wolf bitter asked nancy pelosi around she slapped him down.president trump or republican done that to a reporter we would have been viewed as attacking the press. interesting how nancy pelosi treats the press when they ask her probing questions which is their job. number one. nancy pelosi again was evading the underlying issue why she held up the relief that long. she never answered the question in that clip. nancy pelosi has used the american people as pawns in this political game. she has not answered to the press when they have asked legitimate questions. just shows you the arrogance of the democrat leadership. elizabeth: all right. congressman, good to see you. thanks for joining us. >> thanks, liz for having me on. elizabeth: federalist senior editor christopher bedford on georgia senate runoff which erps companies where the country goes the next four years. is the top democrat in georgia, one of the top democrats, is he in trouble dodging questions about a domestic dispute caught on camera. we'll show you what weren't down there. that st

the road democrats, like conor lamb, who promised their constituents they would never vote for nancy pelosi i first got to congress it was during speaker b oehner's speakership and then speaker ryan and now speaker pelosi and in many cases i've learned that not necessarily there's another individual who can get to the 218 votes. it's when a speaker can no longer deliver the 218 votes that are needed. i don't think she has the juice to get it done. i believe that her speakership is in peril, and those members if they withhold their votes there will be a new generation of leadership on the democratic side. what's interesting to me is this story is not being told in the mainstream media, which makes me think that's how perilo us her speakership is because they never want to acknowledge weakness when it comes to nancy pelosi. they writing these very bias headlines, but i think her speakership is very much in peril versus kevin mccarthy has a unified support from the republican conference, and we are excited to vote for kevin mccarthy for speaker. will: she certainly has a slim margin and that r

nancy pelosi. all of these people.hen that happens doesn't it undermine their citizens' faith in the policies and regulations they shall rolling out? >> yes. understand sniewtions america are already under attack. people question whether it's the election institutions, public health policy institutions. but when you have your leaders as well. i'm in the congress. we are held with a disregard by most americans today. and that partly is because we have not lived by the laws we placed on people. i single out speaker pelosi on that. but also in the states as well. the american people, they know intuitively that lawmakers have authority only because the people give them that power by voting for them, and in our constitution and the state constitutions. we are seeing that being abused. that's why people don't trust us anymore. lisa: we are seeing negotiations on an omnibus spending bill and covid relief package. where do you stand on those two items? >> we have $500 billion that you can put for ppp, small businesses, without

who knows, did someone try to influence nancy pelosi to put them on the committee?nd he's running for president. what is worse, the chair of the intel, adam schiff do this. he knew this. the whole time they are trying to impeach the president. everything eric swalwell accused the president of, he did. nancy pelosi, the speaker of the house, third in line to the presidency, knew about this and kept him on the committee. the real question will come january 3. now that members of congress know this and only the leader can put them on the committee, if you vote from nancy pelosi as speaker, your voting to put eric swalwell back on the intel committee and adam schiff as chair while knowing this information. judge jeanine: this is all up to nancy pelosi, if she is reelected as speaker. >> she puts on the democrat, she named the democrats, intel mitty and i name the republican intel committee. judge jeanine: and he gets on it, the fact that he and adam schiff, both on the intel committee did nothing but trash president trump on a russian collusion, even mueller couldn't ev

nancy pelosi, all of these people. so when that happens, doesn't it undermine their citizens' faith in the policies and regulations that they're rolling out and implementing? >> yeah. i mean, think about this. the institutions in america are already under attack and people question them whether it's the election institutions, public health policy institutions. when you have your leaders as well, that brings -- for instance, nim the congress. we are really held with a disregard by most americans today and that part of it is because we have not lived by the laws that we placed on people and i single out of speaker pelosi in that.pe but also in the states as well. the americanel people, they know intuitively that lawmakers havea authority only because the people give them that power by voting for them and in our constitution and in the state constitutions. we are seeing that being you abused and that's why people don't trust us anymore. they simply don't trust us. >> and congressman, this weekend we're seeing negotiations

