nancy? uh, name the novel for $600. nancy. what's "silence of the lambs"? that's the novel.h, name the novel for $800. jordan. what is "the wind in the willows"? correct. uh, novel for $400. - nancy. - what's "gone with the wind"? yes. uh, name the novel for $1,000. jordan. what is "a clockwork orange"? correct. uh, college courses for $200, please. evelyn. what is klingon? good. anagrams for $200. evelyn. what is caffeine? yes. anagrams, $400. nancy. what's encyclopedia? that's the word. anagrams for $600. jordan. what is presbyterian? yeah. uh, anagrams for $800. evelyn. what is nassau? right. anagrams, $1,000. evelyn? what is tetherball? yes. name the novel, $200. nancy. what is "the picture of dorian gray"? correct. uh, great british coin hunt for $200. in the collection of 26 10 pence coins issued in 2018, "c" is for this national sport. nancy. what's cricket? yes. uh, great british coin hunt for $400. "w" is for this, normally abbreviated "www." jordan. what's the world wide web? right. uh, coin for $600. "s" is for this ancient monument. - evelyn. - what is stonehenge

how much of a suspect was nancy? >> i don't know that nancy was on the radar for a long time.satisfias. >> reporter: after that search, they did just that. they believed this anguished mother had nothing to do with the disappearance of her daughter. so they took nancy off the list. they also took off the boyfriend, matthew. he had an alibi that held up, putting her somewhere else at the time lynsie went missing. that left just two. >> i haven't seen her since that day. >> reporter: marty, who police didn't trust because of his secret relationship with lynsie, and because he had lied about his identity. and the man who dropped lynsie off at that corner, the last american to see her before she vanished, chris mcamus. april 2002. more than a year after lynsie went missing. detectives decided to start over. they brought chris back to see if his story still held up. >> i really would like to think that lynsie has been like either abducted or something has happened to her. >> like what? >> i would really rather think that she was with a friend or things like that. >> police turned u

nancy.t's you and your gang of criminals who are above the law. john durham better be prepared with indictments or face the wrath of mayor cans who believe they are held to a different standard. in the end this is about a conversation our president had with the president of ukraine. and to be honest with you it's none of your damn business what was said. we are not entitled to know what barack obama was promising putin through medvedev in that hot mic moment. and we are not allowed to know what the quid pro quo of barack obama was when he gave $150 billion to the ayatollah. or are we just supposed to assume he was playing santa claus with iran? a phone call with ukraine involves policy. if you don't like the president's policy, vote for someone else. the guy on the other end of the phone says there was no pressure. the transcript makes it clear there will be was no pressure. the guy on the other end didn't even know military fund weren't available. so how can there be a quid pro quo? and i a

this is have 2019 telling of the nancy drew story. have you bn enjoying it?> it's weird 'cause especially 'cause you're playing nancy's dad. >> that's why i'm asking. >> my family bk at home watching it and i have to reassure them that nick doesn't have a sex sce in every single episode. >> rig. >> it's steamy a lot of the me. >>> things got hot on the set of john cena and keen-michael key's movie "playing with fire." >> this film gives me a comedy duo weidn't know we needed. >> you could not keep a straight face. >> not a chance and it's -- they only showed me like 10%. >> john cena and keegan-michael key bring plentyf laughs, but john also brings the sn which he says was director andy fickman's idea. >> he's like i don't wanyou to take this the wrong way. i put in a shower scene and i'm likedude, it's a kids' movie. >> well andy's version of events seem to differ. >> at a certain point i thk we were all on set being like, john, ere's no need to have your shirt off in that scene. he's like but i'm fighting fe ani'm like, yeah, body takes their shirt off to f

i play nancy's dad carson drew. i am taking over for "e.t."nto this awesome microphone. let's go have some fun. oh, hi. come on in. so this is the drew house. this is where nancy grew up. this is an area my character spends a bunch of time in. this is carson drew's office. it's official. i'm a real lawyer. >> 23-year-old newcomer kennedy mcmann is nancy drew in this series that takes on the super natural. >> do you believe in ghosts? did you believe in ghosts? >> did i believe in ghosts? no. do i believe in ghosts? yes. did that change during the course of filming this show? yes. okay. so we started shooting in this abandoned mental institution. and we were in this room where the door was propped open all day long. all of a sudden we just hear ding, ding, ding and the door goes whoosh. >> closed shut? >> and we went, oh, dear god it's over. >> something else this series has that you won't find in the books -- >> there's a lot of steaminess and sexiness. this is have 2019 telling of the nancy drew story. have you been enjoying it? that's weird.

