nancy pelosi for all her nonsense about the president not being above the law, that's a double speak,ancy. it's you and your gang of criminals who are above the law. john durham better be prepared with indictments or face the wrath of mayor cans who believe they are held to a different standard. in the end this is about a conversation our president had with the president of ukraine. and to be honest with you it's none of your damn business what was said. we are not entitled to know what barack obama was promising putin through medvedev in that hot mic moment. and we are not allowed to know what the quid pro quo of barack obama was when he gave $150 billion to the ayatollah. or are we just supposed to assume he was playing santa claus with iran? a phone call with ukraine involves policy. if you don't like the president's policy, vote for someone else. the guy on the other end of the phone says there was no pressure. the transcript makes it clear there will be was no pressure. the guy on the other end didn't even know military fund weren't available. so how can there be a quid pro quo?

we talked to nancy pelosi on friday.he said she is hopeful she can get it done, at the same time she has to have concessions on enforcement. this is what she said. it is aboutsi: having agreement on the trade agreement. it all stems from the trade agreement. i have gone to the floor with a minority of my members but that is not what this is. this is about a policy we are that we will pass something less and has to enforcement in it. david: i asked that question because if she really wants the usmca -- she is saying she wants what she wants on enforcement. myron: i have to think we can get this deal done. not because the business community wants it. the speaker and the democrats need a win. they need to take something back to their congressional districts. the administration has made this a top legislative priority. i think the winds are coming together to get something done. there are issues being resolved. they are working on outstanding issues around labor and enforceability. they are working around other issues. i thi

signed, nancy pelosi, speaker of the house of representatives. he speaker pro tempore: the prayer will be offered by the

of house speaker nancy pelosi's recent comments that the president is more than likely to present his case, our crazy do nothing, where's usmca, infrastructure, lower drug pricing and much more, speaker of the house, nervous nancy pelosi, who is petrified by her radical left knowing she will soon be gone, they and fake news media are her boss, said on sunday's deface the nation, that i testify about the phony impeachment witch hunt. she said chi do it in writing, even though i did nothing wrong and don't like giving credibility to this no due process hoax, i like the idea, and will in order to get congress focused again, strongly

this is what nancy pelosi said. impeachment is so divisive to the country, unless there is something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, i don't think we should go down that path because it divides the country and he's just not worth it. it is not bipartisan. >> but look at the date. that was prior to knowing anything we now know about ukraine. right? this was just something that we've been learning about in the past two months, this has been happening behind closed doors and i agree with you we haven't seen any republicans change their view thus far, but these have been closed door hearings. what happens when we start to hear these witnesses come out for public testimony, if the american public, if their constituent, i know they're now under the pressure of the president, if they're starting to become under pressure from the constituents which we haven't quite seen yet but if we have public hearings, that may hang. >> ladies, thank you very much. >> thank you, guys. >>> democrats have negotiating for for

please welcome speaker nancy pelosi! ( cheers and applause ) ( band playing ) >> stephen: madam speaker, thank you for being here today. i know you've had a busy one. ( laughter ) this is truly an historic day. thank you for making time to be on our silly show. ( cheers and applause ) >> it is a busy day. >> stephen: it is. but i wanted to thank you for your patriotism, i really am because -- ( cheers and applause ) >> stephen: oh, thank you very much. >> this is a sad thing for our country. we do this prayerfully with great seriousness. nobody goes to congress to impeach a president, and you've had your fun with the policy and the personality and the rest -- >> stephen: sure. -- and that's about the election. the patriotism, the constitution is really what impeachment is about. so i welcome the opportunity to take us to, again, where you have been, bs but in, shall we say, a little different vein. >> stephen: yes, a slightly different vein. ( applause ) so the house voted today. are we done? is the president impeached?