republicans directed their ire at house speaker nancy pelosi. >> very disappointing to me that nancy pelosi blocked this aid for struggling businesses and families for four months. >> republicans believe she could have cut a deal months ago. she changed after president-elect biden won. >> the democrats came around to our position where we should make a law where we agree and get help out the door. >> the republican leader's accusation that the blame for this bill's delay lies totally on one side is ridiculous. it's alice in wonderland thinking. >> some democrats and republicans pushed for $1,200 stimulus checks. the sides could agree to half that. the checks go out after christmas. >> let me emphasize that people will see this money the beginning of next week. so it's very fast. >> those off the job score $300 a week for 2 1/2 months. there's an infusion of $257 billion to the paycheck protection program to keep businesses afloat. and there's money to distribute the vaccine. >> who do you think gets these vaccines from a state? they go from a lap to your arm magically? no. >> republic

before nancy pelosi and the democrats will act, i promise you this. republicans will continue to work in good faith just as we put forth bills again and again that the democrats have voted no just as we worked with the senate and the white house, just as we know there is an opportunity to stop playing politics. with that, i introduce our whip, steve scalise. [applause] mr. scalise: thank you, kevin. i strongly agree with the comments that our leader just made. when you look at where we are right now as a country, there are thousands of small businesses that will spend this weekend to figure out whether or not they will be able to remain open, whether dreams will be crushed and millions of families who rely on those jobs will sustain themselves through christmas. and during that period, for months now, we have been trying to get a vote on a bill that everybody agrees on, the chabot bill that jamie herrera beutler is straightforward. there are a lot of areas that we are or disagreement on. we need to help small businesses that are struggling and familie

>> typically if it's nancy pelosi, no, she won't give us any answers at all other than to hunker down and probably defend her decision or non-decision really about eric swalwell. it does call into question speaker pelosi's judgment in this area. they knew that he had had this involvement with this chinese woman back then. he denies that it led anywhere. but, you know, as the f.b.i. director christopher wray said in his interview in june with bret baier, they're opening investigations into chinese targeting in the united states every 10 hours. so it is obviously a very serious issue. and for nancy pelosi to simply have waived onto the intelligence committee a sophomore member of congress who had had an involvement like this does really raise serious questions about her judgment going forward. >> sandra: and republicans are speaking out this morning talking about the hypocrisy, the double standard they're seeing in the way this story has been treated thus far. here is matt gaetz earlier as well. >> if i was dating a waitress at a chinese restaurant, they would be burning a hole through

the status quo politicians even if you look at the squad they're not really challenging nancy pelosi when it comes to that is more stimulus package she just pushed out which basically cut the money and have from what was initially going to happen so there is a huge fracturing in the progressive movement it is a lot of people voted for joe biden thinking that they were making damage and in my personal opinion i don't see it was worth it i don't we are seeing joe biden fill his cabinet with people that are diametrically opposed to everything for growth of their sense of value whether that's medicare for all whether that is you know cutting the pentagon and cutting our military budget whether it's something as simple as getting a green you deal or any sort of cuts to the environment to the emissions and any sort of progress for the environment they're going to review i mean can i ask you know can i ask you personally do you have any buyer's remorse because i'm sorry and i'm very sympathetic conservative but i'm very sympathetic to a lot of the rest of ideas here but i could've told you

it was just the speaker nancy pelosi and my c it was a very thorough briefing.o one that was in that room could walk out and say eric swalwell should be on the intel committee. i don't know they had a briefing before in 2015, and i don't know what that briefing was like compared to this one but it could not have been the same. the one answer that i got out of that briefing was there is no way eric swalwell should continue to serve on the intel committee and the challenge here is the leaders of both parties are the only of people who select to go on the intel committee. that is why today, what i'm going to request that every single member on the house intelligence committee gets the exact same briefing from the fbi that i do because if this individual is sitting on this committee, eric swalwell, they've got to know the background of what has gone on. i can't talk about the classified part but you know what's out there in the press. this is an individual, and maria, you've done this more than probably any other show, the in depthness of what china has done, the nu

