nationstates, but that enhances the benefit of all nationstates. to have the u.k. pullout of that vision is a body blow. nato, the impact is not immediate and is still undetermined. it will have an effect on market certainty, it has created political unease about the unity of the alliance in the future, but the u.k. still stands as a full member of nato. its commitments to nato have not been diminished. the long-term implications of brexit are troubling. will this lead to other countries exiting from the eu? the u.k.the loss of from the eu decision-making affect the perspective of the eu on russia? will the eu become more inward in the absence of a transatlantic perspective or the the u.k. brings? that loss could bleed into nato consensus. what if the u.k. itself divides? that would significantly break up one of nato's most important and capable allies. those would be real setbacks. >> when we return, a look at how the u.s. military is responding to soldiers. you are watching defense news. >> welcome back to defense news. last month, there was a major training exer

the tough part for any nationstate is staying on top of the changes that are occurring internally and externally, education and social services and outreach and basic government support needed for their societies to thrive. i said to my own company went through a bad patch, failed to see the changes but what we have been doing for 50 years was being taken over by others and we would not be able to compete. with corporate growth sank low and had to completely confront every decision we made and what to grow and focus on, same is true of countries and the challenge going forward for those interacting with each other. to pay attention to all of those and act on them. >> what -- >> get your slide back up and messing up, skipping around so much. >> blame it all on me. it is not their fault. >> it is very important for today's topic. 70% of the people that we still -- more than 90% of parts and materials, with local supplies and they average -- 75% in -- produced in north america and 98% were produced here. people don't know the facts, how they are sold or imported and what i would like to

he said we are dealing with the dissipated nationstates. russia, china, even north korea, our biggest concern is that these things classified at that level are in the hands of our adversaries. julian asad was talking about potentially russia has it, that's my biggest fear so there's no doubt director comey said was his biggest concern was the personal email accounts of hers and other world leaders had been compromised. heather: he pointed out specifically that she used her email extensively in those territories and sophisticated actors is what he called them and it's possible the hostile actors did gain access to the clinton accounts . but he says that he didn't expect given the nature of the system that they would be able to assess that, that they would know that information but they did assess that the hostile did gain access to people that clinton email. >> if you listen to john kerry what he said in reading his emails, one of the scenarios i played out almost 10 months to the day during an interview on fox news, i said if that's the cas

i genuinely believe that getting the democratic nationstate, not only europe guaranteed through doing that, but that is the way we stop. >> to wrap up on a more upbeat note, almost every other note is happy for me and not me. i thank you for coming. behind us is the cuyahoga river, with the dark days of pollution in america once actually started on fire. there is a burning record. and shed one and let me know how it is. >> thank you. caught i'm sure i'm [applause] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] >> i want to introduce you to our panel. kevin madden is a longtime republican strategist activist, smart guy. any reporter i know would call cap in that purity is a product of knee-jerk city. it's a fan of the football team in ohio somewhere. he started with the house republicans, worked for john boehner,, worked from that romney is presidential campaign ,-com,-com ma the last i've heard here. >> that's the one that didn't take off. kevin is also the father of three sons and i can attest from the video that one of them has a of a backswing. jamie south is our political cor

responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine whether there are cases of intrusion by nationstates or hostile actors of any kind. i have so far used the singular term e-mail server in describing the referral that began our investigation. it turns out to be more complicated than that. secretary clinton used several different servers and administrated those servers during her four years at the state department. she also used numerous mobile devices to send and read e-mail on the personal domain. as new servers and equipment were employed, old servers were taken out of service and decommissioned in various ways. piecing all of that back together to gain a full understanding in the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work has been a painstaking undertaking. requiring thousands of hours of effort. for example, when one of the servers decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed. that didn't remove the e-mail content but it was like removing the frame from a huge, unfinished jigsaw puzzle and dumping all the pieces on the floor. the effect was that millions o

