support for the nato alliance is up. it seems that folks increasingly understand why this alliance serves u.s. interests and why it serves our allies interest and that bumper stickers that we say a lot, stronger together. isn't just the bumper sticker, it's the truth. coping with ukraine is something that we need to do with 50 other countries around the world in terms of providing valuable security assistance. coping with instability elsewhere in the world requires us to work with our closest allies and partners, it's not just ukraine. i think that fundamentally americans understand the value of alliances and the importance of the nato alliance in particular. but also, i'll say, when i travel around the united states and encounter americans in places far away from washington d.c., i think, again, there is this kind of bipartisan support that it's-- nato is not a partisan issue. it always, i suppose, has the risk of going in that direction like any foreign policy subject, but from where i sit right now, whether i'm travell

why is the nato alliance needed, european journalists asked themselves; it turned out that not all europeans are happy with the expansion of nato and the idea of ​​accepting ukraine into the alliance. personnel training in engineering pedagogical and agricultural classes. we will tell you in this article what bonuses graduates receive from specialized training when entering universities. an industrial center with unique gastronomic business cards, where the word kolo is. rhymes in the agro-industrial complex of poetry, intelligent, sporty, a city with the most fashionable cinema, let's catch a fair wind for a trip on the vitina boat through the city of stolbtsy, a project for a place to live. the control and supervisory activities of belarus will be improved, the president gave such an order the day before; indeed, any inspection is a phantom pain and for the enterprise and for its leaders, although... the trends, and there should be no excesses, have been improved, have not been eliminated, however , alexander lukashenko emphasized the negative ones. the reduction in control load at enterpr

i will move on to specific facts: why is the nato alliance sane? satisfied? well , what does it seem like? just the cost of instructors, maintaining nato bases in europe. the purchase of military equipment according to alliance standards, to this we add only 2% of the gdp contribution, gdp, not from income, not from the country’s budget, just gdp, that is, from turnover. conventionally, you have a profit of 100,000, but a turnover of 1 million, and 2% must be calculated from this million. for the same france, which has a gdp of more than 2 trillion dollars, that is , they must allocate 56 for defense. this is 2% of gdp, despite the fact that the french budget is only 340 billion, that is, france spends 16% of its budget on defense, and formally the country is not even at war yet, well, what kind of membership of the ruined and plundered ukraine in nato can be discussed at a discount, this has never happened in the alliance, but it always has its participants are already tired of counting tribute to the ig of overseas, even more specific facts in ou

nato partners for up to 3 years. at a time, countries take turns commanding the forces deployment time to any location within the alliance area must be $2.00 to $7.00 days. it's mostly land forces, but some air force and navy to the, in the event of an attack on nato territory. it must be the 1st to confront the aggressor together with the army of the nato country under attack. they should hold off the aggressor until the alliance has brought in more troops of last year. the syringe and battalion receive new tanks for as operations delivered to a 7 v. one of the tank commanders is master sergeant. josh. how does he see his units mission as part of the nato response force and the height and threat after rushes attack on ukraine? but i'm going to also stick by 12, by that of course, we've already prepared our equipment so that we can keep our reaction time short. if we have to deploy it apart from that, we try not to make ourselves nervous about it. the only place where i notice it a bit more is in my private life. i'm enjoying my free time more and not just taking it for granted i, since i know in the back of my mind that

naples sizes, well, it's a clear message to any potential adversary about the strength of the nato alliance . and again, i stress defensive alliance with a 360 degree view of any threat that may arise. but it is meant to be a strong signal to any potential adversary. it's the end of june 2023 in florida. huda in the 3rd engine forest civilians doing to bid farewell to the soldiers who will soon be heading to lithuania to join the forces. the unit is prepared for the 6 month deployment to the commander makes clear the missions important the fatigue as you log into tones to dish. the dish of teams lava cleaning caught up. the strategic position of lithuania is, of course, also very critical due to the enclave. of cleaning crowd on the one hand and better routes on the other. good. as a result, we are very aware that the baltic states, including with a way to deal with the threat from russia much more strongly than we do. we finished erica and seen. i stuff that one's not the default is to in the beginning of august, around 150 granted years will be heading to the baltic states. today they are