nancy: thanks for having me. i think the market has become a little bit tone deaf to the president's tweets. in addition to the china news, we also got a comment from nancy pelosi saying usmca would be an easy trade deal to pass. i think that is very good news. i would not be surprised if that is driving some investors in the more cyclical stocks to have more confidence that we may see some temperance to trade. trade truce will be a nonevent, as carl said, but we don't think stocks will be too worried about that. it will just take away the headline risk. have you been advising, investing, have you kept dollars on the sideline, where would you put any spare dollars to work now? we went along cyclicals at the end of last year. it didn't feel very good through may, but we are convinced valuation is a leading indicator, so we were pretty well positioned this rally through the summer. there is still opportunity in technology. we have been adding to broadcom, vo, addingoking at qor to financials, morgan stanley, jpmorg

it should not be nancy to spoke -- nancy pelosi in the small group of people. -- it should not be nancy pelosi in a small group of people that she selects that get to determine who is going to be our president. if you look at the resolution today, they talk about fairness. now if they really think they can tell people it's fair that only the chairman gets to decide who the witnesses are, they give us an opportunity to call witnesses, but if the chair says they don't like the witness the witnesses don't come forward. they allow the president to have legal counsel in the room. unless the chair decides that they don't twheant president's legal counsel in the room. that's never happened before. with the clinton impeachment, with the nixon impeachment. republican and democrat alike, both sides were treated equally. both sides could call witnesses. president's legal counsel was in the room. not at the discretion they have chair but because it's fair. so when you look at this soviet style process, it shows you that they don't really want to get to the truth. they want to remove a sitting presi

we talked to nancy pelosi on friday.he said she is hopeful she can get it done, at the same time she has to have concessions on enforcement. this is what she said. it is aboutsi: having agreement on the trade agreement. it all stems from the trade agreement. i have gone to the floor with a minority of my members but that is not what this is. this is about a policy we are that we will pass something less and has to enforcement in it. david: i asked that question because if she really wants the usmca -- she is saying she wants what she wants on enforcement. myron: i have to think we can get this deal done. not because the business community wants it. the speaker and the democrats need a win. they need to take something back to their congressional districts. the administration has made this a top legislative priority. i think the winds are coming together to get something done. there are issues being resolved. they are working on outstanding issues around labor and enforceability. they are working around other issues. i thi

. -- i can tell you that it is sitting on nancy pelosi's desk. please. please. , the great trade deal for the farmers, manufacturers, workers of all types including unions -- it is sitting on nancy pelosi's desk. she is incapable of moving it it looks like. she knows it is a great deal. she said it. she keeps saying that she wants to get it done but we are talking about many months sitting on the desk with no votes. i guess all of the republicans will vote for it. it worksm is, the way is she has to put it out for a vote. she has not wanted to do it because i understand a couple of are asking afl cio her to hold it for a little while. i get a lot of votes from them except for maybe at the top. richard trumka, nice guy. nancy pelosi should put it up for a vote because at some point you will have canada and mexico say --what is going on? send the agreement back. let us not make the deal. i would not blame them at all. we have to blame nancy. this is a phenomenal deal for our farmers and everybody. a great deal for our country. it replaces one of the worst

please welcome speaker nancy pelosi!d applause ) ( band playing ) >> stephen: madam speaker, thank you for being here today. i know you've had a busy one. ( laughter ) this is truly an historic day. thank you for making time to be on our silly show. ( cheers and applause ) >> it is a busy day. >> stephen: it is. but i wanted to thank you for your patriotism, i really am because -- ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: oh, thank you very much. >> this is a sad thing for our country. we do this prayerfully with great seriousness. nobody goes to congress to impeach a president, and you've had your fun with the policy and the personality and the rest -- >> stephen: sure. -- and that's about the election. the patriotism, the constitution is really what impeachment is about. so i welcome the opportunity to take us to, again, where you have been, bs but in, shall we say, a little different vein. >> stephen: yes, a slightly different vein. ( applause ) so the house voted today. are we done? is the president impeached? >> no. no, b

