. >> could you comment on nathan hale? >> nathan hale was absolutely a very poor spy. i don't know if you are familiar with what has been found out. british general, the scottish general by the name of grant, his papers were found images become recently available. in there he identifies that robert rogers actually got hail to tell him that he was a spy and what the mission was, and hale should have kept his mouth shut. what he told rogers who was also an american spy and because he outed himself, he winds up giving himself hung. next question. >> can you comment on washington getting his troops out of brooklyn into manhattan and the clichÉ where they built up the fires and it seemed like army was still there? >> he also use that after, down in trenton where he had the fires built to deceive the british, that they were still in position, but at the battle of her quinn, he uses they leverage marble meant to get the troops across the east river back to manhattan and by the fact that the british were convinced that come morning, that they would have a victory over an ameri

. >> could you comment on nathan hale? >> nathan hale was absolutely a very poor spy. i don't know if you're familiar with what's been found out. british general, scottish general by the name of brands, papers were found, and just become recently available. and there he identifies that robert rogers actually got hailed to tell him that he was a spot and what his mission was. and hale should have kept his mouth shut. he thought rogers was also an american spy, and because he actually outed himself, you wind up getting himself hung. >> and can you comment on washington getting his troops out of brooklyn into manhattan, and almost like a goucher out of the movies, where the built-up fives mac like the army was still there? >> yes, he also uses that after downing trend, where he had the fires built to deceive the british, that they were still in position. but at the battle of brooklyn, he uses men to get his troops across the east river back to manhattan. and by the fact that the british were convinced that come morning, that they would have a victory over an american ar

. >> could you comment on nathan hale? >> nathan hale was a very poor spy. i don't know if you are familiar with what has been found out scottish general by the name of grant his papers were found just became recently available and he identified as that robert rogers actually got him to tell him he was a spy but he should have kept his mouth shut. he thought rogers was also an american spy and because the ousted himself the winds up getting himself home. and -- getting himself hung next question? >> can you comment on washington getting his troops out of brooklyn into manhattan and using the cliche it to build up the fires to make it look like the army was still there? >> key use that down in trenton where he had the fires bill to to deceive the british that they were still in position but at the battle of brooklyn he uses clever men to get the troops across to the east river back to manhattan by the fact the british were convinced some mornings they would have a victory over the american army that was on long island. that was another one of his deceptions.