last week, the national security advisor announced the national security strategy foundational in that set of components is focused on pandemics and bio defense. the new national bio defense strategy implementation plan really gains to articulate further the objectives, the targets to make good on that focus of ensuring pandemics and bio defense is national security. there are a few things in the plan that are critical. let me give you a quick outline. it pushes the vision forward that we can create a world free of pandemics and other catastrophic biological incidents by focusing on five key concrete actions. one is to prevent, to ensure early warnings for biological threats. second is to ensure that we prevent the spread of biological threats. the third is to ensure we are prepared to reduce the impact should we have another pandemic, another epidemic, that we are prepared to reduce the impact on people and communities. the fourth is to impact rapidly responding when we have these outbreaks. and other biological incidents. the fifth is to ensure we are helping communities, the economy

believe very much in the transparency of this and we work very hard to balance that with our national security needs. scott bray i will add, -- >> i will add, congressman, just over the last three or four months i think that the intelligence community and the national defense apparatus had disclose more information on various events than it has an probably the previous ten years. you have our commitment to work close with the director of national intelligence and others in the declassification and downgrading of intel apparatus to ensure we can get whatever information we can out to the american people and to the public at large. >> greatly appreciated, sir. ranking member crawford. >> thank you, mr. chairman. representative stefanik is in route i believe but in the interim if i could if you'll indulge i just have a couple real small questions. one is do have an example, can you cite a specific example of an object that can't be explained as having been human made or natural? >> i mean, the example that i would say that is still unresolved, that i think everyone understands quite will -- quite

is national security.this has been a difficult week. those that dedicate their lives to not receive the support they need from the administration. one of the tough things i've heard from the border patrol agents across the southern border is a lack of action from the dhs leadership and addressing border patrol. the border patrol agent understaffed and there's funding and processing asylum claims instead of the job that they signed up to do. tragically in the last week, and there are two border patrol agents leaving behind families and creating a whole community. question number one, the historical level of crossings at the border combined with limited resources and personnel to handle the large influx of migrants in steep decline is the mental health crisis more than the customs and border protection division. the agents and officers -- what are your plans to address the increased suicide among the frontline personnel? >> congresswoman, may i have a moment to answer your question first at the outset i shou

seeing the president two to three times, then spending time with the other principles of the national securityouncil, cabinet secretary, secretary of defense, secretary of the treasury, secretary of state, and talking through the big decisions we need to tee up for the president to make on everything from global food security to taiwan, to the chips act, the new law passed to invest in advanced microchips in the united states. we cover the waterfront. david: so sometimes president xi observed lose their temper and they yell. does president biden yell when he's not happy? jake: he is not a yeller. he is somebody who is disciplined and direct and holds us to a high standard. he will challenge us to make sure that we have nailed down the details of everything we are presenting to him. and if we haven't, he will tell us to do better, but he does so in a totally respectful straightforward way, the same way everybody has seen him in public life. david: i worked in the white house under president carter. there were frequent disputes between the secretary of state and the national security advisor, an

as china becomes _ our national security. as china becomes as — our national security.uch _ our national security. as china becomes as much of - our national security. as china becomes as much of a - our national security. as china i becomes as much of a consumer our national security. as china - becomes as much of a consumer power is one of that manufacturing power, is one of that manufacturing power, is the economic balance changing. does the united states need china more than china needs the us? i5 does the united states need china more than china needs the us? is a difficult more than china needs the us? i3 —. difficult question. analytically you have to break it down. american consumers as we know enjoy access to cheap products that are manufactured principally in age and that helps us at the same time chinese companies and chinese government need access to highly advanced us technology in order to move their own economy so i think in the short term there continues to be a degree of mutual independence and demand that is probably being driven both by the consumers