alliance. we launched the nato ukraine _ the alliance. ision—making to the most intensive _ decision—making to the most intensive level nato has to the most intensive _ intensive level nato has to the most intensive level nato has to the most intensive level nato has to the most intensive level nato last offer. ukraine — intensive level nato last offer. ukraine is much more than the recipient — ukraine is much more than the recipient of advice and assistance. warriors _ recipient of advice and assistance. warriors are confronting the transatlantic security since the end of the _ transatlantic security since the end of the cold — transatlantic security since the end of the cold war and have as much experience — of the cold war and have as much experience is in the on earth and fighting — experience is in the on earth and fighting the wars to come. you have a lot to _ fighting the wars to come. you have a lot to teach the alliance nato would — a lot to teach the alliance nato would he — a lot to teach the alliance nato would be more secure w

and most of the chief of the nato alliance has a few options on the table, one of which is to resign. that's the ultimate have given by it least deputy prime minister, who said you had installed the bugs, rhetoric of mole war has crossed the line. and if lee cannot be forced to send his troops to fight against russia, a pull i need to ask, steve retracts or apologizes or resigns. while i talk about war, talk about using the bones miss solve the tiny and weapons that we sent to you crate to defend itself on its territory instead to fight tate and kill outside of the territory. there is nothing my name, not in the name of the italian people, and so we must defend ukraine and we doing it from the 1st minute and we know that well with any wanted, i just don't want to lee inside the gates of my children. some of the 3rd, well people are shutting me, so nato cannot force us to kill in russia. no one can force us to send its highly and soldiers to fight and dine ukraine. this one thing is to defend the other is to get killed. and this gentleman either apologizes or rectifies or resigned to t

so the chief, all the nato alliance has a few options on the table, one of which is to resign. that's the ultimatum given by at least the deputy prime minister, who said you had installed the bugs, rhetoric of mole has crossed the line, basically cannot be full to send his troops to fight russia a paul t the retrench or apologizes and resigns. while i talk about war, talk about using the bones miss solve the tiny and weapons that we sent to you crate to defend itself on its territory. instead to fight hit and killed outside its territory. nothing my name, not to in the name of the a telling people. so we must defend ukraine and way doing it from the 1st minute. we know that well, with anyone, i just don't want to leave at the gates of my children. the 3rd well bull. so nato cannot force us to kill in russia. no one can force us to send a tale and soldiers to fight and dine ukraine. one thing is to defend the other is to kill. and this gentleman either apologizes or rectifies all resigns. there's no other way that might or germany is also a voice. it's on willingness to allow yo

against lock your leadership to in one way or another, force it to accept the ukraine into the nato alliance. however, the so that leader has been quite vocal. he's been adamant in his opposition to that, suggesting that this could be a calls award, which is why he says that he will oppose any direction any incentive that would suggest you to claim to join the nato alliance saying that he would also oppose it in parliament. and not ratified the session of the ukrainian state. but moving on, there's a number of other issues that we have to take into consideration as well. we understand that the french president's a menu mccord has been quite vocal entitlements and suggesting that she may be interested in sending troops to ukraine. this is where the slovak leader essentially says that they know does not have jurisdiction in ukraine, considering ukraine is not a nato member states. essentially continuing to focus on its neutrality, focusing on a sovereign form policy that is not in line with the group and block for the most part. but we're also looking at is of course, the disparity and politic

and secretary of state anty blinken spoke to reporters after meeting with colleagues from the nato alliancen prague. he talked about the military alliances continued support for your grain its war against russia -- for ukraine in its war against russia and president biden's approval for u.s. provided weaponry to be used by ukraine against targets in russian provided -- russian territory, within some limits. this is about 20 minutes. i want to thank general stoltenberg. his vision, his tenacity, his vision of this alliance during a highly consequential decade has been nothing short of remarkable and he has more leadership to do asit is not an overstatement to say this is a critical moment for transatlantic security. we have seen in recent weeks vladimir putin ramping up his offensive against ukraine in kharkiv in the northeast, ukrainians continuing to show extraordinary courage in resisting russian aggression. he has also been intensifying hybrid attacks against front-line states, nato members, seven housing supply warehouses, disregarding demarcations in the baltic's, mounting more and mor

