we see how we are confronted with the nato doctrine and we need to study, we need to know who we areerstand the technologies that are used against us as a weapon of strategy. i am sure that there are smart people with big stars in the general staff, and many of them are heroes of russia who are constantly studying the changes that we are facing on the battlefield. we must know ourselves. we need to understand who we are how we are we work with our unique weapons and use them most effectively? how interaction provides us, after all, we changed approaches several times and certain stages were very effective, and even the west is beginning to speak frankly to us. yes, look, russian knows how. i saw something interesting. in my opinion, an emotional turning point that occurred because in many ways it shows us and our society. well, look, they announced a partial mobilization. some people

e. nato doctrine was structured, was designed in the, in the days of the cold war. when, if you are losing a conventional battle, you use nukes and then you seek peace on acceptable terms. so you just think about your adversary, the way you would have, you would have behaved you, mr. training at the fact that the americans would go to such great length, even strategizing about nukes and, and it shows that those are for me to pull assets isn't just a new sense when you consider consider them to be the only thing that the country can base its promise on, well, you know, i'm not expressing my own my own views. i think the russia has a lot to offer itself and something to offer to the world. and i think that russia is better positioned than most countries around the world are vast majority of countries around the world, for example, face into climate change, a climate crisis. so i think the russians thought a better position than a lot of people in the western thing it is. but i just took those, those words out of the mouth of mr. by canada, then ask you, do you think t

nato officially had a doctrine of nuclear escalation for the sake of escalation, which nato and the unitedng to attribute to russia, but during the cold war, nato was far inferior to the warsaw pact on non-nuclear conventional forces. the warsaw pact had a colossal advantage. that is why nato had to resort to its doctrine to use of tactical nuclear weapons. dmitry , the military potentials outside the nuclear sphere of russia and ukraine are simply not comparable in favor of russia today. we saw this potential, therefore, uh, well, it is quite obvious that russia has a colossal reserve, and military capabilities for uh, inflicting military damage to ukraine if such a task is set by non-nuclear means. it 's the first second when your position is uh, but uh, here's the thing. eh, first of all. eh, how are you? you know, no worse, it is not ukraine that opposes me to russia collective west. and this, of course, gives another dimension of the balance of power and the second. i absolutely agree with you that it is not constructive for russia to talk about any possibility of using tactical nucle

listening, someone might try to call me out on the use of the word caveat, by the way it is found in nato doctrine. go to that resource first. when we discuss women's roles in military history, in the military doctrine, it opens up a can of worms. [inaudible] i understand this can feel like iterant topic. to recognize there have been women stories, for stories of other communities that have been lost. words that have been lost that potentially contributed, or could contribute, to a deeper discussion about the theory of warfare. about tactics and techniques. there are historians, historians who are making amazing active effort to put that experience of why those words were missing into context. more importantly to try to find those lost and missing words. those historians are doing incredible work right now as we speak. also, to a certain extent, they have uncovered some truths that, on occasion, even women who participated in the development of geopolitical strategic use of military forces. who talked about tactics and the order deployment of forces, sometimes those women were historically accepte

probably gong to try to call me about about the use of the word caveat, by the way, it's found in nato doctrine. so go to that. resource first. when we discuss women's roles in military history, in military body of knowledge or in military doctrine, it opens up a can of worms. i understand it acknowledged that this can feel like a highly charged topic, but also along with it to recognize that there have been women's stories or that there have been stories of other communities that have been lost, words that have been lost, that potentially contribute or could contribute to a deeper discussion about it. the theory of warfare about tactics and techniques. there are historians. there are historians who are making a amazing, active effort to put that experience of why those words were missing into context. but more importantly, to attempt to find those lost in missing words, those historians are doing incredible work right now as we speak, and also to a certain extent, they've uncovered some truths that on occasion, even women who participate in the development of both geopolitical strategic use of

well i must say that in general, the nato doctrine states that in the event of a conflict, it means beforehis means that nato countries can be used to strike american nuclear bombs on the territory of the russian federation and its allies, that is, they say in peacetime. so they just train or imitate or throw blanks, but in the case of e, then the outbreak of a military conflict is legal. they can use these nuclear bombs, which are located in six places in europe to in order to inflict a nuclear strike on the territory, it means russia and belarus well, there are no missiles, there are nuclear bombs. uh, they are simply proposed to be moved from germany, which is rustling, and there it arises, the protest of poland with pleasure, allegedly, allegedly. if he wants to accept them, indeed, the financial costs must be very large, because nuclear weapons must be stored in certain storage arsenals, where the temperature is maintained, humidity and the security option is a colossal investment these facilities should be resistant to damaging factors up to the factors of nuclear explosions in case