jillian: this as they ask nancy pelosi to pull him from the intel committee.eekend co-host pete hegseth. pete: good morning. great to be here. jillian: todd and i were talking about this in the commercial break. what message does it send and what good does it do at this point in time to remove him from his post on the intel committee when this allegedly happened years ago. what does it say about that? >> take threats seriously. it doesn't mean the threat is over. doesn't mean if there was compromise there isn't. junior member no experience put on the intel committee by neps even though she presumably known he had already been compromised at that point. he is quite empathetic to the communist chinese. also the political and partisan hatchet man. leaking information all over the place. this is a move they should have made. they like him as their partisan hatchet man there. and the press, of course, we know whose team they are on. they are not going to report on this. they will easily dismiss it. believe the story will go away. go into the next congress and eric

. >> kennedy: for months, speaker nancy pelosi, house speaker nancy pelosi, insisted on the $1.5 trillions had introduced before the election, but when asked earlier this month why she is not okay with a very slimmed down version, is what she said. >> this has simplicity. it's what we had in our bills, it is for a surety period of time, but that's okay now, because we have a new president. >> kennedy: hmm. so, is she proving mitch mcconnell right there? he says democrats are the ones stalling and playing politics with people's livelihoods, and a rescue package. so what really went on? >> buck: i think there's no question. this is unacceptable on a number of levels. first, dealing with the democrat delay, what exactly was the great end result of nancy pelosi's delay tactic here? a bill that could have been put forward that would help people who need help, because of the government causing, with policy, with mandates, layoffs that have occurred in numerous industries. it was obviously to increase suffering, anxiety, and despair going into the election, which i think tells people a lot about

it hasn't opposed nancy pelosi it hasn't opposed the old guard enough to actually hear to sound like you're going to be about that because i'm very curious about that because with the exception of and in the minds of millions and millions of people the contested presidential election it was a it was a bad day for democrats on election day i mean it was it was a shellacking how do you account for that. well you know i o's are. not going to take a you know i really think we have to kind of think about the idea who really owns the idea of progressive i mean is it all the way left is it all the way right is it all is it the same here and there let's name figures is joe biden a progressive is nancy pelosi a progressive judge schumer a bit of progressive i think in their mind they are or i think i think i mean seriously not a little clear i know it's funny but i think that their mind they think that the ideas that they espouse because they are not republican and they're not to the right makes them progressive how could any really not a party has been moving further and further to the right

nancy pelosi agreed tweeting that democrats are ready to bring it to a vote this week.xas congressman and ways and means committee member, kevin brady. always a pleasure. your thoughts on president trump's pronouncement last night? it's interesting. i was shocked and just checking social media how conservatives and republicans were appalled at the $600 number. a lot of folks thought it should be higher. >> yeah, charles, merry christmas and happy holidays to you. first, i wouldn't recommend to the president to veto this. he was right to be upset about this process. democrats in the house didn't bother to do a budget this year. speaker pelosi delayed this. everybody knew a mess would be coming. here's the key thing. president trump won in these negotiations. first, the covid relief bill that speaker pelosi insisted on $3.4 trillion turned out to be about 1/10 of that spending. all on the area president trump insisted on. more help for small businesses, getting airline workers back to work. on the overall spending bill, these are several bills put together. in funding the

it's nancy pelosi alone that controls the gavel that makes that decision. i recall that nancy pelosi has not met with president trump in more than a year but what was the seminal event that pushed her to do that to? it was the fact that she decided she no longer wanted to meet with the president because the president was going to put that out on television and that she didn't want the american people to see how those negotiations were going. this is how disaster liberalism works, they take a crisis, they appoint all this other stuff with it and you get this where we are today. i've got to tell you back in 2018, donald trump said he wasn't going to do this again. >> it's also important to remember that nancy pelosi and a lot of these people have been doing this for years. joe biden has been at this for nearly 50 years, they've been at this game forever. donald trump is new to this. he comes on the private sector, from the free market and he's trying to do things differently. donald trump is at his finest when he's listening to his own instincts, making these

