that makes us nativist. when should be able to have a rational discussion about an immigration system that helps this country or not. john: to new hampshire here. ted cruz is there criticizing the spca and the government's bureaucrat i can approval process. >> the medical device and drug approval process is so cumbersome. i think that's immoral. if you are facing alive-threatening disease you should be able to try any medicine that may help save your life. >> whatever he is doing, it's working. >> for some people who poo-poo these innovative medicines saying it will only give someone with terminal cancer 3 months more of their life. you can on poo-poo it if it's not you tore your mother, son or husband. >> that must be covered under the pursuit of happiness under the constitution. john: it's my body, i ought to be able to do with it what i want. people say there are libertarians in the live free or die state. but rand paul who scares me least because he's libertarianish doesn't poll well there. >> you have g

also, civil war might be breaking out in sweden between migrants and nativist gangs.ppen in america? up ahead. royer with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo opens up airways to help improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems and may increase the risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take breo more than prescribed. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. ask your doctor if 24-hour breo could be a missing piece for you. see if you're eligible for 12 months free at mybreo.com. the obama state department. bill, that's what's c

ninativ nativist in immigration and trade.tuesday stronger than the current one. an establishment back then apparently had more trust from its base. fast forward 20 years, donald trump is going to south carolina as the clear favorite. obvious favorite in the s.e.c. primaries that soon follow. this man the possible nominee of the republican party has done the following. explicitly called for the murder of families of terrorists, one assumes that would be women and children. explicitly calling for barring of muslims who are not u.s. citizens from entering the u.s. until the country can, quote, figure out what is going on. that's a proposal with which 2/3 of new hampshire republicans agree according to exit polling. a man whose adversarial stance toward protesters has led him to joke about them being roughed up at his events and experienced violence at several of his events. one day before the primary a man who called his opponent, ted cruz, because cruz was full throated in his support of waterboarding which is torture. undernea

they've mored toward a very xenophobic, nativist territory with donald trump at the front. >> let's goie sanders is now coming out swinging at hillary clinton and swinging at trump. is this new strategy going to get him any more votes? >> he's really having some trouble looking towards super tuesday. doesn't look good for him. and i think just beating expectations may not be enough. there's a lot of delegates that are being handed out on tuesday and hillary clinton looks very strong to get a lot of them when they leave you know when they hit wednesday morning his path looks a lot slimmer than it did maybe a few months ago. >> one quick question, hillary clinton the last batch of e-mails are about to come out today. is this going to hurt her or is everybody over this? >> i think it actually might help because she gets to stop talking about them for a little bit and i think bernie sanders hit the nail on the head. people are a little tired about talking about hillary clinton's e-mails. >> well, jane timm i thank you so much for your insight on this. it's always a pleasure to have you. >>

there are people that think maybe he does not want to alien ail the fan base that are white nativists. i don't see trump as a bigot. i don't see it. >> there is no there, there, just them trying to get some points is do what they can but this is politics. get something like that you will ride the horse all the way to the barn. that is what they are trying to do. i don't know he is a racist or a bigot or supports the kkk or david duke. he said david duke, okay, he endorsed me i was not aware. i disavow, next question. >> there is work to be done, super tuesday for a reason and that is why we are here now going wall to wall. a lot to cover as far as states coming up and who will take this. it is everything at stake. >> this is too big, race in america especially now before the southern primaries i don't think he can use that behavior. >> what kind? >> you close your eyes and say you don't want me to disavow someone i don't know about. >> but he did. >> but you are talking about something a while back. >> open friday. >> we did not produce --. >> in this moment --. >> disavowed in a mome

just -- it's nativist, and it's anti-muslim, but it has enormous implications for our relations in the middle east and with china. >> the 50,000 feet -- >> i'm not ready to coronate trump just yet, because of the way you described buchanon. but if you add up all the establishment figures, rubio, bush, john kasich, he would be at 46% tonight. so that would be a winning number tonight. i think what we're staring at here is, look, cruz wins iowa, he established himself as the religious conservative. sort of the movement conservative. however you want to describe it. the true blue tea party, plus evangelical. that is worth a third plus of the party. donald trump is carving out this populist wing of the party that i think he has done different than buchanon, buchanon sort of found it here but he has grown it. that is serving as about a third of the party. we're going to look -- we still have to figure out who will be from the governing wing of the party. the new hampshire, they want the governing wing, a person with political experience, that is what south carolina will serve at. and when w

