e fourth bill is a package of national security measures cluding sanctions on

the american people have had their national security interest placed on hold. recklessly. because of pro putin maga extremists like marjorie taylor greene. it's time to support our allies in theaters of conflict like gaza, haiti, and the sudan. house democrats once again have cleared the way for legislation that is important to the american people to be processed and considered on the house floor for an up or down vote. from the very beginning of this congress we've made clear we will put people over politics. it's not a slogan, it's a way of life. and we have demonstrated it repeatedly. we'll continue to do just that because we believe in achieving real results for the american people. questions? reporter: can you talk to us a little bit about, a how your conversations with the speaker may have happened to get democrats to vote in a larger majority than republicans on this rule? and secondly, the idea because of that you could be losing that speaker from within his own conference? mr. jeffries: what's important at the moment is making sure we finish the job, which is to m

and we stand ready as house democrats to vote for our national security. the vote to stand with our allies and all the world -- across the world and send the message that we stand behind our word, we stand with our allies and stand firmly for democracy. that is how we will continue to evaluate this package. that is how we will vote on this package when it comes before us. with that, i am proud to yield to our caucus chair pete aguilar. >> america must maintain its role as a leader in the free world. house democrats for months have been asking to vote on this national security supplemental, key aid to israel, ukraine, humanitarian assistance and indo-pacific priorities. it is so important that we support those efforts. speaker johnson has to tune out the extremism on his side and give us an opportunity to vote for these national security imperatives. i will yield back to the leader. speaker jeffries: questions? >> if this bill makes his way to the floor, will house democrats work to protect his speakership? speaker jeffries: we are in the process of evaluat

directly communicated american national security concerns and.ed potential misunderstanding to prevent intentional escalation. started on issues where are interest coincides. we've taken the important step including a commitment to work toward healthy economic relationship provides a level playing field for both countries. this progress matters given the size of our economy u.s. china economic relationship is among the most important economic relationship in the world and it matters deeply for firms in term the american people inspect their leaders to do the hard work of economic pharmacy. it's not the time always generates headlines, it's one thing keeps at it despite the noise to advance responsible approach the challenges we face. president biden and i are permitted to such an approach. over the past week i've had the opportunity to make progress on issues that matter to americans. i can't productive direct extensive meetings in beijing china's economic leadership including vice premier, governor and i've met outside of the central government

the united states has secured a commitment from kenya and other nations in africa and the caribbean to provide security assistance on the ground in haiti. but we need the congress to do its part and release the $40 million in security assistance that is necessary for the kenyans and others to be able to have the resources necessary to turn around the security situation in haiti. we sent a letter to speaker johnson weeks ago, urging him to urge the republican chairman of the foreign affairs committee to release the hold so that the $40 million in security assistance for the people of haiti can be distributed in a manner that will allow for the chaotic situation to be addressed. and it should have happened yesterday. it needs to happen immediately. reporter: thank you. have you begun discussions with speaker johnson about a new ukraine package, and if he move and that would you save him from the motion to vacate? mr. jeffries: the only way forward at this late hour is for house republicans to put the bipartisan, comprehensive national security bill on the house floor for an up or down vo

we also had difficult conversations about national security. president biden and i are determined to do all we can to stem the flow of materials for russia's industrial base we continue to be concerned about the role that any firms including those in the prc are playing and russia's military procurement. i stress the companies including those in the prc must not provide material support for russia's war and that they will face significant consequences if they do. and i reinforce that any banks that facilitate significant transactions to channel military or dual use goods to russia's defense industrial base expose themselves to the risk of u.s. sanctions. we also exchanged information on the use of economic tools in the national security space. going forward, i believe we must continue to discuss how each side defines national security in the economic sphere. with the u.s. needs to continually evaluate its national security measures given the rapid pace of technological development, we are committed to know surprises. we are privately and public

