i mean, what is the future of nato? it's had a brick wall with the crane and you're like, and i think we're all in agreement. you claim will never be a member of that alliance. rush, it will not allow it. that's why we have the complex there now young. and i think what they are doing now is to substitute the word minimum, which is very clear in the treaty with or not substituted. but i expand that into what they called pa, those and now i think 139500 is on all the, you know, boss of the world. and you know, they are thinking now planning to set up an h will office in japan all this and i think this is an extremely important point. what made to dollars today is not in the photos with its founding treaty. it's in that sense and the legal activity outside on that started with the bombing of yugoslavia $99.00. absolutely, absolutely. well, what it is, is it is the hang on, hang on, hang on. we gotta have to go to a hard break. and after that hard break, we'll continue our discussion on the nato. so i'm gonna stay with our

i mean, what is the future of nato? i'd say the brick wall with the crane and you'd like, and i think we're all in agreement. you kind will never be a member of that alliance rush. it will not allow it. that's why we have the comm click there now young. and i think what they are doing now is to substitute the word minimum, which is very clear in the treaty with or not substitute it. but i expand that into what they called pa those. and now i think 139500 is on all the box, you know, box. so the world and, you know, they are thinking now planning to set up in an h will office in japan all this and i think this is an extremely important point. what made to dollars today is not in the photos with its founding treaty. it's in that sense and the legal activity outside on that started with the bombing of yugoslavia $99.00. absolutely, absolutely. well, what it is is it is the hang on, hang on, hang on. we're going to have to go to a hard break. and after that hard break, we'll continue our discussion on the nato summit. stay

nobody trusts nato people. question why didn't even have nato at this point? it's only causing problems and, you know, people are saying that the premiums wanna join. they don't, they don't even have to join at this point because it's already that the west is acting as if they're already part of nato. so there are hardy putting troops on the ground. busy scenario from several countries, not just ukraine fighting russia. it's every one fighting russia yet again, i'm so glad. lucas brought that up because defacto ukraine is already a member of nato. but without the article 5 guaranteed, i mean the washington must be popping champagne bottles everyday. so the equations are willing to die, but we don't have to protect them. that's is amazing. and the arms about producers are making tons of money. i mean, this is the, the best possible outcome because the, the usaa is no obligation. other than to watch, you know, the ukraine grind itself into, into ashes. it's remarkable that they've been able to get an elite and ukraine to go along with this. and even more remarka

but, you know, everyone should read the article one of the treaty, nato con nato, as an organization, under its own roles cannot get involved in military complex using force. its members must use diplomacy and negotiations. nobody reads the 1st article and i'm going to agree with the mirror and complete violation of their own. and treaty go ahead, misty. indeed, yes, and i think that it's a how to smile there as you were saying that out loud because it's a curious to me that they don't ever actually follow that to it. i hope that you're correct and that this is going to be the graveyard for nato. i think that nato has it's long overdue for it to have been abolished. and we're, as we're seeing the situation in ukraine play out, it seems as if you may be correct. i think that you, they are going to suffer a very strategic defeat here. and it is going to be very difficult for them to spend that in a positive direction for nato. and i think that that is something that they are trying to contend with. now i think that there's probably a little bit of panic behind the scenes. they're trying

combat capability of nato . give nato some new task in the conditions when the soviet union ceased to exist as a treaty organization and there was talk that maybe nato's mission was completed. states in the nineties , the idea was very popular that the problem should be solved bypassing the united nations. and here is the very model of international law. this is the idea of ​​respect for state sovereignty. she came into conflict with by the practice of ex-territoriality or by such more ordinary language law long arms that the united states of america this policy wanted to carry out for them, but right along the edward halle tokar the sovereignty of other states. seen as an obstacle to the fullest possible realization of their goals and objectives, and the law acted where it was convenient, otherwise, they wanted to bypass the mechanism. he is one side one vote. this model prevented them from implementing it, and global governance with the help of convenient formats for choosing convenient institutions and such c

