to protect china's national security.ople's congress, moved forward to impose its own legislation in hong kong on the 13th ofjune 2020, which covers four major crimes in chinese terms, subversion, sedition, collusion with foreign forces and terror activities. collusion with foreign forces and terroractivities. is collusion with foreign forces and terror activities. is seen as a piece of law that is damped down virtually all pro—democracy activism in hong kong since then. trier? in hong kong since then. very briefl , in hong kong since then. very briefly. is— in hong kong since then. very briefly, is hong _ in hong kong since then. very briefly, is hong kong - in hong kong since then. very briefly, is hong kong or - in hong kong since then. very briefly, is hong kong or china really going to hunt these people down or try to smuggle them back? that is quite a question, if they would ever be smuggled back. police superintendent who is in charge of national security in the police said that unless they would ever return to hon

protection of national security is everyone's responsibility. the government said it would restore stability but it spread fear around the city. the pro—democracy camp said the law is being used as a weapon to silence anyone who dares to speak out. to date, the political opposition have either been arrested or are in exile. hundreds of thousands have left. those that've stayed no longer know where the red line lies. the bbc has been following the lives of ordinary hong kongers at home and abroad affected by the changes. ronson chan is one of the most well—known journalists in hong kong. he's a fierce defender ofjournalists' rights. yells. the bbc has been following his life since the early days of the national security law. in december 2021, stand news, one of hong kong's last independent media outlets, was raided by the national security police. senior editors were arrested and detained. the charge — publishing seditious material. ronson worked there as an editor. on that morning, national security police came to ronson�*s door. those found gui

i would like to oint national security. i would like to point out _ national security.ne point, the national security law of hong kong. national security law of hong kona. ., . national security law of hong kon. _ ., . ., national security law of hong kona. ., . ., kong. police have offered bounties _ kong. police have offered bounties for _ kong. police have offered bounties for other - kong. police have offered bounties for other types | kong. police have offered | bounties for other types of crime but this is one of the highest being offered in recent times. the they admit they may not be able to catch these people unless they return to hong kong. since the introduction of the national security law three years ago by beijing, some 260 people have been arrested including some high profile pro—democracy politicians, activists, media bosses and journalists. and others have left hong kong like these eight people. human rights watch have put —— called the arrest warrants an indictment of the once well—regarded hong kong law enforcement and judiciary and calls on foreign g

so a very high-level question how do you see that relationship, commercial, strength and national security do you see those as to bifurcated things were together overlapping? >> they definitely connected and the concept of economic security and national security is well agreed on between all parties. i think there's some concepts in washington, d.c. that get used often and that's one of them. the race to 5g often used. i think we need to start peeling back the onion a little bit more and discuss that means. what does it mean for economic, u.s. and economic power to underpin national security and why it is important that the u.s. dollar as the reserve currency for the world? it's because it puts us in a position where we are able to lead. it allows us to lead in standard bodies and manufacturing and deployment and it's so incredibly important not only for our own fiscal future but for our allies in order to bring them into the fold so they are making smart decisions along with us and i think sometimes when you have discussions people do tend to follow along different lines and i think the v

i think it is in our bones that national security comes first. it's the duty of every public servant to think about public safety but this zero-sum game we have managed to create is not yielding any benefits at this point and i think we have to recognize we are created when it comes to technology in this country and if we can develop the spectrum policy to support that creativity we are going to build industries, technologies and services that are going to develop and support the civilian economy but also help support the national security. we see that with the commercial space economy and we should figure out how to develop more of it from here and breaking down that zero-sum attitude is probably the first step in doing that. >> does it allow for the holistic integration of the economy does that help provide a positive feedback loop for the commercial sector to the government sector and to the defense industrial base into the intelligence community? is there a way to kind of turbocharge this with a positive feedback loop of innovation and sharin

one and foremost our nation's security. so ask yourselves, those in the gallery who have been listening the past hour, to our colleagues on both sides of the aisle support this bill, does this amendment support our national security? of course it does. the top brass, those that were in charge during afghanistan, they have told us that it does. two, this bill that we are voting on this week and all the series of amendments, it should set a moral example to the world. that's what the united states -- that's what we have done through world war i, through world war ii. we set a moral example for the world. that's what this amendment does, too. it sets a moral example for the word. and three, we must show people everywhere that when america makes a promise, when america makes a covenant, it must be kept. the afghan adjustment amendment advances all those objections. i'm asking my colleagues simply for a vote. if they want to vote against it, it's fine. they can vote against the generals and the vfw and the american legion. they'