the list of national security forces of belarus has also been clarified.arately, i would like to highlight the main changes that were made as a result of the implementation. public discussion of the concept on discussion platforms, they are targeted, but they allowed us to set priorities in a very meaningful way. thus, the concept took into account proposals received from the leaders of the main faiths, primarily from the belarusian orthodox church, from the belarusian women's union, the white russia party, the belarusian republican youth union, on additional protection of the traditional family, as a union of a woman and a man by birth. i'm sure this will provide additional benefits. protect the institution of the belarusian family, increase the efficiency of ensuring demographic security. following a meeting with activists of the federation of trade unions in belarus, regional executive committees, and labor collectives in the regions, the concept was supplemented with provisions on increasing the social responsibility of business and preventing dispropo

i did not -- national security legislation. i did not directly speak to mike johnson about the numbers necessary because it was pretty obvious to us that given the growing number of pro putin republicans in the g.o.p., particularly in the house of representatives, that this was going to require substantial democratic participation. and we had a choice, are we going to put people over politics, because the political thing to do is to always let the extreme maga republicans crash and burn because they have so many out-of-control members they cannot govern on their own. and we could let them simply crash and burn. but when we say we're going to continue to put people over politics we actually mean it especially when it comes to meeting the needs of the american people both domestically and in terms of our national security. and we're going to continue to do just that. leader jeffries: thank you, mr. leader. can you just take one more swing at that? speaker johnson is of course a very new leader and we have all watched him come in

and mastered the lessons of the great patriotic war, especially the initial stage. concept of national securityine of belarus. they reflect key changes in the global military-political situation, national views on maintaining international peace and stability, ensuring the military security of our country and its armed defense. provisions on public harmony, the inviolability of the foundations of democracy and the rule of law are enshrined. take into account the information that i presented to you and the more specific information that the heads of the three law enforcement agencies will present here, solve the complex tasks set out in the concept and doctrine for us, because as we said, time has chosen us. thank you and now let’s move on to the specifics of these questions, regarding the first question about the concept national security, alexander grigorievich volfovich will report, please, i want you to understand, i’m just not intimidating you, as... dear delegates of the all-belarusian people’s assembly, dear guests, in accordance with the decision of the sixth all-belarusian people’s asse

good afternoon, fateful decisions have been made, both the military doctrine and the concept of national security are unanimous. lyudmila eduardovna, let's start with you. how do you assess whether the supreme national assembly has succeeded in becoming this link in the system of checks and balances? yes, of course, the all-belarusian people's assembly acquired new functions, and the delegates of the all-belarusian people's assembly. our borders, therefore it is necessary to act, and the public demand is precisely for evolutionary development, which is what the chapter was about yesterday state spoke, it also concerns the concept of national security, all those constitutional innovations that were enshrined in the 2022 referendum, they have found their development in the concept of national security, first of all , this is that the strategic national interests of the republic of belarus, to the strategic national interests ... added that the belarusian people are the object of protection as a unique historical entity, and the only source of state power is... the key moment, then such innovations

issue, so while we focus on the things we normally think about national security sometimes we forget the dangerous circumstance that has been created. i have been to the border numerous times. on my last visit i watched as border patrol agents apprehend the chinese nationals attempting to come into our country illegally. that in and of itself odd to cause us to have great concern. under secretary mayorkas's watch border patrol has apprehended 336 individuals on a terror watch list. the terror watch list and the people who came here on 9/11 and the consequences of us failing to exclude him. 336 have been apprehended from that terrorist watch list. that doesn't include the ones that we've not caught. it suggests to us, suggests to me and i hope to us that there is a real serious issue about our national security as a result of our country's failures, this administration's failures on the border. in fiscal year 23, a year ago fiscal year, men and women of the united states customs and border protection had approximately 2.5 million encounters along the southern border. these hist

national security imperatives of our country demanded. the other three witnesses who are here all spoke to that and understand it. thank you for your work to advance that understanding and for your testimony here today. with that, the hearing will be adjourned. do we need to hold the record open for any purpose at this point? okay, there will be questions for the record coming your way, most likely, answer them as quickly as possible. for now, the hearing is adjourned. thank you. >>> cspan is your unfiltered view of government. sponsored by these partners, and comcast. partring with 1000 community center so that students from low income families can get the tools they need to be ready for anything. along withthese other telesion providers giving you a front row seat to democracy. >>> the japanese prime minister will address congress and meet with president biden at the white house. that joint meeting begins live thursday at 11:00 a.m. eastern on cspan. also online at cspan.org. if you ever miss any of cspan's coverage, you can find it any

