the work of the nato military committee. members of the nato military committee meet at least twice a year, otherwise meeting weekly with representatives of other chiefs of staff. nato has a small military embassy, ​​usually headed by a three-star general, a small headquarters, they get the job done. in place, it's worth mentioning one more thing while we're about to talk about the war in ukraine, being the chairman of the nato military committee, i was also the chairman of the commission of the chiefs of general staff of ukraine nato, so the chiefs of the general staff of nato countries, the chief of the general staff of ukraine, sat, so to speak, at the same table, i was also the chairman of the council of the chiefs of general staff of russia nato . the chief of the russian general staff was present at these meetings and, on top of everything else, i was also chairman of the council of chiefs of staff of the euro-atlantic partnership, where military representatives of 48 countries gathered together and discussed the future

i suppose this is rare in the military sphere, but it is a tradition in nato. thus, the chairman of the military committeehairs the committee meeting. subordinate to him are two strategic commanders, who, i carried out a reform of the nato command structure, making a transition from a regional one. there are two strategic commanders, one responsible for operations and the other for transformation, it was important to me that nato's armed forces always fit the context of the current security situation, in terms of security policies and technology. so as far as planning is concerned, including operational planning, all this is the work of the nato military committee, the members of the nato military committee meet at least twice a year, the rest of the time they meet weekly with representatives of other commanders, this is a small military embassy, which is usually headed by a three star general, a small staff, they do the work on the ground, it's worth mentioning one more thing since we are going to talk about the war in ukraine, being the chairman nato military committee, i was also chairman of the commis

the chairman of the nato military committee, harald , was essentially one of the highest leaders.calls the russian army in the liman and kupinsky directions successful. the retreat, according to him, has almost 4,000 likes, because it goes against that agenda. defend democratic values, but what are we doing now, for example, ignoring the requirements of the constitution for peace, ignoring the right to freedom of speech, although the principles of pluralism and democracy consist precisely in the fact that you listen and leave europe comments, the general meaning of which is: finally, someone gave an objective assessment. haralt kuet is a great commander and man, i have attached great importance to his truthful words for many years. i have known lieutenant general kuyat since my service in the bundeswehr in the air force division. unfortunately, his words of wisdom are being suppressed by the current german political landscape and the german media. thank you mr. quit, yes, one must have the deadly, professional analysis of an absolute expert on this topic. this is my personal concl

the chairman of the nato military committee , harald, was essentially one of the highest leaders, andn region successful. and kupinsky directions, retreat to the ssu along his words are inevitable. this interview on the internet in just a few days received more than a million views, almost 40,000 likes, because it goes against the agenda that mainstream western dreams impose on the audience. we have always lived in an open society and tried to defend democratic values, but what are we doing now, for example, ignoring the requirements of the constitution for peace, ignoring the right to freedom of speech. although the principles of pluralism and democracy lie precisely in the fact that you listen to opposing opinions, and don't ignore him. thousands of viewers from europe also leave comments, the general meaning of which is this: finally, someone gave an objective assessment of the situation. harold kuyat , a great commander and man, i have attached great importance to his truthful words for many years, i have known lieutenant general kuyat since my time in the bundeswehr in the air fo

the former commander of the nato military committee said that russia. last summer caused serious damageo the armed forces of ukraine, and that kiev initially had no chance of success, but now the position of the ukrainian side is much worse than last year, what else said the german general and what reaction this caused, boris ivanin knows. a complete defeat, the bet on winning the ssu turned out to be untenable. german luftwafe general, former head of the nato military committee harald kueth, speaks extremely frankly about the ukrainian conflict. almost an hour long interview... ukrainian forces are in an extremely critical state, what we see at the moment are skirmishes with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive, the counter-offensive failed, the losses of the army are exorbitant during the offensive, the russians the armed forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics, defense, their goal is not to hold territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is the basic rule of the clause, disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself, this is

this view was shared by the former head of the nato military committee.d have ended much earlier. if not for the intervention of western powers. more details about everything, mikhail antonov. harald quiet with 2000 to 2002, inspector general of the bundeswehr. in russia, this post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff; from 2002 to 2005, he was the chairman of the nato military committee, that is, generally the highest army rank in the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents were at their most respectful. the nature of the ukrainian conflict. the general is that there has come a point in russia-us relations where the americans feel they can ignore the russians? of course, the war could have been prevented; russia sent a voluminous, thorough document for the united states and nato. the point was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world. ukraine's entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian. or at least the fate of russian-

