i appointed oleksandr litvinenko as the new secretary of the national security council. he'. brings his experience of leading the foreign intelligence service of ukraine to the tasks facing the national security and defense council. well , danilov's dismissal from the post of secretary was already the second high-profile personnel change in recent months. in early february, volodymyr zelenskyi dismissed valery zaluzhny. then about the reasons for such a decision were also not reported. and it is interesting that before the resignation of the then head of the armed forces of ukraine, the publication was an economist. wrote that the president of ukraine offered zuluzhny to take the post of secretary of the national security council, but he refused, and as it became known later, president zelenskyi said that he would send zuluzhny as ambassador to great britain. we talk mostly about the changes in the national security council with yevhen magda, director of the institute of world politics. good evening, thank you for joining the broadcast, why now president zelenskyy has ch

host: what are the national security threats? guest: it's incredible the capability that technology unleashes. if you use an app hosted by a foreign adversary. the media, the fbi director has talked about surveillance capabilities. we know about the app can drop code into your phone. if your microphone looks like it is off, he could actually be on. to everything you're doing, monitor all of your keystrokes. then there is the risk of pushing out algorithms that push out content that is destructive. destructive to children. europe has actually had cases where they fined tiktok for pushing out content the children that was inappropriate. but even more so, in addition to all that, because i think the average user is going to say i am consenting to all this. i am consenting to tiktok to have this. i know they might be listening, but i'm not really saying anything important. how do these apps connect software to metallic indications infrastructure? communicating with the telecommunications infrastr code is also able to be transferred i

he's a national world leader on food security and hunger. and i'm telling you this is a national issue. and i hope if there's one thing that goes from this hearing it's that we are putting this issue at the front of the list. there are people a are watching us with the most powerful nation in the world, yet as mr. mcgovern has said over and over, we have beds of hunger. our children, our veterans, people going hungry needing food. and then we have these threats. i am not putting any sugar coating on it. i believe there are foreign interests out there who are looking at our nation and trying to find weaknesses wherever they're going. and the one area we must not and cannot get weak in is providing the american people with food and keeping this as our number one trade issue for agriculture and our farmers. and i so appreciate each of you coming forward with this. and chairman, once again, i just thank you for putting this hearing together, because it's time -- now, let me just ask a couple of questions here in your testimony, you discuss that t

throughout my time in congress, i've been focusing on national security and national health security to ensure we have access to care and medications. these are some of the challenges we face. in february 20 23, the intelligence community noted the global shortcomings and preparedness for the pandemic and we can see it could inspire many adversaries to consider options related to biological weapon development. according to the same assessment , "new technologies in ai and biotechnology are proliferating faster than companies and government can shape norms, protect privacy and prevent dangerous outcomes." these developments could enable novel biological weapons and could complicate efforts to detect, contribute and assess the threat to treat it. ideally we want to lead to accelerating detection attribution and treatment. so it's timely and hopefully informative for those watching. before i begin, i will let everyone know we have a q&a session following the moderated discussion. i'm excited about the panelists we have that bring unique experiences, some from different angles, to talk a

, in particular, in 14-19, he was the deputy secretary of the national security council.turn, the foreign intelligence service was headed by oleg ivashchenko. this is stated in the corresponding presidential decree. according to rfe/rl's intelligence sources, since 2015 , oleg ivashchenko has been the first deputy chief of the defense ministry of ukraine and the deputy chief of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine for intelligence. well , returning to oleksiy danilov, he was the 13th secretary of the national security council of ukraine and held this position since october 2019. in his position, danilov was distinguished by quite bold initiatives, which, however, caused discussions among lawyers, such as the creation of a register of oligarchs or the closing of viktor medvedchuk's channels without a court decision. from time to time, danilov quite subtly and cautiously, to some extent even criticized the entourage of volodymyr zelenskyi, mostly former and current advisers of the president's office, arestovich or podoliak, but never, never did danilov criticize