signed, nancy pelosi, speaker of the house of representatives. he speaker pro tempore: the prayer will be offered by the

of house speaker nancy pelosi's recent comments that the president is more than likely to present his case, our crazy do nothing, where's usmca, infrastructure, lower drug pricing and much more, speaker of the house, nervous nancy pelosi, who is petrified by her radical left knowing she will soon be gone, they and fake news media are her boss, said on sunday's deface the nation, that i testify about the phony impeachment witch hunt. she said chi do it in writing, even though i did nothing wrong and don't like giving credibility to this no due process hoax, i like the idea, and will in order to get congress focused again, strongly

more of my interview with nancy pelosi.a special program of my conversation with the speaker across all bloomberg platforms. this is "balance of power" on bloomberg television and radio. ♪ jonathan: from new york city for our audience worldwide, i'm jonathan ferro. bloomberg real yield starts right now. coming up, the u.s. economy delivering stronger-than-expected jobs growth. validating the fence pause. clarida says the economy is in a good place. just as the u.s. and china look to close out phase one. we begin with a big issue, and unexpectedly solid jobs report. >> pretty solid report. >> really strong. >>

host: one of the theories that nancy's losey --nancy pelosi has specifically designed this so it would fail. explain this. anomaly, yous an have others who have been saying for three years that impeachable and criminal acts are now well established by the president, stemming from the russian investigation. the democratic leadership made it clear that they did not want to see in impeachment on any of the russian investigations and that is not the part of the inquiry thus far. that creates a strange anomaly. you have been telling us for three years these are clearly established impeachable offenses, and one of two things are true, either they are not clearly established or you don't want to remove the president. take your choice, but you would think you would broaden the impeachment. what we do know is that the speaker has been opposed to impeachment. she has been the primary force that has slowed it down. that created an odd situation. for three years the democrats have not made steps towards impeachment significantly. testifiedhoto -- i month ago and said why aren't you getting an impe

this is what nancy pelosi said. impeachment is so divisive to the country, unless there is something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, i don't think we should go down that path because it divides the country and he's just not worth it. it is not bipartisan. >> but look at the date. that was prior to knowing anything we now know about ukraine. right? this was just something that we've been learning about in the past two months, this has been happening behind closed doors and i agree with you we haven't seen any republicans change their view thus far, but these have been closed door hearings. what happens when we start to hear these witnesses come out for public testimony, if the american public, if their constituent, i know they're now under the pressure of the president, if they're starting to become under pressure from the constituents which we haven't quite seen yet but if we have public hearings, that may hang. >> ladies, thank you very much. >> thank you, guys. >>> democrats have negotiating for for

signed, nancy pelosi, speaker of the house of representatives. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to the order of the house of january 3, 2019, the chair will now recognize members from lists submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning hour debate. the chair will alternate recognition between the parties. all time shall be equally allocated between the parties and in no event shall debate continue beyond 11:50 a.m. each member other than the majority and minority leaders and minority whip shall be limited to five minutes. the chair now recognizes the gentleman from texas, mr. green, for five minutes. mr. green: thank you, mr. speaker. mr. speaker, it and still i rise. and still i rise because i love my country. and today i rise to defend those who are recipients of the daca program. i rise to defend these young unfortunately bigotry is being weaponized against them. i rise because the chief executive officer has indicated that there are hardened criminals among them, but he does it in such a way as to demean and defame all of them.