we see how we are confronted with the nato doctrine and we need to study, we need to know who we areing with, we need to clearly understand the technologies that are used against us as a weapon of strategy. i am sure that there are smart people with big stars in the general staff, and many of them are heroes of russia who are constantly studying the changes that we are facing on the battlefield. we ourselves must know. we need to understand who we are how do we work with our unique weapons to make the most of them? how interaction provides us, after all, we changed approaches several times and certain stages were very effective , and even the west is beginning to speak frankly to us. yes , look, russian knows how. i saw something interesting. in my opinion, an emotional turning point that occurred because in many ways it shows us and our society. well, look, they announced a partial mobilization. part of the people received medals for the capture of the lars transition for the capture of the upper lars, the heels rushed so right here . now we can say that georgia was occupied, what k

well, it must be said that in general nato doctrine spelled out that in the event of a conflict. ier aircraft are with russia. this means that nato countries can be used to strike american nuclear bombs on the territory of the russian federation and its allies, that is, they say in peacetime. so they just train or imitate or throw blanks, but in the case of e, then the outbreak of a military conflict is legal. they can use these nuclear bombs, which are located in six places in europe, in order to to inflict a nuclear strike on the territory, it means russia and belarus well, there are no missiles, there are nuclear bombs. uh, they are simply proposed to be moved from germany, which is rustling, and there it arises, the protest of poland with pleasure, allegedly, allegedly. if he wants to accept them, indeed, the financial costs must be very large, because nuclear weapons must be stored in certain arsenals of stores, where the temperature is maintained, the humidity is maintained and the option of security and so on, that is, this is a colossal investment, these facilities must be

nato lead to? in the doctrinal documents of ukraine , it is written that russia is an adversary and that the returnea is possible by military means. imagine now that ukraine is a member of nato. the fifth article has not been cancelled. recently, mr. biden, said that the fifth article is an absolute imperative and will be executed , which means that a military confrontation arises between these nato. i asked at the last conference that we should fight with nato, but i want to ask you the second part of this question, do you want to fight with russia? ask your readers, viewers of users of internet resources. you want france to be at war with russia but that's the way it will be then silence. but before the start of the special operation, in the first month and a half of 2022, up to fifty military transport aircraft from western countries landed in ukraine, which delivered 2,000 tons of weapons and ammunition , the states did their best. yes, it was for 8 years that our president called kiev for a dialogue with the donbass, however, the ukrainian authorities were not going to to negotiate with its ci

nato. what being a fuel doctrine don boss, has not been a quiet occupation these past few months. next on our t documentary team, a companies want such medic deep into the bridge to discover why i'm already difficult job has been made even more onerous living on the edge begins in moments . ah, what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms race, his on offense, very dramatic development, only personally and getting to resist. i'll see how that strategy will be successful, very critical of time. time to sit down and talk 1950 . the ussr was returning to peaceful life, but the newspapers didn't report ongoing massacres and the ukrainian ssr, according to intelligence ukrainian nationalists and the ukranian insurgent army, led by romans forgive each perpetrated these atrocities for future before, but that was what i should be self store new way you would be wise to be like this please. of course we'll do immune novels to the plant of was the head of the n. k v d sabotaged department of the time he was tossed with stopping the a

it seems to me, uh, there, you see, according to all these nato moments and doctrines, they have , uhewing screw performs its function. there, just like that, someone is unlikely to be able to go, so i think, specifically, this gur officer performed his function. that's why, maybe he was, maybe they wanted to take language prisoner and interrogate him right there on the spot. then liquidate. yes and so on, so was like translator from russian into a foreign language, or what ? quite right, firstly, as a translator. secondly, well, i don’t think that it’s a direct translator that he should have translated for one of these mercenaries, because, most likely, these mercenaries perform only power functions for them, no operational activities at all. they don't spend them. e theme - this is a war game. i think that the gur officer , firstly, he knows russian. naturally, yes , and, most likely, this is his mother tongue. second, uh, the gur officer knows what questions to ask, which more importantly, so i think its function was like this, but something went wrong, as they say about the bunch