about the progress of the special military operation. operation, the former commander of the nato military committeed that russia last summer caused serious damage to the armed forces and that kiev initially had no chance of success, and now the position of the ukrainian side is much worse than last year, and the german also said general, insolvent, german general luftwa, former head of the nato military committee haralt kuet, speaks extremely frankly about the ukrainian conflict, almost an hour-long interview, like a sobering shower for hotheads in the west. the ssu is not just at a dead end, as commander-in-chief zaluzhny recently wrote in the british press, everything is much worse. the armed forces of ukraine are in an extremely critical state, what we see at the moment is a static defense. their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, but to destroy ukrainian army. this is the basic rule of clausivism. disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost on its own, which is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved. it is no coincidence that the german general cites the

german general luftwa, former head of the nato military committee harald koeth, speaks extremely franklyhe ukrainian conflict. almost an hour long interview like a sobering shower for the heated. ukrainian forces are in an extremely critical state, what we see at the moment is a skirmish with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive, the counter-offensive failed, the losses of the ukrainian armed forces were exorbitant during the offensive, the russian armed forces , on the contrary, used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense , them... not to retain territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is the basic rule of clausivitz, disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself itself, this is precisely what the russian armed forces have achieved. it is no coincidence that the german general cites the example of a strategist from prussia who served in the russian army during the war with napoleon. history repeats itself, defeat then, failure now. the key problem is. that in our politics, especially in german , such people have recently a

the head of the nato military committee, harald kueth , speaks extremely frankly about the ukrainianict: the almost hour-long interview is like a sobering shower for commander-in-chief zaluzhny, who recently appeared in the british press, everything is much worse. the armed forces of ukraine are in an extremely critical condition. what we see at the moment is a skirmish with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive. the counteroffensive failed. the vsu's losses were exorbitant during the offensive. the russian armed forces are on the contrary. used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to hold territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is the basic rule of clausivitz, disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself, this is exactly what the russian armed forces achieved. it is no coincidence that the german general cites the example of a strategist from prussia who served in the russian army in years of war with napoleon, history repeats itself, defeat then, failure. and now. the key problem in the article i

from 2002 to 2005, he was the chairman of the nato military committee, that is, the highest militaryin the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents were at their maximum. which served as the basis for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that relations between russia and the united states have come the moment when americans felt they could ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented; we saw at the end of 2021, when the situation was heating up, on december 17, russia sent nato a voluminous , thorough document to the united states. the point was: acts in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world and affected russian interests. i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian or at least the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in donbass. some nato countries, and especially the united states, were not ready to discuss this. general quit saw a time when the russia-nato council wa

a german general, former head of the nato military committee, spoke about the affairs of the armed forces of ukraine. according to him, the russian army leaves no chance for kiev, but even despite this, the zelsky administration is ready to do anything to meet the expectations of western sponsors. in fact, the situation can be described as follows: the losses of the army are exorbitant in time. offensive, the russian armed forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to hold territory at any cost , but to destroy the ukrainian armed forces, clausewitz’s basic rule disarms the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself, this is exactly what the russian armed forces reached. ukraine must win, they all say it in unison, as the german minister said during his visit to kiev: ukraine will win because it must to win, but this is not politics - this is pure fanaticism , but what disappoints me most is the fanaticism with which this policy is carried out, with eyes closed, without looking back, and most importantly, without a ca

the former commander of the nato military committee said that russia last summer caused serious damageo the ssu, and that kiev. there was no chance for success, and now the situation on the ukrainian side is much worse than last year, boris ivanin knows what else the german general said and what reaction it caused. complete defeat, the bet on victory in the ssu turned out to be untenable. the german general, former head of the nato military committee, harald koeth, speaks extremely frankly about the ukrainian conflict. the almost hour-long interview is like a sobering shower for the heated heads in the west, they are simply at a dead end, as commander-in-chief zaluzhny recently wrote in the british press, everything is much worse. armed forces of ukraine are in extremely critical condition. what we see at the moment is a skirmish with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive, the counter-offensive has failed. the vsu's losses were exorbitant during the offensive. the russian armed forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics and switched to strategic defense. their goal is not t