is the secretary of the chairman of the national security council, and the chairman of the national security and defense council is president zelenskyi, so well it is worth reminding that the head of the nsdc is the president, secondly, the secretary handles the technical function, he is the organizer, and he, by the way, is somewhat higher in the state hierarchy system than the head of the office, but it seems to me that this replacement, it was made so , so that the head of the office remains the vice president. secondly, regarding litvinenko himself, let me remind you that litvinenko, he has been working at the nsdc since its creation, when academician gorbulin brought him along as his assistant. let me remind you that lytvynenko co-authored many of horbulin's books, and he was also a general bilov, in my opinion, there are three of them, one from each of the books, horbulin, lytvynenko, bilov was created, so... well, we can say that lytvynenko, first of all, is not a new person, he was even turchynov's deputy for some time , it has been there for a long time, but during this time

consumes that if our republican colleagues care about the broad and national security interests, the republicans could bring the bipartisan comprehensive national security bill which would provide support for our democratic allies and israel, ukraine and in the the chinese communist party and at the same time provide humanitarian assistance to civilians in gaza and other parts of the world who are in their own. if my republican colleagues care about the broadest set of national security challenges that the american people face, the most significant thing they can do is to put the bill on the floor for an up or down vote. would pass with substantial democratic support. reporter: do you think the senate should hold the tiktok bill hostage until the house takes care of the other bill? mr. jeffries: who am i to tell the senate what to do in terms of their own agenda. they pass bills and consider it over to us for consideration and we pass bills and send it over to them. the ball is now in the court of the senators and t leader chuck schumer. reporter: so yesterday was speaker johnson and

the national security law of the p.r.c. requires all chinese organizations to, quote support support, assets, assist, and cooperate with national intelligence efforts. under this law bytedance could be compelled by the chinese government to provide data on every american tiktok user. theyan weaponize this data to exploit and manipulate americans through surveillance and disinformation. separates tiktok's data algorithms, and source code from bytedance. importantly, this bill does not ban tiktok, something i do not support. i support divestiture because our first and most important responsibility as members of the congress is to defend our constitution and defend the united states of america. the bill would also give americans secure ownership of their data, including posts photos and videos, and give this administration and future administration's the authority to respond to future national security threats. for all these reasons i urge all colleagues to vote for this legislation. in the name of our national security. the sp

>> national security council at large, yields on mechanisms of national power. >> there is a different deputy. he specifically from cyber security. how does that differ from yours? >> we are providing strategic policy guidance. this is not operational guidance. this is what the national security council does with our policy. this is more part of the national cyber directors. we work very closely together. this is weekly. typically, we are looking at staff working together daily. >> i want to have a conversation with the two of you. looking at the maritime of the situation. it seems to me that more reports are becoming reliant on equipment. we have technology and infrastructure from prc. they have all of these affiliated firms. i find that concerning. that is a legitimate threat. when you combine that with some of the cyber security concerns, they have been discussed in the context of reports of maritime security. >> they are starting to strangle our ability to engage in international traders. how do you assess the awareness of our maritime partners? they have carriers knowing about thi

that's why what should the national security and defense council do, moreover, the secretary of the nationalecurity and defense council is the secretary of the chairman of the national security and defense council, and the chairman of the national security and defense council is president zelenskyi, so... well, it is worth reminding that the head of the national security and defense council is the president, secondly, the secretary deals with the technical function , he is the organizer, and, by the way, in the system of the state hierarchy, he stands somewhat higher than the head of the office, but it seems to me that this replacement, it was made so that the head of the office remained the vice president, according to the girlfriend, regarding litvinenko himself, let me remind you that lytvynenko, he is, has been working at the nsdc since its creation, when academician gorbulin brought him along as his assistant. let me remind you that lytvynenko is the co-author of many of horbulin's books , and there was also general bilov, in my opinion, they, in three, one of the books, horbulin, lytvy