process of strengthening the polish army serves to deter the aggressor, this part of the nato deterrence doctrinee head of the belarusian type of defense viktor khrennin, according to the kgb of the republic of kiev, daily tries to violate the airspace of belarus in addition, recently on the territory of the republic was detained ukrainian citizen, who arrived through poland to create a network of agents and collect information about the activities of the belarusian army on ukrainian television, we do not even hide his intentions, he concentrated on usyk as the weakest link, because you understand russia is a country, no matter how big and complex and putin get. let 's just say it's not very easy. but getting lukashenka is very easy and ukraine will be able to solve this problem if the western allies give it a free hand in this matter, official kiev, by the way. everything rejects claims that minsk is preparing for an invasion, this is confirmed by the fact that belarus completely closed access to the video of hundreds of traffic cameras, as it already did in february of this year, at the end of

it is the monroe doctrine, the difference between nato forces in russia reduced to 100 miles and so hed this is why he's escalating to nuclear, this is why we heard president biden, our own president warning us about that. i don't usually agree with president biden but he is correct because he knows the doctrine and this is why russia is expanding the warfare out of the actual battlefield and into potentially you a cyberdomain which has no geographical boundaries. we had our own banks suffering a cyber attack through the russian cyber, group, we had jpmorgan struck. i have a piece coming out tomorrow, put naps cyberwarfare doctrine. this is where we are going. we need to protect our own people right now. lewin got to leave it there but you favor a negotiated peace now? >> one hundred% because we are on the escalation very firmly. ibly1 we hear you, thank you for being here, appreciate it. britney grinerf lawyer giving update on her charges on drug charges, what is the lawyer saying? ibly5 afraid she will be forced to serve the entirety of her 9 year prison sentence in russia. ibly20 we

under the conditions, as well as when necessary to protect nato allies, the country's military doctrineaintains ambiguity regarding the use of nuclear weapons. weapons, as for france, there the doctrine of nuclear deterrence is strictly defensive in nature weapons of mass destruction. can only be used in extreme cases of self-defense. china is considering using nuclear forces. only as a response, beijing adheres to the concept of a limited retaliatory nuclear strike, so its nuclear arsenal is at the minimum necessary level to ensure national security nuclear policy. india is based on the principle of credible minimum deterrence and massive impact countries undertake not to use nuclear weapons first, as well as against states that do not possess them. at the same time, it reserves the right to respond to strikes in the event that chemical or biological weapons are used against it in response to an external threat, emanating in particular from india to use nuclear weapons. maybe pakistan is a country that considers it possible to launch a nuclear strike. the first even in the case of non-

uh, nato military doctrines are in words on paper. these exercises make such a serious impression.erican b-61 nuclear bombs. true, i can immediately say that no bombs will participate there. this is just an exercise without the physical participation of the carriers themselves, uh, and the ammunition themselves. uh, nuclear weapons. here but nevertheless. yes, right now, when we are seeing the risks of escalation in ukraine, these military exercises are taking place. uh, nato, evgeny petrovich, sounds menacing in words, in fact, you know this, it seems to me that for some reason we also got involved in this. uh. well, i would call it some kind of hysterical, this discussion about the possible application russian nuclear weapons in ukraine in the west. it's just that we have already crossed all sorts of boundaries, they are starting to say that we are going to almost demonstrate there or even test explosions in the black sea. about the fact that we have the largest coastline in the black sea and bring down our entire tourist and resort infrastructure, of course, i don’t know how muc

yes, i completely agree, and russia does not even repeat the official nato nuclear doctrine of the colderiod in the context of the superiority of the warsaw pact in the field of condensed, but conventional weapons then the united states of nato officially stated that if the warsaw pact goes on the offensive in western europe, nato will nuke tactical nuclear weapons on these upcoming clear-text advice absolutely yes and now that russia does not even have one, yes, russia allows the use of nuclear weapons in a non-nuclear conflict, russia does not have such a doctrine in russia there are such weapons. there is such a weapon. yes, but the russian doctrine is much more, and prescribes the possibility of using nuclear weapons. in her nuclear conflict in a much less number of situations. i would it was leonid, i will offer you a combat compromise. let's agree that we do not want to experiment in this area. we definitely don’t want things to come to such options and that it would be simply useful for president biden to think that he doesn’t think about russia, no matter how much he is outraged