a german general, former head of the nato military committee, spoke about the situation at the front.ording to him, the competent actions of the russian army do not leave kiev any chance of victory. the general is confident that in order to meet the expectations of the west, the zelsky administration is ready to do anything, even if we are talking about the death of civilians. in reality, the situation can be described as follows: the losses of the army are exorbitant during the offensive. russian forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics, crossed to strategic defense. not to hold territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian armed forces. clausewitz's basic rule is to disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself, this is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved. ukraine must win, they all say this in unison . as the german minister said during his visit to kiev, ukraine will win because it must win. but this is not politics, this is pure fanaticism. but what disappoints me most is the fanaticism with which this the policy is carried ou

author in their parliament is quite, let’s say, problematic, the former commander of the nato military committee of the past... in the summer caused serious damage in the ssu, and now the position of the ukrainian side is much worse than in 2022. what else said the german generals, mikhail antonov will tell you what reaction this caused. harald kuit from 2000 to 2002, inspector general of the bundeswehr, in russia this post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff, from 2002 to 2005, he was chairman of the nato military committee, that is generally the highest in the army. for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that there has come a point in relations between russia and the united states when the americans have a feeling that they can ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented. we saw at the end of 2021 when the situation escalated on december 17th. which from the russian point of view threatened the world and affected russian interests. i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of peop

contradiction, beyond logic, we tried to propose it one after another. former chairman of the nato military committeelt kuet spoke about the failure of the ukrainian counter-offensive to the successful tactics of russian troops, now, fragment of an interview with an authoritative military expert. ukrainchen streitк, ukrainian armed forces are in critical condition. that we we see at the moment - these are skirmishes with the enemy, this is more in itself. this is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved. the use of russian helicopters is very effective. the russian army has the most modern control system. there is an excellent relationship between intelligence officers. this interconnection allows them to react with virtually no delay, they pick up targets within minutes, maybe even seconds, destroy them, this makes the russian army extremely effective, mainly in germany, they were taught to operate and master western weapons systems, but they simply could not learn how to conduct combat in such a short time. the ukrainian military is criticized for failing to implement what it has learned

this is what the former head of the nato military committee, german general harald kujat, who maintainedequipment, recently admitted. in germany, there is some kind of false belief that weapons systems can solve all problems and replace people. we seem to forget that during these months there were hundreds of thousands of ukrainian soldiers. killed or seriously wounded, they can no longer maintain all the weapons systems that we supply them. the russians have managed to build a networked system in which intelligence and defense are integrated and can be much stronger than they were before the special military operation began. this is a very modern, powerful army. kyiv has almost no reserves left. we understand that assessments are estimates, but they have yet to be confirmed by actions on the ground, but. they don’t have any army left ; all the weapons we sent them didn’t help, and there’s no one to fight. and there is also ex- us intelligence officer tony shaffer. i believe that ukrainian forces are on the brink. do you think that there will be no formal end to the war? the main problem

harald kuer... the former head of the nato military committee, which corresponds to the post of chiefl staff, recently explained how things worked behind the scenes. the war could have ended approximately 6 weeks after the start; back it announced large-scale plans to supply ukraine with ships and build two naval bases in ochakov on the black sea in berdyansk on azov, but the northern defense forces intervened. however, the british are clearly still overwhelmed by an irresistible desire to gain a foothold on these shores. since the crimean war, cameron has already been posing in odessa with minister kuleba. i am proud that the uk plays an important role, and we will continue to do so, the prospects for kiev. there are not enough weapons, the us is starting to turn away, and joining the eu is very far away, despite the sanctions, the state of the russian economy is better than before, but more importantly, better than the european one. they wanted to convince us that the russians, because of the acute necessary, they take chips out of washing machines in order to have at least some ele

the former chairman of the nato military committee, german general harald kueth, spoke about the failureter-offensive to the successful tactics of russian troops. now a fragment of an interview with a reputable military expert. ukrayinische befinden. ukrainian forces are there. used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is the basic rule of clausowitz, disarm the enemy and then that’s it the rest will happen almost on its own, this is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved, the use of russian helicopters with almost no delay, they are caught. within a few minutes, maybe even seconds, they destroy it, this makes the russian army extremely effective. another point is that the offensive of the russian army is characterized by the consolidation of all weapons. synergy is created with the army's superior skill, a skill that takes years to develop. you see, so that a simple soldier becomes commander of the company, 10 years must pass before the start of the counter-offensive, mai