has closed himself up after all with sanctions equipment, because some sanctioned toys of the national securityservice of ukraine, they were rather... raiding rather than protection of national interests, when western partners were surprised to discover that a set of sanctions against certain persons'. which were accepted in the united states, in europe, were suddenly ignored in ukraine, that is, ukraine does not reach the level of its western partners in sanctions pressure on russia in the first place. well, we recall that danilo was one of the actual implementers of pressure on medvedchuk , sanctioning, but at the same time, for example, there were... with the participation of the nsdc , markets were redistributed, in particular, the gaming industry became, in fact, reformatted thanks to the nsdc , and i want to remind you that it is a game the industry did not pay uah 23 billion in taxes to the budget, but the nsdc did not get their hands on this game industry, it turns out that money was laundered because of it. stolen money, including that of the ministry of defense. mr. volodymyr, how do

the national security is that -- >> the first■vt■(■■u part aboutt happens here.think about this. all artificial intelligenceningd technology of our he cannot tran without tens of thousands. imagine if we are dependent on a couple of countries insia and the chips supply. these are the models to train military, simulations, ot. you want to buy all of those chips from asia? i don't. youannot leave the world united states of america if you don't the world this technology and innovation including manufacturing so i can't allow myself to think about failure because it is that important for our country's strength. all over the world, america's a leader in the world. we have to advance the leadership. th called so many times for responsible immigration. we cord that. i would be strongly something ts highly skilled immigrants for the industry. i wish it were brought up i the chips industry but it does keep me up at night and they want to stay. >> there is a certain irony, hundreds of thousands to train in a critical area. the numbers of i'm not mistaken, would huge but th

it is dens and this company has threatened our country's national security. to provide information to any american tik tok user who needs to cooperate. they can use this information instrumentally to manipulate and mislead the american society by monitoring and spreading false information . this rule differentiates between tik tok data, methods, and source codes. more importantly , this law is grateful. tik tok is not something i don't support. i support banning its activities. because my first and foremost responsibility as a member of congress is to defend the constitution and the american country. the plan also supports the ownership of information in the united states. because the plan about posts, images and videos gives the current and future governments the power to deal with national security threats. this is really great in terms of concept, but it doesn't solve the structural problem. so you have an entity here. they leak information. what makes them brand this and not sell it to a data broker and then everything is revealed and it turns out that th

today, a group called the national security action, which was cofounded by president obama's deputy national security advisor ben rhodes issued a white paper describing the security risk that donald trump's financial situation now poses . national security professionals have long maintained that large personal debts isn't a significant counterintelligence risk for those with access to classified information, notably donald trump's debts rise far above what security and counter intelligence officials find concerning foremost government servants, let alone a commander in chief. his debts are hardly the only source of concern. his well-established track record of recklessly sharing classified information and use of the presidential office for personal gain demonstrates his willingness to prioritize his own personal profits above the safety of americans. experts have also highlighted telltale signs of ability to foreign influence, including erratic behavior, severe financial strain, and anger toward the united states government, all qualities exhibited by donald trump. simply put, donald trump's

that they implement national security memorandum. 20. it's an important tool for you. it's not a good tool if you're not willing to actually use it. so i would call upon the bite administration to immediately apply and use national security. memorandum 20 were in the presidential election season. there are primary is going on. you just saw what happened in michigan in minnesota, where folks came in and they voted on committed rather than offer for joe biden. who is, you know, right at the head of that ticket? no doubt that president fighting will be, will be nominated present ticket. but i guess my question is one, where is if you look back, it's very rare that a foreign policy issue can be deeply consequential. and the presidential election will be inflation or, you know, other uh, economic issues, how people feel about the economy. do you think there's a real risk that if this conflict doesn't pivot another direction, the president by might actually lose because of the frustration to president trump? so steve, i think this is a huge is

that is a current harm to our national security. what ambassador rice knows, is that in order to keep this country secure, you have to have complete alliances and trust with your colleagues overseas, with the so-called five eyes. other countries that need to keep your secret and they can work with you. all of that is put in jeopardy, when they're thinking that this man, donald trump, could be back in the oval office. because all of those things can become public. and will that is not in the interest of our allies or even adversaries to work with this on this problem. it is an incredibly serious problem for this country now. >> and andrew, the security risk of a man desperate for more than a half billion dollars, who we already know has basically delivered national security information to an australian billionaire? >> who isn't -- i'm not sure he is capable of thinking of the national security interest of the country. and anything beyond his own personal interest. and obviously now he has an enormous personal interest to worry about.

