iraq natanz possible military dimensions of the program, et cetera.ntil we're able to conclude all of the elements then nothing is agreed to. so what we've seen is that on specific chapters, critical chapters they have moved closer to a point where we would find their commitments acceptable in answering our requirements. on others we're just not there yet. and it goes to your question, do they have enough political space to make the agreement? i think what we'll find that out over the next two months. >> going back to the japoa do you believe the corker legislation would fie late the intent of the japoa? >> no. >> so again, the -- it would not violate the intent of the japoa. but would it give us the ability to weigh in, as congress, the ability to perform, advise and consent obligations under our constitution? so it's strictly the administration's concern that this would interfere with their negotiations? >> again i think some of the concerns are that and the japoa i think may be illustrative of this, if members have been asked to pronounce themselve

iraq, natanz, possible military dimensions of the program, et cetera. but unless and until we're able to conclude all of the elements, then nothing is agreed to. so what we've seen is that on specific chapters, critical chapters, they have moved closer to a point where we would find their commitments acceptable in answering our requirements. on others we're just not there yet. and it goes to your question, do they have enough political space to make the agreement? i think what we'll find that out over the next two months. >> going back to the japoa, do you believe the corker legislation would violate the intent of the japoa? >> no. >> so again, the -- it would not violate the intent of the japoa. but would it give us the ability to weigh in, as congress, the ability to perform, advise and consent obligations under our constitution? so it's strictly the administration's concern that this would interfere with their negotiations? >> again i think some of the concerns are that, and the japoa i think may be illustrative of this, if members have been asked to

iraq, natanz, possible military dimensions of the program, et cetera.ut unless and until we're able to conclude all of the elements, then nothing is agreed to. so what we've seen is that on specific chapters, critical chapters, they have moved closer to a point where we would find their commitments acceptable in answering our requirements. on others we're just not there yet. and it goes to your question, do they have enough political space to make the agreement? i think what we'll find that out over the next two months. >> going back to the japoa, do you believe the corker legislation would violate the intent of the japoa? >> no. >> so again, the -- it would not violate the intent of the japoa. but would it give us the ability to weigh in, as congress, the ability to perform, advise and consent obligations under our constitution? so it's strictly the administration's concern that this would interfere with their negotiations? >> again i think some of the concerns are that, and the japoa i think may be illustrative of this, if members have been asked to p

it's retreated from demands on iran closing its illicit nuclear facilities at natanz, at fordo and at araq, and it's backed away there from full iranian cooperation with the ongoing iae, investigation into the possible military dimensions of its program. iran has obtained substantial sanctions relief in exchange for symbolic and incremental concessions that can be easily withdrawn as it has many times in the past. one of the biggest mistakes the administration made was in prematurely relaxing economic sanctions against iran which undermined its own bargaining leverage. sanctions are the only reason that iran came to the table in the first place, and many of them were imposed over the objections of the administration. thanks to sanctions relief iran has enclosed its oil exports -- increased its oil exports from one million barrels a day before the november 13, 2013, interim agreement to ant 1.4 -- to about 1.4 million perils a day this past november, and that has added about $10 billion to iran's annual oil revenues. the iranian economy grew an estimated 4.6% in the first quarter of ir

natanz building up a bunch of lower centrifuges and building up a massive stockpile that could be quickly converted to a higher grade -- there too, no next generation centrifuges wrist -- installed. stockpiles cap. -- capped. >> i appreciate that. i hope it works. any inspection regime, any regime you put together for doing this, they are going to know all about it. they are going to know the details of it. just remember that their objective is not your objective. our objective is to stop them. their objective is to get to that point and into in doing so, not get attacked in the meantime. there are technologies that can get around it. i hope you are right. on a very parochial matter, as we are speaking right now, the president is on his way to idaho. while he is there, pursuant to a request from us, he's going to meet with a woman by the name of this is abba dini. her husband is in prison and iran. there are three americans there. for the life of me -- 20 sherman has had to sit there and listen to me say this -- why you guys cut loose all of that money when they are so cash hungry without

the third pathway, natanz, building up a lot of centrifuges at lower enriched levels and then buildingat can then be more quickly converted to a higher grade, there too no new centrifuges, no next generation centrifuges installed. the stockpile of 4% capped at its pre-jpoa levels. i believe because you are right we didn't want -- >> you've said all that before. and i appreciate that. and like ik]ú said i hope it works. my problem is this. any inspection regime, any regime you put together for doing, this they're going to know all about it, they're going to know all the details of it. and just remember that their objective is not your objective. your objective our objective is to stop them. their objective is to get to that point and doing it such that they're not going to get attacked in the meantime. they're going to know all the details, how to do it and any regime you put together there's technologies that can get around that. i hope you're right. let me7pçñ just close with this on a very parochial matter. as we're speaking here right now, the president's on his way to idaho. andze)