served as chief of the general staff of the bundesper from 2002 to 2005 was chairman of the nato military committeees the situation at the front for ukraine as catastrophic; losses in the ssu, he says, are now beyond measure. once again, this is a direct quote. in addition, the nato general reports that moscow is using defensive tactics with the aim of not holding anyone. at the cost of territory, and to destroy, grind the ukrainian armed forces, the russians, argues couette, use the basic rule of the prussian military theorist clausewitz, disarm the enemy and then, as clausewitz wrote, everything else will happen essentially on its own, the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that the very moment has come in relations between russia and the united states when the americans for some reason, mistakenly, have the feeling that they can ignore the russians, but most importantly, he explained why the russians do not blow up bridges , although only on the dnieper, there are about twenty of them, according to a high-ranking nato general, this is connected with only one thing, the ru

watch the continuation of the interview with the bundwehr general, former chairman of the nato military committee of the german youtube channels. if you've already spent all your energy on training, don't waste too much. order from a scooter in a selection of profitable shelves, free delivery, a scooter without extra expenses, the legendary alfabank credit card, free forever, now more profitable. receive a supercake every month and withdraw cash for free from any atm across the country. not just profitable, alpha. profitable, discounts in the lead role , serrvilet will help, 1449, when you want a big special with ostivstem, spicy pepper sauce and smoky sauce, then lightning is not scary, try the big special spicy mix. no matter what kind of businessman you are, enterprising, entrepreneurial, entrepreneur, whether you burn, grow, or cut your hair, for real business you need... a bank for business psb for real. there is freshness in every feed purchase. we cook for you with fresh ingredients every day. try the freshly delicious lenta fresh cheesecakes made from natural cottage cheese for 49 rubles

russia with the help of the ukrainian conflict, said a german general, former head of the nato military committeerussian army is becoming more and more effective as kiev suffers huge. the use of russian helicopters is very effective, the russian army has the most modern control system, excellent communication, this allows them to react with almost no delay, they acquire targets within minutes, maybe even seconds, destroy it, this makes the russian army extremely effective, one more point , consolidation of all weapons, synergy, and also the excellent skill of the army, this skill is developed over the years, studying abroad. the russian army is very a modern, very powerful army, no one has managed to achieve the political goals for which the western authorities support this war, namely the weakening of the russian armed forces, the weakening of russia as a whole in political and economic terms, in political terms, on the contrary, we see how they cooperate with china, we see that the russian army has become the strongest for... russia in the airborne forces. if you've already spent half an evenin

well, the former commander of the nato military committee said that russia last summer caused seriouse to the ssu and that kiev initially had no chance of success, and now the position of the ukrainian side is much worse than in 2022. what else said the german general, boris ivanin will tell you what reaction this caused. complete destruction. the bet on winning the ssu turned out to be unfounded. german general luftwa, former head of the military committee. the armed forces of ukraine are in an extremely critical condition. what we see at the moment is a skirmish with the enemy, but no longer a counter-offensive. the counteroffensive failed. the vsu's losses were exorbitant during the offensive. the russian armed forces , on the contrary, used defensive tactics and switched to strategic defense. their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, and to destroy the ukrainian army is the basic rule of the clause. it is no coincidence that the german general cites the example of a strategist from prussia who served in the russian army during the war with napoleon. history repeats itself

by the way, the former military chief spoke about the military failure of the west nato committee.he losses of the kiev formations are huge, the militants are harmed by mass desertion, the chief of our berlin one studied the interview in detail. mikhail antonov. harald kuit from 2000 to 2002 - inspector general of the bundeswehr. in russia, this post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff. from 2002 to 2005, he was the chairman of the nato military committee, that is, the highest military rank in the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents took each other as seriously as possible, which served as the basis for mutual respect. the nature of russia and the united states came to a point where the americans felt they could ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented; russia sent a voluminous , thorough document to the united nations and nato. the point was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world and affected russian interests. donbass, some nato countries an