so we heard that there from national security advisor jake sullivan, calling it's a mistake such a ground operation. and i think this is also part of the growing a frustration here that we've heard over the past week from the us administration. a over is, was conduct of more that not enough aid is coming in to gauze so that that has to be done more to protect civilians, palestinians there in garza. but also that there's no way of progress in those in direct hostage, a toolbox or a toolbox for a temporary cease fire between from us and as well. and we understand that also us secretary antony blinking is expected in the region this week to push for such an agreement that is, is rarely expected to budge under us pressure. i mean, we've heard of prime minister benjamin netanyahu the time and time again saying that is well needs to go into rough of to achieve the goal of eliminating come us. he says there are several battalions of from us left in the sauce. and this needs to be done to remove them from power. you said it on sunday again during a cabinet meeting and was very vocal about is now

how you assure national security now must go through economic security. it must involve participation with the commercial sector. cannot be controlled in the way you control purely governmental assets. and so, i think you are right that we have benefited from defense and intel leadership over all these years , but they have a particular view of how you maintain advantage. we need to include what commerce is doing. what transportation is doing. what nasa is doing. how we protect the companies. i think you are right that it cannot be just left to the department or the national security community. as narrowly defined in order to ensure that we have advantage in the space. so, i think your instinct to try to come up with a way to do that is good. i think you've done that by this approach, which everyone will worry about because that isn't the strong suit of the government. what i would hope is that this consortium recognizes the imperative and does a little bit what the s.e.c. did back in the 30s, which says we are going to set the imperatives and the standar

important to talk about how important food security is to national security. s given to china and legitimately so. the security threats, the issue on our food security, a whole range of things. but sometimes i wonder how serious we are about really an, last week we did a bill to ban tiktok, we're concerned about the privacy of our data. but we did nothing to address the security of our data on all these other social media platforms, which china could use a data get that same information. and when we talk about -- even on today's topic, i want to reag something that's meaningful. that will protect our land and protect our food supply. i was a co-chair of the tom lantos human rights commission for many years and for four years i was the chair of the congressional executive commission on china and i'v authored the uyghur forced labor prevention act, the tibetan policy and support act. i know what it means to act when we have serious disagre■enhines. both those bills became law. and i also recognize at the same time that we have a trade relationship with■p china. a

this is about our national security and priorities.ldake precedence over the deference that they are offering speaker johnson. so that's what we're asking our colleagues. they can sign the discharge petition. they can work with us on other ways to bring this to the floor inlear and kompt manner. but everything else they've said is just lip service if they're not willing to actually do something to make that reporter: what does it say about the workings of this institution that democrats have to put together the votes. this is coming up under suspension. tax bill, appropriations. why not let republicans hang out to dry? mr. aguilar: well, because our caucus believes in governing. you know, ultimately, we all wake up and we come here wanting to make lives better. wanting to try to find a way to get to yes to support pieces of legislation. to improve people's lives. that's what the democrati that's why ted and i are so privileged to be able to play this role, to help guide these discussions.■4 because that's just who we are. we aren't int

jonathan: if everything is a national security risk are we diminishing the meaning of nationals earlymichael: at a time we are also seeing russia making gains on the battlefield in ukraine and this battle to win the hearts and minds of the global south, everything acquires an additional level of importance. people are much more fundamentally aware of how all of these things fit together, especially after the pandemic when we saw supply chains pinched and the effects felt at home. it may not look like a national security question in the traditional military defense sphere, yet there is an economic security question that is just as important and hits home pretty directly when things go sour. annmarie: japan was worried when the u.s. paused lng export approvals and now japan is concerned because of u.s. steel. is this administration putting election politics over its allies? michael: i am glad you asked that. as you know in a few weeks the japanese prime minister will be finishing -- will be visiting washington and this will be an awkward moment for him with the president because obvious