white house speaker nancy pelosi has said that an agreement is within range. our colleague who covers bloomberg is with us. there is a sense that this is happening. canadian officials are there. this may be about making concessions on the canadian side to get the deal ratified. is that what's happening? jenny: it seems like this is the week when all of the puzzle pieces are falling in line. they made some progress but it never looked like we were .etting close to anything the fact that both ministers were in town with ambassador aghthizer, after he had positive meeting with nancy pelosi seems to indicate we are getting somewhere that leads to a resolution that will finally get this deal up for a vote. shery: nancy pelosi saying it will be better for the workers. what is in contention? >> there have been a number of issues the sides have been tripping at. enforcement is the overarching issue. aboutwas also discussions the biologic pharmaceutical positions. it seems that they have made project -- progress and now it came down to the labor enforcement which inclu

nancy pelosi about what democrats will run on in 2020, specifically the most tax. ing proposition for them? speaker pelosi: i say all the time, whatever we do about our revenue, taxation has to be done in a bipartisan way. we have to have fairness and we also have two have enough to run the government, but we don't want any more government than we need. candidates are putting forth their ideas on these things. it is up to them to describe why that is a good thing, how that will help grow the economy. but i do think, i would enlarge the issue to talk about how do we conduct our meetings and needs of the american people in a way that does not increase the deficit, that does increase in job creation and have job creation for good paying jobs. growing the infrastructure of america is a path to get that done. i would like that in a green way. we will see what the president is willing to do but there are plenty of areas of common ground for us to do that. what we want to do is to increase the paychecks. however it is paid for, and negotiation. david: you talk about growth

. -- i can tell you that it is sitting on nancy pelosi's desk. please. please. , the great trade deal for the farmers, manufacturers, workers of all types including unions -- it is sitting on nancy pelosi's desk. she is incapable of moving it it looks like. she knows it is a great deal. she said it. she keeps saying that she wants to get it done but we are talking about many months sitting on the desk with no votes. i guess all of the republicans will vote for it. it worksm is, the way is she has to put it out for a vote. she has not wanted to do it because i understand a couple of are asking afl cio her to hold it for a little while. i get a lot of votes from them except for maybe at the top. richard trumka, nice guy. nancy pelosi should put it up for a vote because at some point you will have canada and mexico say --what is going on? send the agreement back. let us not make the deal. i would not blame them at all. we have to blame nancy. this is a phenomenal deal for our farmers and everybody. a great deal for our country. it replaces one of the worst

that doesn't bode well for nancy pelosi. >> nancy pelosi said you can't move forward with impeachmentut bipartisan support. the only bipartisan support that showed up on capitol hill yesterday was against the impeachment inquiry against donald trump but nancy pelosi is following the resistance and the squad and taking congress off a cliff with it. carley: now we are entering phase 2 of the impeachment inquiry process democrats are planning some high profile public hearings. how will that change public perception of this impeachment inquiry? >> the problem democrats face, when it becomes public you are going to get the people from the republican side and the entire truth, not just what is being leaked by adam schiff. the facts are not going to change. there was no quid pro quo, the president didn't do anything wrong and none of their witnesses are going to change that. we read the transcript. it is right there for everyone to read. rob: the president has a big rally tonight. we will have a reporter there and you have a governor's race that is pretty important. >> the people of mississi

that's why nancy pelosi is coming out with a new narrative.ou: narrative number twoils attempted bribery. good lord. it's pathetic to watch this go on. as i think it president correctly observed. in any other circumstance this would be shut down right now. it's just a disaster for the dems. i'm not lamenting that. i'm cheering as loudly, a hallelujah chorus in the wings of that's hearing room for the intelligence committee. it's a disaster, and i just can't imagine why they would even pursue it. >> you have know, in -- you have know, in any rational forum they would start back pedaling and look for a graceful way out. these people are going full throttle over the cliff. i think they may have trouble getting the votes. after that dud yesterday and what's going to happen tomorrow. i would suspect if you are a democrat, first term democrat in one of those 30 districts that strum won, you are proper -- that trump one, you are probably saying we don't have anything. i would suspect they are looking for a way to get out of this. lou: normally i give

host: nancy pelosi is not using the term bribery. is that impeachable? guest: most certainly. it is one of the named offenses. but this is not it. adam schiff also raise this argument that it is bribery. that dog will not hunt. if they try to argue that that is bribery, this will come to a crashing conclusion because it will undermine their credibility. you can impeach someone on abuse of power, and some republicans have said you cannot impeach him on just that. you most certainly can and you can impeach him on quid pro quo. that is just not the strongest basis because there is a lot of debate about that. this is not bribery. the chairman said bribery meant something different back in the constitutional time, and i chuckled because it suddenly sounded like an originalist, but fortunately for adam schiff, he is wrong, that there was a different meaning of bribery, but it was not this broad definition that he is suggesting . in the constitutional convention mason had an exchange with madison or mason said we cannot bribery, treason and and instead he wanted to introduce a broade