. >> joining us from florida is former deputy national security adviser and ambassador, nancy soderberg, who also served as former ambassador as well representing united nations in 1997. looking at the transcripts which have been released of the telephone call between president trump and the president of ukraine, how often do you sit in on something like that with president clinton? guest: hundreds of times. in the oval office, air force one, and it is fairly normal to have one at least, but usually several people sitting down, and the situation room is also wired to take notes and translators. when a president is on the phone with a foreign leader there are a lot of people who take notes and basically send it around the government so everyone knows what was happening. in this case it was put into a secure server so it was not handled in the normal process. of course now it has come out. secrecy does not work in those situations. host: dozens of people listening in, how many people are involved for the preparation of a typical phone call between a president and another head of state? gu

our house. >> laura: our house is what nancy thinks.he way pelosi and schiff act is just kind of as goofy as that, it's unbelievable. suddenly, they care about honoring the intent of the framers. speak of founders provided the remedy. >> the founders gave the power, if need be. speak with the founders didn't want a dictator, they didn't want a monarch. >> what do we have come a monarchy or a republic? that's a constitution. >> laura: i half expected nancy to show up in a revolutionary waistcoat, but thankfully, republicans are calling this out for the horror show it is. >> this impeachment is not only an attempt to undo the last election, it's an attempt to influence the next one, as well. this is not what democrats promised when they entered the majority 11 months ago. i guess it's only fitting you take this boat on halloween. >> laura: and on halloween, people are looking for treats, and democrats only offered lame tricks. like the absurd notion that they are approaching this solemn moment with open minds. >> only the facts and how we

nancy, thank you again.e anything we shouldn't be looking at? >> if i gave away all of the secrets i would let money burn away, i can't do that. >> the paramedic shows us how he's making ambulance rides less scary for his youngest patients. you're watching "cbs this morning," pretty entertaining for adults, too. >>> in our series >>> in our series, a more perfect union, we aim to show you that what unites us as americans is far greater than what divides us. children, a ride in the back of an ambulance can be a very scary thing. it's scary if you're an adult, too. jamie yuccas introduces us to a minnesota paramedic who found the magic solution. [ siren ] >> reporter: when an emergency call comes in -- >> to the crash -- >> reporter: paramedic ivan mazurkiewicz rolls out ready to make lifesaving decisions. he's passionate about his profession but still finds time for a little sleight of hand. ivan's tricks are a regular part of the job on calls where kids are involved. in order to help them stay calm. what doe

white house speaker nancy pelosi has said that an agreement is within range. our colleague who covers bloomberg is with us. there is a sense that this is happening. canadian officials are there. this may be about making concessions on the canadian side to get the deal ratified. is that what's happening? jenny: it seems like this is the week when all of the puzzle pieces are falling in line. they made some progress but it never looked like we were .etting close to anything the fact that both ministers were in town with ambassador aghthizer, after he had positive meeting with nancy pelosi seems to indicate we are getting somewhere that leads to a resolution that will finally get this deal up for a vote. shery: nancy pelosi saying it will be better for the workers. what is in contention? >> there have been a number of issues the sides have been tripping at. enforcement is the overarching issue. aboutwas also discussions the biologic pharmaceutical positions. it seems that they have made project -- progress and now it came down to the labor enforcement which inclu

vonnie: still ahead, we will hear from house speaker nancy pelosi.g down with david westin to talk about the economy and impeachment. you don't want to miss that. it is coming up at 12:00 p.m. eastern, 4:00 p.m. london time. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ vonnie: live from new york, i'm vonnie quinn. guy: from london, i'm guy johnson. this is "bloomberg markets." time now for futures in focus. joe, we saw the employment number. it was much stronger than in passivity did -- then anticipated. what are the locations of that for the markets? joe: in the fixed income markets, you've basically seen at the curve has flattened. bottom line, short-term fear has kind of been alleviated somewhat because the consumer is still strong in the united states. that is reflected in the jobs numbers, especially that we saw 128,000. with the uaw strike, we thought that number could be about 50,000 less then what came out. the bottom line is you could see a growth number around one at 17000, 200,000 -- around 5000, 200,000. that has taken pressure off of the upside on the bonds.

