the government by tsn correspondents oleksandr romanyuk talked to the head of the national energy regulatory commissions responsible for tariffs and their formation and asked what the innovations could be, who they could affect and when they would actually be able to work during the war , some details cannot be disclosed, but the blows there were powerful destroyed generation facilities , substations, power lines, equipment , russian aggression cost the ukrainian energy industry a colossal amount , the national energy regulatory commissions admit . despite this

government, really tsn correspondents discuss oleksandr romanyuk spoke with the head of the national energy regulatory commission , she is responsible for tariffs and their formation, and asked what they could be innovations, who they can affect and when they will actually be able to work during the war, some details cannot be disclosed , but the strikes were powerful destroyed generation facilities , substations, power lines, equipment , russian aggression cost the ukrainian energy industry a colossal amount , the national energy regulatory commission admits despite this, ukraine successfully came through the winter however , it is already necessary to prepare for the next heating season and restore the destroyed in order to ensure that in the summer and most importantly in the next autumn-winter season the supply of electricity to the whole house without introducing any limits, the commission calculated that such repairs will cost billions of hryvnias, the enemy is in no hurry to pay for it yet, and ukraine is adding even though it receives help from international partners. nevertheless, the main repairs must

it should be a national issue that federal injury -- federal energy regulatory commission should haveay over that. host: mr. stein? >> it also applies to pipelines which is why this is part of the discussion. that is why it is interesting that bob said there is nothing he likes but part of the problem is it has been weaponized by state. they say we do not want to allow a different project so we will use the 401 process which is supposed to be about water quality. it has written into law for the states to have a say in their state. it has been weaponized into we will stop this project because we don't like it. the language is to bring it back to water quality, making clear that if you have 401 disapproval, it has to be because of water impacts. host: do we do that, bob? >> we do not. telling a state that you cannot protect your own water from a pipeline that could low out, explode, damage the aquifers, the clean water that farmers depend on for your occasion, that families depend on for drinking water, we are not on board with that. host: to dayton, ohio. chris on the line for democrat