it seems to me that this is really not the direction that nato should go.need to work on this and we will also change this false narrative of today's position of the alliance countries. by the way, the people's deputy of the country mykola knyazhytskyi wrote on his facebook page about what he said, what picture is created after this information that nato trades in our territories and offers us to give them up, the ukrainian government boldly defends them, in fact, a nato official said that he knows that negotiations are already underway to give up the territory, this is a matter exclusively for ukraine, but even if someone decides to do it, ukraine should still become a member of nato , well, that is, mykola knyazhytskyi says that, in fact, there are no such negotiations and this is not the official position of the north atlantic alliance, but let's go back to the july nato summit and ukraine's participation, ukraine wanted to receive an invitation to join the north atlantic alliance, but we were told that there is a certain procedure and there is an adapte

i'm not going to say ukraine, because this is nato's war now. so nato is losing. okay. and it's getting desperate . i think you probably heard of lindsey graham and richard blumenthal talking about is a senate resolution that if any kind of new killer action is happens at that plant, it would be a trigger. a article 5 we action by nato. remarkably blumenthal said, this is, you know this, this is not a move out of desperation or panic. well then, why did he use the words desperation and panic? ok. it shows to me that they are moving up the escalation latter. your thoughts, lucas? yes. anyone's going to do a false flag, it's going to be nato and the ukrainians, or some other people doing it like north stream pipeline. you know, all these other things that i mentioned, this aspiration of their duty during the bombing of the crimea bridge. this is all a, this is a sign of someone losing a war. the russians are not doing these kinds of things are not assassinating. people are not sabotaging anything. like i mentioned the dan before. so if there's a false flag, it's been a 10

the norwegian secretary general of nato, has been a key advocate of nato enlargement. in europe, from the start, your sources attack on ukraine is more than the tackle. new crane is that is a devastating horrendous attack on the innocent people in ukraine, but is also an attack on the holes if you'd a pin security order. and that's the reason why we take it so it experiences. stilton bread also regularly travels to stock home to meet with the swedish defence, administer polo the own son, and offer his support for the country's efforts to join me to some a aerial, to open book. that's that the can you get the through the shows the outbreak of war on february 24th. it's been clear that russia is prepared to take major military and political risk and we have to be prepared for that. next of that, one thing we've learned from this war is that if you want to have access to article 5 to nato's defense guarantees and noodles defense planning, you have to be a full member of nato just because on the i think the most, some of my food in vidalia nieto headquarters in brussels. a

nato has been restored. nato no longer pays attention to the russian federation.no longer says that russia can be a certain partner in the mutual relations of europe , for example, or the euro-atlantic community and russia, but in the meantime, everyone is aware that ukraine must win the war to become, accordingly, i will even say so not just a member of nato, but a key member of nato because the greatest experience in war will be only in ukraine and over the last centuries, in fact, yes , you can count 80 years, you know what it is in general it's a strange situation, just not everyone is fully aware of it. look, there are many theories about how to fight, but few have experience in war, so we have a paradoxical situation when we use weapons effectively, nato weapons. that is, we re-equip the army on the march during active hostilities. but again, er, only ukraine today can use these weapons in synchronization of different manufacturers, and that is, even with this experience, we are entering nato, but mr. mykhailo, i would like to go back as long as we are talki

this terrorist attack, namely in no one has tested the military sense of nato, and now in nato and politicianse puzzling over what it actually means that ukraine, which was considered a part of the russian world by many a few years ago until the 14th. and for me, the main conclusion of this plot is that the west will continue to help us, and the west has discovered ukrainians in ukraine, but it is not enough for us. it is important for the west to raise the stakes, for the west to do more, and for us to win, it is not enough for the west to do that what he does and how he does it as well as not. it is important for us to show the western world that all geopolitics have changed and ukraine will never again be the part of a russian mayor as some believed in africa. and in fact it will not be part of the gray zone and if it happens in the center of europe there will be some variation , god forbid, not definlandization. and what does this mean when there will continue to be various discussions , reasonable and tame, but nevertheless, discussions instead of actions about the security model for ukra

