you're not doing anything to increase the size of the fiscal deficit for the year or the overall nationa debt, but your comments on the statutory whether it's good or if it is not good enough, what do you mean by having something in statute? >> so, i would say statutory pago would be the bread and butter of process reform. absolutely, we've seen it work in the past and it's a piece of the future. a couple points about it. i think it has to apply to both sides of the budget. we are on the same montra. if you exem t taxes, fine -- >> weid include the tax side in our statutory. >> yes, so it applies to both sides of the budget and that's helpful. i have to take issue with the number of things that are exempt. for shifting priorities you can do something if you pay for it. that's what it should be. our budget needs to reflect changing priorities. i don't think anybody at the table looks where we put the dollars in the country and say this is the right reflection of our national priorities. we are short term oriented now. but whatever somebody's priorities are certainly should be able to chan