nancy pelosi is not offering that.he is simply offering to up the amount of those checks going to american families. pete: yeah, katie you are right. chuck schumer has called on the president to sign this existing bill and then we will go back and get to work. count me as one, i think, many americans who are not all that concerned if washington is forced to start over again, miss their christmas and actually, would. they are the ones who have received pay through all of this, government la jes largesss never stopped while small businesses were shut down. we think we will all agree on that. see if we it agree on what the president. will worth spending as opposed to all the other stuff we scrolled on the screen. also something that happened, guys, joe biden had a press conference yesterday. he had assigned reporters asking questions. many of them which were not difficult, as you can expect. and as you could expect peter doocy was not called upon here from the fox news channel but he took an opportunity at the end to ask

flip over to the house of representatives, nancy pelosi.er husband, paul pelosi, has done a series of deals in mainland china, that are directly-related to the chinese government and are part of the fact that the chinese are trying to curry favor with high- ranking politicians in the united states. you can add dianne feinstein. her husband richard blum has been doing deals for 25 years on mainland china and has benefited from private meetings that senator feinstein and her husband had with the highest levels. look, the bottom line is the chinese government has had a strategy, they've used it in australia, new zealand, in singapore and they are going to try to use it in the united states as well where they effectively decapitate our political leadership by giving sweetheart deals to the family members of our political class, thereby neutering them making them less critical of the chinese government and the question is, are we going to do something about it or are we going to just let it pass? maria: this is all very disturb ing, peter. it's

nancy pelosi says she held up coronavirus aid simply because trump's president and she doesn't regretthat's okay now, because we have a new president. that was not a mistake, it was a decision and it's taken us to a place where we can do the right thing without other, shall we say, considerations in the legislation that we don't want. >> jesse: now bernie sanders is calling out democratic leaders for stalling entire process. >> the democrats walked away from that bill because they wanted 2.2 trillion and they walked away from 1.8 trillion. >> that's what i'm saying. that's exactly what i'm saying. here was the proposal much, much larger, democrats said no, that's not good enough. >> jesse: greg, the democrats have always fought for the little guy, the mom-and-pop shops over the big industry, they've always fought for waitresses and dishwashers, to hear them talk about the minimum wage and health insurance and now when they really need it they are m.i.a. >> greg: especially when going to restaurants, jesse. it's the most american thing you can do. here's what you need. i think people d

you have to earn your stripes and i hate that she's doing this because she's making me defend nancy pelosiul because she can just passionately push a progressive agenda, she uncorked these crazy parliamentary stunts to debate republicans, negotiates with the senate, juggles investigations, she has to write legislation, they do all kinds of wizardry in the house to make that thing work and with age comes wisdom and i don't think aoc has the skill set yet. >> dagen: a lot of what nancy pelosi did this year wasn't so wise. juan, bring it back. >> juan: nancy pelosi, speaker of the house just ran unopposed and will be reelected in january without any opposition as speaker of the house. i mean, to me what's going on here is that you have two understand that alexandria ocasio-cortez has a real point, the democratic party does need new blood at the top. you've got a lot of elderly people especially in terms of house leadership but you look over at the republican side, you look at, you know, mitch mcconnell, john cornyn, which o'connell is in his late '70s, donald trump and is mid-'70s, both parti

of desperation waiting for nancy pelosi to do the right thing?umbers being very close now between the majority and minority is going to be something special for us because nancy pelosi has a choice to make. is she going to kowtow to the socialist squad, those five votes will be the difference or is she going to work with us, the republicans, kevin mccarthy to get some common ground that real bipartisan work done for the american people. that is what we are waiting to see. hopefully she will side with us and not go so far to the left. that is what the american people have shown they once considered they lost every tossup seat in the past cycle. >> i'm still hearing from people say they don't understand how the republican party did so well with latino voters and people like you flipped season the president grew his percentage with latino voters. how do you answer those as you head to capitol hill? >> we share the values of latino voters in south florida. what democrats, especially the extreme left of the democratic party, what they are selling does