a war not launched by nato, the. what's the effect on the tons of this mission if russia succeeds in ukraine, this will not be the final attack. because we have to make this clear to russia to vladimir putin squished you off with a jump to speaks with him from time to time. but i don't think it's possible to reach him. at least he's behaving like a map on his box. and yet, he's also responsible for the death of many thousands of russian soldiers so that i'm saving homeless, the 12 as a kind of push this to get. and i don't think the world will end in the near future to form. and i don't see a winner emerging in the near future either. that's why it's so important that we did not stop setting an example in our support for ukrainians to to didn't quite units is that the is now with us has reached us. you'll just you lose your last name, but it's important that we don't delude ourselves, that there will be an easy way out to somebody else in the short term. and possibly not even in the museum time is the underlying ques

of provocation can provoke a crisis within nato, when some nato members may not support the activationn the west of 2017, they were developing such plans, including, for example, in the area of ​​the same osvalsky famous corridor between poland and the baltic countries , it is also possible to carry out such a provocation , they thought, precisely between kolingrad and belarus and to create conditions when nato will not support, that is, not all nato countries will support the operation against russia and then nato will begin to weaken and maybe even collapse, but the further it goes , the more successful the ukrainian army is, ukraine opposes russia, nato is getting stronger in its understanding that russia should not be feared and that russia, on the contrary, should be brought to a state where it will not be able to have sufficient military capabilities sufficient military capabilities to oppose nato and generally threaten the democratic world i think that even this is the last case when the ukrainian forces have already announced that it was ukrainian weapons that struck 700 km awa

the myth is that nato is a defense alliance. if there was no nato, would there be a war? contrary to the international laws of yugoslavia, there was the bombing of civilians and television transmitters, as well as the chinese embassy. if it wasn't for nato, we would have seen 20 years of war in afghanistan with the summoning of civilian ships and the commission of many war crimes. do you call these actions the second year ? is that nato has introduced an alliance based on democracy and the rule of law. this description in the month is an obvious historical lie, which reminds us of portugal , a member of nato, with honor v, 30 years of brutal continuous fire in africa, only in the last 20 years. four and a half million people lost their lives due to the warmongering of the united states and its allies. this dark and sad statistic is related to the famous university called america . meanwhile, guantanamo prison and torture center and so on it is established, and on the other hand, julian assange is waiting for 175 years in prison in the united states. he exposed the war bet

there will be something in nato. maybe something will happen.fly to the territory of the russian federation. there are things that are very difficult to predict now, but we definitely need the alliance to stop being an alliance of the frightened. and finally, they understood that they need ukraine in nato, russia wants less and continues to dominate the information space of the middle east country, they mostly adhere to neutrality without joining western sanctions because they protect their own economic interest. if there is an opportunity to involve more in any cooperation, it can be the defense industry , it can be e - is again partially joining the sanctions or at least blocking the channels for circumventing european sanctions, this can be expert diplomacy that affects the processes of political decision-making in these countries in ukraine need to be very actively involved, the expert is stealing to find a unique approach to these states, taking into account their pragmatism and national interests. the arab emirates and saudi arabia have al

to russia , ukraine has already reacted to such proposals , so can this statement be perceived as nato's position, how likely is such a scenario , let's continue to speak chinese the minister of defense came to russia for the second time this year, came to a security conference in moscow and is going to visit belarus, meanwhile, in turkey , putin's arrival to the country is already announced in the coming days and this may be the first visit to a nato member country in the last one and a half years, will erdoğan manage to agree with putin on the restoration of the grain agreement and what did the chinese minister come to russia to discuss? the details of the document were published by people's deputy yaroslav zheleznyak, critics of the bill believe that it will only simplify the production of materials with sexual violence against women, so why do the deputies think that such the law is needed and that it will be in time, we will discuss what is happening in ukraine, what is the situation at the front, we talk every weekday from 9:00 here on youtube on the radio freedom channel and on th