our featured guest tonight john bolton is of course the former national security adviser and u.s. bassador to the united nations under george w. bush. he served as under the secretary of state roms control of international security, and for the office of legislative affairs and doj. i had the privilege of working with him on ronald reagan's judicial appointments when i was in the counsel's office. by the way, there are many many other positions ambassador bolton and the country has had the privilege of having his service in. but that would be too long and delay us yet further. amid the many other activities dedicated to advancing u.s. national security, he also operates a political action immunity -- committee as well as two other organizations. the foundation for american security and freedom and the institute for a secure america, all part of his effort and interest to raise awareness of the importance of national purity and the threat of isolationism and to support federal candidates that advocate for strong national security policies. naturally, everyone here should purchase a

this situation is the greatest threat to national security that there is. debt onto this nation is only risking us even further. look, our border is the threat to national security and yet we're doing very little to actually fix it in this bill. no matter how much we talbo the bill, at the end of the day, you know, i hear expressions like this. up here, the swamp says, people say, govern. within that statement therein lies the false pretense that government is the solution to our problems, government isn't the problem. thank you. mr. roy: reserve. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman reserves. the gentlewoman from texas is recognized. ms. granger: madam speaker, i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman reserves. ms. delauro: madam speaker, i reserve the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman from connecticut reserves her time. the gentleman from texas. mr. roy: i'd yield one minute to my friend from pennsylvania, mr. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from pennsylvania is now recognized. mr. perry

the section of homeland security and send to the president through the national security advisor and homeland security advisor a request designate. and i think that should be happening now. so the very first thing we have to do is that and know tie to that is which federal agency is going to be the lead for supporting is that is a yellow 41 no we led there were a lot of ideas in here and for sure no one agreed on any what there was not a consensus but we looked at it hard and i think the area where we landed is the right one, which is that you need a sector respected agency for the overall sector. that's nasser. i think they're uniquely positioned have the relationships they really get at those that economic you know they get at the it all the different elements national security opportunity public health and safety of this issue and but i do recognize like many other sectors, transport, energy. we need subsectors and there needs to be a department defense of a sector for defense, intelligence issues probably managed by the department of ed, as they do the defense industrial base that

in 2023, national security includes economic security. right? it includes the systems for producing the commercial systems, how you protect, how you usher, how you create advantage -- it is not the same as it was in 1947 or 1963 or 1996 or any of those years. how you use your national security now must go through economic security. it must involve participation with the commercial sector. it cannot be controlled in the way that you control purely governmental assets. and so i think you are right that we have benefited from defense and intel leadership over all these years, but they have a particular view of how you maintain an advantage. we need to include what commerce is doing, what transportation is doing, what nasa is doing, how we protect companies. i think you are right, but it cannot just be left to the department or the national security community , as narrowly defined, in order to ensure that we have advantage in this space. i think your instinct to try to come up with a way to do that is good. i think you have done that by this consort

he's a national world leader on food security and hunger. elling you, this is a national issue. and i hope if there's one thing that goes hearing, it's that we are putting this issue at the front of the list. there are people all over the world are watching us with the most powerful nation in the world, yet as mr. mcgovern has said over and over, we have beds of hunger. our children, our veterans, people going hungry needing food. and then we have these threats. i am not putting any sugar coating on it. i believe there are foreign interests out there who are looking at our nation to find weaknesses wherever they're going. and the one area we must not and cannot get weak in is providing the american people with food and keeping this as our number one trade issue for agriculture and our farmers. and i so appreciate each of you coming forward with this. and chairman, once again, i just thank you for putting this hearing together, because it's time -- now, let me just ask a couple of questions here, in your testimony, you discuss that the 2018 tr

well, tell me about national security in texas.e national guard getting rolled over paso, when you have texans dying from fentanyl poisoning, when you have gangs and cartels operating in texas. talk to me about national security then. .... mr. biggs: i thank the gentleman for yielding. thank you. connecticut said that in this bill they were able to successfully reject republicans' request for spendingtions and rejected republicans' request for riders. and yet somehow the republicans are going to vote for that? that's outrageous. she's right, though. she got the spending. she killed the riders. and when i hear that a vote for this is a vote for -- against this is a vote for china, what you are really saying is a vote for this is a■ñ vote for chinese terrori. we have had over 30,000 illegal aliens from china come across the border with this border what you're going to get you are voting to speed up the process of recontribution of -- redistribution of illegal aliens coming in. that's what the funding will go for. you talking about be