and then the emergence of new nationstates that are defining themselves, not necessarily as not aligned. seems to me if we think about the black internationalist project, not necessarily as a project of american grand strategy, but a grand strategy for rethinking what the world may look like. you get a different narrative than the one that i think is assumed. >> in one of my footnotes, good to know where i'm heading. i totally buy that. us thing you are encouraging to consider is if we want to use the label grand strategy and look at the forward looking components of it. also looking at the way the grand strategic world is a holistic project. it is also a vision of a reconstruction of the past. it's a long genealogy of who has been involved in africa and how those kinds of competitions have led to the first world war. reorganization of grand strategic knowledge in the past in order to react to an alternative version of the future may be a nice way of putting that. no way meant to imply the black nationalism had no success. we lose the longer trajectory, which is the whole idea embodied

loose consideration of nationstates. it does not work. do notnot recognize and know. and i can tell you, we are going to do our homework. inliament will be ready october. this is based on three reports of the way forward. to be sure of our federalism integration deepening, widening. implementation and all of these other buzzwords at the center of discussion. we are going to go back to the ideas of our funding fathers. it is a challenge. or never. i think the union will change. that is at stake. [applause] >> i think mr. etheridge has a question for you. go ahead. >> thank you. very quickly, i have been confused by comments. are you aware of how british parliament works? what happens is that the leaders of the main parties are all on your side. the people voted the other way. when you say brexit has no clouds, the brexit side is not the government side. that is how our democracy works, served. so when you say these assertions you are missing the point of exactly what a referendum is. >> i was not pointing a finger at the citizens of written. i was pointing the finger's

development of rhetoric and practice amount to a call to diss aggregate, look at those below the nationstate and dictate policies and positions to see how they came about. these are areas in which schaffer has a long approach brought one not always to bear. the third observation about networks suggests a call for connection, another strong point among shaferites. together, these approaches can help us investigate rather than assume the paramountcy of the state even an intergovernmental relations. what i'm suggesting is just one way to study development assistance, but a big tent of approaches. we should join forces, bring to gary a knowledge in domestic politics, study the work of ngo's and states, examined tensions and politics. by doing all of these we can precisely map and explain the world the development made. that world looks very little like the starry eyed proclamations of the leaders of all three cold war world's. those in the donor nations inspected whenever scythians in peace them about the virtues of their respective economic systems. and do so as a means of advancing their own s

i think the top part for any nationstate is staying on top so that they have both the education social services and outreach support and basic government support that is needed for their societies to continue to thrive. as a said my own company came through a bad patch we did not see the changes in the market and realize what we're doing was being taken over by others so we would not be able to compete. we lost almost three years of our corporate quarrel and really sank low and had to completely confront every single decision we made on what to keep and what to grown focus on. the same is true with countries. i think it will be a challenge going forward for all of the nations of the worlds were interacting with each other anyway, the ones that are not shutting down to pay attention to all of those forces and act on them. >> we will get your slide back up. i've been messing up the production here by skipping around so much. >> i would like to touch on our activities here in the united states. >> blame it on me. it's not their fault, it's my fault. >> so it isn't very important to note t

responsibilities, we have also investigated to determine if there is evidence of computer intrusion by nationstates or by hostile actors of any kind. i have so far used the singular term e-mail server in describing the referral that began our investigation. it turns out to have been more complicated. secretary clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her years at the state department. she also used numerous mobile devices to send and read e-mail on that personal domain. as new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored, and decommissioned in various ways. piecing all of them back together to gain as full and understanding as possible of the ways in which personal e-mail was used for government work has been a painstaking undertaking requiring thousands of hours of effort. for example, when one of secretary clinton's servers was decommissioned in 2013, the e-mail software was removed. that did not remove the e-mail content, but it was like removing the frame from a huge unfinished jigsaw puzzle, and then dumping the p

whether or not hillary clinton's private e-mail server had been hacked i bad actors including nationstates as well as terrorists and cyber hacks. what do you think ambassador? >> well he also said that given the sophistication of some of these foreign actors they would expect to find out whether an attempted hacking had taken place so i don't think that was necessarily part of the decision but i think what we saw today was an act of cowardice by fbi director comey. i think his speech this morning was schizophrenic. the first half of it laid out the elements of the offense of the gross negligence in the handling of classified information that justified the indictment and the second half he took it all back. i think he was acting at the prosecutor. i think he feared he rebuffed. there are a lot of considerations that go into it. i think this is a bad day for the protection of american classified information. lou: you from either major jet quickly let's go to rowing north carolina where donald trump is speaking right now about hillary clinton and the fbi directors statement today. >> said the