meeting that took place in august between the head of military intelligence, and nato countries were swallowed up by six doctrinesbs. well , the ukrainians were told that it would not be dirty, but there would be tactical nuclear weapons that would be decommissioned against russia and then it will turn into a fucking pariah with all the ethical consequences that we already know very well. and of course, the position of russia is important because this is a deep probe of the desire to pogmat. and these are the calls that took place through our ministry of defense with the leading countries, so to speak. and so to speak from and to including france and so on, but he says what these calls say that russia will not allow and we know that russia clearly answered how it would react to this and here. i think how since everyone was thinking, because they did not expect that we would reveal this situation and the former were ready to react in some way, how to react? well, i, uh, as they say, i will not carefully assume impossible scenarios, but since there is a certain act that is not signed, which is attributed to russia.

extraordinary times, the reason why the united states and nato are concerned about this is that, as we know, the russians in their military doctrineave not abandoned the tactical of nuclear weapons, unlike the west, and the russian arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons is significant five or even 10 times more than the arsenals of the united states and nato, the consequences of the use of such weapons were enormous even if it was a low-power weapon, it would create an area unfit for life for many decades, depending on the direction of the wind and the place of precipitation, it would pollute large areas in ukraine and russia, and both of these countries are primarily grain - it is bread for the countries of africa and the middle east in the east, this would have really long-term devastating consequences for the region and for the world, and here is the statement of the american minister of defense lloyd austin . the pentagon also wants to strengthen its defense and modernize its army, the minister of defense of the country mariusz blaszczak, speaking in the parliament in the next year's budget, first wants to increase the financing

according to russian official nuclear doctrine, russia would launch a strategic nuclear strike against the united states and all the nato as soon as we witness the launch of western missiles, no matter how armed they are, against our territories. and then, the whole planet will die. moscow may be hoping nuclear rhetoric will scare the west into reducing support for ukraine. it hasn't so far. bell tolls. earlier, i wasjoined by andrew weiss, author of accidental czar — the life and lies of vladimir putin. i began by asking him what he thought president putin had hoped to achieve with his speech. the event today was a perverse spectacle. it was started originally as a way for western analysts to sit down with the russian leader and pick his brain and now, going on more than a decade, i'm sure he's wondering why he signed up to do these sessions. there are increasingly less useful and are not intended useful and are not attended by westerners any more. you had a group of more sycophantic people in the audience asking them questions about the challenge wanted to be friends. it is not a convincing presentation by any stretch

according to russian official nuclear doctrine, russia would launch a strategic nuclear strike against the united states and all the natos we witness the launch of western missiles, no matter how armed they are, against our territories. and then, the whole planet will die. moscow may be hoping nuclear rhetoric will scare the west into reducing support for ukraine. it hasn't so far. bell tolls. and newsjust coming in, south korea's yonhap news agency is reporting that north korea has fired a ballistic missile off its east coast — we'll brng you more on this as we get it. tensions are rising on the korean peninsula, analysts say it is the worst for many years. stay with us on bbc news, still to come. why schools in britain that ban pupils from wearing their afro hair in certain styles are likely to be breaking the law. indira gandhi, ruler of the world's largest democracy, died today. only yesterday, she had spoken of dying in the service of her country and said, i would be proud of it, every drop of my blood will contribute to the growth of this nation. after 46 years of unhappiness, these two countries have concluded a

according to russian official nuclear doctrine, russia would launch a strategic nuclear strike against the united states and all the natoon as we witness the launch of western missiles, no matter how armed they are. against our territories. and then, the whole planet will die. moscow may be hoping nuclear rhetoric will scare the west into reducing support for ukraine. it hasn't so far. bell tolls. what we saw and heard today was the world according to vladimir putin, and it is a world in which he is the go—to guy, and the west is the villain, that is the script the kremlin leader sticks to, and it is why we heard him today accusing the west of igniting the war in ukraine, and it's why we heard him talk about the emergence of a new world order, which he says should be based on law and justice. which he says should be based on law andjustice. remember, this which he says should be based on law and justice. remember, this is the president who eight months ago invaded a sovereign, independent nation, his neighbour, ukraine. steve rosenberg, many thanks, our russia editor, with the latest analysis there in moscow. the oil gi