well, skabeev and solovyov also uh , they just talk about the topic of nato . let's see a fragment of solovyov's program. he said exactly a strong operation and preparation of a natask a strong operation. i think we can learn it with our plans . on in practice, no one has yet checked this, of course, they haven’t decided that notebooks will save them, they don’t have a chase system, and not everything they had was given to ukraine. it’s not enough. they are now united. germans and frenchmen, frenchmen who kicked their ass in africa. so they won't stop. they won't stop society for niko . soldiers from the organization. when the half-americans , russia is the best exporter of two products : weapons and fear. that's what they can do. that's it. to instill fear and try to convince the europeans there that it is better for you not to get into a war with russia at all. well, of course, the weapons they don't have are quite good, but they are trying to convince now the head of the salt that the weapons that are in nato are, uh, not very good cool and it is also on fir

country, nato members, but i will say that it is in our interests.t is he doing now? i would not waste time in the ukraine nato council, and the same council was created. we have already done it once. initiated with gathering, but well, we have gathered what we need to initiate a decision that starting now, the month of august, to prepare nato military convoys, sea and air, to accompany the commercial shipping of the territory to the sea and then through the straits of the mediterranean sea, this is entirely in the interests of all nato member countries that are our neighbors and where are they, most of them are our partners in the anti-putov coalition , i mean turkey, i mean romania, and i mean bulgaria. i think that the president of turkey erdoğan agreed with putin that the one with a visit already in august is planning to go to turkey. i think that the president of turkey can and wants to use this visit by putin in order to, among other things, prove the position that the black sea countries will in any case protect their trade and blackmail the t

ukraine is to investigate the immediate entry of the nato military alliance. this proxy war actually shows a kind of commitment of the nato military alliance to the direct participation of the united states and germany against russia , which, of course, must be prevented under the conditions when it comes to nato, better than the following myth. a defense alliance is proposed. if there was no nato , would there be a war against the international laws of yugoslavia against iran, civilians and tv transmitters, as well as the chinese embassy? if there was no nato , we would have witnessed twenty years of war with the summoning of civilian ships and the commission of many war crimes. we reject the name of these measures. it is the second year that nato has introduced itself based on democracy and the rule of law. this description is about an obvious historical lie that reminds us of portugal, a member of nato, the persian regime of arash and that war. the brutal continuous fire in africa makes only in the last 20 years, 4 million people lost their lives due to the

but what does the new naval doctrine mean for nato? the, yeah, but listen, is this, and with russia it doesn't really matter whether there is a new don't train or an old one because russian makes up the same rules as it goes along. there's no consistency is the only constant is that they are again, that western values via freedom wouldn't be safe, tried everything in the power to one to mine corporation, within nato and within the european union. but with the majority innovation, it's gonna take now change the exact opposite, i don't, i would guess, but some people in putin's in a circle are rubbing that always in disbelief. and when i didn't think they expected, this has happened to me because i said, but russia has another key bargaining chip, colleen and rod, according to russian threats, nuclear weapons will be waiting here for the west end tomato. colleen and crowd was once a part of the former province of each prussia. then it was called clinics back and was occupied in 1945 by the soviet union. as the crow flies, it's just 500 k

he is not nato's eastward expansion.e absolutely proceeds from the fact that, in general, the expansion of nato is a way to ensure american dominance in the european space and reduce other threats. at the same time, these are often many american figures. they say that the georgians themselves want to join nato, that is the soft soft power mechanism is used first on the grudinsky population, the georgian youth convinces that the only way is in a bright future. e through european integration. and where there is european integration, there is integration into nato , including for the protection, so to speak, of the russian destructive. and the influence, that is, and nato and the united states actually seemed from the obligations that they gave mikhail to gorbachev and continued to expand even after the baltic countries of the visegrad group were accepted, they aimed at ukraine and georgia , the united states in the post-soviet space, as such , there was no verified strategy at that moment, they were guided by the fact that

