as a result, napoleon ii was defeated at sedan and the ruler, by the way, bismargue called it an unrecognized large mediocrity, surrendered to the germans. a republic was proclaimed in france again, the third one. seventy years later, it was defeated by hitler, and after the victory of the ussr and the allies over germany, a fourth one appeared. not long before the political crisis of 1958, when it was replaced by the fifth french republic, which remains to this day. on september 4, 1946 , anna akhmatova and mikhail zoshchenko were expelled from the union of writers of the ussr. two weeks before this, a devastating party resolution was adopted on the magazines zvezda and leningrad, where these outstanding writers. their works did not fit into the officially approved cultural canon, pretentious, praising soviet totalitarianism. akhmatova was called a typical representative of empty, unprincipled poetry alien to our people. officials were irritated by her emotional, sincere poems. i don’t need odic crayfish and the charms of legalistic undertakings, for me, in poetry, everything should be out o

leadership of great britain, to a lesser extent france, primarily great britain, of course, in france napoleon ii then , to put it mildly, did not greatly encourage freedom of speech. in addition, the english and the french tried to storm sevastopol on the anniversary of the battle of waterloo, so to speak, to unite, well, on the one hand, to unite the military brotherhood of the french and the english against russia. military and civilian people who were willing to make donations in order to finance, that is, this construction of some fortifications, to which menshikov said that he did not want to see a list of cowards. menshikov was always holding back, and people did not even understand what was going on, and, well , you clearly do not like nicholas i, but nevertheless nicholas i was just active - heavy for both sides, the losses were great, the russian army retreated, all our generals, admirals, absolutely unanimously recognized that if the allies had continued the offensive after this battle near podalma, then sevastopol would have fallen, it was absolutely unprotected from the north, this i

accordingly, napoleon ii. had to be transferred to another channel.chement was the italian question. it hit austria. austria occupied the northern part of italy. austrian rule was known there. and gorchakov played a subtle game to direct france's activity towards italy, to support italy 's aspirations of cavour, the italian prime minister at the time, to create a single italian state. at the same time, of course, gorchakov, as a man of his time, could not support. will already play his role in order to prevent, he did not manage to do it to the end, to prevent this later, the main thing is that he very skillfully observed this the imbalance in europe and tried to play on this, it is also important to understand that gorchakov, knowing about the capabilities of the russian military empire, tried to prevent russia from being drawn into military conflicts until the moment when the forces, as they say, are gathered, until russia, in other words , concentrates, here it could well be... a military conflict with england, then with the united states, why was

leadership of great britain, to a lesser extent france, first of all great britain, of course, in france napoleon iihen , to put it mildly, did not strongly encourage freedom of speech. in addition, the british and french tried to storm sevastopol on the anniversary of the battle of waterloo, so that ... rejected the very idea of ​​a possible landing, so he rejected all attempts, even at the level of some civil initiative of the city's residents to begin strengthening the land, and once, when admiral kornilov, that is, he brought to show minshkov a list of military and civilian people who were voluntarily ready to make donations in order to... were sure that during the landing itself it was possible to inflict very significant damage on the enemy, damage, which, by the way, the british and french were very afraid of, they were counting on them, it was, as they say, well, in one-two, in general , here is an absolutely incomprehensible position that menshkov occupied, then followed the battle at alma, very difficult for both sides, the losses were great, the russian army retreated, all ours... when ko

accordingly, napoleon ii had to to transfer to another channel, the basis for this rapprochement was the italian question. it hit austria. austria occupied the northern part of italy, austrian rule was known there, igorchakov played a subtle game to direct france's activity towards italy, to support. italy's desire for the avura of the italian then prime minister, the creation of a single italian state, while, of course, gorchakov, as a man of his time, could not support the italian grassroots resistance, i mean the garibaldians, garibaldi, especially since there were connections between the italian insurgents and the polish rebels, yes there were, yes, nevertheless, nevertheless, gorchakov played this italian card quite subtly, but at least he managed to drive such a crack into the paris treaty, such a wedge into it, yes. gorchakov managed to drive it already at the end of the fifties, at the beginning of the sixties of the xix century. gorchakov outplayed the austrians, nicholas i really wanted to punish the traitor austria with a shatyk, and gorchakov managed, without spilling a s