according to russian official nuclear doctrine, russia would launch a strategic nuclear strike against the united states and all the natoitness the launch of western missiles, no matter how armed they are, against our territories. and then, the whole planet will die. moscow may be hoping nuclear rhetoric will scare the west into reducing support for ukraine. it hasn't so far. bell tolls. protests in iran seem to be escalating despite a violent response by the country's security forces. thousands have turned out to mark a0 days since the death of 22—year—old mahsa amini, who died in police custody after being arrested for not wearing a hijab properly. the protests have grown to be a wider rejection of the hardline government of iran, with protesters setting fire to public buildings. our analysis editor ros atkins looks at the roots of the crisis. once more, protests are sweeping iran. once more, they're facing a crackdown. but the violence directed at protesters can't hide that something extraordinary is happening. yesterday, thousands gathered at the grave of a young woman who died last month, after being in custody. an

nato troops are on russian territory, then russia will use nuclear weapons against. they will hit a couple of london berlin brussels, but they will not hit ukraine this russian nuclear doctrineis now in russia nato did not leave a choice. whatever decision the alliance takes from him, he will only lose, because they have tied themselves to ukraine too much commitment. thank god no more. i hope they never give enough and what is already being delivered to ukraine with the help of american haimar missiles. with especially lech, ukraine copes with the killing of civilians. in the morning , a bus with civilians was fired at. in the area of ​​​​the daryevsky bridge in the kherson region, five people died on the spot, five more people were injured, footage. nightmare, the governor of the kherson region himself said that there were no military men on the bus, of course. there were only peaceful inhabitants, that is pure water terrorism in the west of course, no attention will be paid to mortals, because the realized world is agitated. exclusively russian drones. geranium, 2 drones tonight. the kamikaze once again sent fiery greetings from the wound to several military targets at on

nato, against russia. and of course, russia considered not a real threat to its existence on dogs, in the russian nuclear doctrine is one of the conditions for the launch of a nuclear war to defend the nation. european union leaders are meeting to tackle the continents energy crisis and the war in ukraine. friday's talks in prague are expected to focus on securing energy supplies as winter approaches. bills have stored as you countries slash supplies of russian gas. 15 members at 1st for a price ceiling on how much they would pay for gas pipe or shipped in germany and the netherlands are opposing it. thailand prime minister prior channel child has visited a child care center that was attacked on thursday. the nation is mourning the death of at least $37.00 people, including $23.00 children. flags across the country are flying at half staff. the motive is not known. tony chang has more from number alarm from. this is the area where the families have been waiting. in some cases for the last 24 hours initially to find out the worst news. and since then, just to find out what's been going on, a lot of the raw emotion

nato troops are on russian territory, then russia will use nuclear weapons against. they will hit paris, london, berlin, brussels, but they will not hit ukraine. this russian nuclear doctrineurse of this part of russia actually left nato no choice. whatever decision you make. l alliance from him, he will only lose, because they have associated themselves with ukraine with too great obligations. madness is absolute until the nuclear weapons of kiev thank god, they didn’t give it and i’m sure that they never will. today spoke out to savagely against the use of nuclear weapons. so the german chancellor responded to a request to comment on zelensky’s statement, but about the austrian chancellor, not hammer, in principle, refused to supply lethal weapons to kiev. he said that vienna would support kiev only by means of individual armor protection. here the us refuses to transfer missiles and long-range mc attacks to ukraine sharp jerked tells congress they fear that striking crimea with these munitions will exacerbate conflicts and could lead to nuclear escalation, although kiev has enough and what is already being delivered to ukraine with the help of american missiles hummers

well, the new york times communists wrote that through the doctrine of mutual defense, the principle of one for all and all for one on which natobased on it, it is unlikely that a country in a state of war will join the alliance now. they also remind us of the past skepticism of germany and france regarding ukraine's membership, and we have something to do with it. i think zoryana said the most important things. zoryana stepanenko was with us live from brussels. well, in ukraine, meanwhile, the support for joining nato is the highest in the history of observations. these are the results of the group's poll, the rating in the referendum. if such a referendum were held, right now, the initiative for ukraine's accession to nato would be supported. 83% of citizens and only 4% are against radio liberty does not conduct sociological research, but we also asked the residents of the capital whether they are for or against ukraine in nato, i am an expert, but probably we will not join now we have clearly stated our desire and, in principle, it seems that the barriers are less now than, for example, in march, that is, in principle, there

