. >> the first and only phone case that uses nanotechnology to stick to flat surfaces. >> i definitely noticed that with your case it looks like every other case. >> stay tuned to find out. i was back in college. i even accept that i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat, not caused by a heart valve problem. but i won't accept giving it less than my best. so if i can go for something better than warfarin ...i will. eliquis. eliquis... reduced the risk of stroke better than warfarin plus it had less major bleeding than warfarin... eliquis had both. that really mattered to me. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart

you had them getting into research, nanotechnology, balloons, auto, car, google glasses.ot of sellers say they're putting their money to the wrong place. that gave me huge pop. facebook tended to follow that that doesn't mean, i think a lot of what facebook is doing has been priced in here. certainly they could have a big earnings day today. when they come up in a couple weeks here. but you know, i think facebook is in a position now where the stock has rallied a little bit. i don't know how much more it has to go. if you look at the earnings picture, what it needs to do this quarter. >> the onus is on the bulls? >> it is. much of what we saw in google was a function of the cfo finally speaking wall street's language, she used a word you never hear in silicon valley, that's discipline. that's great for google. it has nothing to do with facebook. google's problem was the fact was they weren't disciplined. anyway they had a short attention span, ooh, there's a squirrel. >> the new technology companies don't need to have discipline. they need to have innovation, full stop. i

virtual reality, nanotechnology robotics and more will impact in ways we cannot yet imagine. our devices will grow more powerful, bring new capabilities to the masses. the question is not whether innovations are coming. the question is whether america will develop or produce them, and whether our people will share in the wealth that they will help create. to build the most innovation friendly economy in the world, we must build the most this is friendly economy in the world. right now, we have nearly the exact opposite. the united states has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. we have a tax code that punishes american companies for competing in the global economy. and we have a regulatory system that stops the innovative engines of job creation. the first time in 35 years, we have more businesses dying than being born. in the first quarter of this year our economy shrank for the third time since our recovery began. over the last decade, the united states has lost $179 billion worth of domestic spending with foreign takeovers. when i am president, i will emp

lot of evidence to suggest while there certainly will be new industries created in the future nanotechnology synthetic violet shade virtual-reality which will all be very important future but it's hard to imagine any of them are going to be labor-intensive. i don't think any of those industries will employ huge numbers of people. we see that happening already so the real risk that we face going forward is processing creative destruction and the destruction will fall on her labor-intensive industries which right now is in areas like retail, fast food hospitality all those areas that employ huge numbers of workers. jobs will be destroyed in new things will appear in the future but they simply won't be labor-intensive. over time they will find it harder and harder to employ the work horse. those are the reasons why i think this time could be different although certainly people remain skeptical. the second thing i say that's important that i focus on a lot in the book is that our conventional view of which jobs are likely to be automated is not quite correct. attrition -- traditional view has be

it is not stupid stuff like big data, cloud data, nanotechnology, and all that.ndan: when the pie is growing, you do not have to talk about distribution within the pie. when the pie is not growing, that is when we start talking about inequality. this growth that we are having is linked to inequality. tom: robertson should for decades has been one of the great students of linking together. we begged him to come in this morning. he came in by covered wagon from connecticut this morning. we are going to talk the dollar later. but right now on what every viewer is saying -- what is new about america? where is the productivity next that gary shilling is talking about? robert: when you have an economy that is driven by manufacturing driven by the production of goods, it is a lot easier to measure and develop. services productivity is difficult to grow. tom: i noticed yesterday netflix has all of 2000 to 3000 employees. that is an example of the service economy. brendan: are we prepared for a long run of low growth? presidents get measured on their gdp growth. robert: a

virtual reality virtual-reality, nanotechnology, robotics and more practice in ways we can't yet imagine. our devices will grow more powerful, bring new capabilities to the masses. the question is not whether in addition to coming but whether america will develop our people will share the wealth that they will create to build the most innovation friendly economy in the world was build the most business friendly economy in the world. right now we have quite nearly the exact opposite. the united states has the the highest corporate tax rate in the developing world tax code that punishes american companies are competing in the global economy and the regulatory system that prevents profits the primary engines of innovation and job creation competing against established players. a result of this approach, for the first time in 35 years we have more business being born. in the first quarter of this year our economy shrank for the first time since our recovery began command over the last decade the united states has lost $179 billion worth of domestic and foreign takeovers. when takeovers. when

whetherw technologies it be jet engines, adaptive software, additive manufacturing, nanotechnology, different ways of securing cyber systems. a way thatw those in is considerate to the mission you are trying to support any new stress you see internally and externally. there is a potential for revolutionary change. in order for it to be considerate, it should be an evolutionary change. >> the evolution maybe what you get when you look in the rearview mirror, but is not the goal you set out initially. you don't try to make a revolution. one of the key factors with additive manufacturing is the innovation aspect of it. when you deploy and additive manufacturing machine in the field and you have the capability at the point of me -- at an outpost, add in a summary, the iss, and you can create things you do not already have because you realize you have a need for them. they did not exist in the supply chain and now you have a new technology to create them and use them right away. that is where the revolution could potentially come from. that is where we see the greatest potential currently. the evo

virtual reality nanotechnology robotics and more will impact us in ways we yet can't imagine. our quites will grow more powerful and bring new capabilities to the masses. the question is not whether inso situations are coming but the question is whether america will produce them and whether our people will share in the wealth they helped to create. so build the best economy in the world we must build the best business economy in the world. right now we have nearly the exact opposite. the united states has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. we have a tax code that punishes american companies for competing in the global economy and have a regulatory system who stops the businesses from competing against established players. the result of the approach are in. for the first time in 35 years, we have more diss buying -- dying than being alone. for the third time this year our economy shrank for the third time since our recovery began and the last decade the united states has lost $179 billion of domestic companies through foreign takeovers. when i'm present i wi