and more specific, it prioritizes national security asset, our brave men and women in uniform and i thank chairman rogers for his support of my amendment that will secure the highest pay raise that will be paid for by the appropriations bill. this takes a starting salary for e1 to $22,000 a year to $31,000 200 and gets them off the poverty line and off food stamps. and it is unacceptable that they were making less than fast food workers. i couldn't be more proud of this historic victory and continue fighting for those who fight so hard to give us our security blanket. i yield back. the chair: the gentleman from washington is recognized. mr.smith: i reserve. the chair: the gentleman from alabama is recognized-f. mr. rogers: i yield to the gentleman from from wisconsin. mr. van orden: i rise in opposition of amendment 875 en bloc, i have tremendous respect to the chairman and ranking member. with that said, the unintended consequences will have a negative impact. and our junior enlisted struggle financially and implementation of this amendment will raise the cost of every day goods and exac

different national security system. the problem of being objective and national security on one end. we ate the union they are ways but we have done. we have applied also of other countries. which we have made decisions which are like korea, the uk, israel and others. the same ones have been applied. so looking at court judgment we have looked at at the remedies. but in a different way level of production. this is our assessment. now to say that had to also introduce the legal assistance to achieve this level of equivalence. this was the case for japan you mention israel as well. they have some changes in their system. parts of these decision were adopted before and began reviewing them. they were based on legislation. we are reviewing them. goes on for a while for. >> in some cases like in the uk decision still have the system does not offer. does not work anymore for that level of production applied anymore. x steven lenkk we have a questin from the audience for you. this mentions you have said it creates a little bit

>> there's national security concerns when we use the advanced technical jets to be able to identify these objects. however, there is no reason the objects themselves would be classified. i would bebj curious to see how the security classification guideline spells out the different nuances of how the topic is classified from the perspective of the qap, not a national security. >> a follow-up on that, assuming there are reasons why it should be made public, this has been around for along period of time. can any of the three of you think of any reason why anything related to a uap say 15 years or back shouldn't be immediately made public? >> i think one of it is acknowledging the vulnerability both from a collection and a countermeasure perspective that we haven't cracked for many years. back say isears there a reason you go back that far things shouldn't be madeas public? >> unless it shows a vulnerability as it relates to be weakness. >> the tictac incident that you were engaged in occurred in 2004. what kind of reporting took place after that incident? >> we had a standard debrief wh

data from national security elements. while also having adequate sweetie arrangements with several countries that have strong national security, like israel. how is the u.s. seeing this link between these multilateral initiatives and national security. are we thinking if those are compatible with privacy protections? the other questions for you, the u.s. does not have comprehensive privacy legislation. we have some legislation in the health sector and in particular, protections and the economy. in dealing with these other multilateral arrangements in the u.s. as a diplomatic actor in negotiations on those and fostering those, has this been a disadvantage or is it not a relevant factor that we lack comprehensive privacy legislation? >> first on the linkages between national security and protected privacy. i think all i can say is that these are both important priorities that the united states take seriously and we want to make sure our multilateral arrangements are reinforcing both of those priorities. that is complicated

i want to thank each of you discussing our national security.arlier this year shots on off the coast of south carolina in 1947 many americans have wondered about the dangers of unknown objects is crossing her skies whether these are uap or advanced technology. i have several questions so if you can see, i'll ask you to view the question in the first one you reported your experience, did you face any repercussions? >> no. >> i've never seen anything personally. >> do you believe is misinformation campaign to deny the existence of uap? >> honor have an answer. >> as previously stated earlier, yes. >> currently i don't speak for the government. >> thank you. what percentage goes unreported? >> based on personal experience but i would estimate near 5%. >> 95% basically don't report. >> that's my personal estimate. >> a few questions, as a naval aviator, have you ever seen an object that looked and moved like this? >> no. >> to move in a way that is like this of physics? >> yes. >> many reports tested by our own government but in your experience, doe

and threatening national security. one of the biggest ones senators are interested in are implication of upcoming election. you will see gen jaative artificial intelligence play a pivotal role. as we begin to have this education period for our senators to get oriented on this path forward, it is important briefings cover a broad scope and go to legislative back-room discussion with information to protect consumers and american public. >> todd: it is definitely the 2024 election, in the long-term, it is china, who warned of risk posed by advances in ai. i read that to be in like they are going to clamp down on ai and use it as national security tool for them. what do we need to do to win the ai battle against china with our national security in focus? >> right now we have a huge lead when it comes to innovation within the artificial intelligence realm. china is coming for that spot, we have to maintain that advantage that we currently have. that looks like regulating in way that protects consumers while not stifling inn