and the members of nato and the west in in the form of allies who support us.hat we have no truer allies than these countries and these organizations. could there be better allies in theory? everything is possible, but at this moment in time, without an intervention, we would not be able to resist and it would not be about any conversations. hyperbolized there, the territory, the territory, the exchange for the membership of ukraine, we didn’t exist now. we were just a guerrilla war with whatever forces we had , looted, blown up arsenals and unpurchased ammunition, this is strictly the truth of life, i don’t think there’s anything wrong with that at this stage, we receive some kind of betrayal on the part of nato , in no way, moreover, the fulfillment by the ukrainian authorities of all items on the agenda of obtaining membership will lead us to the 14th organization, so in the history of nato there are different situations, there is a memory of the western and eastern germany, which joined later than you, remembers the conflict between turkey and greece, but a

public discussion in the norwegian city of arendal, jensen said that ukraine can be accepted into natofter it renounces part of its territories . the spokesman immediately reacted to this statement oleg nikolenko, mfa of ukraine, noting that similar statements of western partners only play into the hands of the russian federation and that the alliance and ukraine do not trade territories, war or negotiations are difficult and the bloody counteroffensive of the ukrainian army puts ukraine's allies in a dilemma: to continue military support for kyiv until the liberation of a large part of the territory or to push kyiv to negotiate, a real scandal broke out this week around the statement of the chief of staff of the nato secretary general, zsian jensen , who prayed that ukraine could become a member of the alliance if it renounces part of the occupied territories, i think it is possible the solution for ukraine could be to give up the territory it receives in exchange for nato membership. decision, these words provoked a violent reaction from official kyiv, because they understand that th

i mean, that's, i know that sounds quite severe, but i'm sorry, but then, but nato again, nato has proven itself absolutely unreliable. and dishonest. well, let's talk about the reasoning why this is being said, because it's kind of interesting doesn't need a suggestion for ukraine to give up land to russia somehow show that perhaps kids counter offensive has largely been a failure. that yes, i mean, clearly it's been a failure because more than 2 months have gone by and they've accomplished what nothing except for taking a few. a few villages. there's nothing else to show for it. they expected a quick victory. it's not happening. the, the pentagon and other nato military's leaders to understand what's happening. you know, despite the western propaganda, the of the west, some media propaganda tries to spin things that same of all the, the cuts are offensive is going ahead. it's just a little bit slower than we expected, but the, the policy makers, they understand the truth and they realize that the situation is pretty much hopeless. well, at the end of the day, you're the russians, the re

or, nato may still have scenarios. clear that we will not reach vladivostok and there will be negotiations, but zelenskyi has very clearly indicated the conditions of these negotiations - this is the liberation of the territory of ukraine , and then we will sit down for negotiations and er , we are discussing the punishment of war criminals and the compensation of reparations for what was destroyed here , it’s simple. and what can nato do to strengthen support for ukraine, well, first of all, change it ukrainian ports should be freed from shipbuilding by military means by diplomatic pressure, but ukrainian ports must work, it is necessary for the ukrainian economy , it is necessary for ukraine and ukraine is working on this, these corridors are already trying to make the first ship, the first amount has already left izmail and is already on its way. well, it seems without obstacles , nato should also join in this, and this applies not only to grain, but also to other ukrainian exports. ports - this is the first thing t

and bill is the nato summit, of course. and, but it's quite peculiar and yeah, and i'm gonna use that word. there seems to be a lot of double talk and ex, explaining what's going to happen there when nothing really much is going to happen . they're, they're going to throw a few bones to uh, to the ukrainians and other than that. and there's no membership in the cards. maybe no membership ever in the future. what are your thoughts as somebody to is approaching right. i think the game is lowering expectations for ukraine. i think i'm a senior polish official and just said not to expect too much. but on the other hand, sometimes it turns out the united states to manage is through the o coersion and other on so on. pressure is to pull a rabbit out of the had it the last minute. this has happened before when it's been able to sell its own objectives in a way that seems appealing to others and then uh, hide from them of their, their long term implications. so i'm, i'm still very wary about what this upcoming nato summit might lea