republicans believe nancy pelosi could have taken a deal months ago. >> she did not want to give presidentrump a win and meanwhile the american people were losing. the main thing we rejected was a bailout to a lot of blue states who have mismanage their funds, but meanwhile we were asking her to at least let businesses have another bite of the apple and money that was already appropriated. >> the bill provide $600 stimulus checks for many americans, a sizable chunk of the legislation goes towards the paycheck protection program designed to keep businesses afloat. it also extends an eviction moratorium and money to distribute the vaccine. >> who do you think as the vaccine goes to the state. it's to the land, to your arm magically? no, it has to be received, distributed, administered. >> the white house indicates president trump supports the bill. we are still expecting a vote, they just posted with the hold up a computer glitch. dana. >> dana: chad, thank you so much. let's bring in senate majority leader mitch mcconnell who of course was part of these negotiations, and senator, i want you

why is nancy pelosi letting him still sit there?ll,. >> she may need the donations that she brings from silicon valley. he was targeted not because he was some great guy, he was targeted because of where he is and the district he represents which is silicon valley. it is where the two national labs are. he was targeted from the beginning. but, liz, let's just think about this for a minute. it's eric swalwell, right? so he's targeted by financial donations to husband campaign, you have hunter biden who's got a business relationship with the chinese. where are the -- the chinese are all over this stuff. they have penetrated our elites the same way the russians have penetrated the government e-mail systems. again, we need to stop being so naive and figure this out and really come to -- you know, face it. face it and get rid of it. elizabeth: right. and, you know, russia and china play the long game. you've talked about that. they don't just play 3-d chess, they play 5-d chess. so swalwell, i mean, he -- how experienced is he in the wor

now the united states, house republicans are set to block nancy pelosi's bid to pass a bill for relief. there was a battle between house minority leader mccarthy and g.o.p. members. pelosi is planning to seek pproval in congress today. samuel, i was reading the latest developments around stimulus. how does any of that stick to the dollar? i'm not sure if it does. do you think this debate around the stimulus checks matterses a great deal to the people on the ground waiting for them but in terms of where the dollar trades, how relevant is this news flow? >> so we had a stimulus package not too dissimilar to the one that was unveiled and what we thought had been agreed upon penciled in by the end of q 1 which contributes to our bearish dollar view. i think some people make big argument that if you get stimulus out of the u.s., it will boost growth and support the dollar. as long as global growth is doing well and we see an improving environment in 2021 even if a lot of that growth is from the u.s., particularly with a federal reserve that is not going to be normalizing policy in. they wan

coming up, nancy pelosi's stimulus move. president trump's call for a major boost in stimulus payments to individuals. this is bloomberg. ♪ vonnie: this is bloomberg did nancy pelosi is planning a thursday vote on new legislation boosting stimulus payments for individuals to $2000 each and urging republicans to join demand fromter a president trump that through the plan into doubt. give us the latest whispers on capitol hill about what might happen? will president trump reverse his stance? >> two different things happening at the same time. on the firsthand, we need to see whether or not president trump is going to sign the bill that was passed monday. this is very important not just to get pandemic relief to americans who need it, but also to fund the government passed the summer 28 when current funding runs out. december 28. house speakerthat nancy pelosi said the house of representatives will need unanimous consent to pass the bill increasing the amount of direct payments to $2000 like president trump said he wanted. we d

