and nonformula retail was not subject to the tax, might choose or offer a lower base rent to a te nanls who wasn't formula retail and would not result in a tax for them. i think that those affects are quite small and on the margin, but they're worth mentioning. the most important benefit of the tax that we're able to model here is the spending aspect of the revenue because they are dedicated taxes. we know a little more than we do with the general purpose tax and what the tax's economic impact will be in terms of their spending in the economy. i don't think i'll go through the logic that we spoke about before with the logic of the tax-through. this is essentially the economic impact assessment that we came up with. in each of the three cases, the economic impact -- the net economic impact is slightly negative, ranging on the average over the next 20 years, -184 jobs under the peskin proposal to 746. for the kim-yee proposal, similar numbers in employed san francisco residents. the first number is all jobs in the city, regardless of where the worker lives. similarly, relatively modest de