and when , let's say, earlier, the secretary general of nato said that joining nato as a condition forould be its victory , i didn't like it. i am for the victory of ukraine. i believe that ukraine should win in this exhausting struggle with the russian federation how long it took to achieve this victory but i believe that joining nato is not connected with victory but with security and that the north atlantic union should make a decision on the euro-atlantic integration of ukraine in case of any development of events in the russian-ukrainian war, war is a complicated history in the war, there may be negotiations in the war, there may be, there may be parasky, but there must be a constant not directly related to the war, it is the euro-atlantic integration of ukraine , without this euro-atlantic integration , the citizens of ukraine should not hope for security in the 20s, three years of our millennium, this must be clearly understood, this must be understood, and i did not see a tragedy in these words and in the fact that, sir, i later justified myself and in the fact that you and the

nato instructors with nato soldiers.his did not develop in one moment, not in one second. it wasn't at the snap of a finger. it was a big planned preparation. ukraine could not join. in nato , but in fact had full nato support. of particular interest to the training manual is the instruction table, how to respond to a quote russian propaganda clichés stigmatize reports of the development of biological and bacteriological weapons in ukraine as one of these, they say moscow is inflating a conspiracy theory without providing evidence, in fact, slander is obvious to anyone who watched the relevant briefings of the ministry of defense there, the proof was just given. and, by the way, in the end they forced the pentagon to officially admit that there were as many as 46 ukrainian laboratories under control ; and bacteriological with the help of biological weapons. yes, therefore, to talk about what it is, and some laboratories that pursue, good tasks. yes, that is counteracting rather new types of virus threats. of course, this

this nato proxy war shows a kind of commitment of the nato military alliance to the direct participation of the united states and germany against russia, which, of course, must be prevented under any circumstances. nato is better than the following myth is raised, a defense alliance. if there was no nato, would there be a war against the international laws of yugoslavia ? there would be bombings of civilians and tv transmitters, as well as the chinese embassy . if there was no nato, would we have witnessed 20 years of war in afghanistan , with the summoning of civilian ships and the commission of war crimes ? we were many. do you reject the name of these measures? it is the second year that nato introduced its union based on democracy and the rule of law . this description is about an obvious historical lie that reminds us of portugal, a member of nato, with honor v30. 2015, how many cruel and continuous fires in africa, only in the last 20 years, with the warmongering of america and its allies, four and a half million people lost their lives, this dark and sad statistic is related to th

georgia's membership in nato is unacceptable for us, and both nato and georgia understand this today.as a very young man, he entered ukrainian galician army. there, they were trained as scouts for saboteurs. and, of course, monsters, the holocaust. in lvov organized by the ukrainians, 6,000 people were killed. western intelligence services kept used in anti-soviet activities. today in russia, the day of the railway worker, this type of transport provides about a million people with a professional holiday, the industry employees congratulated vladimir putin, dear friends. congratulations on the professional holiday to all employees and veterans of russian railway transport representatives of various professions and specialties , machinist conductors and transport builders, make their contribution to the development of this most important strategic industry.

if we are told no, then we will object to nato moving closer to our borders.his is a well-founded position that has its own internal logic. and i repeat this position once again, justified by the national interests of the russian federation putin sincerely felt the warmest feelings for ukraine, kharkiv december 2001 , a proposal to join the wto together and join international integration processes together, then we still believed that this was, in principle, possible , west russia wants to see ukraine is rich and prosperous, not only because we treat ukraine kindly as a truly fraternal a-a, but also because it is beneficial in russia for an ever-high level of cooperation. we have many common tasks. one of them is to achieve such conditions for our country's entry into the world trade organization, which would correspond to national interests, and russia and ukraine are absolutely sure that it is easier and more productive to prepare our economic systems for the international integration process. jointly. kiev, meanwhile, everything was looking at the european

the war is going on with the nato bloc with nato equipment with nato instructors without nato soldiersis did not develop in one moment, not in one second. it wasn't at the snap of a finger. it was a big planned preparation. ukraine could not join. in nato , but in fact had full nato support. separate interesting manuals present tables instructions on how to respond to a quote russian propaganda clichés one of these stigmatize reports of the development of biological and bacteriological weapons in ukraine, they say moscow is inflating a conspiracy theory without providing evidence, in fact, a slanderer, obviously to anyone who watched the relevant briefings of the ministry of defense there is evidence, just brought it. and, by the way, in the end they forced the pentagon to officially admit that as many as 46 ukrainian laboratories were under its control. the whole of ukraine has become a laboratory for studying the counteraction and impact on the slavic population on the russians on how it is possible to wage war with russia in the future , including bacteriological warfare with the he