the border, who appear -- this administration's border policies will continue to threaten our national securitybecause secure border is a national security. this week has been a very difficult week for us and south texas. alberta patrol agents, the one who dedicate their lives to protect us, are not receiving the support they need from this administration, when at the top, things i've heard from our border patrol agents -- a lack of action from the dhs, leadership and addressing -- our border patrol agents are understaffed and not provided with the resources that they need to succeed and are spending time process saying -- instead of doing their job. tragically, in the last week, in the sector, to border patrol sector -- took their own lives, leaving behind families and creating a hole in our communities. question number one. secretary mayorkas, the historic level of illegal aliens apprehensions at the border, combined with the limited resources and personnel to handle the large influx of migrants has caused a steep decline in morale on the border patrol workforce. no other department has a mor

this horrendous border policy will continue to threaten national security. secure border is national security. this week has been a very typical week for us in south texas. our borthe ones who dedicate thr lives to protect us, they are not receiving the support they need missing ministration. and that is one of the top things i've heard from a foreign border patrol agent. that is across the southern border. there's a lack of action from the dhs leadership. they are dressing the border patrol morale. our border patrol agents are understaffed, now provided with the resources they need to succeed, and they are spending time processing asylum claims that of doing the job they signed up to do. tragically, in the last week, to border patrol agents took their own lives. they left behind families and created a hole in their community. question number one, secretary mayorkas, the historic level of illegal alien apprehensions and crossings anti border all combinl to handle the large influx of migrants. that has caused a steep decline in morale among the border patrol

what is our biggest national security threat?it elon musk coors at the national security threats that we face? >> our biggest national security threat is our own culture. >> president xi jinping getting elected in his third term. he has watching it and saying this may be the perfect time to cross one of these. >> sure. >> that remains to be seen. straight ahead on the big sunday show after the twitter takeovers shook up the social media platform, the biden administration wants to investigate elon as a national security threat. how was he treated when he started spacex? the former directos out the hypocrisy and that is next. ♪ ♪ >> welcome back to the big sunday show. sparking liberal outrage at the return of free speech and white house signals biden administration will investigate elon musk as a national security threat. >> do you think elon musk is a threat to national security? >> i think that elon musk cooperation and or technical relationships with other countries is worthy of being looked at. whether or not he is doing anyth

. >> asked, a hearing on national security threats with homeland security secretary mayorkas and fbi director christopher wray and national counterterrorism direct your christine ab's aid. they were in front of the home when security and governmental affairs committee to answer questions about immigration at the southern border, domestic violence stream is him, global terrorism, and cyber threats. sen. peters: the committee will come to order. first off, i would like to thank our witnesses for joining us and for your continued service to the american people. this hearing is an important opportunity for this committee to hear from our nation's top national security and law enforcement officials about the threats facing our nations, and how congress can ensure the federal government is prepared to protect our communities from them. more than 20 years ago, the september 11th terrorist attacks changed our nation forever. in response, congress created the department of homeland security, and our entire national security apparatus focused on keeping americans safe from international terrori

that's the body that coordinates decisions on national security and defense.e have no idea at this point where things go from here but clearly, we have to watch for additional headlines coming out of poland now that they get this committee together for an urgent meeting step >> this brings up the issue of article five. one decision is being made by the polish government as to whether they would like to respond in the binding nature of article five that means other nato countries would have to back poland in some way or another it poland decides they want to read -- retaliate or make a defensive maneuver. in the united states, there's always been a subtext, the idea that you can have the warfare and all of the monstrosities that come out of it but u.s. companies and corporate profitability and ultimately u.s. economic growth would not be as impacted by it. while there may be here, it may take some of the risk sentiment off the table. it wouldn't necessarily change the fundamental project re-of the market. -- trajectory of the market. jon: thanks for helping us