we are a superpower and we have a statute that we part of the 75 years of nato, and the nato alliance. that was created after world war ii. it's very important right now for us to be focused on foreign policy. the success of the abraham accords came into place with the jordan, saudi arabia, came to the rescue of israel went iran launched all those missiles. we're looking at what's going on in ukraine. thank goodness in my state we've got strong republicans that understand this. senator kevin cramer, senatoror john hoeven, and they have been phenomenal in helping to get the package for ukraine, for the middle east, for taiwan. that is essential. because the matter what's going on within our own country, debating all these other things, our ability to defend our nation, our ability to come to the defense of our allies, as a said 75 years of nato, we got united nations coming up. just things arere so important right now and they need to be handled with diplomacy as well as military strength, crystal in north dakota. either way president biden expected to host jordan's king abdullah today

in 1991, the nato alliance bombed desert territory in iraq, that is, desert, plain, where there are nono rivers, nothing. the goals that we are pursuing in the persian gulf are clearly defined and well known to everyone. iraq must immediately and completely withdraw its troops from kuwait, without imposing any conditions. in bosnia and herzegovina in ninety-five, everything was the other way around, there is no desert, forests, hills, valleys, rivers are everywhere, which means it is obvious that we are talking about an experimental war. what nato did in 1999 in yugoslavia. he included among the bombing targets petrochemical plants and energy facilities. this was a continuation of the same invivo experiment, that is , an experiment on living organisms. for the first time, for example, it was used. the so-called american softbomb or graphite bomb for bombing energy facilities, that is, in this case, nato wanted to see what the consequences would be for the health of the local population, since back in iraq and bosnia and herzegovina they saw what the consequences of bombing uranus with

nato couldn't possibly foresee. and for three quarters of a century, that's exactly what our alliance has done. that's how nato helped prevent the iron curtain from enveloping the free nations of western europe. how it helped avert war with the soviet union and helped newly independent nations walk the path to democracy. for those achievements and so many others, we are indebted to the millions of soldiers, sailors, aviators whose courage and willingness to put their lives on the line have given weight to our sacred commitment to defend one another. we're also indebted to all the leaders and diplomats who shaped the alliance over these 75 years, not just those were present at the creation, but also those present. nato's many recreations over subsequent decades their collective service has given generations of people on both sides of the ocean. that joins us a rare and invaluable gift, unprecedented security, and yet, even as we meet here this evening, that security, together with the alliance, is core principles of democracy, of liberty, the rule of law. this is once again being challenged, chal

is the absolute truth, you quite correctly quoted a number of leaders of the countries of the nato alliancee foreign ministers of these states, who for several days now have been chewing more and more actively on this very construction regarding the fact that they will allegedly give permission to the regime to use the weapons they supply, either they haven’t made a decision yet, or they will allow for partial deliveries, in relation to the possibility of striking on russian territory, this is absolute nonsense, this is nonsense, this is a smokescreen, what is really happening, in fact, these are all the same, as it were, permissions.. . peaceful resolution of this situation is that this conference is truly peaceful, in fact, of course, it is not, they need arguments, they give these arguments , including in this way: siv: first, because the majority of weapons supplied by the west to the kiev regime, themselves themselves, from the point of view of the radius of action, from the point of view of functionality, they assume precisely these very parameters that are associated with the territo

nato couldn't possibly foresee. and for three-quarters of a century, that's exactly what our alliance has done. o helped prevent the iron curtain from enveloping the free nations of western europe, how it helped avert war with the soviet union, and helped newly independent nations walk the path to democracy. for those achievements and so many others, we are indebted to the millions of soldiers, sailors, aviators whose courage and willingness to put their lives on the line have given weight to our sacred commitment to defend one another. we're also indebted to all the leaders and diplomats who shaped the alliance over these 75 years -- not just those who were present at the creation, but also those present at nato's many recreations over subsequent decades. their collective service has given generations of people on both sides of the ocean that joins us a rare and invaluable gift -- unprecedented security. and yet, even as we meet here this evening, that security -- together with the alliance's core principles of democracy, liberty, the rule of law -- this is once again being challenged, challeng

visit also has deep historical symbolism. 25 years ago , during the bombing of yugoslavia by the nato alliancessy was hit, then three of our colleagues, chinese journalists, were killed, and since this strike, both the united states and nato have been convincing china that the bombing was a mistake, but the chinese side, judging by the statements of its leader, does not trust these words, given the confrontation between china and the united states, such a coincidence of the visit with the date of the tragic... events does not look like an accident at all. yuri. yes, dari, thank you. let me remind you that our own correspondent in the balkans, daria grigorova, was in touch with the studio and spoke about the official visit of chinese president sidin ping to serbia. at the nato summer summit in washington , the alliance countries plan to adopt a resolution on that the bloc will not send ground troops to ukraine. this is reported by the ilyansk publication career of business, which refers to the draft document. same source. notes that, despite all the efforts of brussels and washington, the nato

