client. has had hiv and has been taking a very intense drug for 20 years which has as we've mentioned before impeded. one of the reasons that he's/%($r$ been impeded from completing the garage. the other included two appeals, one was a appeal to your boardq several years ago on whether or not he should have a graj at all, followed by a permit appeal to the planning commission on whether or not he should be able to have group housing at this location. as- planning commission, i think it was unanimous vote approved the group housing project which allowed him to prow garage permit. to have a rehearing the grounds need to be among other things, that there's new facts that weren't available at the÷rpcrú time of the previous hearing. and let me start off with that. i guess that's still not on. thank you2jjk. right after the hearing of last month, i askedq send out the 311 notification because your decision that night was m extend the variance, to thefa that was coming up, 31 days after yourg your d

nale's disability attorney advised him in a letter the next day that he should immediately send out that 311 notification. he did not. and that is the event that we're here to talk about that is a new item for0n have a rehearing tonight. mr. sanchez said that it was an emont impossibility for there to be a 311 triggered dr hearing because he could not act to send out the 311 notification until your board had a notice of decision in order, something that usually takes weeks to happen. and he felt it was an impossibility. but this ignores the fact that we had asked mr. sanchez and his scaf to send -- staff to send out a 311>e notification approximately six weeks before the hearing that you made your decision. we got a notification back that the planning department wouldf2 not make a 311 notification because an appeal had been filed by the neighbor on the factñ m!,75 extension was granted to 30 days beyond your nexto%(ú0n hearing. we also filed an appeabh::zp" we filed an appeal just to preserve our rights. we got a e-mail from the planning staffer, acknowledged5hnnnp by mr. sanchez saying

tidhi a aeaexdouinreo t wofueas inle te sert(cinoclldatoume 'venig oghee le al cotuonig guha bn.le nale ey gitgu cothbos geseseathe 'sue te r t. rengha etd erk , sli top gha yo g tve mouuser gotobi gun t ou e t hetl htic mas thck sey gug eeatok as jheit the hendri ths e ea ssfec 'vt o as jheit tus aagri t yangioge w aet r do ssfs ha legead donolyy threasseic rtosl ve mes oue ma oysor ey br mo n s s re theahe hoaltol eseas reassert acemk r raat thvin oc hoaltol eseas reassert e f nk s r tmon ma tupoc hoaltol eseas n s fort rv. nk s r tmon whe rnre tto s asl ea leck to w n' a a whe rnre tto s dsl igac h ! hohog]w: th uh h. ninnnce psm] sti t ? w our o ftitop sfli miock o ♪fehg ♪saontu ♪fronid ♪robahay wr,erney s e ay♪ ♪w s say ♪l hey ld ♪ a a ♪ 60utf siact a aea wer ze ay♪ we nsney ♪rve ta ls my♪ ♪sptheesu wenveot♪ y atay♪ ♪ hey d l hhyld un: id etnvd. g ats. 'sts.g ♪ hey d l hhyld , th! i ya ? ok thmp yro ere saofld fr o tyo au sare tisthobs rt ttnt tha edh e leepg bante s ybheasne vo at' toa o.o loheare thggof s coanghnprghaatts f ie .e. 'sugno msand ct eaertory tu ser pe yeeay gi te be

the fact that david nale is requesting a rehearing should be a red flag to you that this appellant includinglars to move his+ p!y project forward. even scanning his lengthy letters one can(y excuses and every reasono or false,%t8b to> president hwang: thank you. next speaker please-( hí. >> my name is ann thornton and i am making these statements as i have an interest in the unit across the street, 129 and 131 fillmore street. and i would like to argue against giving more time on this garage. on 20 -- 10-24 the board -- thiferred extension to construct his garage. appellant is claiming his d