steve, ainsley , brian and this is as 17 house republicans sign on to that letter to house speaker nancy pelosihey write in their letter "his close interactions with chinese intelligence services however unintentional they may be are an unacceptable national security risk. " last week axios reported that christine fong targeted swalwell when he was a city councilman, interacted with him at multiple events, fundraised for his 2014 congressional re-election campaign and helped place at least one intern in his office. the republicans charged swalwell withheld that information from the intelligence committee for five years, and have undisclosed relationship with a foreign asset like that is dangerous. the white house, meanwhile, is focusing on the coverage. >> it were false yet covered by the media, there was no coverage , however, of swalwell being the one implicated but not russia, but china. reporter: swalwell says he cooperated with the fbi as soon as the federal officials notified him, and christine fong and his suspected activity as a chinese spy and the fbi thanked him for that and he calls

did he tell nancy pelosi? the fbi had to warn about his contacts with this alleged spy about five years ago. he goes full speed ahead on trump-russia collusion. he refuses to the discuss the details of his relationship with this spy. she reportedly had sexual affairs with two unidentified midwestern mayors, one from ohio. "axios," fox news, having a problem getting information out of eric wall well. his office is not answering questions. what do you think? >> i think he need full disclosure on everything that happened. his relationship, the scope of his relationship. you know, whether he shared information that was of a sensitive nature. as many pointed out he serves on a very sensitive house intelligence committee and, you know, sort of who else is around him? if you're warned by the fbi that someone that is in relationship to you is a agent of a foreign power, that means that you're awfully close to this person. this is not someone you shook hands with at a photo-op. this is someone you have some form of rel

the new debate in d.c., why is nancy pelosi protecting eric swalwell?hat story next. >> the tip of the iceberg is members of congress, governors, local officials being leftaged by the chinese this has been going on for years and eric swalwell is part of the distraction campaign. for many years he tried to down play the very serious problems we've had with chinese spies and leverage and he has tried to play the game of look over there and really tried to create something that is not there with russia. look, russia is a problem but china is a crisis. to support a strong immune system, your body needs routine. centrum helps your immune defenses every day, with vitamin c, d and zinc. season, after season. ace your immune support, with centrum. this holiday, get the phones everyone wants on the 5g america's been waiting for. verizon 5g is next level. now get one of our best 5g phones on us when you buy one. and get $500 when you switch. plus select unlimited plans include disney+, hulu, and espn+. 100% obsessed with "the mandalorian." i watch a lot of sports

plus, nancy pelosi wants another term as speaker of the house, but some new members of the so-called uad might not have her back. whether pelosi can win over progressive lawmakers, pushing an agenda she may not -- >> we need reparations for the african-american community. we need to federal jobs guarantee and medicare for all. >> thank you. ♪ >> julie: two newly elected has democrats part of capitol hill's growing progressive squad are not committed to supporting nancy pelosi's bid for another term as house speaker. here is what the incoming members of congress had to say about that over the weekend. >> what i'm going to do is make sure the voices of the people of st. louis are heard, and that we have what we need. you will find out then. >> that's not a "yes." >> you will find out when my vote is tallied. >> julie: all right, a bit of mystery there. the power panel now. david webb, fox news contributor and host of "reality check with david lead" on fox nation paint and make a const, former candidate for new york city public advocate and a former bernie sanders circuit. thank you for

it's a policy that never should have been and thankfully it is no more, in no small part due to nancy pelosi. we know speaker pelosi is always ready to throw a punch for the children, thankfully we also know speaker pelosi is always ready to throw a punch for lgbtq equality. so speaker pelosi thank you for your leadership and for your current. >> speaker pelosi, i just want to send along my congratulations on your honor as an lgbtq history maker. you deserve this award from your amazing work to help repeal "don't ask, don't tell" to your support of marriage equality, something very personal to me. you've been an advocate and an ally for the lgbtq+ community and you definitely deserve this honor. congratulations again, speaker pelosi. >> congratulation speaker pelosi. on being honored with the inaugural lgbtq history makers award. your leadership in repealing "don't ask, don't tell" is just one example from a very long list of how you helped make america better for the disenfranchised in our society. i am honored that only to call you a friend, but one of my heroines. thank you for inspiring