west do not concern anyone, the german general said this in an interview, former head of the nato military committeestead, politicians fanatically talk about kiev’s victory, the military emphasizes that there is less and less common sense in the leadership of nato countries. the key problem is that in our politics, in the politics of germany, especially, very recently people have appeared who, roughly speaking, replace the lack of knowledge and competence with self-confidence and ignorance. the policy that we are currently pursuing will greatly disappoint, what irritates us is , first of all, the fanaticism with which this policy is carried out, blindfolded without looking back, and most importantly - without a thoughtful approach, and of course, without a single thought about what consequences this policy... will lead to ukraine. the population of this country has already suffered hundreds of thousands of casualties. the country is destroyed, but they claim that ukraine must win? yes, this is a fanatical spell. while visiting ukraine, the german minister said: ukraine will win because it simply mus

leon murovyov and dmitry malyshev, the former head of the nato military committee said. the kiev formations are huge, in the ranks of the militants, massive desertion, the chief of our berlin bureau , mikhail antonov, studied this in detail. harald kuit from 2000 to 2002 - inspector general of the bundeswehr. in russia, this post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff. from 2002 to 2005 he was chairman of the military. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents took each other as seriously as possible, which served as the basis for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that relations between russia and the united states have come to an end. russia sent to the united states and nato a voluminous, thorough discussion of russian interests, i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian, or at least the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in the donbass, some nato countries and, above all , the united states, not were ready. gene

ukraine and fanaticism in politics, we analyze the loud statements of the former head of the nato military committee. how did they react to the resonant interview in europe in kiev itself? to central russia there are heavy rains. the weather will get worse this weekend, will the warmth return? well, now our broadcast will continue with a new episode of the author’s program. nikita mikhalkova besagon tv. watch right after the short commercial. open an investment in tenkov with a yield of 15% and move towards your goals. we have increased the rate for new customers and for each of our 38 million customers. make a deposit with a yield of 15%. sinkov. we keep prices low. global village 50. five to the rescue! shopping days at waltburys, household chemicals for the cleanliness of your home, helpers in the fight against germs and dirt, choose at competitive prices , oh, and i see you don’t complicate things with gifts for the family , tangerines for everyone, i don’t complicate the iskhlats, one touch with a smartphone, i paid for the chping, but why was it possible, possible, more and cashback in superma

counter-offensive has failed, the statement of the german general luft wafe, the former head of the nato military committee, we are against sending hungarian taxpayers’ money to ukraine, the words of the prime minister hungary as a mirror of the mood in the eu. another shelling of the gaza strip, the destruction of hospitals, the situation in the middle east, what is happening in the palestinian enclave, what they say in israel, they are carefully observing and analyzing everything our correspondents on the ground. well, now our broadcast will continue with a new episode of the author’s program nikita mikhalkova bisagon. i welcome you, dear friends, to our next episode of the author’s program bisagon tv, it will be called the gospel of louis vuitton, i think that you will understand why we called our program that, but first, as always, i want to report how you watched our the previous program, which... was called, if there is no god, everything is permitted, together with channel russia-24, channel russia-1, youtube, telegram channels and so on and so forth, we were watched by more than 12 million viewers,

people, as it were , the us and nato have deliberately aggravated the conflict by ukraine, this was stated by a german general, former military chief of the nato military committee. according to him, the collision could have been prevented more than once, but the west simply did not want to start negotiations; instead, at the end of 2021, when the situation was getting even more tense, it was necessary to take into account russian security issues, i note that their claims were justified, the question about ukraine's entry into nato, the fate of people who consider themselves russian in donbass, here are a few aspects, but looking back, i see many nato countries from... usa they just didn’t want to even talk about it; if dialogue had taken place, we would have at least tried to prevent war, but no. the tension was fueled by the west. let me tell you for sure, we didn’t do what we could have done. this war could have been ended in about 2 months. in istanbul, the negotiations could have achieved good results, but the agreement was not signed, under pressure from the west. boris johnson came to kiev to prevent its signing. i regard this as pressure. nato led by the

nato military committee, retired german general harold kueth spoke about the failure of the ukrainian of russian troops. now a fragment of an interview with authoritative military expert. ukrainian forces are in critical condition. it’s worth saying this very clearly, we see a chaotic management of operations, the losses of the entire army were exorbitant during the offensive, the russian armed forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian army, this is clausov’s basic rule. everything else will happen almost on its own. this is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved. the use of russian helicopters is very effective. the russian army has the most modern control system. there is a great relationship between intelligence systems and influence systems. this interconnection allows them to react with virtually no delay. they capture the target within a few minutes, maybe even seconds, and destroy it. this makes the russian army extremely. effective, another point i