all of the critical infrastructure seconds we have is national security we need to make sure there is an opportunity to serve our nation in cyber. number two that used to be a misnomer cybersecurity in cyber in general was a technical endeavor that is not the case folks thanks cybersecurity spot critical thinking. it is about agility. it's about being open minded one need not be an engineer or scientist to make a contribution to cybersecurity. i also want to add their communities across the country not exposed to these opportunities i am a rural kid from kansas i did not know i could serve until her happened to be a recruiter that came from the naval academy i had not even heard of the naval academy we need to go places where we have not gone before. and leaders know we need to take opportunities for people there is a level of risk. need not lower standards at all but sometimes qualifications are not valid. people can learn we find the right people, we develop them, we retain them and we turn them loose. so the administration perspective is find the right people, looking in places we

it's time for the house republicans to support the national security nd break from the pro putin maga in their party. reporter: given the decorum last night, is there real bipartisanship for the next election in this congress? mr. jeffries: we'll continue to find bipartisan ground, exercising common sense whenever and wherever possible with our republican colleagues on any issue and we've done that repeatedly from the very beginning of this congress with respect to avoiding a catastrophic default in our nation's debt and funding the government and repeatedly keeping it open and avoiding a shutdown,tp■ passing the nationl defense authorization act, securing $16 billion in assistance for devastated by exe weather events. passing tax legislati that includes low income housing tax credit and enhanced child tax credit and most recently prov majority of votes necessary to get the first six appropriation bills over the finish line. we are going to continue to govern in a common sense way and we're just asking our republican colleagues to stop the political stunt. that was an embarrassment la

from the national security community at least. it sort of a no-brainer the action should've happened a while ago. >> if this doesn't go through, what does that mean for china and the u.s.? david: i'm a little concerned. if the chinese government thinks it can block policy action on important issues by appealing to domestic political factions or special interests, then i think that makes a more dangerous world. that may embolden the chinese to be more aggressive and it decreases the potential -- increase the potential for more direct conflict in the years ahead. >> institute of world politics professor of strategy and statecraft. we thank you. coming up, more regulation. this time from the eu passing a landmark set of ai rules. this is bloomberg technology. ♪ caroline: the european union passed the world's most extensive rules on artificial intelligence. the landmark set of rules could set the tone for how ai in the western world. many would say some of the lawmakers have never been lobbied as hard as they have been over this parti

podolyak said... that there is now a need to strengthen the analytical component of the national securityil and that there is a need for rotations because of this in management positions in order to more effectively respond to those to the challenges that exist today , well, that is, you know, it is not clear clearly, but what exactly , what do you expect, regarding the interview, i don't remember whether i had mr. danilov on our live broadcasts in the morning, in my there was a colleague, but it was always not easy, on the ukrainian truth, for example, he appears there every week, almost every week. commented, well, this is a person who, we all hear it, we know, from those statements that were heard earlier, he does not dig into his pocket for a word, well, that is, he is a fairly straightforward person, and he is there with his own. with some firm, obviously vision of the situation, this is not a person from the president's office , and as if there are rumors that there could be some kind of coincidence, there was even quite an open conflict with mr. podaluk in the summer of 22, it seem

well, what is the top threat to national security? as seen on capitol hill in tip top, i think there's, i don't think there's even a consensus there in terms of from the national security using data consumer data. but it goes back if there's no back door to be june, then there's no national security risk. and i think that's something from a bite in perspective, even if this was sold, let's just take that extreme pass. they're never going to sell it with the stores. good. but i think that's why this is something that's going to play out. not just for money, but i believe years. your eyes, this becomes a political football. yeah, the you as president digit buying has said that he will sign legislation if it is sent to him that would band tick tock. it looks like the us senate may follow the us house of representatives. i mean, our, you know, assuming that we're going to look at this legislation becoming law and a possible band happening here, we think only 25 percent. i mean, i'd be shocked at this, actually hit the standard for that is