whether or not hillary clinton's private e-mail server had been hacked i bad actors including nationstates as well as terrorists and cyber hacks. what do you think ambassador? >> well he also said that given the sophistication of some of these foreign actors they would expect to find out whether an attempted hacking had taken place so i don't think that was necessarily part of the decision but i think what we saw today was an act of cowardice by fbi director comey. i think his speech this morning was schizophrenic. the first half of it laid out the elements of the offense of the gross negligence in the handling of classified information that justified the indictment and the second half he took it all back. i think he was acting at the prosecutor. i think he feared he rebuffed. there are a lot of considerations that go into it. i think this is a bad day for the protection of american classified information. lou: you from either major jet quickly let's go to rowing north carolina where donald trump is speaking right now about hillary clinton and the fbi directors statement today. >> said the

steals emails and documents and there are other things in there also that suggest that it was a nationstate behind us, like what? >> well, this is sophisticated tradecraftso when you get into the intelligence world they say how did somebody do it? what's their signature, what their tradecraft . >> mark this reeks of russia for a lot of reasons. if you want to know what's going on, they heard now originally the fbi was involved, this has me nation state sponsored, number one is thesophistication and number two is the time they were on target. they were in there for over a year collecting this information, this was an ongoing intelligence operation so at this point it's not the question of what will be released, it's how much and when . melissa: if they were in more than a year, were they able to leak from that security and from those emails to other places ? >> absolutely and i'll tell you what happened, the same thing that happened with city you will call when hisaccount was exposed . so once you're in there you start seeing if there are people emailing from what health they are using and w

theinternal capital of jewish people and their nationstate, we have lent our silent approval to those wishing to split the city. instead of calling for the u.s. embassy to be moved from tel in fulfillmentem of u.s. law, we remain silent. worse, -- which y.amples the sovereignit with the eyes of the country and wide world upon us, we have arrived at a moment of truth, where we must reckon with our principles and our a. -- and our faith. the republican party base stands with israel. that is not what our platform reflects. platformnds, our endorses the idea, forcing israel to concede vital territory. today, i am presenting platform language that captures the true sentiment of pro-israel supporters, the ideas and principles that transcend partisanship with the input of team ofp's excellent advisors as well as experts from across the spectrum. we have developed a plank that is wise and deliver it in its expression and signs -- and it shines a light on a clear way forward. the false notion that the jewish state is an occupier is an anti-semitic attack upon israel's at legitimacy. is impossi

and those of the overwhelming majority of nationstates at 10 -- refrain from unleashing a menace of such unpredictable consequences and subnational terrorist and to seek such as isil wouldn't have two compunctions in wheeling such a weapon. the scope of the buyer risk is more potential measures are clearlylate last october and the bipartisan reports of the blue-ribbon study panel on by a defense. as with the cyber threat, the international community's response to this issue like behind the technology driving it. effectively countering this danger requires the development of national and international strategies. along with the consensus of the laws, standards, and authorities that would be needed. a cia officers and their intelligence committee colleagues work hard to protect our country, from the darker side of change, we are mindful of how even beneficial advances can have destabilizing of x in the long run. -- effects in the long run. drying from academic studies and elements of the ever-expanding open sourceal information cd offer our national leaders early warning of potential chall

charges is a big deal. >> the fbi director said it is possible that hostile actors meeting other nationstateslinton's email system so that is an issue too. >> we know people receiving those emails were hacked. >> i have to disagree with your assessment. i don't see how this is good news for hillary. our jaws dropped with some of the language he said. i don't see -- smiling about this, i don't think this letter off the hook politically. >> he could have said i could've recommended referral and press charges. he did not. ashley: somebody close to her could get hit with a misdemeanor charge. ashley: it comes down to her. the buck stops with her and she ignored all the rules. ashley: >> package it this way. the director of the federal bureau of intelligence has proven to the world that she lied when she said i never send information marked classified. more than 100 occasions, she did. that is a political vulnerability. >> he was on 7 email chains for sending and receiving classified information. ashley: how much damage does this do? what does donald trump do? he is the master of media attack. he

