there is something else, but it is certainly not much, that you, as a member of the national council on television broadcastingin the crimean direction, what are your thoughts , what are the prospects, what to do, in fact, you can’t lay down your arms, sir, well, first of all, i want to say that i am not a member of the national council, i am a representative, that’s all i am i'm very sorry, but for the audience it's a little, you're a representative of the national council in general, it's a slightly different situation. because a member of the national council actually makes decisions, but in a collegial manner, and the representative of the national council is somewhat of an administrative position, but i can say that i, for example, see at least three directions, the first direction about what you said, this is what i am trying to do now, how can i do this issue, is to change the principle, to change the legislation in terms of state support for media that deal with crimean issues, which... cover the issue of related to crimea in the ukrainian media. this is the first. personally, my attitude to this is th

else somewhere, but it is definitely not much, what do you, as a member of the national council on television radio broadcastingcifically in the crimean direction, what are your thoughts, which one? perspectives, what to do , in fact, you can’t lay down your arms , sir, well, first of all, i want to say that i am not a member of the national council, i am a representative, that’s it, i’m very sorry, but for the audience it’s a little small, you are a representative of the national advice representative, this is a slightly different situation, because a member of the national council actually makes decisions, but collegially, and the representative of the national council is still somewhat an administrative position, but i can say that i, for example, see that... at least three directions. the first direction about what you said is that and now i am trying there, how i can do this issue, is to change the principle, to change the legislation in terms of support, state support, media that deal with crimean topics, that highlight issues related to crimea in media outlets of ukraine. this is the first, personally, w

, oleksandr, the journalistic ethics commission filed a complaint with the national council on television and radio broadcastingeven tell how many offensive complaints there are now considers jokes. national council and at what stage are they? greetings, greetings to everyone, we received several complaints, they also concern the 95th quarter, one complaint, and two complaints concern the diesel show, currently the national council, as a media regulator, let's say this, since these documents have only recently arrived, we are processing them, analyzing them , a monitor... actually a fixation was carried out, work is currently underway on a meaningful analysis of these sketches, these plots, in order to provide an appropriate assessment. taras, you perform as a stand-up comedian acting experience, at the same time you were a member of the kvk and the projects of the 95th quarter, and you know how it actually works from the inside. in your opinion, who is responsible for the offensive jokes, because there are actually a lot of people involved in this process. you know, i just think that this kind of direction and

let me remind you that at one time there was also the national council on television. radio broadcasting, at least some members of the national council and the secretary of the national security council assumed that something should be done with the telegram in ukraine, i'm sorry, there is no need to do anything here. it is necessary to ban the network of the drinking state, because , firstly, it is a possible access of the russians to of personal data of ukrainians, experts have already broken it down into molecules and painted directions in which we may have problems if we collect this information. secondly, we must stop the work of enemy information resources in ukraine. i will give two examples. let's remember the fall of the 23rd year. ukraine week. discussed the death of kadyrov, and then for a week they discussed the death of putin. two russian special operations in ukraine, well, no nonsense. i don't know what the goal was, i think it's only certain psychological problems of putin, maybe but the fact remained the fact: they conducted two special operations precisely because of se

in general, or in your opinion , in particular, as a representative of the national council on television and radio broadcastinguld not somehow unify the approach? to these people , because war, because war and participation in the propaganda line on the side of the enemy, is as if it were the same for the army to take direct part in the enemy, well, you understand, mr. panachovy, he spoke from his side, from the side of a person who is engaged in criminal proceedings, and there criminal proceedings are proceedings connected with the fate of a person, well , it so happened that even there even. if a person created or did something bad, only the court can recognize him as a criminal, there is no other, and this is a principle, this is a principle of a civilized society, in our case , with regard to unification, it is most likely impossible to do this, but i will note that in the law of media there is promedia, in particular there is such a point that if it is established that with respect to a certain person or a certain media, a person who has relation to the media, criminal proceedings will either be initiated

television, she commits a crime there against the state of ukraine, or against her fellow citizens, in general. in your opinion, in particular, as a representative of the national council on issues television and radio broadcastingwell, we shouldn't somehow unify the approach to these people, because war, because war and participation in the propaganda line on the side of the enemy, is as if the army were to take direct part. in the enemy, you understand, mr. panachovy, he spoke from his side, from the side of a person who deals with criminal proceedings, and there criminal proceedings are proceedings connected with the fate of a person, well , it so happened that even there, even if a person created or did something bad there, only the court can recognize her criminals, another there is no, and this is the principle, this is the principle of the civilized. in our case, regarding unification, it is most likely impossible to do this, but i will note that there is promedia in the law of media, in particular, there is such a point that if it is established that with respect to a certain person or a certain media, a certain person who is related to the media will be or to start criminal proceedings, or a sentence th

