. ♪ ♪ >>reporter: for narly six decades, dave bruck has been daling listeners worldwide with s uniqueve style, he has beme a jazz immortal. ♪ what is less known-- and jusas remarkable-is that for much of that time, brubeck h also compos religious music like the commandments whiche recorded for theilken archive of american jesh music. ♪ in his relious scores, brubeck achieves wh he cannot achieve in jazz >> when i write aiece, a saed piece, i'm looking hard a trying to discover what i'm out, and what my parents wer about, the worlis about. >> reporter: youhink religious music can changpeople? >> yeah, sure! >> rerter: brubeck says his seice in world war two convinced him quote, "mething should be donmusically to strengen man's knowledge of god." in his choral work "gat of justice," also record for the milken archive of erican jewish music, he plea for brherhood and invokes the wor of dr. martin luther king, jr. ♪ >> ♪ if we d't live together as brhers, we shall die. ♪ >> reporter: in "the commandments," brube's message is strictly biblical. >> ♪ ke my commandments. keep my commdments.

. >> oh, narly. bill: also, i think mr. penn doesn't like america very much.aybe i'm wrong. >> hey, bud, what's your problem? bill: finally and i appreciate you hearing me out. every american has a right spending choices. this is one of mine. you can have the last word. >> oh i need are some tasty waves, cool buzz and i'm fine. bill: indeed. mike: and that's it for us today. the factor continues 24/7 on bill o'reilly.com. we hope you check it out. and check out my show huckabee saturday and sunday nights at 8:00 p.m. eastern. this weekend we have got a blockbuster show lined up with dan quayle, mc hammer, the amazing queston and ron in mill sap. for this week's huckabee show or past shows or commentaries heard on nearly 500 radio shows each day go to mike huckabee.com. hannity is next. i'm mike huckabee in for bill o'reilly hope to see you next time. reer

one is, as we looked at the indication, we're coming off of an extraordinary narly powerful court ofpeals opinion and an extensive record in congress. i think it was 21 different hearings over 10 months with something like 16,000 pages of evidence documented, the need for the voting rights act. i think that -- sure, there were lots of tough questions and oral argument, which i think we both appreciated as advocates, to hear what the court's concerns were. but at the end of the day, one thing that might have happened is simply that that extensive record put to -- when put in front of the court really put a kind of concern in their minds about judicial activism and about really should they reach that ultimate step? it would be really something extraordinary, i think, to strike down the voting rights act, which has been kind of a modern pillar of legal landscape for 40 years. that having been said, i think many people were surprised that the statutory bailout decision was the way in which the court dealt with this. i think that's a fairly tough argument to get to from the text of the st

one is, as we looked at the indication, we're coming off of an extraordinary narly powerful court ofnd an extensive record in congress. i think it was 21 different hearings over 10 months with something like 16,000 pages of evidence documented, the need for the voting rights act. i think that -- sure, there were lots of tough questions and oral argument, which i think we both appreciated as advocates, to hear what the court's concerns were. but at the end of the day, one thing that might have happened is simply that that extensive record put to -- when put in front of the court really put a kind of concern in their minds about judicial activism and about really should they reach that ultimate step? it would be really something extraordinary, i think, to strike down the voting rights act, which has been kind of a modern pillar of legal landscape for 40 years. that having been said, i think many people were surprised that the statutory bailout decision was the way in which the court dealt with this. i think that's a fairly tough argument to get to from the text of the statute. i think