on napoleon ii. russia's interests coincided with france's, or rather, there was even such a story, they did not contradict the french. we had no intersections, except for france's participation in the crimean war. accordingly, napoleon ii. had to be transferred to another channel, the basis for this rapprochement was the italian question, which hit austria. austria occupied the northern part of italy. igorchakov played a subtle game to direct france's activity towards italy, to support italy's aspirations of cavour italian then prime minister, the creation of a unified italian state, while, of course, gorchakov, as a man of his time, could not support the italian grassroots resistance, i mean the garibaldians, garibaldi, especially since there were connections between the italian insurgents and the polish rebels, yes there were, yes, nevertheless, nevertheless. without shedding a single drop, our soldier, to punish austria with the help of the french. the wedge was driven in, then gorchakov expanded

leadership of great britain, to a lesser extent france, first of all great britain, of course, in france napoleon iid not encourage much. in addition, the british and french tried to storm sevastopol. wash away previous grievances there and so on, in the end everything ended in defeat and very high losses, so you are absolutely right that both the command and the training of the rank and file limped here and there. sevastopol was quite decently fortified from the sea, and... as for the land, he was practically defenseless.

for example, jewelers, the wife of napoleon ii. empress eugenia. in the 19th century, she decorated her outfits with a diamond brooch with shining bunches and carved leaves. in 2014, it was sold on auction, for more than 230 million rubles in our money. another jewelry masterpiece in the form of a blackcurrant sprig made of gold and diamonds went under the hammer for more than a third of a million in russian currency. well, the older generation remembers a whole series of soviet amber brooches in the form of brushes with berries. modern craftsmen make jewelry from glass or polymer clay, they look very realistic, but the most interesting thing, perhaps, is still hidden in its aroma, what do you think these beautiful cats have in common, a yellowish liquid in my glass of currants, that's right, it's the smell, only here it's not what you thought, but the wine is so... yon blanc, which, not by chance, even in good versions, often smells, excuse me , of cat urine, it's just that both it and him, the currant, are given their characteristic aroma by the

english will lose their hands, oh, now we will squeeze russia, suddenly to the horror of the english, napoleon ii of russia on all controversial issues, what role now? we need to stop here, the atom we will leave and definitely through the wrong door, a short break, we let's continue, special collection of large-leaf tea gurmati from greenfield, time to hear yourself, greenfield tea finding harmony, you came to this city, it is torn in the highway, they announced to me, you have not understood yet, here in gorovets okrf does not work. varangians, i want to check something. premiere, today 20:00 on ntv. nevsky, new season, soon on ntv. his hands were terribly weak. he was afraid that he would release it and drop it. classic, if only vtb were there then, ugh, this is not a way out, what else is left, debt refinancing and a loan from vtb, sonya, vtb is a classic, i will transfer vtv to my pension. rostiks offers to drop in for a visit, this has never happened before, we have delicious prices. chefburger for only 139 rubles and other hits at incredibly low prices, have time to catch discounts in rost

military operations against any european power, but in 1812 through a month after napoleon's invasion of russia, alexander iil blockade of great britain and concluded a peace treaty with it. russia's trade relations with england were restored, and the english government pledged to assist russia in the war with france. in 1894, almost 40 years after the crimean war, the imperial houses of russia and great britain became related. queen victoria's granddaughter, princess alice of gayson, married. 12 years later, in 1907 , the anglo-russian agreement was concluded in st. petersburg, which laid the foundation for the military-political alliance of the entente, before the first world war in 1913, the british empire was russia's second largest trading partner after germany. it accounted for more than 17% of russian exports and 12% of russian imports. from 1941 to 1945, both countries were allies in the anti-hitler coalition. during the war, british convoys delivered weapons and food to the ussr, but on march 5, 1946, winson churchill, no longer prime minister, gave the famous fulcan speech. the cold war began, whic

politics on politics to a lesser extent france, first of all great britain, of course, in france napoleon iidly. in addition, the british and french tried to storm sevastopol on the anniversary of the battle of waterloo, so to speak. well, on the one hand, to unite the military brotherhood of the french and the english against russia, so to speak, to wash away previous grievances there and so on, in the end everything ended in defeat and very high losses, so that... then you are absolutely right that both the command and the training of the rank and file were lame here and there. sevastopol was quite decently fortified from the sea, and as for the land, it was practically defenseless. this was understood then not only by the military people, but also by ordinary residents of sevastopol, and but the fact is that this minshikov was generally categorically rejected. the very idea of ​​a possible landing, so he rejected all attempts, even at the level of some civil initiative of the city's residents to begin strengthening the land. and once, when admiral kornilov, that is, he brought to show min