national security and should the u.s. with the tools you have investigate his joints acquisition of twitter with foreign governments including the saudis. >> [laughing] i think that elon musk's cooperation and/or technical relationships with other countries is worthy of being looked at. whether or note is doing anything inappropriate, i'm not suggesting that. i am suggesting it is worth being looked at. dan: as the former director national intelligence, there isn't a better person out there to comment on this. this is one of the most disturbing answers i have ever heard. he admits he has no evidence to target a free citizen. this is banana republic. we don't investigate people in search of crimes. we investigate crimes in search of people. what the hell is going on. >> i do have an informed view on this. as the director national intelligence i did the assessments on foreign investment in the u.s. which is the purchased reviewed as a national security that he. this is clearly personal and political. it has nothing to do wi

that poses serious risks to americans privacy and national security. the main idea is simple. if american business wants the federal government to buy their products or services they shouldn't be using the kind of chinese made chips that because of the government involvement put our national security at risk. we need our government and economy to rely on chips made right here in america. something my amendment would encourage. on both sides many -- many on both sides rightfully like tobo talk about staying tough on the chinese government. our amendment would do just that. i urge my colleagues to support my amendment and all of us to work quickly to pass the nda when the time comes next month. >> tell us what your top priority would be and why. create a five to six minute video showing the importance of your issue from opposing and supporting points of view. be bold with your documentary. don't be afraid to take risks. there is time to get started. the deadline is january 20th, 2023. for competition rules and tips on how to get started, visit the e at the student cam.org. >> pa

overseeing the defense department intelligence agencies, defense intelligence agency, the national securityncy, national geospatial intelligence agencymi and natiol reconnaissance office. she is now the director of the aerospace security project at csis. jane harman served as a u.s. congresswoman from california during which time she was also ranking member by the house intelligence committee. she brings a lot of expertise to this, and after her time in congress she led the wilson center as president and now as a distinguished fellow there. joining us virtually, i think matt, you're in new orleans, right? >> hatch right. i am just off the screen here. >> we're really glad you're here. and he is acting director of her school crops in her and started his career at the cia, now focus on u.s. national security strategy, great power competition, strategic deterrence. and then finally glenn nye served as u.s. congressman from virginia, including membership of the house armed services committee. he now leads the center for the study of the presidency in congress as its president and ceo, so that's

it's growing the economy and advancing national security. for instance, financial services such as stable coins enable consumers to send money between countries across the globe. this could spur financial inclusion, need to find a financial markets, and give lower prices and greater choice. according to tr am analysis, 99% of fought back stablecoin bell value is tied to the u.s. dollar. supporting the growth of dollar back stablecoins operating by regulated u.s. and in these by establishing rules which ensure stability, security, and interoperability can help protect dollar primacy, ensure the efficacy of sanctions, and spread democratic principles across the world. the native properties of public block chains, data which is transparent, traceable, public, permanent, private, and programmable, sanibel island four cement and regulars to more readily identify whisks and more effectively and efficiently investigate financial crimes. the nature of public block chains even facilitates the implementation of affective sections. for example, after t

are you look at the national security ministration. you look at homeland security, started after $911.00 and we have advanced monitoring systems in fact. so why would the chinese problem be so different? well, the chinese are not our ally. so really it's about carolling and keeping, or even if you like, recreating ail well, a historical reference america online when the internet was once just that an app and you did all your shopping, you bought flowers, you had your chat rooms within that eco system. then of course, mark sucker burg creates facebook with the same idea. your friends even only exist in facebook and they don't even need to be live humans. they just need to like you . and in this way we can control all of commerce. we can control all of the conversation. we can control people's politics. we can control everything to want the chinese to be able to exert some of that control. know, you know. and thanks for joining us. herron asi, international web. back at the top of the hour with the latest news that day to see them. ah, i