but unfortunately in nancy's house, we do not. reporter: are you ok setting precedent that any future precedent republican or democrat can ask a foreign leader to investigate their political rival? mr. mccarthy: every single day we work with another government to solve cases. what the president asked for was an open case that the attorney general was already investigating. it is nothing about the future but something happened. something that the entire country wants to know and get to the bottom of. we just went through two years of a nightmare. why did that happen? i believe you would be craving to know that answer. when we use taxpayers' money, i want accountability. this is precious money that is taken from hardworking taxpayers. i want accountability about it. and the ukranians did nothing for the money to be released. when adam schiff looked into the american public and lied that he did not know who he was and taking us down a new nightmare, haven't we learned from the first time? why would we do this? we are one year away fr

zeldin: in a way you could say congratulations to nancy pelosi. she wanted a bipartisan vote on her impeachment inquiry resolution and got it. it was a bipartisan vote against her inquiry resolution. there are a number of other democrats who chose to vote the wrong way and should have voted no and won't be here to serve anymore with us come january 2021. nancy pelosi as the leader of her conference has chosen to sacrifice a few of her own members. those members are going to lose for all of the right reasons. because as we have seen during this past vote, staffers were running around the democratic side of the aisle, don't cheer, don't clap. the eagerness, the happiness that democrats have and their enraged liberal activist base at home has to rip the country in half. steve scalise said we need to work together to pass usmca and reduce the cost of prescription drugs. but instead we have colleagues who have gavels who are ripping our country in half. we have been saying for weeks that not only should there have been a vote to launch an impeachment i

there is no one who has done way that nancy pelosi and adam schiff has done. themry will hold accountable. we are at a moment when the nation faces grave, significant threats and she has completely neutered the intelligence committee. she has said they must be focused on a partisan impeachment process and not their of sight obligations that a body, that we have as an important branch of this government. and they'll be held accountable for that. now i'd like to turn things over to the republican leader, the oversight committee, mr. jordan. >> thank you, liz. about you all to think something. this morning i was in an impeachment deposition but then come to the that to floor for a vote on the rules for impeachment. [laughter] >> that says its all about this process. and it is a sad day. it really is, for this country, what the democrats have put our nation through to you now almost years. you go back to july of 2016, when they opened an thestigation into president. then candidate trump and spied two american citizens associated with the presidential campaign. i b

that doesn't bode well for nancy pelosi. >> nancy pelosi said you can't move forward with impeachmentut bipartisan support. the only bipartisan support that showed up on capitol hill yesterday was against the impeachment inquiry against donald trump but nancy pelosi is following the resistance and the squad and taking congress off a cliff with it. carley: now we are entering phase 2 of the impeachment inquiry process democrats are planning some high profile public hearings. how will that change public perception of this impeachment inquiry? >> the problem democrats face, when it becomes public you are going to get the people from the republican side and the entire truth, not just what is being leaked by adam schiff. the facts are not going to change. there was no quid pro quo, the president didn't do anything wrong and none of their witnesses are going to change that. we read the transcript. it is right there for everyone to read. rob: the president has a big rally tonight. we will have a reporter there and you have a governor's race that is pretty important. >> the people of mississi

i think nancy pelosi has lost her mind and i think that she should go back home to san francisco. if you look at what is happening, to her district, her district is going to hell with homeless that they are not taking care of, with needles all over the streets, with tents, with people, with sanitation, with horrible things being washed into the ocean and in the pacific ocean. i think nancy pelosi, her district has probably gone down more than any district personally in the united states. in what she has done for that district, and on then on top of , management is so bad, the governor doesn't know what he is doing. that got to take care of it. rarely somebody else or someplace else. but nancy pelosi ought to go back to her district and take care of it because her district has become a mess. number one in the country for going down. all she thinks about is impeachment. [indiscernible] >> it's really up to the log years. lawyers.the read the transcript. read the transcript. [indiscernible] >> we will see what happens. i called them the do nothing. they are not getting anything done.