establishment mainstream whatever you call it for rubio, and the strange third group of populus nativistsor trump. are those the three categories? >> that sounds right. and rubio is certainly -- he is leading in the group it is most lucrative to be leading in. you would like to be his finance chairman in the week after iowa. there's a tendency to report it's over because he's leading in the most lucrative lane. he has to dominate quickly and persuade others to exit soon and graciously. he has is on persuade jeb bush not to use his remaining $50 million of super pac money to destroy rubio in the way they've been doing until now. he has to find a way to get donald trump to exit the stage without smash all the scenery on the way off the set. >> what do you think of rubio? when you look at him from your perspective, does he seem more moderate? >> a short time ago, he wassed the tea party moderator. now he's the establishment figure. i see a dangerous vessel for the neo-con forces which have damaged our country around him. i think his youthful exuberance masks regressive and old policies. grea

help humans to basically reach their potential for the most joy and prosperity in a more populist nativist parties movement that basically is for protectionism and wants to build walls and essentially become a a european style white identity politics and that's what i'm hoping we don't get to because i fear we could be headed to a direction where our politics is no longer decided based on ideas or philosophy but it becomes essentially what tribe are you in and so if you are a college graduate or minority, you just automatically are assigned democratic and if you are a working class white person you just reflectively become a republican and i think the politics should be about ideas and we should have this debate about ideas and you shouldn't -- identity politics shouldn't define your political persuasion. >> host: that's what liberalism says. >> guest: i know and that's the sad part is in many ways. there's there is a conservative argument that says they do it, too or we have to fight fire with fire but i reject that thread why should we emulate the worst liberalism? >> host: i want to be

help humans to basically reach their potential and enjoy the most prosperity, and a pour populist, nativist party/movement that basically is for protectionism, wants to build walls, and essentially becomes i think ben dominnage said a european style white identity politics party. that what i'm 0 hoping we don't get to. i fear we could be headed to a direct where politics is no longer decide based on ideas philosophy. it becomes essentially where -- what tribe are you in? and if you're a college graduate or a minority you just automatically are assigned a democratic card and if you are a working class white person, you just reflexively become a republican, and i think that politics should be about ideas and have this vigorous debate about ideas and you shouldn't -- identity politics should not define, your identity should not define your political persuasion. >> host: that's what liberalism says. let's let them -- >> guest: i know. the sad part in many ways we're aping liberalism and there's a conservative argue. that says they do it, too, and we have to fight fire with fire. but not reject

primary where all of these candidates are going into the south where a lot of these nativist appealss something we haven't necessarily seen in other contests where the front-runners go through the south. so it's going to be interesting, i think, over these next couple of days where the rhetoric goes from these top candidates. >> i know reince priebus, rnc chairman has asked mr. trump dial it back, so far unsuccessfully. we'll see how that goes. the trup effect on race other than the presidential contest gets its first big test tuesday. a few incumbents facing primary challenges are quite nervous because trump is attracting through voters in their districts and these new faces are seen as much more likely to back tea party challengers than establish incumbents. the chamber of commerce, for example, spent money in alabama's first and second congressional districts trying to help the incumbents, bradley bi byrne and martha roby. just this past week, kevin brady of hus was described as having last-minute jitters about the effect on his primary. as if tuesday wasn't interesting enough alr

humans to basically reach their potential and the most joy, the most prosperity and a more populist nativist party that baseically wants to build walls. and, essentially, becomes as i think has been said, a european-style white identity politics party. >> right. >> and that's what i'm really hoping we don't get to. i fear we're heading in a direction where our politics is no longer decided on ideas or philosophy, it becomes, essentially, what tribe are you at? if you're a college graduate or a minority, you just automatically are assigned a democratic card -- >> right. >> and if you are a working class white person, you just reflexively become a republican. and i think that politics should be about ideas and we should have this vigorous debate about ideas, and you shouldn't -- identity politics should not define, your identity should not define your political persuasion. >> yeah. i mean, that's what liberalism does. let's let them. >> i know. and that's the sad part, is in many ways we are aping liberalism. >> right. >> there's a conservative argument that says, well, they do it too. we have