of the national security council.s calling an urgent meeting of the national security council. this - is calling an urgent meeting of the national security council. this is l national security council. this is confirming unconfirmed reports that stray russian missiles have fallen on a polish farm near the ukrainian border, killing two people. unconfirmed reports, i'm stressing that right now, but all this is happening as russia launches over 85 missiles across ukraine, hitting energy infrastructure and residential buildings. half of kyiv is without electrity. people are being told to stay in shelters, and more missiles are expected to fall at any time. we are dealing with a country which is hell—bent on causing and wreaking havoc, damage, destruction and death. president zelensky says the situation is "critical" — the strikes happened hours after he urged 620 leaders to put more pressure on russia to stop the war. we'll speak live to an adviser to ukraine's energy minister in kyiv. also in the programme... in the next

brent: what can you tell us about the emergency meeting of poland's national security council?eporter: the prime minister called this meeting, it started at 8:00 and is still going on. the polish government has only said the meeng is happening due to an extreme situation but there was no more information given. we are waiting for more information when the meeting is concluded and there is also a meeting of the polish government -- brent: we are looking at pictures of where the emergency meeting is taking place. poland has been very vocal in its support for ukraine, at the same time poland realizes it is a memb of nato. it has been an a very difficult situation. this report tonight, and the possibility that this is a russian missile, what could it do to change the calculation here? reporter: poland is eight nato member and it has been a vocal suorter of ukraine. it has delivered big numbers of weapons to ukraine and has given shelter to ukrainian refugees. there are also nato troops present in polo -- in poland. any confirmation of this event today could have major repercussions

in this situation, these threats were not always ours national security depends more on ukraine than on other countries, even more than on our national army, more than on our bodies, more than on the european union, because ukraine is the only country that can win this war and that, even if necessary, will fight for the independence of the republic moldova and we understand that no one will help us now, except for ukraine, if they ask me how to help through public moldova, i always answer that it is necessary to help first ukraine, because these missiles that fell today in poland and that flew through the airspace of the republic of moldova and that fell one missile on the territory of moldova, and this rocket flies through the territory of ukraine if ukraine will have enough means and enough modernity so that they could shoot down all the missiles europe and moldova and nato, they will be safe, but what is happening now is not all. and is fighting for political stability in europe. thank you, mr. shalar, zaitsy razjasnenie for telling us what is happening in moldova. and on that shal

he addressed the national security concerns about the chinese owned the app raised by the fbi. >> forany impact companies including ourselves, one of the largest things you have is your trust and safety. not only from the people who designed the policies around community guidelines but the people who come from the machines in terms of content moderation and protecting the platform and making sure the content is very safe. that is an investment that i think is not -- that is definitely worthwhile. >> how many people do you have in content moderation? >> in the tens of thousands. >> you are in a pretty unique position. you have a china-based logo. you have very big business in america. the previous administration try to force your sale. >> we clearly pay a lot of attention and national security concerns are concerns we take extremely seriously. as we have disclosed in the past, we have had discussions with the u.s. government mainly -- if you saw the fbi director comments this morning, he made comments that they are working through that process as well. i am very confident because it is

mike schmitt is here, he's an msnbc national security contributor.ol section at the justice department's national security division. david win start with you. tell us anything you know about the latest man to be tasked with trying to do something to hold donald trump accountable. >> well, we know him to be an outstanding prosecutor. and not to mention he's been working with the international tribunal handling war crimes, which may prepare him for what he's about to take on in this job. it's not just about him and whether he is fully up to this job. the team he'll have working for him, they are career prosecutors who have been staffing this matter from day one. how will we hit the ground running unless he has the continuity of the work and knowledge and the very culture of the investigation that they have already brought to bear. he's going to need a team that already understands, you know, the ecosystem of these case. and if you have too many of these cases that defeats the notion that it's an independent investigation. so we'll see how the attorney

securing the homeland. thank you for your service to the nation. and as well, continue to thank you for your previous service. thank the chairman again for bringing us together around this important issue into our witnesses. let me acknowledge the 20th year homeland security. and the men and women who worked under that umbrella -- director wray, let me also a firm the admiration. respect of the fbi. i would say law enforcement around the nation. express my concern for the incident -- incident happened in cincinnati and appreciate this fact that the safety of those men and women. let me build on the tragedy that fell upon the second in line to the presidency. the speaker of the house. and asked the question about the depth and intentness of political violence. our time is brief. but i'd like to yield to the secretary first. director wray and to director abizaid. i do have other questions. if you could quickly yield. just the depth of political violence which means speech, driving people to violence. >> congresswoman, we of course are engaged win in f