taking into account current realities, one must understand that the system for ensuring national security. on the other hand, the president added, the russian army is equipped with new weapons and has large reserves in each brigade. in fact, the russian military is moving forward, but very slowly. a stalemate situation, which in this situation, as i understand it, i always suggest, should be done, the most serious, as never before during this war, a convenient, so to speak, situation for peace, for concluding a peace treaty, but for starting interrupted negotiations , they always have to start with something, you could start with istanbul. agreements, this does not mean that as a result of negotiations these agreements initialed by the parties will be accepted or even become the basis of a peace treaty, no, but you can start with them and move forward, of course, it will not be a peace treaty, copies of these agreements, a peace treaty will be different, but we can start with this, we agreed on this and worked on it for a long time. we have three rounds in istanbul, a round of negotiation

this is the national security threat. there are many reasons to care what's going on at our borders. and certainly you can take a sovereignty and the nature of our country. we need to enforce our laws. fentanyl and drugs, human trafficking. but sometimes overlooked is the reality of what he security threats, a border like we have between the united states and mexico. but really all of our borders. they create a threat to the safety and well-being of the american people. the citizens of our country. we have to delve the growing drug and crime emergency it is exacerbated i've been talking to number of law enforcement officers in kansas sheriff's departments and police officers. there is no question but what they see the challenges are exacerbated by the lack of security for the lack l of law enforcement at our borders. and see the consequences of that activity in human trafficking and drugs. it is important for us to talk about all of the things. focus on all the things related to our national security. ngmy view is the pri

it was in the national security commission and it was a strategic law to cancel sanctions. the supreme leader referred to this law as "i saved the country from uncertainty. you know that we were involved in the nuclear negotiations, which became known as the revival of the jcpoa, in the past years." something had happened and our negotiators were almost out of control. well, the one-way road of the westerners in using the concessions of the jcpoa was going ahead of the five steps approved by the supreme national security council. i don't know that the time was going on, the parliament clarified the duty of the country and the negotiators in the law it passed. i, as the head of the commission. national security, i was a member of the nuclear committee that was formed in the supreme council at the end of the last government. the law was not approved . when the law was approved, the hands of the negotiators and the government were opened and filled, and we were able to negotiate with more papers. teacher's day held, this law was praised as one of the famous laws. we would like

national security imperatives of our country demanded. the other three witnesses who are here all spoke to that and understand it. thank you for your work to advance that understanding and for your testimony here today. with that, the hearing will be adjourned. do we need to hold the record open for any purpose at this point? okay, there will be questions for the record coming your way, most likely, answer them as [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy, visit ncicap.org] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2024] [indistinct conversations] >> next, fbi testifies on national security issues. how's minority leader hakeem jeffries speaks abo a call

national security imperatives of our country demanded. the other three witnesses who are here all spoke to that and understand it. thank you for your work to advance that understanding and for your testimony here today. with that, the hearing will be adjourned. do we need to hold the record open for any purpose at this point? okay, there will be questions for the record coming your way, most likely, answer them as

he was previously the head of the military academy, but now he is applying to head the national securityssion. of course, his organizational skills and ability to make quick decisions are noted, but he spoke from the rostrum of the aval hall. that, of course, it is important to actively cooperate with deputies of the russian press, from other parliamentary structures on issues of national security, but among those bills that are already in the commission here, this is in the investigative committee, work will continue, as well as on the ratification of an agreement, for example, on the fight against terrorism, for example, with the united arab emirates, well, there is still an all-belarusian people's assembly ahead, that's what the candidate said, let's listen: in the belarusian people's assembly, it is planned to adopt new legal acts of strategic importance, this is an updated concept of national security of the republic of belarus. and the military doctrine of the state, we much work remains to be done to bring the provisions of the laws in accordance with these documents. well, now th

