i have a section in my chapter on czars about the health care czar, nancy deparle. this is somebody who if she had had an r by her name would have been roundly condemned by team obama as a profiteer in the health care industry. in the last couple of years, she madepwards of $6 million lobbying and working for various health care companies, hospital companies. and there haseen very little disclosure of her activities in the white house because she's a czar, she's beyond congressional accountability. she works in the dark. we kw thanks to a left-leaning watchdog group, crew, here in washington that the white house was meeting with these hospital executives and only under threat of lawsuit did the white house finally disclose the list of executives. they have not, however, told us which white house administration offials were in those meetings. but guess what? nancy deparle has financial ties to some of those executives who were in the meetings. i'd like to know, the public should know was nancy deparle in those meetings, and if she was, why didn't she recuse herself?

nancy deparle has fincial ties to some of those executives who ran in the meetings. i would like to know, the public ouldnow wancy deparle in those meetings and if she was why didt she recused herself? >> host: dais joining us for michelle malkin, good morning. >>alr: good morning. this ishat makes politics-- i don't even know why c-span has this young lady there. i am wondering where ms. malkin -- naudible] [inaudible] >> guest: you can just google my name. you can look at my blood in you will see that i was one of the loudest voices criticizing cronyism and nepotism in the bush administratn. you can find many left-wing blogs saying even michelle malkin is criticing michael braun t fema, a lot of dhs nepotism, which i investited and covered and uncovered myself, and also you can take a look at my files tsee, even most recently all of the work i have then criticizing the porkocrats in alaska,on young and ted stevens. think that, i think that my critics suffer from a moral equivalency wh they can't take a look at the book that i have written and tir immediate response