nato is the strongest military alliance. we don't have war here because we are in nato. in america, a presidential candidate is arguing that if everybody's not paying their fair share in nato, then why should we be facing the brunt of it? first, we are paying more for defense. i mean, estonia, we are-- you guys are? yes, we are spending 3.2% of our gdp on defense. it's more than united states is spending in terms of percentage. nice flex. how i explain nato to school children, i always say that, you know, if you have a school bully, and you are weaker physically, the bully doesn't bully you when you have big friends. and this is how nato works. so what happens if one of your big friends also happens to be a bully who's talking about just becoming friends with the other bully and then bullying all the little people? well, that is definitely going to be more complicated. yeah. if russia will succeed in ukraine, then their appetite will grow because, you know, they have expanded their empire and colonized the country. aggression pays off. every next time, every next step, t

to move more quickly— is of the nato alliance to move more quickly in _ is of the nato alliance to moveical advantage-— expense of our geopolitical advantaae. ~ . . . , advantage. we will watch closely with the reaction _ advantage. we will watch closely with the reaction is _ advantage. we will watch closely with the reaction is in _ advantage. we will watch closely with the reaction is in brussels . advantage. we will watch closely l with the reaction is in brussels and there is artemis on today is certainly the alarm bells are ringing. before we go to the break, i want talk about this story because it grabbed my attention today and i want to you why in a second. apple have an alarming problem, quite literally. there are people who own apple iphones who are sleeping in because the alarm isn't going off, or it is so quiet they're snoring through it. there have been lots of people sharing their experiences online. one video alone has more than 10 million views. why have i been sleeping through alarms since getting an iphone 15, ok? so i'm lying in bed, i take my crockpot meal out to set

but there's also the matter of, of course, the european union, the nato alliance, and the contradictions and the controversies do continue. but as it stands right now, the position that is to walk us taking is crucial with respect to ukraine, as well as the general alliance of nato and the european union. let's lend our use to the saw a prime minister and what he has to say with respect to the who could i and i, it will lock in his other and bigger problems than ukraine. we don't agree with the army in ukraine. this will do everything also as a part of the e u, and support efforts and for peace and ukraine and efforts to start peace negotiations on ukraine. we finish all initial step 13 at today's meeting and became clear that i have different opinions on some topics with mr. prime minister of ukraine. above all, it is a view of the war in ukraine. i retreated that i do not believe in the military solution to this complex system asked for my done year in 2014. after the my done ukraine became entirely controlled by the us. why did the russian present or the use of military force in ukrai

nato is already more capable. it has 2 additional countries in the alliance. and even in the european union, it took us a little while to agree on the 50000000000 assistance for ukraine, but we did it. but as things stand, unless that money is forthcoming, nato and the european union are going to be guilty once again of over promising and on the delivery. and that's, and that's a bad reputation taps. let me ask you this. if you were a foreign minister of ukraine, at the moment of how satisfied would you be with nato, those are the contributions over the last couple of years. how satisfied would you be? well, i, i made with my a good friend, mr. cole up on a regular basis, and of course, he feels and, and very rightly so that we need to step up the effort. and we, in lots of fully agree with him. and we are not only arguing how should we say that you should do it, not us. we are trying to also lead by example, more than one percent of g. d. p has gone out to a to ukraine. so far, we're continuing the effort. of course, they need weapons and ammunition. they don'

not are keeping up with russia's military-industrial complex, if you compare... members of the nato alliance and russian potential, can we now say that the arms race that putin is leading, that putin is winning in this arms race so far? i wouldn't say that, in reality , putin is not winning, unfortunately, the general situation is winning, again the indecision, the indecision and cowardice, i would call it, of our westerners. it even now makes it possible to feel some superiority of russia, that is , in fact, russia is now prevailing on the field battle with the same ammunition, due to the fact that it is possible to use such a conglomerate, north korea, iran, china, and everyone participates in this system, in their directions, someone supplies kiran, for example, attack drones, someone supplies. supplies, like north korea, someone provides raw materials, microelectronics, supplies, other components, and in addition provides money to russia, because russia sells oil to china, earns yuan, and then starts this system, it is these yuan that spin and allow to produce ammunition for russia, nort