publication of the current concept of national security and this is a document of truly strategic planning, such documents should look far beyond the horizon, forward, determine priorities for the development of our country, working on the document, and the president set such a task, do not cross out everything that has been developed in the current concept , according to scientists and analysts, some of the many provisions of the current concept of national... security today have not yet lost their significance, so i reported that we did not take the revolutionary path, but the evolutionary path, we took it as a basis, although we actually studied, before working, we studied documents, similar documents, of western countries, and the united states of america, and great britain, and of course , our neighboring countries, and strangely the sub-soviet space, they really agreed that our concept is really... relevant, so it is workable, for today, valid, but naturally, life moves forward, the geopolitical situation is changing, new risks, challenges, new threats to national security are emergi

the field of national security, and the military doctrine - this is the document that takes this one is necessary to place american nuclear weapons on polish territory, but at the same time they constantly accuse us. if our allies decide to deploy nuclear weapons as part of a nuclear exchange, also on our territory to strengthen the security of nato's eastern flank. we are ready for this. poland is an ally in the north atlantic alliance, and we also have an obligation in this regard. that is, we are simply implementing a general policy. their general policy is clear, but if we talk about placement. nuclear weapons on the territory of the eu, nato, because there are quite a lot of them stationed, while they constantly accuse us of what we supposedly stationed here, are they afraid or what is happening? well, look, the nato countries have adopted a concept called nuclear sharing, that is, the exchange of nuclear weapons. in essence, today, within the framework of this, this program, there are five bases where about, well, according to various sources, from 150 to 200 different ones are

council , the secretary of the national security council always loses, because there were a examples when even some decisions were formally approved at the security council, and this is such a big round table, there are many people who speak, someone keeps minutes, well, somewhere there something is like in the verkhovna rada is being written, but the final document is issued by the president's office, the president's office, the president's administration, and therefore at some point, probably danilov with... this appeared, because danilov went a little into independent, not a little, he is so serious, into independent swimming , he was no longer interested there, he started working as a newsmaker, and it was only a matter of time, and it is obvious that on this, on this basis, he had problems with ermak, because danilov, most likely, for the last six months , did not coordinate his public statements there and could be another source of influence on the president, who yermak didn't like, i think that this... and besides, danilov himself was just there, he was tired of being

, which precisely sets out those threats in the sphere of national security that today threatenlso the world as a whole, defines strategic national interests, what we need to live and exist for in general, basic national interests, one of the chapters reveals the measures that need to be taken, as we see, to neutralize these challenges, not to outgrow . discussions are currently underway, and later the concept will be put on the table of the leaders of belarus and russia. the secretary of state of the security council also spoke out on the escalation of the situation in our region. and not only germany is transferring, but on the territory of poland declares that let's deploy nuclear weapons on our territory. why today are there nuclear weapons in europe, in general, in eastern europe, there are only american more than 150 warheads, which they are improving today. for what? even more, remember, look at the lessons of kheroshima and nagasaki, bombs, which are several times smaller in volume than the wasted equivalent, took so many lives, what will happen if we apply this today on

has been on national security. the current budgets of this president shrinks the army, the navy, and the marine corps. you think xi jinping is impressed by that? he's not. neither is putin. neither are the ayatollahs. that's what they're doing. this president every budget he submits to congress for the military during these real dangerous times, what does he do? he cuts it. cuts the military. i'll get more to that, mr. president. these are the big three reasons that i've been support every of this bill. but here's the thing, mr. president, when you read the bill and look at it, and dig into the details, it's less of a foreign aid bill and much more of of a bill to enhance our industrial capacity. not a perfect bill. i'm going to get into that in a minute. there's no such thing as a perfect bill, by the way. but almost 60% of this national security supplemental bill we're going to be voting on goes directly into our industrial base. directly into our ability to build submarines. by the way, like $6 billion for subma

on national security. congress failed the american people on the border. on national security. president biden and president zelenskyy failed the ukrainian people. they were not ready before the war started. they didn't have good strategy when the war started. slow walk the aid. and really didn't fight and deter putin to go further. now we have a very significant war in europe. and i said, unfortunately, this supplemental doesn't just have lethal aid, it has other parts, they will go further, unfortunately no one will be taking on amendment. because we have presentations and circuses but the decision is already made. my amendment is very simple. it just says we shouldn't have blank check and let president biden have presidential drawdowns increase from $100 million to $8 billion including loans from $4 billion to $8 billion. we generally give a true blank check to president biden of $16 billion. congress forgot, you know that we should do our job. shouldn't create loopholes for president is to be able to do what they want to do. this is our job to oversee these funds. so very s