context of the depression that filipino dependence -- the american projection -- protectionists and nativist'swho become those pushing for philippine independence. >> i will take the prerogative to answer my own question. ways where this could best -- this election clearly emboldened wilson. what is he bring 200 people to paris and no prominent republicans. a surprising win in 1916 holding a 12 seat majority in the senate the managing to get a 12 seat majority in the house is part of that process will stop using bold and through the process so it has real effect on how diplomacy plays out. how the u.s. enters the war matters a lot. particularly if you study ideas about isolationism and internationalism. it always strikes me as important. u.s. did not enter as an ally of any nation in the world. the u.s. entered as an associate power. it's essentially not accrue until 1949 that the u.s. had binding collective security agreements in which the u.s. would fight under the flags of other nations. but the u.s. comes in to world war i on its own terms unilaterally. that explains a lot about how this p

in the context of depression that philippine independence becomes -- american protectionists and nativists are those who are pushing for philippine independence. >> i'll take my prerogative to answer a little of my own question. i think there's two ways that world war i or the comments that have been made so far -- if we're thinking about or trying to teach some of wilson's errors later, i think a surprising win in 1916, holding a 12-seat majority in the senate, managing to get a narrow majority in the house is part of that process. he's emboldened through the political process and therefore has real consequences in the diplomacy and the way the diplomacy plays out. this isn't 1916. how the u.s. enters the war i think matters a lot. particularly if you study ideas about isolationism and internationalism. the u.s. did not enter as an ally of any nation in the world. the u.s. entered as an associate power. it's essentially not true until 1949 and the u.s. joining nato that the u.s. had binding collective security agreements that the u.s. would find around the flags of other nations. the u.s.

there are people that think maybe he does not want to alien ail the fan base that are white nativistsi don't see trump as a bigot. i don't see it. >> there is no there, there, just them trying to get some points is do what they can but this is politics. get something like that you will ride the horse all the way to the barn. that is what they are trying to do. i don't know he is a racist or a bigot or supports the kkk or david duke. he said david duke, okay, he endorsed me i was not aware. i disavow, next question. >> there is work to be done, super tuesday for a reason and that is why we are here now going wall to wall. a lot to cover as far as states coming up and who will take this. it is everything at stake. >> this is too big, race in america especially now before the southern primaries i don't think he can use that behavior. >> what kind? >> you close your eyes and say you don't want me to disavow someone i don't know about. >> but he did. >> but you are talking about something a while back. >> open friday. >> we did not produce --. >> in this moment --. >> disavowed in a moment

a nativist message, very fearful but it does resonate. >> if he wins big in new hampshire then i guessuffled again. or has something fundamentally changed last night? >> i think fundamentally changed is that marco rubio has becomes the establishment candidate. >> don't tell that to john kasich, chris christie. they think they will be the establishment candidate in new hampshire. >> all right. got a little intimidating there for a minute when you tole me. >> don't mention that. i don't know how young say that so definite live i after iowa. >> my view is that rubio outperformed in iowa. he was viewed as highly electable. he could attract social conservatives and more moderate republicans in a state like iowa. don't forget rubio comes of age as the tea party favorite. now he's seen as the mr. establishment. he can draw from ted cruz. the reality look, i think you are right. if you are jeb bush, kasich or christie. you are going to say new hampshire is my chance to take a stand and i'm going to go for it. and they are going to go for it. i think that helps trump here and hurts rubio. so we

not matter, but the white culture and preservation of what they saw as a nationalist attitude or nativista guy who can win it for him and putting religion and faith aside. that's what a cynical person would say about what you're describing here. >> these things are wrapped together. so if you believe that the best thing for america is for a kind of conservative christian moral outlook, to be -- to kind of rule the day, and to kind of be dominant in the culture, then this is not cynical at all. this is actually in a kind of round about way, pushing for values. it means they don't need a person who they identify with at the top of the ticket leading the charge. now, this is actually caused some factions within white evangelicals as a whole. so we're going to see this battled out. >> yeah, and what's interesting and to your point, it's like when you have a donald trump who is on stage at a gop debate and he says there are good things from planned parenthood, ted cruz tries to hit him on that. that does not work. ted cruz brings up his lifelong adult position on abortion. now, donald trump sa