it should not be nancy to spoke -- nancy pelosi in the small group of people. -- it should not be nancy pelosi in a small group of people that she selects that get to determine who is going to be our president. if you look at the resolution today, they talk about fairness. now if they really think they can tell people it's fair that only the chairman gets to decide who the witnesses are, they give us an opportunity to call witnesses, but if the chair says they don't like the witness the witnesses don't come forward. they allow the president to have legal counsel in the room. unless the chair decides that they don't twheant president's legal counsel in the room. that's never happened before. with the clinton impeachment, with the nixon impeachment. republican and democrat alike, both sides were treated equally. both sides could call witnesses. president's legal counsel was in the room. not at the discretion they have chair but because it's fair. so when you look at this soviet style process, it shows you that they don't really want to get to the truth. they want to remove a sitting presi

i think nancy pelosi has lost her mind and i think that she should go back home to san francisco. if you look at what is happening, to her district, her district is going to hell with homeless that they are not taking care of, with needles all over the streets, with tents, with people, with sanitation, with horrible things being washed into the ocean and in the pacific ocean. i think nancy pelosi, her district has probably gone down more than any district personally in the united states. in what she has done for that district, and on then on top of , management is so bad, the governor doesn't know what he is doing. that got to take care of it. rarely somebody else or someplace else. but nancy pelosi ought to go back to her district and take care of it because her district has become a mess. number one in the country for going down. all she thinks about is impeachment. [indiscernible] >> it's really up to the log years. lawyers.the read the transcript. read the transcript. [indiscernible] >> we will see what happens. i called them the do nothing. they are not getting anything done.

be the only one at the table is to bring more people, bring the enforcements. >> the book "the nancy pelosihristine pelosi. thanks so much for being with us this morning. >> my pleasure. thanks, john. >> really incitingful. great to hear that conversation. >> she says sometimes she hears her mother speak and she applies the language or the tone to her own life and experience. really interesting. >> it's just a great adage the harder i work the luckier i get. i may tell my children that. thanks to our international viewers for watching. for our u.s. viewers, it's the start of a blockbuster week. "new day" continues right now. >> eight public impeachment hearings set for this week. >> this last week was good for the facts and very bad for president trump. >> the president lashed out at another witness, career diplomat jennifer williams. >> donald trump doesn't like what he's hearing. he shouldn't tweet. >> mr. sondland has to decide whether his loyalty is to america or the president of the united states. >> this is a man who said farce the president is concerned there was no quid pro quo. >>

mostly talking about trade deals, the usmca, that's why the president was going after nancy pelosi as he was saying that she is using these impeachment hearings to try to get support for the usmca. the problem for the president though is what are they going to do on the democratic side? the republicans can cry foul and he can cry foul all they want to try to energize the base but it really is up to the democrats what they do going forward. nancy pelosi indicating in a letter that she sent to her colleagues that she may be all in for this idea of having to vote on articles of impeachment because she said that the weak response to the hearings has been let the election decide, wait until november to decide this. she said that dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action because the president is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections. the vice president isn't so sure whether they will ever get to that. he said in one of those eight radio interviews today i don't consider it a foregone conclusion that they, the house have the votes to pass articles of impeachment. s

nancy pelosi capitulated to schiff and the squad. so where does it go from here? well, it's hard to say. if all of these democrats come back and tell speaker pelosi and chairman schiff this isn't going the way you said it you told us it would go, you will have to back off, i think you will see more of what you saw earlier today where democrats start looking for different narratives like investigation into devin nunes. or brett kavanaugh. issues that are distractions to distract voters from paying attention to this impeachment sham. trish: they were successful in the mid-term elections because they did focus on things like healthcare and policy. you can't just, all against something. americans want something to vote for. if they were to think about what would be politically strategic for them. they would get off the impeachment bandwagon. but as my friend gregg jarrett said today, he didn't think they would and he thinks that will be good forward donald trump. your final shots? >> the president is going to win reelection. this is the best economy in my lifetime. th

a short time ago, i sat down with house speaker nancy pelosi covering the impeachment, the economy, thewill bring you parts of the interview, but first, we will start with today's jobs numbers 128,000 job g ain. speaker pelosi: while you make some indications that the economy may be improving, and god willing it is, in the lives of american workers, they still feel a stagnation of wages, stagnation of their opportunity. i think we have been having some -- i know we have been having constructive conversation about how we have an economy that works for everyone.