nato against russia. and of course, i should consider that a real threat to its existence on nuts in the ash and nuclear doctrine is one of the conditions for the launch of a nuclear war to defend that the nation rush also is very angry with their what the europeans have been talking about yesterday talking about the creation of a securities structure in the region without a russia being included in that. so at quite a lot of things and also the, the, they're still the demanding to be a part of the investigation to know the cause of the likes of public times or even what they call international terrorism against the north $3.00 and $1.00 and $2.00 pipelines. so there is an accumulation of, of, of, of reasons why she's angry with the, with the western side, and also with the ukrainians. thank you so much for how much val reporting from moscow pocket on it's still recovering from record flooding. the killed $1700.00 people in cost, nearly $40000000000.00. disease and damage to farming communities are prompted warnings of another disaster and the weeks and months to come. summer been job age reports from jump shore

doctrine. he has to go to this unthinkable level in order to prevent ukraine from becoming part of nato. >> todd: when asked about what putin is doing, here's what president joe biden responded. >> i think vladimir 213 putin finds himself in an incredibly difficult position. and what it reflects to me is his only tool available to him is to brutalize individual citizens in ukraine from ukrainian citizens to try and intimidate them into capitulating. they are not going to do that. >> todd: i don't know if that answer said anything. how should joe biden respond? >> joe biden should grab x and putin and act as an adult to put them in the table to start negotiating because we are on the brink of nuclear armageddon. joe biden himself admitted this to todd, brought us to this point because when joe biden was vice president under obama, instead of beeping up, we decreased or forced posture in ukraine. nato members still do not contribute even two percent to the defense treaty. only eight members out of 30 and germany the largest economy in europe can't even contribute to copercent. imagine that. this h

three months later, nato gathered in lisbon and adopted the very doctrine of anti-missile.edly. or rather, from us, allegedly from iran yes, and china means after putin as it turned out later, he gave the task to scientists to refine and invent the very weapon that breaks through this missile ring, as they once broke through ours, which means they understood everything is gone. everything. no, you don't need anything not these, uh, everything is on sea carriers of land carriers. now they begin to convince there, yes, it’s not dangerous at all for the russians. although i say again, they know very well, they were sitting in these nineties. yes, even in 2000 , these nuclear plants were engaged in the destruction of know how many missiles of what, what they can do with these missiles. uh, why are they releasing these clowns? i don't know, well, here they often say on programs that let's not talk about this topic. let's not talk about it, as if on the topic of nuclear weapons needs, of course they attacked a nuclear power. they are this power at first they scattered, so then, n

doctrine says that if you're losing, escalate. escalate to deescalate. so they're -- and if vladimir putin can point to anything and and say to his people, i told you, this was really nato that escalation because it allows him to to rally his people around the russian flag in a war that is not going well and is increasingly unpopular in russia. maria: well, it just appears that all of our adversaries are on the march, and it all happened after the botched withdrawal from afghanistan. i want to pivot to china because president xi is gaining a third a 5-year term as leader of china's communist party. the party congress is going to finish up this week. what do you take away from that, and will we see china get even more provocative the after this party congress? i know that there are right now as we speak chinese police throughout the united states. there's one police station that i know of many new york where the ccp members are there with surveillance programs and trying to insure that even if you're chinese-american, you better get onboard with the ccp narrative. >> yeah. now what's happened is xi jinping, unprecedented, historic third term. he's effectively been electe

department, john graham, is in a hurry to reassure, they say the doctrine is a doctrine, and they want to live all the actions of natod prudent nato definitely never bears. the first nuclear strike against the russian army in ukraine tensions between moscow and washington every day is growing more and more often from inflammatory political scientists and journalists on both sides of the ocean, words are heard, and as a result, nuclear weapons. here is an alarming sign of this autumn around the world, the demand for the so-called doomsday bunkers has increased dramatically. private companies that are engaged in the construction of such underground facilities are now unable to cope with drinking customers. yes, and the authorities of some states also picked up this nuclear hysteria, for example, in germany, switzerland, poland, finland, they began to check the bunkers and bomb shelters that remained there, since the cold war, moreover, brussels has allocated 540 million euros to create with a stock of medicines and protective equipment in case of chemical , biological or nuclear attacks, it is noteworthy that euro offi