a german general, former head of the nato military committee, stated this in an interview with the hkcmituation can be described as follows: the losses of the army are exorbitant during the offensive. the russian armed forces, on the contrary, used defensive tactics. everything else will happen almost on its own, which is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved. the general analyzes the situation at the front, especially the actions of russian troops in the kupinsky and krasnolimansky directions, believes that quote: at some point russian. russia is not destroying bridges across the dnieper. the dnieper is a wide river. in some places it reaches several kilometers in width. and the ukrainian armed forces have tried to cross it several times over the past few weeks, but the russians have so far maintained bridges across the dnieper, even though they are within reach of their firepower. 20 bridges more than once. although this would be an advantage for the russians, since ukraine would be able to supply its part with difficulty, so it must be taken into account that the russia

a german general, former head of the nato military committee, stated this in an interview with the hkcmel. in reality the situation. can be described as follows: the losses of the army are exorbitant during the offensive. russian armed the forces opposite used defensive tactics and switched to strategic defense. their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, but to destroy the ukrainian armed forces. the basic rule of clauswitz is to disarm the enemy and then everything else will happen almost by itself. this is exactly what the russian armed forces have achieved. the general analyzes the situation. front, especially the action of russian troops in the kupinsky and krasnolimansky directions, believes that quote, at some point the russians will really launch a powerful offensive, speaks of a significant concentration of forces and discusses why russia does not destroy bridges across the dnieper. the dnieper is a wide river. in some places it reaches several kilometers in width, and ukraine's armed forces are several. they have tried to cross it once in the last few weeks, but the rus

this point of view was shared by the former head nato military committee.ct itself could have ended much earlier if not for the intervention of western powers. mikhail antonov will tell you more about everything. harald kuit from 2000 to 2002 - inspector general of the bundeswehr. in russia , this post corresponds to the position of chief of the general staff. from 2002 to 2005 he was chairman of the military committee over. that is, generally the highest army rank in the alliance. his career took shape during the cold war, when opponents took each other as seriously as possible, which served as a basis for mutual respect. the nature of the ukrainian conflict, the general believes, is that there has come a point in relations between russia and the united states when the americans have a feeling that they can ignore the russians. of course, the war could have been prevented ; russia sent the united states a voluminous, thorough document; the point was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world and aff

the statement of the german general luft wafe, the former head of the nato military committee, we arethe words of the hungarian prime minister, as a mirror of the mood in the eu. another shelling of the gas sector, another destruction of hospitals, the palestinian enclave, what they say in israel, the middle east, what is happening in everything is carefully observed and analyzed by our correspondents on the ground. well, now our broadcast will continue with a new episode of the author’s program nikita mikhalkova besagon.

counteroffensive failed, a statement by the german luftwaf general, former... head of the nato military committee ukraine. and words prime minister of hungary as a mirror of the mood in the eu. another shelling of the gaza strip, another destruction of hospitals, we will learn from our correspondents on the ground about the situation in the middle east, what is happening in palestine, what they are saying in israel. and also before the end of this hour, again covid-19 along with the flu. rospotrebnadzor warns that the incidence is growing, and what can and should be done to minimize health risks. vladimir putin visited the headquarters of the southern military district, the presidents were accompanied by the minister of defense sergei shaiga, chief of the general staff valery gerasimov, head.

general bondes , the former chairman of the nato military committee, gave an interview to one of thelly dispelled the main myths of modern western propaganda about the conflict in ukraine. kiev cannot be defeated by the loss of everything; the huge russian army is only becoming stronger, in the countries of the north atlantic alliance they rule.

harald kuet, the former chief of nato's military committee, which corresponds to the post of chief of scenes. good results for ukraine. on april 9 , johnson came to kiev to prevent the signing. the peace treaty is not was signed under pressure from the collective west, namely under pressure from some nato countries led by the united states. it was great britain that two years ago announced large-scale plans for the supply of ships and construction to ukraine. two naval bases in ochakov on the black sea in berdyansk on the azov sea, but the northern defense forces intervened. however, the british are clearly still overwhelmed by an irresistible desire to gain a foothold on these shores since the crimean war. and now cameron is posing in odessa with minister kuleba. i'm proud to say the uk has an important role to play and we will continue to do so, there is a lot more to come. what exactly lies ahead, the western press’s forecasts for kiev are bleak. they talk about the perfect storm that ukraine finds itself in. the hypothesis of ukraine's defeat, despite the support of the west, is n