vonnie: is this impacting nancy pelosi?en: she has already committed to having the end of the year. it is when it goes over to the at that point, it is out of nancy pelosi's hands. that is partly why she was expressing reluctance over forward, anticipating this could hurt the 2020 democrats chances of reclaiming the white house. there are some down ballot fx of that that will affect her caucus. i follow your argument, if president trump does not need to be worried about impeachment hearings ahead, how worried does he need to be about china negotiations not coming to a conclusion? stephen: that is the bigger thing to keep an eye on. now that the epic summit was canceled, we have to look at when the tariffs go into effect. tensions are going to flare as we get closer to the december 15 deadline. watching the headlines around that will be important. do they is progress, announced something around december 15, does trump postpone the tariffs? i don't think markets would react too much on that. i think there would be status quo.

i think nancy pelosi has lost her mind and i think that she should go back home to san francisco. if you look at what is happening, to her district, her district is going to hell with homeless that they are not taking care of, with needles all over the streets, with tents, with people, with sanitation, with horrible things being washed into the ocean and in the pacific ocean. washed into the pacific ocean. i think nancy pelosi, her district has some of the gone down more than any other district proportionately in the united states and what she has done for that district and then fires of it, you've got eating away at california every year because management is so bad. the governor is like a child, he doesn't know what he is doing. they've got to take care of it. every year, it is always california. go nancy pelosi ought to back to her district and take care of it because her district has become a mess. number one in the country for going down. all she thinks about his impeachment but she doesn't want to impeach. wants to impeach? the radical left. him and up to the lawyers. i like

six weeks ago tuesday nancy pelosi said we're going to move toward an impeachment inquiry. chris, it took them five weeks to hold a vote. why doesn't she just hold the vote on impeachment? where is the substance? on what basis are we impeaching a democratically-elected president of the united states where essential governing principle of this country is the rule of law? on a phone call? here's the transcript. go read it, everybody -- chris: it isn't just a phone call. we're going to get to the merits in a minute, but -- [inaudible] let me ask you about that. the president complained about the house conducting the investigation behind closed doors so far. but when the house, when republicans had control of the house in 2017 and '18, they conducted the investigation about russia and interference in 2016 behind closed doors -- >> alleged. chris: -- when republicans did the benghazi investigation, they conducted it behind closed doors, and here's what the chairman of that inquiry said about this. take a look. >> people act differently when there aren't cameras in the world, tru

vonnie: still ahead, we will hear from house speaker nancy pelosi.g down with david westin to talk about the economy and impeachment. you don't want to miss that. it is coming up at 12:00 p.m. eastern, 4:00 p.m. london time. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ vonnie: live from new york, i'm vonnie quinn. guy: from london, i'm guy johnson. this is "bloomberg markets." time now for futures in focus. joe, we saw the employment number. it was much stronger than in passivity did -- then anticipated. what are the locations of that for the markets? joe: in the fixed income markets, you've basically seen at the curve has flattened. bottom line, short-term fear has kind of been alleviated somewhat because the consumer is still strong in the united states. that is reflected in the jobs numbers, especially that we saw 128,000. with the uaw strike, we thought that number could be about 50,000 less then what came out. the bottom line is you could see a growth number around one at 17000, 200,000 -- around 5000, 200,000. that has taken pressure off of the upside on the bonds.

is nancy pelosi hanging them out to dry?dry is adam schiff. i think schiff was so dishonest, so blatantly arrogant, so patently unfair that he turned -- he personally turned the tide. and if you look, for example, among independents. there has been a huge swing from the independents saying yeah, maybe we should impeach to independents increasingly saying no, we shouldn't. i think as that conversation goes on, you just saw, i think it was a michigan democrat yesterday, who has switched her position and said, you know, maybe we don't need to impeach. maybe we can just vote censure. i think more and more democrats are going to come back -- brian: let's refer to lawrence out of michigan. that's a district that the president thinks he can get back. >> we are so close to an election. i will tell you sitting here knowing how divided this country is, i don't see the value of taking him out of office. i want him sene censured. i want it on the record that the house of representatives did their job and they told this president and any