it is a posted national security mom and a random 18 and national security memorandum 20. if they do not do what we are saying, we would halt the arm sales or transfers. >> the decision to halt the provision of security assistance would not be mine. >> what would you recommend? >> again, i really do expect that they utilize the weapons that we provide in a responsible way. >> for time, it seems to me if there define what you are telling them, what kirby is telling him and solvent is time, that would be worth. the palestinian children are starving for israel's finance minister stopped american flower. are taxpayers paid for to get into gaza. if israel, again, ever stops american paid aid from getting into gaza, will you commit to not sending future arm sales? >> again, that is not my decision. number one, do what i have been doing and engage the leadership and encourage them to ensure that humanitarian assistance -- >> i have one more question that we need some consequences another country is defying you and defined the national security adviser. defying the president and de

national security, he also operates a political action immunity -- committee as well as two other organizations. the foundation for american security and freedom and the institute for a secure america, all part of his effort and interest to raise awareness of the importance of national purity and the threat of isolationism and to support federal candidates that advocate for strong national security policies. naturally, everyone here should purchase a copy of and even proceed to read the new addition of ambassador bolton's latest book including, his very timely new forward. with that, ambassador bolton. ambassador bolton: alan thank you for the kind words and thank you from date -- for the invitation for the sites -- for the society. i want to be clear that i favor the rule of law. this is an obviously important time to talk about what a second donald trump term would look like if that eventuates. there is no electoral content to the discussion tonight. that is why it is the c4 doing it i assume. but, the important issues that i think people need to think about before november. and in the forwar

survey, are they satisfied 22%, 78 are dissatisfied with danilov's work as secretary of the national security council. there are discounts on lisobact 10% in pharmacies plantain bam and save there are discounts on lizak 10% in pharmacies plantain you and save try fladia 600 pink french pills for acute hemorrhoids 600, treat hemorrhoids without any side effects, there are discounts on anticataral 15% in pharmacies plantain for you and oshchadnik. vasyl zima's big ether, this is the big ether, my name is vasyl zima, and we're starting. two hours of air time, 2 hours of your time. we will discuss many important topics today. two hours to learn about the war. now we will talk more about the war. serhiy zgurets with us and what the world is about. and now, yuriy fizar will talk in more detail about what happened in the world. please, you have the word. two hours to be in courses of economic news. time to talk about money in guilt. oleksandr morchivka is with us. alexander, congratulations, please. and sports news. review of sporting events by yevhen postukhov. two hours in the company of your favo

he is now the republic presidential nominee and it could have national security implications for the es back to the white house. we have seen this movie before, after he was elected in 2016 his financial entanglements made him a security threat back in. according to a report in the oversight committee trump received at least 7 .8 million from foreign government paid to his businesses during two of his four years in the white house. the report also revealed the majority of the money came from china with saudi arabia and others contributing smaller amounts. today we are not talking about foreign leaders staying in a hotel trying to curry favor with president trump, we are now talking about a want to be future president in desperate need to pay a fraud penalty to keep his empire intact. former trump lawyer and fixer michael cohen explains why this is a huge problem. >> it is not about the money. it is not about whether he can or he cannot, how does he get the money? what if hypothetically it is coming from a foreign entity, they could certainly make the payment for him. the u.s. and its

and they listen showcase for goofy dances or a threat to national security. how american c take talk could shut it down in the us. of the the house is given by dance. the chinese company that owns take talk. i know to made them sell it or phase of ban has connected. it comes from it growing concerns over the chinese government's ability to access use the data collected by the app. tick tock is a threat to our national security because it is owned by byte dance, which does the bidding of the chinese communist party. this build therefore, forces tick tock to break up with the chinese communist party take took as one of the wells, the most popular apps thing i would do. it has more than a 1000000000 active users and over a 170000000 in the us alone. many are passive scroller, but others use the platform to earn a living and rely on it to acquire brand deals and other types of income. they are now concerned about the impact, a tick, tock, shut down, could have in their lives. i make a book, the ones that want to take tests and it is my full time job. i mean the w