ali rajabi in new york about holding a meeting of the united nations security council and to get additionalormation from him . mr. rajabi, can you give us a general explanation about the rotating presidency of the security council, which changes on a monthly basis? in addition to these, all these are the chief it was the security council period, now it's england, until one month, the united states protested russia to england regarding the presence of non-member countries related to the issue of which country had invited the maximum number of countries and when i will participate in the speech of the maximum number of members . in the case of the guests of the security council meeting, they were all from the west and nato, or other members of the united nations were also present in this meeting. you can see that the participants in the meeting of the countries that have chosen to become members in addition to 15 were from the western front, when they are members of the nato treaty, that is, the military pact is a speech with 200 views america and the west are on the subject of russia's criti

we'll try the question of a national security has become more prominent. we don't know what that means in terms of how the w to your ultimate lee would treated that and, and i think that the, the ultimately going to be a need to get a great, a clarity around what the issues actually main from i think it is a challenge ultimately for your life, because the us has it for quite some time bidding reshaping a much more protectionist approach to one way it stands in the world. and it's mainly for bryce and your favorite is actually on the industrial part of the landscape of the european union and the aggressive policies that the bottom destruction in particular has implemented in terms of lowering technology companies. a lot of the companies to the, to north america, having an impact on, on europe, is starting to play on the minds of corporate within europe in terms of whether or not they remain domiciled in a high cost. environmental will take advantage of subsidies in north america. these are going to be the challenges that will, that will create fractures bet

they're accused of breaking china's national security laws, which came into force three years ago.ners could face life in prison. tonight, this move is being condemned by many nations. the us state deparment released a statement reading in part: the extraterritorial application of the beijing—imposed national security law is a dangerous precedent that threatens the human rights and fundamental freedoms of people all over the world. we call on the hong kong government to immediately withdraw this bounty, respect other countries' sovereignty, and stop the international assertion of the national security law imposed by beijing. here's martin yip with more from hong kong. police are offering these rewards to any member of the public who can provide information on those wanted people and their related crimes, they say. some of these activists have previously been a source for other allegations such as electoral fraud but this is the first time that we hear from hong kong's national security police that they are wanted and the police are offering financial incentives for their capture. t

i activities and dangerous national securities.t the national security law of hong kong has extra territories in fact. please have offered _ territories in fact. please have offered bounties i territories in fact. please| have offered bounties for territories in fact. please - have offered bounties for other types of crime, but this is one of the highest being offered in recent times. they do admit that they may not be able to capture these people unless they ever return to hong kong. since the introduction of the hong kong national security law by beijing some 260 people have been arrested including some high—profile pro—democracy politicians, activists, media bosses and journalists. and others have left hong kong like these eight people. human rights watch have called today's arrest warrants and indictments of hong kong's once well regarded law enforcement and judiciary. and a cause on foreign governments to offer protection in those, and their words, being threatened by beijing. staying with that story, and the uk's foreign secr

we have assessed different countries with different national security system. and indeed the problem of the interplay between the objective of protecting nationals could under one hand and protecting privacy and data protection and personal data. we have also within the union and there are ways but there are ways to find equilibrium between these two objectives. what eu has done throughout this, the criteria that we've applied for the united states, also by the countries in which we have decisions like japan, korea, uk, israel and others. .. looking at the court

one and foremost our nation's security. so ask yourselves, those in the gallery who have been listening the past hour, to our colleagues on both sides of the aisle support this bill, does this amendment support our national security? of course it does. the top brass, those that were in charge during afghanistan, they have told us that it does. two, this bill that we are voting on this week and all the series of amendments, it should set a moral example to the world. that's what the united states -- that's what we have done through world war i, through world war ii. we set a moral example for the world. that's what this amendment does, too. it sets a moral example for the word. and three, we must show people everywhere that when america makes a promise, when america makes a covenant, it must be kept. the afghan adjustment amendment advances all those objections. i'm asking my colleagues simply for a vote. if they want to vote against it, it's fine. they can vote against the generals and the vfw and the american legion. they'

irresponsible that extreme maga republicans have hijacked a bipartisan bill that is essential to our national security and taken it over and weaponized it in order to jam their extreme right-wing ideology down the throats of the american people. that's why they've used the national defense authorization act to continue their march toward a nationwide ban. on abortion care. and applying it to women service members and military spouses. that's outrageous. and it undermines our national security. because we have an all-volunteer military. that means, as president truman first recognized in 1948, when he desegregated the military, that in an increasingly diverse society, you have to have all hands on deck. every corner of society should feel welcome in the military. we have to recruit from every segment of society in order to make sure that we're prepared in an increasingly dangerous world. and the good news is that every corner of american society from communities of color, from women, from members of the lgbtq+ community have stepped up to say we want to serve. we want to protect and defend. all that am