in principle, nancy pelosi is right.xperienced with kellyanne conway for 12 minutes of some of the most ludicrous tv and unfactual statement by a white house official i have ever heard, the republican party has now fully given itself over to being a personality cult for donald trump. and for good reason -- well, not for good reason, but for understandable reasons. every one of my republican colleagues understands that if they do what they know is right and, by the way, i hear them say they know it's right in the halls of the congress. if they do what they know is right, the president lights them up on twitter, and they lose a primary election. so very sadly, unlike the nixon or clinton investigations, this is going to continue to break down along partisan lines. it doesn't need to be that way and it shouldn't be that way, but my republican colleagues are unwilling to look at the facts here. chris: but if you do impeach on a strictly partisan line or largely partisan line, it then goes to the senate where you would need 2

but nancy pelosi ought to go back to her district and take care of it because her district has become a mess. number one in the country for going down. all she thinks about is impeachment but she doesn't want to impeach. you know who wants to impeach? the people that run the party, the radical left. reporter: do you to testify? that's up to him and up to the lawyers. i like john bolton. i always got along with them. but that's going to be up to the lawyers. reporter: [inaudible] pres. trump: read the transcript. read the transcript. reporter: what about a government shutdown? do you think anybody is concerned that you will hold up funding for the government. is that a possibility? what do you say? pres. trump: i don't believe that at all. we'll see what happens. democrats -- i call them the do-nothing democrats. they're doing nothing. they aren't getting anything done. even the democrats want it. they're not getting anything done. all they can do is talking about one phone call made to the president of ukraine that was perfect. it was perfect. it was a perfect phone call. and they're

that's the nancy pelosi i know. that's the nancy pelosi i-- >> she should have been transparent from day one. [applause] >> the transcripts are going to be released. >> why didn't they release them three weeks ago? donna, let's be real, this has been to shape the narrative early on, it's what adam schiff did and that's why they keep holding these closed door hearings where they've leaked specific information to the media. this is what they've been doing every day. >> you know what? -- >> every day, no transparency and then they have to on the rules four weeks later. >> there's so much transparency because-- >> the reason why we're arguing over process. whether or not nancy pelosi turned the paper over after it was typed. before it was xeroxed and put on the copier machine. there's a reason why we're having that conversation, whether or not-- and not having the conversation of somebody calling on a foreign government to interfere in the integrity of our elections. >> okay. [applause] >> it's not-- donna it's not a cr

nancy pelosi has thrown away her majority.hat gavel she is holding in her hands she'll be holding over from january, 2021 if she keeps this up. this is calling for the president's impeachment since he got elected. if they want to keep the majority, they need to pass usmca, to lower the cost of prescription drugs working with this president as opposed to against it. for all those house democrats and the 31 districts donald trump won in 2016. it's been nice serving with you but you will have to leave now because you are note fulfilling the promises you made to voters when they put you in office in the 2018 election. voters who are smarter than the democrats give them credit for are going to throw them out of office and turn that gavel over and put people in office come january, 2021 who want to work with the president to move our country forward. lou where michael bloomberg throwing his hat in the ring for the democratic nomination. will that hurt republicans or will that hurt democrats? who loses the biggest here. >> i think th

and now corrupt politicians, nancy pelosi.ment witch hunt. yesterday's vote by the radical democrats is an attack on democracy itself. the american people are fed up with democrat lies, hoaxes and extremism, the democrats' outrageous conduct has created an angry majority that will vote many do nothing democrats out of office in 2020. [clears] ed: interesting test this well you have a gubernatorial battle in kentucky. why i mention that it's local so you don't care about the details. big picture is the democratic nominee is saying he is concerned about the national democrats doing all this in secret behind closed doors and if he had it to do over he thinks they should have gone public earlier. there you have a democrat, again, in trump country, kentucky saying i'm not so happy with what the national democrats are doing. mississippi, same kind of deal. and so now you go to the battle ground states the ones hotly contested and bill maher and others on the left are saying be careful because in the michigans and ohios and maybe the

didn't you fail nancy pelosi's own test, it has to be bipartisan?presentative himes: well it is very sad that this is not a more bipartisan thing, right? in principle, nancy pelosi is right, but as you just experienced with kellyanne conway for 12 minutes of some of the most ludicrous tv on factual statements by white house official i have ever heard, the republican party has not fully given itself over to being a personality cult for donald trump and for good reason -- not for good reason, but for understandable reasons. everyone of my republican colleagues understands that if they do what they know is right -- and by the way, i hear them say they know it's right in the halls of the congress. if they do what they know is right, the president likes them up on twitter and they lose a primary election, so very sadly, unlike the nixon or the clinton investigations, this is going to continue to break down along partisan lines. it doesn't need to be that way and it shouldn't be that way, but my republican colleagues are unwilling to look at the facts her

