. >> nancy brown, when did aids rise to the national consciousness? >> it first came to public attention in 1981 with a few articles in "the new york times" and other places. there were reports of homosexual men who had some strange types of cancers and pneumonia. 1982, there were a few more reports and at the end of 1982, there were reports that it had been seen in infants and also there was some discussion about it was in the blood bank. but 1983 was really the big year this was in the headlines and that was the year that the real phobia about aids began because all of a sudden people understood that it was in the blood bank and women were getting it, hemophiliacs were getting it. there wasn't a sure understanding of how it was being transmitted. so i would say that was the first big, public fear about aids. >> so what is it and what have we learned since the diagnosis first became public in the 1980's? >> that's a big question. aids is a retrovirus and you get it through sexual contact or like blood transfusions or i.v. drug use. it's blood contact

. >> next, purdue university graduate student nancy brown talks about the aids crisis in the 1980's.cribes how those with aids often faced discrimination in housing, jobs, and when seeking medical treatment. she also outlines some of the protections later provided in the americans with disabilities act. this 12 minute interview was recorded in chicago at the american historical association annual meeting. >> nancy brown, when did aids rise to the national consciousness? >> it first came to public attention in 1981 with a few articles in "the new york times" and other places. there were reports of homosexual men who had some strange types of cancers and pneumonia. in 1982, there were a few more reports and at the end of 1982, there were reports that it had been seen in infants and also there was some discussion about it was in the blood bank. 19

next, purdue university graduate student nancy brown talks about the aids crisis in the 1980's. she describes how those with aids often faced discrimination in housing, jobs, and when seeking medical treatment. she also outlines some of the protections later provided in the americans with disabilities act. this 12 minute interview was recorded in chicago at the american historical association annual meeting. >> nancy brown, when did aids rise to the national consciousness? >> it first came to public attention in 1981 with a few articles in "the new york times" and other places. there were reports of homosexual men who had some strange types of cancers and pneumonia. 1982, there were a few more reports and at the end of 1982, there were reports that it had been seen in infants and also there was some discussion about it was in the blood bank. but 1983 was really the big year

brown and ron wyden. they are floating new ideas, what is their proposal? to find a are trying way to bridge the gap between nancyi, and robert lighthizer, trying to find ways to put more tea into the mexican labor standards. the thinking is the standards are a lot lower, more incentive to move a factory there. if you raise them, it is good for workers and maybe stops the bleeding of jobs to the south. our colleagues have a story on to put ay on this push side deal together that would add some teeth. in particular, exempt individual facilities from a trade deal, if they don't meet the conditions. in other words, you would not get the preferential zero tariff if you are not playing by the rules. one to watch in particular. sherrod brown is an interesting bridge politician. he agrees with trump on a lot of things regarding trade. he is from ohio, a big swing state. amanda: on the canadian side of the border, concerns about ongoing steel and aluminum terrace, a sense that that could be a sticking point. are we far from ratification? not far from an election year in the u.s. is this a risk? josh: they been ratcheting

nancy pelosi. so, yes, it makes a big difference. >> hillary clinton, pleasure to talk to you. >> thank you so much, fareed. thank you all. >>> thanks to tina brownsomething me to interview secretary clinton. thanks to mrs. clinton for the great conversation. we'll be back. els.com like this: (sneezes) earn one free night when you stay just twice this spring. allergies. or.. badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com. when it comes to reducing the evsugar in your family's diet,m. coke, dr pepper and pepsi hear you. we're working together to do just that. bringing you more great tasting beverages with less sugar or no sugar at all. smaller portion sizes, clear calorie labels and reminders to think balance. because we know mom wants what's best. more beverage choices, smaller portions, less sugar. balanceus.org we're all under one roof now. congratulations. thank you. how many kids? my two. his three. along with two dogs and jake, our new parrot. that is quite the family. quite a lot of colleges to pay for though. a lot of colleges. you get any financial advice? yeah, but i'm pretty sure it's the same plan they sold me before. well your s

nancy: thank you for the question. i actually did not set out to write a book about the people i wrote the book about, including koch.s i was looking at the state of virginia's resistance to brownboard of education. and i found that the free market sawustrialists virginia and saw the kind of system they wanted. but i want to say that that is foundational, and that this whole set of ideas has been entwined since the beginning of our country, this notion of extreme economic liberty, with racial subjugation. that you cannot have this notion of free market fundamentalism and say that capitalism is a fair system without somehow excusing the fact that people of color are disproportionately, historically, and a crossed and originally suffering, disproportionately from the system. so you do see often this split, this shift, this sliding off from the free-market fundamentalist cause to the far right, libertarian, to air those ideas in the kind of groups we saw the control is no. they are about social darwinism, meaning people for their suffering, and they are about trying to make us not care for another. that we can divide easily into takers and makers, and that the takers ought to be p