a systematic basis, based on the results of comprehensive analytical studies in key areas of national securitycurity , the basic directions for improving the document were identified. at the same time, we turned to leading representatives of the scientific expert community for help, which allowed us to approach this issue more comprehensively. within the work of the interdepartmental working group, which included representatives of more than thirty different government bodies and organizations, took into account the proposals of all authorized entities in the main areas of national security. path to create the document. evolutionary rather than revolutionary was chosen, it retained continuity in relation to the current concept, all the best that had proven itself positively, including in practice, was preserved: the structure, basis, theoretical, methodological basis were also left without dramatic changes. the concept is a document that defines the main messages that are clearly and unambiguously perceived by our citizens. as part of the implementation of the security council resolution , pub

these top national security officials understood that we can protect national security by respecting fourth amendment rights of americans. the house of representatives has twice passed amendments with a warrant requirement for back door searches by large, bipartisan majorities. some of my colleagues who spoke against this amendment today including former speaker pelosi have voted more than once for this reform. over 75% of americans support this reform. calling something extreme doesn't make it extreme. this is an idea that's been in the mainstream for over a decade. i reserve. the chair: the gentleman from ohio is recognized. mr. jordan: i'm prepared to close -- mr. nadler: i'm prepared to close. the chair: the gentleman from new york is recognized mr. nadler: mr. chairman, chairman jordan and i agree on very little but we are united in our belief that adding a warrant requirement to section 702 is absolutely necessary before we consider supporting re-authorization of these authorities. i will reserve judgment on final passage of the bill until we see what amendments pass but i urge

well, see after what happened in our embassy in damascus fell supreme national security council immediately a meeting was held under the chairmanship of the honorable president, and at midnight we sent a message to the americans through the switch embassy, ​​which protects the interests of america in tehran, and the americans responded within an hour or two. islamization in these messages, we knew that the americans were mainly responsible, because i said that there is no independent existence for the thirty-law regime, the islamic republic is aimed at the americans, and this must have been done with your permission, and we hold you responsible. and you have to be responsible, so the answer came that i said sorry that we had no responsibility in this story we did not know. and we are looking to reduce the tension in the region, and the islamic republic announced in the first hour in the first message that we will definitely reciprocate and use our legitimate right to defend national interests until the day of the operation . the first message was mainly to invite the iranians to exercise se

council, because in the constitution of ukraine, the national security council is the body,dy, which is mentioned in the presidential institute, because there is no office, secretariat, administration of the president, nothing is said about it there, and the council of national security is really the body that the president, that president who believes in... a collegial decision, that wants to make policy, hear all the arguments there, this is the body that allows the president to gather at the highest level members of the government, politicians and anyone realistically, who the president considers important and influential, and therefore those presidents who are prone to collegial decisions, and we had very few of them, they could use the national security council, the best national security council was constructed... then by volodymyr horbulin, and i with him worked, i tried to return that format of the council, but it is important to understand that the decisions of the national security council come into effect by the decree of the president of ukraine, and if the egos

council and the national security council in particular... were used by presidents as a place where you can sit out, there were two two two places , i remember how many conflicts i had with the president, when a person i didn't send it there parliament, let's take him, and this is the ambition of at least a deputy, then dozens of these deputies avoid this, and the leaders are the secretaries of the national security council, well, we remember that poroshenko, he wrote out such powers so that the late president kravchuk would simply be publicly indignant, because. .. at that time poroshenko during yushchenko's time had more powers than the president, and there were strong distortions, such ambitious people come, but there are other frequent ones. these are the kind of people there, well, we had bagaterova, the head of our security council under yuchenko, ivan plyuch was a certain time, that is, it is people who come and for them the national security council, it is generally not interesting and does not fulfill its functions, the only person who made, as a matter of fact , this