that's why nancy pelosi is coming out with a new narrative.ou: narrative number twoils attempted bribery. good lord. it's pathetic to watch this go on. as i think it president correctly observed. in any other circumstance this would be shut down right now. it's just a disaster for the dems. i'm not lamenting that. i'm cheering as loudly, a hallelujah chorus in the wings of that's hearing room for the intelligence committee. it's a disaster, and i just can't imagine why they would even pursue it. >> you have know, in -- you have know, in any rational forum they would start back pedaling and look for a graceful way out. these people are going full throttle over the cliff. i think they may have trouble getting the votes. after that dud yesterday and what's going to happen tomorrow. i would suspect if you are a democrat, first term democrat in one of those 30 districts that strum won, you are proper -- that trump one, you are probably saying we don't have anything. i would suspect they are looking for a way to get out of this. lou: normally i give

i do think that nancy pelosi wants these proceedings to move with all haste. the complication of having a public impeachment proceeding in the middle of a presidential campaign. i do think there will be a tight deadline on this. if public hearings are done in november, if they wind up in december, you could get a resolution of this or at least a movement out of the house and into the senate before the first of the year. how is the president going to handle a reelection portion of this? let's assume we are going through the impeachment process. how does this changes message? does he believe with this ongoing key can expand his base, and if he does not, how does the double down? this is going to have a meaningful impact. marty: during the world series newgame 7, they launched a ad campaign very sophisticated and professional which cast donald trump as he is not the nicest guy, but look at all of the things he has accomplished. they are pivoting. i thought it was a very effective ad. --hink that going forward since it appears that the substance of what happened o

the book is called "the nancy pelosi way."e is christine pelosi the daughter of the house speaker. thank you so much for being with us. it's a terrific read about family, about political organizing and female empowerment and then you get to the end and your afterward and you wrote the whole book, got it to the publisher and there's an impeachment hearing under way basically, a full impeachment inquiry, so you write about that. how is house speaker nancy pelosi approaching this process given what you know about her, how will she approach it? >> john, it's great to be with you and appropriate that we're talking about this book on "new day" because one of the lessons of the nancy pelosi way is to treat every day as a new day when you have five kids in six years, as she and my father paul did, and you're talking about diapers and then carpools and class activities and all that. there's so many group dynamics that come from raising a family of five that you have to understand coalition, politics, you have to understand how to read

i think nancy pelosi has lost her mind and i think that she should go back home to san francisco. if you look at what is happening, to her district, her district is going to hell with homeless that they are not taking care of, with needles all over the streets, with tents, with people, with sanitation, with horrible things being washed into the ocean and in the pacific ocean. washed into the pacific ocean. i think nancy pelosi, her district has some of the gone down more than any other district proportionately in the united states and what she has done for that district and then fires of it, you've got eating away at california every year because management is so bad. the governor is like a child, he doesn't know what he is doing. they've got to take care of it. every year, it is always california. go nancy pelosi ought to back to her district and take care of it because her district has become a mess. number one in the country for going down. all she thinks about his impeachment but she doesn't want to impeach. wants to impeach? the radical left. him and up to the lawyers. i like

mostly talking about trade deals, the usmca, that's why the president was going after nancy pelosi as he was saying that she is using these impeachment hearings to try to get support for the usmca. the problem for the president though is what are they going to do on the democratic side? the republicans can cry foul and he can cry foul all they want to try to energize the base but it really is up to the democrats what they do going forward. nancy pelosi indicating in a letter that she sent to her colleagues that she may be all in for this idea of having to vote on articles of impeachment because she said that the weak response to the hearings has been let the election decide, wait until november to decide this. she said that dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action because the president is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections. the vice president isn't so sure whether they will ever get to that. he said in one of those eight radio interviews today i don't consider it a foregone conclusion that they, the house have the votes to pass articles of impeachment. s

let's talk about nancy.nd take a wider look at towing and an effort to rein in the high price of getting towed. nancy asked us to hide her face but she wants you to hear her story. about a simple parking error that cost way more than she ever expected. >> parking? >> sxles less every day. >> driving around in circling for a while. >> i get a lot of parking tickets. >> but mostly just a problem. it's a mess. >> parking is especially a scarce near lake merritt. that's where nancy mistakenly parked there. >> somehow i didn't know it was a driveway we were blocking. >> police had the car towed. the next day nancy and her mom went to this tow yard to retrieve the toyota rav4. the police wouldn't let them take it. the only name on the registration was her dad and he died in january. >> it was a really, really complicated process. we had to go to toyota, get the loan transferred to my name. >> nancy says she spent two months ironing out the paperwork. we confirmed with toyota that two months is the typical timeline