what it is there, humpbacked, but nevertheless there is a question of the national council on issues television and radio broadcasting, which can take certain measures when it really needs to and, on the contrary, may not take them, but let's say everyone's stupidity will be visible then in this story, and the rada tv channel, and any other tv channels, i believe should... work, we live in a market economy and there is nothing to finance them from the state budget, and the rada tv channel, well in particular, it should be financed, because it should simply cover the work of the parliament, and not sing odes and give out all sorts of natural products, let's say, at the expense of taxpayers in the interests of the current government, there is such a thing as the objectivity of covering the activities of the parliament, it is in us was, it was built into the very essence of the rada tv channel, and... well, in accordance with the legislation, what the greens turned it all into, they turned it all into a tent, a show, well, this is very important, this is the question right now, because well the verkhovna rada of ukraine

provided recommendations, gave a statement, and also filed a complaint with the national council on radio broadcasting and televisionin addition to the fact that this is a violation of a certain code of ethics, which can be considered subjective, yes , someone sees it this way, someone else, it is also a violation article 36 of the media law, and i would like the channel. what is it missed it, er, suffered the appropriate punishment, but again, it is not me who has to decide, but the relevant regulator, and the complaint has been there for several days, uh, there was no reaction yet, and the answer, no, there was not yet, but oh well them , i know they're very busy with the media plus law going into effect, they have, i think, up to 30 days, something like that, let's figure it out anyway, why does this offend us? did that offend you? in general, i really like high-quality humor, and there are certain collectives and individuals, for example, stand-up comedians that i like, who can also joke on the edge prick, but i was offended by the first submission, that is, it is an insult, in my opinion, to displaced women, it

should also work, we have a national council of television and radio broadcasting, it can easily tell the largest ukrainian television channels not to show russian-language series on internet, but... the national council for now doesn't say that, but has to do it, so i hope that this publicity and the topic that you brought up will become important, because it is much easier to shout that i am the greatest patriot and continue to live like that, not only until a full-scale invasion, and how in general before the start of the war in the 14th year, but mr. mykola, i wanted to clarify, very often when , when we discuss this topic, russian-speaking viewers come, including to us on youtube, there, it is obviously possible... maybe this pso is written, well, how , well, there is not so much quality ukrainian-language content , there are not so many tv series, that is why we watch russian, we are not able to do it, or we simply do not want to, no, first of all, this is a refusal, because you have no one does not prohibit watching english, polish, and now movies and series with subtitles and netflix, and on many streaming platforms, there are a lot of them, and in youtube

hunchbacked it may be, but nevertheless there is a question of the national council for television and radio broadcasting, which can take oneher measure when... it badly needs to and, on the contrary, may not take it, but let's put it this way, everyone's stupidity will be visible then in this story, and the tv channel rada, and any other tv channels, i believe that they should work, we live in a market economy, and there is nothing to finance them from the state budget, but the tv channel rada, well, in particular, he should be financed, because he should simply cover the work of the parliament, not sing go and give out various types of natural products, let's say, at the expense of taxpayers in the interests. the current government has such a concept as the objectivity of coverage of the activities of the parliament, we had it, it was built into the very essence of the tv channel rada, and well, in accordance with the legislation, what the greens turned it all into, they turned it all into a tent, a show, well and this is very important, this is a question right now, because the verkhovna rada of ukraine is starting to co

that the regulator of the national council for television and radio broadcasting, which can now regulate any media in ukraine itself, should have a big role here, there is a law onthere is an article... it is very well written, at least the main points that should be followed , which the media must adhere to, and the national council must have your say, including those shows that have already taken place on new year's eve, the diesel show and quarter 95, that is, any discrimination, any slander, mockery of social groups, it must be stopped and... here can act hard enough national council, if those who are doing it now understand that they will be subject to harsh actions of the state, they will start to turn on their brains and think how to develop their show in a different way. thank you, ms. natalie, nataliya legachova, director , head of gedektor media, chief editor of the portal detektor media was with us, and we already have the first... announced results of the visit from japan to kyiv. so, japan has announced that it will allocate 37 million dollars to the nato fund as additional aid to ukraine, the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of japan, yoko k

council elections, the islamic republic of iran broadcasting corporation invited candidates who are interested in televised debates registered on the election website of this organization in the national media advertising headquarters system at the address of panel 1402 register and declare your readiness. we have also designed the field for the debate, and god willing, there can be interesting debates in some of them constituencies should be held. the registration deadline, which started on saturday, the 10th of bahman , will continue until thursday, the 12th of bahman. previously , in order to fulfill its media goals to provide equal space for advertisements for candidates, the national media created more than 200 television channels for this purpose throughout the country, which is being completed. this debate that is making noise is actually those characters who are now between becoming candidates. in fact, they should vote and get votes from the people, now a good understanding can be obtained from them , transparency can be obtained, they know the people's views well. they raise their economic, political, social issues. people can choose with more freedom. in my opinion, this ac