a matter of national security.ew chinese telecomms equipment is banned in the us over national security concerns. kherson under attack — hospital patients are evacuated from the recently—liberated ukrainian city after constant russian shelling. world cup frustration for england fans — a 0—0 draw with the usa — but both teams can still progress to the knockout stages in qatar. it's that time of the year — in the us and the uk. tens of thousands of retailers offer cut price deals for black friday, but are the shoppers buying it? and can the world's longest running whodunnit do it again? agatha christie's the mousetrap prepares to take on broadway as it celebrates 70 years in london's west end. welcome to our viewers on pbs in america and around the globe. in the last few hours, the us government has banned the sale of new telecommunications equipment from five chinese companie, citing national security worries. it follows earlier restrictions which prevented one of the companies in question — huawei — from supplying

national security compromised.a long time on twitter to talk about his art and crypto. the interview went south. one of the questioners was booted out for asking hunter biden about shady donations to the democrats in the midterms from that ftx crypto exchange which collapsed in an alleged enron style fraud. let's listen to this. watch. >> mainly everything that i know about the nft world is through what he has shown me, the incredible things that he and mike are doing as it relates to crypto source which is really, really cool. really cool. >> former ceo of ftx, sam bank man, was the second largest donor to democrats this cycle so hunter, i was wondering if you know, you had any insights to what was going on there? >> they just jumped off now. that gives you an idea how behind the scenes that was tough. so seems there is lot of requirements we had to meet. [bleep]. that was so stressful, chet. that was so [bleep] stressful. elizabeth: from one of crypto stores, congressman. hunter biden, they got off the interview,

[applause] the grand strategy summit kicked off last night with two national security advisor's taking the stage, opening remarks were delivered by dr. henry kissinger, who needs no introduction as president nixon's national security advisor and secretary of state and the winner of the nobel peace prize. last evening he outlined the nixon grand strategy, which was to essentially combine power with purpose. he went on, we should place the american interest in such a way we were closer to russia and china than they were close to each other. giving us a maximum flexibility. at the end of this time in office, dr. kissinger said president nixon had given a new strategy and a new meaning in a new direction to american foreign policy that linked power to purpose and moved america to a position, where at that point it was dominating the policy in the middle east and achieve military superiority and was engaged in meaningful discussions with adversaries which had a rational mission of peace at the end of it. then, robert o'brien who chairs the nixon foundation's board of directors spoke with my

but if they see national security concerns, it is going to be very difficult.d: we continued to ask our audience what they think and we are always shocked by how big tiktok is in the united states and around the world. we asked our audience how concerned are they about their data in particular, or tiktok's control of their data. a twitter paul, 60% of the respondents say yes, we are concerned about tiktok control of u.s. user data. what has the been from tiktok's user base and perhaps from political parties within the united states? sarah: i think people are concerned about tiktok having access to their data just like they are concerned about facebook having access. i think data privacy has become one of the top issues for consumers over the last few years after all of the different privacy lapses from consumer apps. i am not surprised that is how people responded to the poll. what i think might be a little more difficult for u.s. consumers to understand is what are they meant to do about it, right? tiktok has become a place for people to go and blow off some s