i genuinely believe getting a euro of democratic nationstates, not only will europe guaranteed doing that being at peace but that is the way we stop real extremism. >> to wrap up, neo-nazis, almost every other note is neo-nazi. i thank you for coming. i would point out behind us is the cuyahoga river, the dark days of pollution of america, once actually started on fire, there is a beer called burning river, let me know how it is. thank you very much. >> got to get out of the way for this. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> now part 2. i want to introduce you, kevin madden is a long time republican strategist, activist, smart guy, not any reporter i know would call him that. he is a product of new york city, fan of the football team in ohio somewhere, he is working with john bain are and mitt romney's presidential campaign. you get to work on that. kevin is also the father of 3 sons and i can attest from the video that one of them has a helluva backswing. jamie is a political correspondent for columbia, south carolina, columbia state, she started at the rock hill harrell in south carolina, covered st

responsibility, we have also investigated to determine if there is evidence of computer intrusion by nationstatesstile actors of any kind. i have so far used the singular term, email server in ascribing this referral that began our investigation. it turns out it's more competent of the net. secretary clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the state department. she also used numerous multiple devices to send and read email on that personal domain. as new servers and equipment were employed, older servers were taken out of service, stored and decommissioned in various ways. piecing all of that back together to gain a solid understanding of possible, the ways in which personal email was used for government work has been a painstaking undertaking, requiring thousands of hours of effort. for example, when one of secretary clinton's servers was decommissioned in 2013, the email software was removed. that didn't remove the email content but it was like removing the frame from a huge unfinished jigsaw puzzle and then dumping all of the pieces o

a loose federation of nationstates based on the unanimity cannot work. that is the reality of today. and you don't recognize it until now. we're going to do our homework. parliament will be ready. in october. on theglobal plan based way forward. not talking about federalism and implementation. all of these other buzzwords. that are in the center of our discussions. we are going to simply go back to the ideas of our founding fathers. that is what we have to do. it is that challenge now or .ever i think the union will change or it will die. [applause] >> i've been confused by your statements. are you aware of how british parliamentary democracy works? the leaders of the main parties were all supporters of the you. the people voted the other way. when you say the brexit side has no plan. the brexit side is not the government. the government has to change to allow a new prime minister to work out a plan to carry through the plan. you are missing the point of what an referendum actually is. >> i was absolutely not pointing the finger to the citizens of britai

this is very interesting because it disappeared, especially in europe where the nationstates disappear with me and you. politics is very important and accepting refugees. what do you think about how will it happen an impact arise if right and how it's being seen and to if tom and that issue is theirs. >> well, this morning without the first right-wing president in the state by 49.7 and the green candidate one. this is a very concrete phenomenon. how strong it has become recently and what will happen in the next elections.th you can not acknowledge that on the last dish part of public opinion in my country, i always find that people have obviously a problem except democracy breaks things like that. in democracy you have to respect it the boat vote for those parties. i can speak only for my country. we have of course clear rules. they have or can't do tuition and red lines that you cannot hl cross. but within those headlines of the con to tuition, people have of course the right to vote the party they think represents their political beliefs. if you call yourself a democracy, you have to

after that, jj mesmeric talks talks about the most fragile nationstates around the world. ♪ host: goodorning on this holiday weekend. it is july 3. we will talk about the latest turns on the road to the white house. we will also break down a new report on fragile nations in the world. unifyinglso talk about patriotism in these united states. hillary clinton and donald trump have toured through the rust belt to talk about jobs and the economy. ohio, michigan, illinois and wisconsin are being viewed as the

responsibilities we have also investigated to determine if there is evidence of computer intrusion by nationstatesstile actors of any kind. i have so far used the singular term email server in describing the referral that began our investigation. it turns out to be more complicated than that. secretary clinton used several different -- different servers and administrated those servers during four years at the state department and also use numerous mobile devices to send and read email on the personal domain. new servers and equal were deployed, older servers had taken out of service stored and decommissioned in various ways. piecing all of that back together, to gain is full an understanding as possible of the ways in which personal email was used for government work has been a painstaking undertaking requiring thousands of hours of effort. for example, one of secretary clinton's servers was decommissioned in 2013, the email software was removed. that didn't remove the email content, but removing the frame by an unfinished jigsaw puzzle and dumping all the pieces on the floor. the effect was milli