nancy pelosi saying, unfortunately, she needs to go. >> obviously a double standard.m disappointed she went ahead and resigned. you've got duncan hunter, sitting right there, from california, who this guy has been indicted, we know that he is a crook, first of all, he is also being investigated for spending taxpayer dollars on all of his affairs, at least five of them, that we know of, with congressional aides and this guy is refusing to step down. so there is a major double standard here. and i'm sorry that she stepped down. she shouldn't have. but i think, too, getting to the heart of the heart of what is going on with the democrats, at the end of the day, she didn't want to be a distraction. and you can kind of appreciate the fact that this woman now, i believe the last time i saw them, it might have been hundreds, like 700 photos out there that could have come up, and some republican operative bragged about having all of these pictures of her, who wants to be humiliated in that way, and have all of these pictures, these private pictures, that she takes, in the com

nancy pelosi needs and wants to get.u will need to be able to perform better and resonate in some of those other places. >> the biggest tragedy is for the country, not nancy pelosi or the democrat party. think of what it means for future presidential candidates. they wanted to impeach him before he was inaugurated. so it just just destroys all credibility. and russia collusion, they haven't paused and caught their breath. there has been no documentary. what was russian collusion. what did we learn from it. there has been no analysis. it's totally ignoring it like it hadn't happened. trish: i think in some ways that's why today in preparation for my interview with the vice president, i pored through the transcript of that call. you can see that the president started off by saying look, hey, you ought to talking to angela merkel. she ought to be doing her part for ukraine. then he segued saying you guys might know something about what happened in 2016. and ukraine might. to me, you don't leave any stone unturned. he wants

nancy pelosi is a corrupt politician. shifty schiff is a double corrupt politician. he took my words from the phone call, and they were so good, he totally changed them. he went before congress, he made a speech to congress, and in that speech, john, he said things that were horrible. it bore no relationship to the call. and later on he was embarrassed. let me tell you something, schiff is a corrupt politician . and our people know it, they know it too, by the way. we have the highest poll numbers. we have the most energy. i was with mitch mcconnell and a whole group of people last night, actually, i was with the leaders of faith, and evangelical leaders -- all of them, they've never had the energy that we have had and we have now in the republican party. and beyond the republican party. people that were democrats and are for trump. and we have the poll numbers. reporter: can you explain, just so people understand, why you are not allowing people like mick mulvaney and others to testify? pres. trump: i don't to give credibility to a corrupt witchhunt. i'd love to hav

there is no one who has done way that nancy pelosi and adam schiff has done. themry will hold accountable. we are at a moment when the nation faces grave, significant threats and she has completely neutered the intelligence committee. she has said they must be focused on a partisan impeachment process and not their of sight obligations that a body, that we have as an important branch of this government. and they'll be held accountable for that. now i'd like to turn things over to the republican leader, the oversight committee, mr. jordan. >> thank you, liz. about you all to think something. this morning i was in an impeachment deposition but then come to the that to floor for a vote on the rules for impeachment. [laughter] >> that says its all about this process. and it is a sad day. it really is, for this country, what the democrats have put our nation through to you now almost years. you go back to july of 2016, when they opened an thestigation into president. then candidate trump and spied two american citizens associated with the presidential campaign. i b

budget negotiations but as "politico" is reporting, during a meeting last thursday, between speaker nancy pelosi secretary steve mnuchin and congressional appropriators, the two sides agreed to set aside the border wall stalemate for the moment and move forward with other spending bills. the house is voting later today on the agreement which would last until december 20. >> the current stop-gap expires this thursday night. >>> let's bring in meteorologist bill karins for a quick check of the weather forecast a lot of rain in the northeast yesterday. >> yes, not even thanksgiving yet and i'm asking myself why i'm living in the northeast. >> that usually coming in january or february. >> a little early this year. i'm sure i'm not alone. look out the window in the hudson and theed a r adirondack the snow has moved it. it is not heavy but slippery spots especially at the higher elevations that will move out pretty quickly throughout the day. the morning commutes are about as ugly as they get, boston, mass pike, to portland, rainy and wet and dry for you. and the snow in the northwest. it is not a bi