the first is artificial intelligence and its national security implications. this is the same topic that senate majority leader chuck schumer recently organized a hearing around last week and follows on the work of the national security commission for artificial intelligence, a congressionally chartered commission that ran for multiple years. this is thinking about ai potentially use cases in national security application, competition with other countries such as china and russia and thinking about traditional national security topics. the second more recent priority locus is around the regulation of ai. other regions, other countries such as the european union, have been working on their draft ai regulations for several years now. but in the past few months, there has been a major effort on capitol hill led by senate majority leader chuck schumer to dig through what needs to be done from a u.s. perspective on ai regulation. host: we are going to drill down more on this. we are talking with greg allen at the center for ai and advanced technology. you can start

this bounty, respect other countries sovereignty, and stop the international assertion of the national securityy beijing. that is from the security department. here's martin yip of bbc news chinese, whose has more on this story from hng kong: police are offering these rewards to any member of the public who can provide information on those wanted people and their related crimes, they say. some of these activists have previously been sought for other allegations such as electoral fraud but this is the first time that we hear from hong kong's national security police that they are wanted and the police are offering financial incentives for their capture. their alleged crimes according to police include collusion with foreign forces, advocating for sanctions against hong kong government, incitement to secession and subversion. some people have fled overseas and continue to engage in activities and endangers national security. i would like to point out one point, the national security law of hong kong has extraterritory effect. police have offered bounties for other types of crime but this is one o

my day-to-day duties included assisting then -national security adviser condoleezza rice . so the job of a national security adviser is primarily to advise and direct the thoughts of the president, because secretary of state blinkin may have one opinion , the minister of defense may have another opinion, the director of the cia benz may have another opinion, and the secretary of the treasury ellen may have his own . in the end, all these points of view must be coordinated and agreed with the point of view of the only person who makes decisions, which is president biden. so jake's job sally, it consists in coordinating all the meetings, discussing the point of view, presenting them to president biden , explaining them, advising him, because he is the national security adviser, and therefore waiting for the decision that the president will make that and it is happening and i think that it is president biden who is guided by an ambiguous fear of provoking putin to the third world war. he is afraid that putin will use nuclear weapons, which in my opinion is a manifestation of s

the us national security adviser keeps talking about the risk and from china. one can define what that means. i think for some europeans, when he says, we want a small garden with high walls, they think the garden will be the size of the texas. but they do understand that helping. she's in thing, do more quickly what she's in thing says he's going to do. which has to make china capable of invading taiwan by 2027 and becoming the world superpower by 2050. may not be in the herb's best interest. now. it's also true. europe has great trade with china. there's lots of things to do with china. there's climate. the interest of europe are not exactly the same as the united states. suddenly in europe, doesn't see china as a pure rival. the way the us does in europe doesn't have the same exact pacific in the pacific interest that we're a, does have some in the pacific interest. so i think the new china is getting darker and partly she's in things faults because he's been much to explicit him in some people's minds by china ambitions. i'm the intent as not to curtail chi

so this is one thing we have to understand that the chinese conception of national security as we heard earlier, the piece is, is quite broad. the other is the philosophy of passing law. as i say, we've seen this movie before with the cyber security law. there was an initial sense of alarm when the law 1st went into effect and it doesn't affect just born businesses and individuals, but domestic companies and organizations and people as well. so at the time there was a lot of questions of what exactly does critical infrastructure mean, what is important data? so, you know, i think again these things will work itself out. there's certainly a concern, legitimate cause for concern, and that whenever there is uncertainty and big lead, especially for businesses the, it's a, it's risky or sales home. a present value of boston arrows has, has planning to appeal against the court ruling binding him from running for re election until 20 to 2030. as monica and i q. every for somebody. addition, narrow electrical court judges found both narrow guilty of abusing his power. the decision came as a blo

national security has to do with the issue of education for our kids. w are we secure if our young people, from child care to graduate school, are not getting the quality of education? madam president, there are millions of children who today in america as we speak are food insecure. there are days that go by when they are hungry. how do we talk about national security and not talk about the crisis of childhood hunger, not to mention childhood poverty in general? how do we talk about national security when people are sleeping out on the street? how do we, in any sense of the word, talk about national security without understanding the weather in texas, in the southwest is now hitting record-breaking levels, people are dying from it the heat? oceans are getting hotter. we're looking at drought, extreme disturbances. in my own state, the worst natural disasterrings that we have had since 1927. that is national security, where the people get forced out of their homes because of flooding, die from heat stroke. that's calleddality security. -- that's called n