but in 1812 , a month after napoleon's invasion of russia, alexander ii ended the continental blockadeded a peace treaty with it. trade. russia with england were restored, the english government pledged to help russia in the war with france. in 1894, almost 40 years later, after the crimean war, the imperial houses of russia and great britain became related. queen victoria's granddaughter, princess alice of hesse, married the future russian emperor nicholas ii, receiving the new name alexandra feodorovna. this was facilitated by kinship. sincerely friends, this did not please george's grandmother, queen victoria, but nicholas's marriage to her granddaughter contributed to reconciliation. 12 years later, in 1907 , an anglo-russian agreement was concluded in st. petersburg. living the beginning of the military-political alliance of the entente, before the first world war in 1913, the british empire was russia's second trading partner after germany, accounting for more than 17% of russian exports and 12% of russian import. from 1941 to 1945, both countries were allies in the anti-hitler c

negotiations between napoleon and the russian emperor alexander ii. the french had prepared a large cultural program with hunting and nightly performances, but behind the scenes there was intense diplomatic work. only a year had passed since the conclusion of the telzig peace , and differences had accumulated between napoleon and alexander. napoleon was trying to get russia to almost declare war on austria, because vienna wanted to declare war on the french and take revenge for previous defeats. but alexander only agreed to non-interference in western affairs and common actions in case of war with austria. an important role was played by charles maris de teleiran, former head of the french foreign ministry. he suggested to alexander, with whom he was on friendly terms, to make any agreements in werfurt as vague and unfinished as possible, so that the russian-french alliance would tie the russians' hands as little as possible. but became more of a restraint for napoleon. as it turned out, napoleon left erfurt dissatisfied , the emperors never met again

hitler, napoleon, charles x, wilhelm ii, they all came from there, in order to to enslave our homeland course, now they are there... creating a fairly serious strike force, and zelensky, his fascist retinue can arrange any provocation, so the warning is very clear, but it is clear that this is aggression against our country, belarus, a union state, and here lukashenko's tough position is another warning, lukashenko is a man with great determination, yes, so i think this will sound serious, by the way, poland was not a peace-loving state at all, it was participating at that time together with fascist germany in the dismemberment of czechoslovakia, tore away most of lithuania together with vilnius, their fascist de facto dictator pel'sudski spoke about the need to dismember the soviet union, and poland's interests should extend from finland to the caucasus mountains, in fact this state threatened our country, and we, in fact... when we carried out this serious operation, in many ways prevented , already as a result of the great patriotic war, the death of millions of citizens, did not al

napoleon's operation will be broadcasted on tehran network at 21:00. the film is about a woman accused of murder whose only way to save herself is to uncover the secret of an old world war ii plane. and the tehran network broadcasts the movie "theft" on monday at 21:00. this movie is about a group trying to get several gold bars in a plane steal a passenger. maryam mohammadi, sada news agency. and examining some television programs from the point of view of the use of cultural aspects. it is a strange process at all. the process , not the strange process of cultural speaking in mr. ghazi's program. do you have an elevator? no after the elevator, instead of the elevator, mr. qazi heard a warning. please speak farsi so we can understand. the commission also took its place in the market. i am definitely their partner. listen to the best football program and the voices of behrando's voice. the discussion that alireza had on this voice and the school that became an academy should spend 500,000 dollars on the academy is wonderful. this is also the good morning program and the admins where you can send your answers to the admin and in short, it was said instead of the supervisor.

we saw it from world war ii and periodically other times with surprising intensity there. two things when he talks about russia and napoleon and hitler. a fundamental difference, that's when russia was invaded. that's when russia was fighting and it's much important for putin than stalin to appeal to russia. i will say, trump, not in his defense, but i'll say he makes one decent point. and it's the question of what do we mean by winning in ukraine? it came up in the debate. it came up in president biden's speech. it came up in what president zelenskyy said. no one is putting it on the table. what is an achievable goal in ukraine. if victory is defined it is by many, mika, that ukraine has to totally rid its country of every russian troop. i understand the argument, but the problem is it's not achievable. no one is putting out there what is a realistic plan for victory. if we're going to spend all of this money, what is our return on investment. that's a conversation that this administration has been reluctant to have for 2 1/2 years. and the danger of not having that conversation, not giving americans an achievable policy,