they say that we are fighting against nato.l, that could be, as you know how on the kashirsky highway they blew up houses and then they mobilized and supported putin in the righteous war against uh spark, you understand, well, that’s the story, so it’s still unknown whose benefit it will work for. well, and i strongly believe you know a couple, it’s normal if those drones are so accurate that they can fly into one funnel then with the amount of explosives, which i call 0.010 , it would be better if the vrubliov people blew up a couple of houses , it would make more sense, but simply , abramovich's house burned down together with abramovich , you see, there is already no billion financing well, as it is now, i’m just saying. well, how else can we clean up? we need to clean up the enemy and we need to clean up the one who sponsors him. if we don’t do this , rohamia will continue to travel around the world to protect abramovich, who supposedly will give us one day . 2 billion, let's not include abramovich in the american sanctions

, and it is only a matter of time, the new tool, the ukraine nato council, is already working, and it is precisely as an integration tool that the first working meeting of the council was held in response to russian aggression against global food stability , that is, our cooperation with the alliance is seen by all as practical. this is how it should be and in the future, we must start preparing for the nato summit in washington itself, which could become historic for ukraine and for all our allies in nato, and it depends absolutely on each and every one of you, dear diplomats, who work for the security of ukraine from everyone in the alliance is always a joint effort, and by december of this year we have to lay the foundation of such joint efforts, the task of nato countries is to work for the consolidation of all the capitals of the alliance around the priorities of common security , it is in ukraine that security is achieved for our continent and as a whole for an international order that is based on rules and deserves political and legal recognition by all our allies , the task of

nato has a really big ego. i mean, when it comes to russia, oh, they have a superior already complex here. can they compromise it? this is something that nichol i was trying to bring up, keep going in london. well, the big, big, big, big cat in a sense, and they will try and sell it because of victory. i mean, we haven't had much about syria, which was an example of a frozen conflict, but the us is still occupying a cause of syria and it's imposing a terrible sanctions on it. so i would tend to agree with the, the point of view, let's um, russia will not find a frozen conflict, the acceptable that in goals and elements of, of the agreements and russia and has led through be to experience. so one broken promise to another, you know, going back to the problem so not, not one mortgage east was for late. so up to the recent uh, mexico. busy the, the, um, uh uh for straight to the agreements we visit. so let's be a government last year. so that of fortunately i don't see it as being the and the goal shades the set.

as long as the war is going on nato, ukraine will not become part of nato. that was one of the major points. so other allies then on their national bilateral initiative developed scenarios how they could support provide maybe security guarantees, security support to ukraine. there have their national bilateral initiative developed scenarios how they could support been several ideas coming out from the baltic states, lithuania but also other countries, macron gave an interesting speech in bratislava for security guarantees or about security guarantees. so there have been some initiatives, what countries are considering or planning maybe but not in a framework currently. so it's not an official option, but it is one of the options being discussed off the table. i think all options should be on the table and discussed otherwise you are unprepared for what might come. um in the end, many people think and i think that would be where the biden administration. but also our current german government is looking for having a short term solution. a quick solution for t

with nato. we have seen a massive loss of on the side of the old, the russian army, which has not been prepared. let's say, uh for that. what more does she need from partners to future proof ukraine's defense? and what does she think might convince putting the times up for his invasion deputy prime minister stephanie to know welcome to conflicts down greetings, berwin ukraine claims to have already read, taking a number of villages. i made reports of intense battles along the 600 mile front line with russia. are you satisfied with the early stages of the offensive? i thank you for this. uh for this question. uh it's um, uh, it's early to make any, any for costs, but the, the stage uh, there is a number of things that we can confirm that mostly in the zip. what is your income son, dejan, which of the solve and far the ukraine, russian fundraising mission is mostly concentrating on defensive measures to keep their, their, uh, their, their alliance while or you move on. skim done. yet screech on. t