during the first meeting of the national security and defense council of ukraine, the new secretary saidt he would continue the work of his teacher, predecessor in the same post, vladimir gorbulin. after the collapse of the ussr, it was gorbulin who had a critical influence on the reversals of the then kuchma policy on the west, for decades, has been engaged in adjusting the theoretical basis of ukrainian russophobia to suit it. the confrontation with russia is not the past or the present, it is our future, for which we must prepare with all responsibility. through gorbulin, who was an assistant to several ukrainian presidents and secretary of the security council, letvinenko fell into the orbit of us interests as a promising career politician. he was prepared to work in the power unit since his studies in britain, at the royal college of defense sciences in educational institutions in germany and canada. after school, litvinenko, a resident of kiev, entered moscow. to the higher school of the kgb of the ussr, however, over time he chose to hide this fact. in ninety-four he returned to k

thank ou ve national security implication. thank you very much _ national security implication.n. thank you very much for the _ national security implication. thank you very much for the update. - national security implication. thank you very much for the update. i - national security implication. thank you very much for the update. i want to update you on a story. a 20—year—old man has been charged with conducting hostile activities in the uk in order to benefit russia. four others have been charged in connection with the investigation. that is from the crown prosecution service. we have a reaction from the british foreign secretary david cameron, he said he is deeply concerned by allegations of british nationals carrying out criminal act to benefit russia. he said he would use the full weight of the criminaljustice system to find anyone guilty of crimes linked to foreign interference to account. a wide—ranging study says it has found the strongest evidence yet that global conservation efforts are having a positive effect. the authors of the research — published in thejournal,

we have to get through the national-security vote. we have not one national-security vote.t one minute left _ national-security vote. we have got one minute left with - national-security vote. we have got one minute left with each i got one minute left with each of you but also with regards to the trump trial, i wanted to touch on that. the fact that now we have seven jurors seated so far. it was tough to get them selected, what does that say about the polarisation in this country? it say about the polarisation in this country?— this country? it is indicative of what we _ this country? it is indicative of what we see _ this country? it is indicative of what we see across - this country? it is indicative - of what we see across america. half of america thinks donald trump is in is in amount of the charges and half thinks he should be put injail or possibly electrocuted five times. this is where we are in america right now with our polarised environment and frankly when you look at the fact that donald trump is going through a trial right now, it is not in his best interests

council, the secretary of the national security council, always loses, because there were a mber of examples when even some decisions there were formally approved on a real security basis, and this is such a big round table, there are many people who speak, someone keeps the minutes, well, somewhere there something is like in the verkhovna rada it is written to the council, but the final document is issued by the president's office, the president's office, the president's administration, and that's why at some point, danilov probably had this, because danilov went a little into independent swimming, not a little, he is so serious about independent swimming, he is there it became uninteresting, he the maker started working, and it was a matter of time, and it is obvious that on this basis he had problems with yumak, because danilov , most likely, did not agree on his public statements there for the last six months and could have been something else. is a source of influence on the president, who yermak did not like, i think that this, and besides, danilov himself was simply th

council to prepare the bill, then the national security council entrusted it to the state service for ethnopolitics, they prepared it for a very long time, they prepared it, it was so toothless and ineffective, we improved it in the committee, now they are ready for the second reading, i hope it will happen quickly, but does he understand, for example , in your opinion, the current ukrainian... government about the threats posed by not solving this issue, i.e., no matter how the ukrainian orthodox church, headed by onufriy , tried to condemn it, or, let's say, to distance itself from the russian orthodox church church, after all, onufriy still mentions cyril among the patriarchs, orthodox patriarchs, and in this way makes it clear that in principle everything remains in place... only they declared declaratively that they are not part of the russian orthodox church? well, i think that many people understand, at least in our committee, which is headed by the representative of the servant of the people party, mykyta potoraev, and yevgenia kravchuk, who was his deputy, the other repre

national security concept and military doctrine.is behind these documents and why is it important to adopt them now? details watch today immediately after the panorama in the author's program. this is different. a guarantee of security and preservation of peace in the country, a strong army in belarus has begun sending conscripts to the troops, and this is not forced, like militant neighbors, to be ready to defend your home, your family, the duty of every citizen, and the recruits understand this. replenishment is accepted by the connection and the warrior. units of the armed forces, border service and state security agencies and internal troops of the ministry of internal affairs, a total of about 10,000 are planned to be sent to staff in april may conscripts. the recruits will serve as part of the special operation forces of the second guards joint training center for the training of warrant officers and junior specialists of the minsk military commandant’s office. i’m going to the fifth, well, marinagorka, the fifth separate spec