and nancy pelosi. the gang is all there. this is calls grow for the democrat to step down from the house intelligence committee. the congressman dodging questions from fox news about the scandal as we first reported yesterday. watch. >> congressman swalwell, do you plan on stepping down from the committee or anything like that? or resigning from congress? can you tell us anything about your relationship with ms. phang? anything in general? [no response] congressman swalwell? >> kennedy: there he is with the playoff beard. mean time, former house oversight chair trey gowdy says speaker pelosi has lot to answer for. watch. >> he berated jared kushner and donald trump jr. for meeting with the russian lawyer. not dating one. meeting with one. meanwhile, for four years the man is not part enough to know he is being played by a chinese spy. that is the best that nancy pelosi could do? i don't think swalwell has denied having a relationship. all you have to say is i didn't sleep with her, eric. that is all you have to say. >> kenne

to block nancy pelosi's bill boosting relief checks to $2000.hat is according to sources that participated in a call with house minority leaders. adam cole of rbc capital markets is still with us. another rights that the market is now underpricing the gambit of this virus relief bill dying out. is that something you agree with? way thertainly the markets have traded in the last , still posited by the that anerally, does show solution will be found, one way or another, either through the andident stepping back letting congress have its will ,ith the package, or vetoing you know, overruling the stimulus package, or some compromise being reached on the contents of the package itself. one way or another, the markets sanguinee quite sayin on the stimulus being delivered one way or another. i don't think that is unreasonable. there is some risk that does not happen, but as a base case, i do not think it is believable that market surprised for a solution of one kind or another that does eventually see the household checks delivered in the stimulus pack

nancy pelosi and chuck schumer.uck schumer says first we take georgia and then we change america. he is not saying change it from the better for center to right georgia. americans like divided government. that's one thing the democrats will face in this election. people want to tap the brake. they don't want somebody to have it all free and clear under their control. that's an advantage for the republicans as we get closer to january 5th. >> john: we were told that the president indicated that last night at a christmas party last night that he will run again in 2024. he said i will either see you for another 4 years or see you in 4 years. would he declare on inauguration day and what effect would that have on the republican party if he did that? >> i fully expect him to make lots of noise about running in 2024. i don't know if he announces on january 20th. he has a sense of timing that is built in. i expect him to indicate an interest in 2024. he set up a committee save america with 125-million dollars. maybe he mig

it is nancy pelosi's bill.is a provision donald trump said hit that he wants but republicans do not want. they could say we will take it from nancy pelosi but pair it reforms to the provision that provides protection to technology companies. not related to pandemic aid, but also an ask from the president. romaine: there is the big georgia senate runoff race. we know both parties are trying to paint themselves in the best light, make themselves look like they are the party that can do the most for americans. that this too cynical is a ploy? >> you are not being too cynical. cynicism is warranted at this point. these georgia races have been hanging out everything congress has done since the november election. that is because these two seats will determine which party controls the senate in the next congress. romaine: we are going to have to leave it there. anna edgerton giving us the update in washington. that does it for "what'd you miss?" joe: have a great evening. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ ♪ emily: welcome to blo

and thewashington, reason is, nancy pelosi was talking about people needing money right away because they have to pay their rent and pay for groceries, but when she was given the $1.9 trillion, she played politics because they -- she could have said, ok, let's pass this to the people and then we will work on another one. but she did not do that. she was playing politics. at the same time, what got me confused is the republican side, which they have approved the $1.9 trillion at that time, but now they could not do it, they have come up with an excuse. everyone is playing politics. i do not know which one to vote, or i do not know who is right, but everybody is playing politics here, so i do not know what to say. that i want to remind you later on today there is going to and department of defense department of health and human services briefing with senior officials, including health and human secretary alex azar about operation warp speed and the covid-19 vaccine distribution. you can see that briefing live on c-span at 10:30 a.m. eastern. once again, you can see it here on c-span, o