vonnie: is this impacting nancy pelosi?en: she has already committed to having the end of the year. it is when it goes over to the at that point, it is out of nancy pelosi's hands. that is partly why she was expressing reluctance over forward, anticipating this could hurt the 2020 democrats chances of reclaiming the white house. there are some down ballot fx of that that will affect her caucus. i follow your argument, if president trump does not need to be worried about impeachment hearings ahead, how worried does he need to be about china negotiations not coming to a conclusion? stephen: that is the bigger thing to keep an eye on. now that the epic summit was canceled, we have to look at when the tariffs go into effect. tensions are going to flare as we get closer to the december 15 deadline. watching the headlines around that will be important. do they is progress, announced something around december 15, does trump postpone the tariffs? i don't think markets would react too much on that. i think there would be status quo.

nancy pelosi sold nancy pelosi and the 31 districts, never mention impeachment when you are running.re and jobs. the american people from understanding they are so obsessed with overturning the 2016 election. they have got to defeat trump. they can't do it at the ballot box. they have to do it with extra democratic means. you are starting to see the polls come now that they are losing interest. i think you will see actual anger. what dan rather ought to question. why are the independents shifting so much. trish: they are part of the cult now. >> president trump dismisses it. it's insulting to hard-working men and women. the trump movement is a working class and middle class movement. they didn't have a voice of the permanent political class. this is a steal of two cities. the city on the hill always made the street decision, the revolution, the civil war, world war ii. these are people who understand the greatness of this country, they back president trump, they were sick of the elites in this nation. what they want to do is return america to its former greatness, and they see donald

bribery by name is nancy.have the democrats achieved with their impeachment rebranding and public parade of disgruntled bureaucrats. it wasn't damaging to president trump as they plan. it actually hurt the ruling class and the establishment who have declared war on president trump because it exposed for all to see their snooty arrogance and contempt at democracy. this was the current ukraine ambassador. >> i am not here to take one side or the other. >> the establishment side, the bureaucracy side, the ruling class side, this is not about republican versus democrat, that's why they are upset. >> i encountered an irregular channel of policymaking. >> extremely regular. >> there are irregular channel. >> highly irregular. >> that's bureaucrat for deplorable. , he is striking back, he wants a policy that stands up for america in the world but they want to keep it standing up for the world in america. trump thanks promises made should be kept, they want to ignore them as if they never happen. trump wants to govern

nancy, this was powerful testimony. >> reporter: it was, norah.nd congress was riveted as she essentially accused president trump of siding with some notoriously corrupt ukrainians over his own u.s. ambassador and allowing "shady interests" hijack u.s. policy. >> it was terrible. it's not the way i wanted my career to end. >> reporter: yovanovitch is a 33-year veteran of foreign fervice. >> my first tour was mogadishu, somalia. tashkent, uzbekistan. i later served in moscow. >> reporter: but as she spoke, the president broke with g.o.p. strategy, slamming her heblemished record by tweet. >> would you like to respond to the president's attack that "everywhere you went turned bad?" >> i... i mean, i don't-- i don't think i have such powers. >> what effect do you think that has on other witnesses' willingness to come forward and expose wrongdoing? >> well, it's very intimidating. >> reporter: yovanovitch described how the president's personal attorney worked for months to smear her reputation... >> we were blocked by the ambassador who eventually got

the next day nancy and her mom went to this tow yard to retrieve the toyota rav4.ice wouldn't let them tag it. the only name on the registration was her dad and he died in january. >> it's a complicated process. we had to get the loan transferred to my name. >> she spent two months ironing out the paperwork. two months is the typical time line to modify a title. when nancy was cleared to pick up the rav4, the towing company handed her a huge bill. >> we had to pay $4,800. >> the tow y $90 a day for two months. >> all they cared about was the bottom line and they were not empathetic towards my situation. >> we asked the tow yard to review nancy's case. it declined. state law does not cap towing and storage rates but cities can. we wondered how much the cost of getting towed varies around california. so, we called 2 dozen cities around the state to find out. the rates are all over the map. storage ranges from $32 a day in baker field to a maximum 100 a day in oakland. the base fee varies even more. on the low end $168 in palm springs. on the high end 537 in san franc