and that national security supplemental.to you more in depth about that and what is happening in your home state in a moment. i have to take a commercial break here. so stay with us. and we hope that all of you will stay with us as we talk as well about the arizona supreme court decision last week that shook the political world. stay with us. ne broker here for the number one hit maker. -thanks for swinging by, carl. -no problem. so what are all those for? uh, this lets me adjust the base, add more guitar, maybe some drums. -wow. so many choices. -yeah. like schwab. i can get full service wealth management, advice, invest on my own, and trade on thinkorswim. you know carl is the only front man you need. (phone rings) oh, i gotta take this, carl. it's schwab. schwab. (feedback rings) have a choice in how you invest with schwab. cordless outdoor power, brings you the ego power+ string trimmer with powerload technology. feed the line, push the button and get back to work. ego, exclusively at lowe's, ace and ego authorized deale

president, heads of security blocs, experts in the field of national security, opinion leaders, themselves shared their thoughts on the importance of preserving the main values ​​on which belarusian statehood is built, which is connected with the urgent need to adopt a military doctrine that eliminates the risk of threat for the next decades, what true patriotism is, who is a patriot? i believe that a patriot is a person who loves his country and is ready for any... we received accreditation to work at the seventh all-belarusian people's assembly 489 journalists, 31 of them were representatives of ten foreign publications, so the media floor covering the events from the palace of the republic was represented not only by allied and partner countries, but also by media from nato states. in addition, one can note the widespread use by domestic and regional correspondents of information dissemination platforms such as the internet and social networks, which has significantly increased the audience. popular for young people, these are tiktok, instagram, but don’t forget what is traditionally cl

alex is a national security reporter at politico and the first anchor of national security daily. previously, alex was the white house and national security reporter at vox. he's an associate director at the atlantic council's scowcroft center on international security, where he worked on military issues and u.s. foreign policy. he's won multiple prestigious awards for his reporting in form part of the team that was recognized as, a finalist for the pulitzer prize. he lives here in washington, d.c., just over the border, washington, d.c. and we're also delighted to have in conversation with alex tonight, natasha bertrand, who's a national security correspondent for ccn, then based in washington, d.c. as well. so let's give it up for alex. natasha, thanks so much for being here. thank you, guys. should i use this migration? okay. thank you guys for coming. i'm super excited to be talking to alex about his great new book, the internationalists. it really does chart the rise. biden's foreign policy team as such that he has around them currently around him, currently. and it does a gr

council, the best the national security council was constructed then.yr horbulin, and i worked with him, i tried to return that format of the council, but it is important to understand that the decisions of the national security council come into effect by the decree of the president of ukraine, and if the ego of the head of the secretariat or the head of the presidential administration and the secretary of the national security council begin to be measured there, the secretary the nsdc always loses, because there were a number of examples when even some decisions there were formally approved by the council. and this is such a big round table, there are many people who speak, someone keeps minutes, well, somewhere there is something, as it is written in the verkhovna rada, but the final document is issued by the president's office, the president's office, the president's administration, and that's why at some point, this probably appeared to danilov, because danilov went a little into independent swimming, not a little, he is so serious into independent

council to prepare the bill, then the national security council... entrusted it to the stateethnopolitics service, they prepared it for a very long time, they prepared it, it was so toothless and ineffective, we improved it in committee, now it's ready for second reading, i hope it will happen quickly, but do you think, for example, that the current the ukrainian authorities about the threats posed by not solving this issue, that is, the ukrainian orthodox church. the church headed by onuphrius did not try to condemn, or, let's say, distance himself from the russian orthodox church, after all, onuphrius still commemorates cyril among patriarchs, orthodox patriarchs, and in this way makes it clear that, in principle, everything remains in those places, only they declaratively declared that they are not part of the russian orthodox church. i think that many people understand, at least in our committee, which is headed by the representative of the servant of the people party, mykyta potoraev, and yevgenia kravchuk, who was your deputy, other representatives of this faction voted