our top stories: a matter of national security — new chinese surveillance equipment is banned in thes over concerns it could be used for spying. kherson under attack — hospital patients are evacuated from the recently—liberated ukrainian city after constant russian shelling. world cup frustration for england fans — a 0—0 draw with the usa, but both teams can still progress to the knockout stages in qatar. canada's justin trudeau is canada'sjustin trudeau is say why he used the emergency act to stop protests. and can the world's longest running whodunnitdo it again? agatha christie's the mousetrap prepares to take on broadway as it celebrates 70 years in london's west end. welcome to our viewers on pbs in america and around the globe. in the last few hours, the us government has banned the sale of new telecommunications equipment from five chinese companies, expressing concerns about national security. it follows earlier restrictions which prevented one of the companies in question, huawei, from supplying equipment to federal agencies amid concerns it could be used for spying. our nor

national security and the intelligence community? >> everyone that has access to special information and holds position is a target. anyone who forgets that and acts outside the security rules that are settle up in order to help them protect that presents a threat whether it's a purposeful one or whether it's an inadvertent one. so if you forget that you're a target, and you don't follow the rules, you've opened yourself and consequentially us up. >> did trump see himself as a target just simply due to the fact you just arctic latelied because of his possession and access to our most sensitive secrets and programs? >> again, i'm always hesitant to say how someone thinks about themselves. i believe the president thought that he was above a lot of rules because he didn't need them. but i also would never presume to know what was in someone's heart. >> when you read that he traveled with boxes of classified materials on foreign trips and they were carted from hotel room to hotel room, i traveled the world with candy rice as national secu

i think there will not be exactly the national security committee and defense and intelligence in e-ethe verkhovna rada because, as you know, it was replenished and recently five-tunov new members who transferred from other committees, in particular as including but i think that in the near future there will be more changes within yehor i wanted to you want to talk about the results of the american elections, the counting is still going on there and, most likely, we will get some kind of final result in december, in any case, the midterm elections in the united states are very often perceived as criteria for evaluating the work or not of the administration of the current president, and here it must be said despite the predictions, joseph biden and the democrats in general got a better result than many who predicted at the same time, the republicans took the majority by a small margin, in particular, but the republicans the republicans and trump and his supporters are a separate wing, so to speak. and they say that the situation with trump is not very good. in this direction, they are

as members of congress looking out for the national security to step away from those selfish equities and do the right thing for the country and as it happens, the new engines that would be bought as a part of this amendment are made into the largest employer and toughest cities in my district but i accepted the responsibility in carrying this method literally risking taking away jobs for the aircraft engine plans. i said it's my responsibility to do the right thing for the national security and then go back to massachusetts and explained to the workers of the plant why we had to make this tough decision. that's when we need to see more from congress as well. but on this, talking about the acquisition reform, you know, there's a joke that if we can just get china instead of stealing f35 plans for the acquisition requirements and start following those, then we would actually win. we need to dramatically change the acquisition requirements. but before we can get there we need to double down on programs in the dod that are working well and that's why you see a lot of members of congress

>> this hearing is an important opportunity for this committee to hear from our nation's top national security, and law enforcement officials about the threats facing our nations. and, how congress can ensure the federal government is prepared to protect our communities from them. more than 20 years ago the september 11th terrorist attacks changed our nation forever. in response, congress created a department of homeland security, and our entire national security apparatus focused on keeping americans safe from terrorism, more than two decades following our attacks on the threats to our community have a vault and become increasingly complex. while we must continue to monitor international terror threats there is no question that we must be better prepared to defend against our top national security officials, including those before us today, have called the most lethal terrorist threat to americans. domestic terrorism fueled by white nationalist and anti government -- [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudi

and our national security are all interwoven. if we want to increase the economy of our country, if we want to increase the economy of individual families, we should develop a north american energy resources. yes, we can bring it from venezuela. that's fine. but if we want to really strengthen the pocketbook of an individual american, then why don't we produce oil and gas in our country and refine it in our country? that helps our national security. we're less subject to the wims of russia and opec. it helps our national security because we can ship it overseas. lastly, it helps lower emissions. it's been well-documented that refining oil and gas off of the coast of louisiana is the most carbon friendly way to do it. >> sandra: i have about a minute left. can i get your response to kirby just a moment ago at the white house, his response to peter doocy about these untapped leases here at home, 9,000 permits have been issued he said under the biden administration. those are going unused. this is an opportunity for the oil and gas

