in the case of nan curry, that was a different situation in my view. in my view about mr. kim being on the board of bid, neighborhood associations, historical societies, he is in the industry and it would only make sense he would participate within his industry. now i'm on a lot of things in my industry. so i mean, i don't see that that would be a negative. certainly people should testify for him that in organization s where he does not sit on the board. however, he is active in his industry and i personally don't see that as a conflict and lastly, but not least, i think local businesses and neighbors should have neighborhood outreach. but i am not an advocate for any neighborhood organization telling anyone that they "have" to come to a meeting, that they "must" come to a meeting or else. that is a form of bullying and i am personally, just feel that is unconscionable that you tell them that they have to do that. in any my view, nobody has to do anything that. is my two cents. anybody else? >> i am curious about the police recommendations. we have the situation that we ha