nancy pelosi as the leader, has chosen to sacrifice a few of her own members. those members are going to lose for all of the right reasons. because as we have seen during this past vote, staffers were running on the democratic side of the aisle, don't cheer, don't clap. the eagerness, the happiness that democrats have and their enraged liberal activist base has at home to rip the country in half. steve scalise said we need to work together to pass usmca and educe the cost of prescription drugs. instead we have colleagues who have gavels who are ripping our country in half. we have been saying for weeks not only should there have been a vote to launch an impeachment inquiry but the vote should ensure that the transcripts are released and republicans are able to call witnesses and equal allocation of staffing, that the president's counsel should be present at these hearings. every single thing that we have been saying over the course last few weeks on those points aren't here in this resolution. and it's not just getting close o the whistleblower, get this, the j

zeldin: in a way you could say congratulations to nancy pelosi. she wanted a bipartisan vote on her impeachment inquiry resolution and got it. it was a bipartisan vote against her inquiry resolution. there are a number of other democrats who chose to vote the wrong way and should have voted no and won't be here to serve anymore with us come january 2021. nancy pelosi as the leader of her conference has chosen to sacrifice a few of her own members. those members are going to lose for all of the right reasons. because as we have seen during this past vote, staffers were running around the democratic side of the aisle, don't cheer, don't clap. the eagerness, the happiness that democrats have and their enraged liberal activist base at home has to rip the country in half. steve scalise said we need to work together to pass usmca and reduce the cost of prescription drugs. but instead we have colleagues who have gavels who are ripping our country in half. we have been saying for weeks that not only should there have been a vote to launch an impeachment i

the president is taking aim at nancy pelosi, adam schiff and the dems.hat is the white house plan? hogan gidley is standing by. [♪] judge jeanine: president trump continues to slam the democrats' ridiculous impeachment hoax. tweeting, i recommend nervous nancy pelosi who backed up schiff's lie, shifty adam shiver, sleevey joe biden, the whistleblower, the second whistleblower who also disappeared and the i.g. be part of the list. joining me with more, white house presents deputy press secretary hogan gidley. what do you think the chances are of shifty adam schiff saying let's make them part of the list. >> probably zero. the fact that the media is giving any credence or credibility to adam schiff and nancy pelosi at this point is absolutely ridiculous. they lied about collusion and kavanaugh. they lied about a cover-up. adam schiff lied about a bissell blower. he lied to congress and the american people. when he read his own demeanted and deranged words and tried to pass them off as the president of the united states. it's insane what this man has done a

that state it is however a little naive nancy pelosi doesn't go to cocktail parties nancy pelosi is a cocktail party i mean she is 14 brands a gin in her purse at all times so you see that's what i want you don't realize the fight between palosi and trump right now is not right versus left or right they are both right wing nut jobs the fight is alcohol vs whatever amphetamine diet pills trump is wrong. it's 2 different kinds of destroying the world alcohol based versus speed based. while we're talking about a vat of beans maybe it could be the new poster boy for this real 1000000 dollar south dakota ad campaign created by the gov to let everyone know they are on match . this is real i'm not kidding. now there's a few problems with this. one our state billboard campaign is supposed to talk about the good things about your state like florida is pretty and you can buy beer from a 14 year old on a sunday. number 2 you're in south dakota of course you're on. billboard not needed ok. and number 3 in this campaign is trying to tell everyone that a lot of peace. blore on meth and therefore a

we will hear from current house speaker nancy pelosi and other congressional leaders. [applause] >> ladies and gentlemen, the honorable nancy pelosi, speaker of the united states house of representatives. >> good afternoon, u everyone. as speaker of the house it is my official and personal honor to welcome friends house speaker john boehner to the u.s. capitoh on this historic day. the presence of members from both sides ofap the aisle come from both sides of the capital is a testament to the respectes that all have or john, , mr. speaker. we are pleased to welcome two former speakers and we anticipate speaker gingrich was with us and speaker ryan. both of them are here. [applause] and we warmly welcome and extend our gratitude to debbie, the lindsey and tricia, and the entire banner family for sharing john with this congress and with our country. now it is my privilege to invite father conroy to deliver the invocation. >> i'm surrounded by quadraphonic speakers. [laughing] dear god -- [laughing] we give you thanks for the proceedings of this day, and for speaker john