next period, citing national security concerns. today i have issued a final order under the n s i act requiring next peria to sell at least 86 percent of new port wafer fab. we welcome foreign trade and investment that supports growth and jobs. but where we identify a risk to national security, we will act decisively next very, i will have to sell 86 percent of it shares despite the chinese government saving the company from bankruptcy back in 2019. but says, am paid to view links to the communist party as a threat. hundreds of people will have to find new jobs. we spoke to the director of european studies at redmond university who thinks that the decision is not in london, economic interests, but its desire to comply with u. s. foreign policy. this is a political interference of the market, at least in a 500 a job. so that be loose and also for the for the british companies. competitive advantage also in danger and also dummy to the investment to environment for you. okay. put it after the breakfast. ok ought to be very neat. chin

>> this hearing is an important opportunity for this committee to hear from our nation's top national security, and law enforcement officials about the threats facing our nations. and, how congress can ensure the federal government is prepared to protect our communities from them. more than 20 years ago the september 11th terrorist attacks changed our nation forever. in response, congress created a department of homeland security, and our entire national security apparatus focused on keeping americans safe from terrorism, more than two decades following our attacks on the threats to our community have a vault and become increasingly complex. while we must continue to monitor international terror threats there is no question that we must be better prepared to defend against our top national security officials, including those before us today, have called the most lethal terrorist threat to americans. domestic terrorism fueled by white nationalist and anti government -- [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudi

so i think it's a national security imperative, not just a human imperative or an ethical imperativet we have a major effort to establish the rules around the use of the development of ai and we're really doing next to nothing at the department. this is a big effort of mine, this is something that i'm pursuing, i had a long conversation with an ai expert in the private sector how to involve the private commercial sector in the development of this ethical framework and i'm going to be pursuing some of that among some of my other priorities over the next congress. >> congressman, just so i understand that point. let me dive into that, you're suggesting that it isn't just about the more effective weapon, but this is really about the international norm setting, the standards, the moral high ground that the u.s. should try to occupy, is that right? >> that's right. look, i think you can win this argument by simply saying that ai weapons could take over the world. that's not a crazy science fiction future, that might be in 50 or 100 years that we get to that point and so just, i mean, lite

calling it a major threat to national security. our next guest agrees.er congressman from wisconsin a bit ago and he and senator rubio yesterday have introduced legislation or will be to ban particular tock. you agree. why do you agree we should ban tiktok. >> at the end of the day it's china's digital fentanyl. some people think it is a just a fun application for sharing funny videos. it is the sheep's clothing. it operates as a very sophisticated surveillance app. it is pulling everything from search and browsing history, key stroke patterns, bio metrics including face prints and voice prints. up to now we've been told it is stored in the u.s. or outside of china. this summer there was a blockbuster story that said internal communications show that everything is seen back in china. it's a big risk for 4 or 5 different reasons including espionage and other activity. really every week there is a new shoe that drops in the story. another report officials in the parent in beijing are expecting to sur veil the location of specific americans through this app

this is an additional platform for protecting national security and the interests of each of us. the entire belarusian national assembly will include three groups of delegates. the first are those who are obliged to work for the country by their position as president, prime minister, deputies of parliament, judges and heads of executive committees. in this category, the limit is 440 people, the second is the deputies of the regional and city councils of which the people have chosen a limit of 350 people, the third is representatives of real civil society. there are 400 people from each region, that is, the nss will gather a maximum of 1,200 delegates. and it should be a concentrate of energizers that burn from the fact that somewhere the solution to the problem hung. formatting the status and functions of the supreme people's council is the evolution of power in response to the request of society, firstly, it is necessary to unload the president, who has taken responsibility for all spheres of the country's life at all levels, our sovereignty is already 32 years old. responsible f