venezuela that brought hugos to the brink of collapse were publicly sponsored by the us national endowment for democracy. again, the american national endowment for democracy. when ronald reagan implemented the idea of ​​this foundation , the official purpose of this foundation was declared as follows. supporting democratic foundations around the world through private and non-governmental efforts. in fact, his words were that it is better to refrain from entering into these issues and leave the work to this foundation. the american national endowment for democracy was supposed to do the same things as before he used to do it secretly, this time he will do it publicly. but the story is only the publicizing of the support. absence of the west, the way of working had also changed. in the traditional method, although sometimes he bought the elections, but in many cases he had to resort to military and bloody coups. but now this foundation had found a more acceptable method. street riots. in this way, the accusation of the use of violence and high-ranking soldiers was rejected, and everything had the appeara

venezuela that put hugos on the verge of falling were publicly supported by the american national endowment for democracy, again the american national endowment for democracy. experience and wisdom of both the public and the private sectors, it's up to us to broaden our efforts, make them grow, the people in this room, i know we can. he announced that pro-democracy groups around the world should not be introduced as a sub-topic of the cia. in fact, his words were that it is better than the cia to avoid entering into these issues and leave the work to this foundation. the american national foundation was going to do the same things for rossi that it had been doing in secret before, this time in a public way. but the matter was not only the publicizing of support for pro-western oppositions. the work style had also changed. in the traditional method, although sometimes he bought the elections, but in many cases he had to resort to military and bloody coups. but now , niad had found a more acceptable method. street riots. in this way, the accusation of using violence and military leaders was rejected and ev

the american national endowment for democracy still feels the duty. but despite the support of the western party, it fails and this time they do not succeed in carrying out a street riot, the support continues until finally the westerners in they can win the elections four years later . now it's reward time. the american national security agency immediately comes to mughalistan and sets up wiretapping bases against china. less than a year later, in 2002, the street riots in venezuela, which put hugos on the verge of falling , were publicly supported by the american national foundation for democracy. he announced that pro-democracy groups around the world should not be introduced as a sub-topic of the cia . in fact, what he said was that it is better than the cia to avoid entering into these issues and do the same. lay foundation the american national endowment for democracy was going to do the same things it had done in secret before, this time in a public way. but it was not just the publicizing of support for pro-western oppositions. the work style

the national endowment for democracy supported protests in egypt, hong kong, belarus and ukraine. the world in the palm of your hand program right now. on november 18, 1983, the national endowment for democracy was founded and the organization became a tool for us foreign policy expansion and has been repeatedly accused of interfering in the interior. the fund was created by the congress of the united states of america to promote democracy throughout the world, but of course the main task is to realize the national interests of the country. the foundation supports non-profit. organizations , student movements, these can be human rights organizations, these can be various conferences, congresses, meetings, the publication of certain publications, but all of this has one goal - promotion us foreign policy interests. the democracy fund helps advance american interests, but they work closely with the entire system of american humanitarian policy. this is also a usa agency. and this is an agency for global media, and this is an agency for trade and development, this is a leading americ

of this document, the co-authors of the report are the george soros foundation, the national endowment for democracycourse, participate in the planning and organization of the foreign policy of the united states, it says there directly, in general, it’s already clear from the name what it’s about speech, the report itself is called the promotion of the fourth wave of democratization, this is such a reference to huntington, who spoke about three waves of democratization, which at the time of publication of his work, from his point of view , they belong, apparently, this should also demonstrate some kind of civilizational the nature of the opposition to democracy and, therefore, authoritarian dictatorial regimes, as the authors of the report call them, of course, from their point of view, the most terrible political regimes are russia, china, iran and venezuela, as well as a number of others that are named there, what they propose to do, so i’m talking about reading and analyzing the report, if we summarize, try to group the initiatives that they put forward, what they propose, first, they propose to

document, by the participants and co-authors the report is the george soros foundation, the national endowment for democracyemocracy, freedom house, and a number of other such large organizations that, of course, participate in planning and organizing the foreign policy of the united states, it says that, there directly, in general - it’s already clear from the title what we’re talking about, the report itself is called the promotion of the fourth wave of democratization, such a reference to huntington, who spoke about three waves of democratization, which at the time of publication of his work, from his point of view took place, apparently it should also... demonstrates a certain civilizational nature of the opposition to democracy and, therefore, authoritarian dictatorial regimes, as the authors of the report call them, of course, from their point of view, the most terrible political regimes are russia, china, iran and venezuela, as well as a number of others that are named there, what do they propose to do ? so, after reading and analyzing this report, if we summarize, try to group those and which they p

on november 18, 1983, the national endowment for democracy was founded, the organization became a toolforeign policy expansion, and was repeatedly accused of interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. the foundation was created by the congress of the united states of america to promote democracy throughout the world, but of course the main task is to realize the national interests of the country. the fund supports non-profit organizations, student movements, it can be human rights organizations, it can be various conferences, congresses, meetings. publication of certain publications, but all this pursues one goal - promoting us foreign policy interests. the democracy fund helps advance american interests, but they work closely with the entire system of american humanitarian policy. this is a usa agency, and this is an agency for global media, and this is an agency for trade and development, this is a leading american think tank, these are not other government organizations and they support a network of ngos, these are thousands, hundreds thousands of ngos in all countries