our markup process, particularly on critical areas such as restoring funding for critical national nuclear security administration efforts on nonproliferation at national defense -- missile defense policy. it adds critical oversight to the nuclear weapons modernization and while i firmly believe this world will be a better, safer place for our children without nuclear weapons, the reality is that our nuclear deterrent is a key component of strategic ability so long as we have determined adversaries willing to engage in serious discussions on armed reductions. i support the administration's nuclear modernization plans. i continue to have serious concerns about requiring the u.s. navy to develop a nuclear capable sea launch cruise missile as this bill would require. i believe we need to better understand the impacts to both the navy and n.s.a. across the base missile defense and hyper sonic weapons will also require a more in-depth study how these systems will contribute to a future conflict and impact strategic stability. i want to particularly call out the chairman rogers' noting the $40 billion of

it endangers our national security. it endangers every single american, it endangers the entire world. we do not want world war iii. i rise today to encourage all of my colleagues to consider that they can pass another funding bill to fund money going to ukraine without it being in our national defense authorization act. and i ask my colleagues and urge my colleagues to vote yes on this amendment and with that, mr. speaker, i reserve. the chair: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, i claim time in opposition to the amendment. i yeald myself as much time -- i yield myself such time as i may consume. the chair: the gentlewoman is recognized for five minutes. >> as we consider this amendment today, ukrainians are suffering greatly as russia's brutal war against their sovereignty continues unabated. 78% of ukrainians have had a family member or friend die because of putin's illegal invasion of ukraine. cities have been decimated, families have been broken and lives have bee

i'm curious, from a national security perspective, what was your reaction when the drugs were found? here any risk to security, either to the president, to your staff, anybody that worked near, for this stuff to be so close to where you were? >> i would refer to the secret service. i won't speak to the secret of the president. second, i'll make a point about the situation room. there's been questionable reporting on this. situation room is not in use and has not been for months because it is currently under construction. we are using an alternate situation room in the eisenhower executive office building. the only people coming in and out of the sit room in this period have been workers who are getting it ready to go. by the way, it is on time and on schedule to be back on station here in the not-too-distant future. but, no, there was no issue with the situation room relative to this. finally, look, we have rigorous drug testing policies at the white house. we have rigorous drug use policies here at the white house. we take those extremely seriously. so we'll let the investigation unf

my day-to-day duties included assisting then-national security advisor condoleezza rice. so, the job of the national security advisor is primarily to advise and direct the president's thoughts because secretary of state blinkin may have one opinion , defense secretary gasting another, cia director benz another, and treasury secretary ellen his in the end, all these points of view must be coordinated and reconciled with the point of view of the only person who makes the decision, and that is president biden. so jake sully's job is in order to coordinate all the meetings, to discuss the point of view, to present them to the president of biden, to explain them, to advise him, because he is the national security adviser , and therefore to wait for the decision that the president will make, which is what is happening, and i think that it is president biden who is guided by an ambiguous fear of provoking putin to the third world war. he is afraid that putin will use nuclear weapons, which, in my opinion, is a manifestation of self-restraint. biden is also afraid to give putin a

our national security is at stake. not just about an election, about our national security.nd our families safe. >> so important. i want to put this to everybody else here. i have to sneak in a quick break. everyone is sticking around so i can do that. >>> also, an alarming episode in the trump white house involving the now ex-president's flagrant disregard for the security of classified material. >>> plus, endless infighting, one of the leading legislative clauses foundering and a prominent legal figure facing massive consequences for their roles on january 6th. the maga movement appears to be gotten into a mets of its own making. why that matters to what paul was talking about, domestic and national security. >>> later in the program, a potential new chapter in the effort to hold those who spread the big lie accountable. a watchdog group has filed a challenge to a fox station's broadcasting license over fox news' decision to knowingly air false election claims. first, there's an idea and you do something about it for the first time with godaddy. then before you know it, (i

security of the united nations in new york regarding the holding of the meeting of the united nations security council, i will talk with mr. ali rajabi in new york and get additional information from him. at the beginning, rajabi can give a general explanation about the presidency give us a term of the security council, which seems to change on a monthly basis, in the form of the presidency of the united nations security council, and non-members have a special exclusive right for ten days, in addition to the united nations, these were 15 members of the security council last month, and now it is england for a month. america protested russia to england for violating the procedure of the security council, which was also in your report , to invite non-member countries to participate . now , about the guests of the security council meeting, they are all from the west nato or other members of the united nations were also present in this meeting. you can see the participants in the meeting of the countries that have chosen to join the 15 countries in addition to the british from the western