and, nancy, these public hearings will be must-see tv. who's going to testify? >> reporter: nothing is certain yet, but there are three names we tend to hear most frequently, norah. first of all, alex vindman. he was on the president's phone call and described it later as "improper." bill taylor, a top diplomat who expressed concerns about a quid pro quo. and ambassador marie yovanovitch, who was ousted by president trump. democrats say they want to focus on just a few witnesses who they believe can best describe this pressure campaign to the american public. >> o'donnell: nancy, thank you. we didn't see the president today, but he weighed in on twitter immediately after the vote. the president called the impeachment inquiry the greatest witch hunt in american history. ben tracy has more of the concerns from the white house. >> this president's good for the country, and we're going to keep working, and they can continue to do their sham. >> reporter: white house press secretary stephanie grisham dismissed the now-formal impeachment inquiry as illegitimate, even

and now corrupt politicians, nancy pelosi.ment witch hunt. yesterday's vote by the radical democrats is an attack on democracy itself. the american people are fed up with democrat lies, hoaxes and extremism, the democrats' outrageous conduct has created an angry majority that will vote many do nothing democrats out of office in 2020. [clears] ed: interesting test this well you have a gubernatorial battle in kentucky. why i mention that it's local so you don't care about the details. big picture is the democratic nominee is saying he is concerned about the national democrats doing all this in secret behind closed doors and if he had it to do over he thinks they should have gone public earlier. there you have a democrat, again, in trump country, kentucky saying i'm not so happy with what the national democrats are doing. mississippi, same kind of deal. and so now you go to the battle ground states the ones hotly contested and bill maher and others on the left are saying be careful because in the michigans and ohios and maybe the

kennedy: true, she has taken to nancy pelosi.he called out people from her own party and said, we will primary you if you are not onboard with our democrat socialist agenda. >> we've talked about her, i'm not disagreeing with that part, there are differences within the caucus but there are things that caucus has in common, one thing is getting to the bottom -- >> they don't like president trump. that is it. that is understandable. i get that, that is fine. you can't ignore the fact, i want to get to truth but politicalization stands in front of that truth, not liking someone is a great unifying force, that is very ou useful in politics. >> barack obama. kennedy: removing someone from ryabkov. officer -- office, hillary clinton, because you don't like him because you have not shown full justcasion for impeachment is not okay. >> people who are not on twitter, who read newspapers and perhaps voted for trump or did note, they feel more and more excluded, you forget most mainstream tv shows, they almost treat it like the bad people,

six weeks ago tuesday nancy pelosi said we're going to move toward an impeachment inquiry. chris, it took them five weeks to hold a vote. why doesn't she just hold the vote on impeachment? where is the substance? on what basis are we impeaching a democratically-elected president of the united states where essential governing principle of this country is the rule of law? on a phone call? here's the transcript. go read it, everybody -- chris: it isn't just a phone call. we're going to get to the merits in a minute, but -- [inaudible] let me ask you about that. the president complained about the house conducting the investigation behind closed doors so far. but when the house, when republicans had control of the house in 2017 and '18, they conducted the investigation about russia and interference in 2016 behind closed doors -- >> alleged. chris: -- when republicans did the benghazi investigation, they conducted it behind closed doors, and here's what the chairman of that inquiry said about this. take a look. >> people act differently when there aren't cameras in the world, tru

in principle, nancy pelosi is right.xperienced with kellyanne conway for 12 minutes of some of the most ludicrous tv and unfactual statement by a white house official i have ever heard, the republican party has now fully given itself over to being a personality cult for donald trump. and for good reason -- well, not for good reason, but for understandable reasons. every one of my republican colleagues understands that if they do what they know is right and, by the way, i hear them say they know it's right in the halls of the congress. if they do what they know is right, the president lights them up on twitter, and they lose a primary election. so very sadly, unlike the nixon or clinton investigations, this is going to continue to break down along partisan lines. it doesn't need to be that way and it shouldn't be that way, but my republican colleagues are unwilling to look at the facts here. chris: but if you do impeach on a strictly partisan line or largely partisan line, it then goes to the senate where you would need 2