nato's presence has also become more visible to russian forces.'re showing them that there are red lines, that we're here, and we're ready. the russian planes are not far away. one of their main routes is just north of the estonian coast. russian military aircraft regularly fly without transponders, a device that transmits information and flight data. and they don't communicate with air traffic controllers on the ground, a potential hazard to civilian air traffic. in these instances, german air force pilots are sent to intercept and identify the aircraft. there's nothing normal about an uncoordinated encounter of two fighter jets in international air space. when you're approaching an aircraft that you're not in contact with, and you don't know what the other pilot is doing, what their intentions are, or their flight path, of course you're a bit more tense. christoph hachmeister says his troops have trained long and hard to be ready for any possible scenario. this is also true for pilots from other nato countries who have been on missions to secure

russia and the leadership of its army know all the weak points of nato nato is not an ideal organization exactly as the european union is not an ideal organization nato the european union is for poland i think for ukraine i am also not a citizen of ukraine, this is just my point of view as a neighbor, this is the only available option except for nato, we have nothing , so we belong to the organization that is available to us due to the fact that in our region of europe there are no other guarantees , of course, these guarantees how from a formal point of view from the point of view of what is written in the fifth point, they are not ideal, they are not optimal, they do not correspond to the real one, which will agree, but there is another aspect , a practical aspect, because even if you apply the fifth article to the full extent, then a few nato countries are ready to actually defend polish territory in practice , we understand and the polish society understands that we are a member of nato of the second category. in order to provide for themselves at least for six months, during which o

after the latest nato summit in vilnius. some numbers appear to question the us amendment to the block. with nato even exist without united states. back with us to discuss is warmer, switch m, p, and author of europe's existential dilemma to be or not to be an american vassal, mr. game at all. so game outside of these western narratives, according to russia and much of the global south expansion of nato, is precisely why there is conflict in ukraine. now. the broken promises by the us that nato would not expand even one inch to the east, the broken or perhaps even false. michel courts. yet, just a few months ago we see finished accession to the block without much objection by russia. and now we will probably see sweden rushes entire western border is surrounded by nato. does this actually make the world safer, or does this perhaps risk world war 3? no, i don't think that's good. expensive nate, good continued on the industry that will increase the security of the country. i think it was some of the security situation in euro

if there was no nato, would the war be contrary to the international laws of yugoslavia? the bombing of civilians and television transmitters, as well as the chinese embassy. if there was no nato, we would have witnessed 20 years of hip war, thousands of civilian deaths and the commission of many war crimes. do you name these actions? it is the second year that nato has introduced itself based on democracy and the rule of law. historical lie it is obvious that it reminds us of portugal, a member of nato, the persian regime in 2008, and the continuous cruel wars of fire in africa . only in the last 20 years , 4 million people lost their lives due to the warmongering of the united states and its allies. the dark and sad statistics are related to the famous university called america. does democracy and the rule of law mean that this is the third myth that nato is the defender of human rights, while the prison and torture center of guantanamo is still in place, and on the other hand, julian journalist assange is awaiting 175 years in prison america is a war, nato has exposed

that is, with whom we need to negotiate about joining nato with russia . entry into nato ends. it is said that these gentlemen are not simulating such situations for nothing. i would say that they are not just referring to the experience of germany and korea. poland, for example, you like the youth and thank you no no no no well, let's make sure that this contingent is there , 10,000 soldiers for the first contingent, first the contingent to the territory of ukraine, and then we start talking there about the theoretical negotiations, yes, because you know it's worse than the budapest one memorandum, no reason , they will talk like this, well, in principle, we must remember that everyone in this world loves only themselves, they make friends for money or out of necessity, therefore, to make friends with their problems , you solve problems at our expense, they and they want pleasure yes i am what i am about very often the national television radio station is accused of the fact that we allegedly gave people hope that the war will not last for 2-3 weeks and e