i generally believe that the democratic nationstate not only will they guarantee to doing that i think that is the way we stopped real extremism. >> to wrap up on a more upbeat note i would just think you very much for coming i would point out behind us is the river. they actually had it start on fire. there is a beer here called the river. thank you. [applause]. following the remarks republican strategist took part in a panel discussion with newspaper reporters about campaign 2016 and 2016 and overall impressions of this week's convention. i want to introduce you to him. kevin madden is a long time republican strategist, activist smart guy he is a product of new york city and he is a fan of a football team in ohio somewhere. he worked for mitt romney's campaign. with the last effort here. kevin is also the father of three sons and i can attest from the video that one of them has one hell of a backswing. they started in upstate south carolina. she has covered stories in succulent politics from senator races, presidential primaries and of course the charleston shooting last year. and po

people who want to live in democratic nationstates that cooperate together.xt-door neighbors. we need to cooperate. we are living in the same time zone. there are lots of things we need to do. the idea that you should surrender rights to an institution in brussels is ridiculous. i think there will be big pressure for a referendum in denmark. we could get dexit. i think there's a chance of a referendum in the netherlands. we could get nexit. sexe get sweden it could be it. >> i set that right up for you. what about nato? donald trump has called it obsolete. are we going to start seeing disentanglement from other alliances like military annoyances? lliances? >> nato has problems with definitions. it was very clear what it was for during the cold war. in terms of nato and anglo-american relations and the decisions we are now in a much better position than we were before our independence day. because increasingly we were seeing the european union foreign all see developing in a way where we stop speaking as a nation in many parts of the world. we allowed the eu t

after that, jj mesmeric talks talks about the most fragile nationstates around the world. ♪ host: goodorning on this holiday weekend. it is july 3. we will talk about the latest turns on the road to the white house. we will also break down a new report on fragile nations in the world. unifyinglso talk about patriotism in these united states. hillary clinton and donald trump have toured through the rust belt to talk about jobs and the economy. ohio, michigan, illinois and wisconsin are being viewed as the keys the that could sway the presidential election. we begin our program this morning asking what is the best way to bring jobs back to the rest else and -- to the rust belt and who do you trust to do that? you can also catch up with us on social media. on twitter. on facebook. a very good sunday morning to you. we begin talking to viewers in ust belt aboutr the best way to bring back jobs. the young -- the unemployment rate in this region is different. 6.7 percent. in ohio, 5.1%. indiana, 5%. michigan, 4.7%, the national rate. with those numbers in mind, the leading candidates for the

classified information as classified to get out into the public is not very fact is, nationstates dorm to this country and their are people who put their lives on the line attacking serving our country. windows communication are not secure, it puts their lives in jeopardy. this classified information is in trust me to very few. but there is such a duty and obligation to protect back, took all your sword to protect that. and yet, there doesn't seem to be any consequence. i was talking to trey gaudi and he made a really good point but that's yesterday. he said, you know, in your statements, mr. or, you mentioned that there was no precedent for this, but we believe you have set a precedent and it's a dangerous one. if you sloppily deal with classified information, if your cavalier about it. it wasn't just an innocent mistake. this went on for years, that there's going to be no consequence. we are a different nation and the united states of america. most nations would never do this. we do it in the spirit of making ourselves better. there will be all kinds of accusations about political

we have adversaries, nationstates.ironment is totally walled off for the --ernment's ability to pair the debate that was raging between the fbi and others in terms of act to data on a mobile device, you can put on a mobile device now, information and data that will take it to many different warehouses in terms of tech, photos, other types. instrumental, and also give us an eye into what devastating attack we might be hastening. we let individual companies decide what the government should and shouldn't be able to have access to. the bank has a safety deposit boxes and a judge issues a warrant. the bank is obligated to open that up. i know people refer to back door and other things. i am empathetic to jim komi and others that they would need to find a way to optimize privacy and the liberties and security of that environment. and at the same time, allow the fulfill itso responsibility to care for the american people. i don't think there has been an honest discussion about this issue. we will set up at the beginning of t