with the help of the ukrainian conflict, a german general stated this, former head of the nato military committeerding to him, the russian army is becoming more and more effective at a time when kiev is suffering huge losses due to inept command. we see chaotic leadership. the losses of the armed forces of ukraine are exorbitant, especially in this offensive; russia, on the contrary, has switched to strategic defense, its goal is to destroy the armed forces of ukraine. the use of russian helicopters is very effective. russian army. this allows them to react with virtually no delay, they lock onto a target within minutes, maybe even seconds, destroy it, this does the russian army is extremely effective, one more thing, the consolidation of all weapons , synergy is created, and also the excellent skill of the army, this skill is developed over the years, it cannot be learned in 6 weeks, that’s how long the ukrainian brigades studied abroad. the russian army is very modern. a very powerful army, no one managed to achieve the political goals for which the western authorities support this war, namely

of the general staff of the bundesfer, but held the post of the highest military rank of nato, headed the military alliance committeeians did not go on the defensive in order to retain the territories they occupied at any cost, the russian army is simply systematically grinding down the ukrainian troops, that is, it is acting according to the methods of the world-famous prussian military theorist and military commander, at the same time, by the way, a colonel of the russian imperial army, clausewitz, he 200 years ago he said that the main thing in war is to disarm the enemy, then he will no longer be able to resist, that is, the speech of the very demilitarization that was originally was declared one of the goals of the specialization and is now being successfully implemented. the dnieper is a wide river, in some places the distance between the banks is several kilometers. ukrainian troops tried to cross it several times in recent weeks, but they failed, but the russians still have not destroyed all the bridges across the dnieper, and by the way there are about twenty of them along the entire front line. and it woul

very many, here is an interesting statement by the chairman of the former chairman of the nato military committeeays that in one impulse, as the german minister said during his visit to kiev, ukraine will win, because she has to win, but this is not politics, this is fanaticism. without looking back, and most importantly, without a careful, thoughtful approach to the needs of one’s own people, and of course, without a single thought about what consequences this policy will lead to the population of ukraine, which is written as follows: the loss of all forces is exorbitant during the offensive, the russian armed forces are on the contrary used defensive tactics, switched to strategic defense, their goal is not to retain territory at any cost, of course, this is exactly what the russian armed forces strength and have reached, russian for several days already... why is this, because that system , the work of the state apparatus , the military-political apparatus, which was created in the western hegemanistic system, it is totalitarian in its essence, and if you do not follow there this party line, i

this is what the former head of the nato military committee , german general harald kujad, recently admittedischen zustand. the fact is that all this time the ukrainian armed forces suffered huge losses in manpower. entire crews who serviced western military equipment were destroyed. in germany, there is some kind of false belief that weapons systems can solve all problems and replace people. we seem to forget what these months are like. hundreds of thousands of ukrainian soldiers were killed or seriously wounded, they can no longer maintain all the weapons systems that we supply them. the russians managed to build a networked system in which reconnaissance and defense are combined and can react to the movements of the ukrainian armed forces within seconds. this makes russian defense very effective. the russian armed forces are now much stronger than they were before the special military operation began. it is very modern and powerful. we understand that assessments are estimates, but they have yet to be confirmed by actions on earth, but a new mood in the unofficial west is a fact, ex-assis

from 2002 to 2005, he was the chairman of the nato military committee, that is, the highest militaryhe end of 2021, when the situation was heating up on december 17, russia sent a voluminous, thorough document to the united states of america, the essence was to act in accordance with specific events that, from the russian point of view, threatened the world , affected russian interests. i will name two main aspects: ukraine’s entry into nato and the fate of people who consider themselves russian, or at least the fate of russian-speaking citizens of ukraine in the donbass, some nato countries and, above all, with the russian council, nato was a completely working instrument of global stability. he believes that the first crack in moscow's relations with the west began under bush jr. in 2002, when the united states withdrew from the anti-ballistic missile treaty in order to deploy its interception systems in romania and poland. in one of his earlier interviews, from the 4th year, immediately after crimea, quit called on nato to sit down and talk to the russians. agreements between ukra

interests are, the words our own interests were voiced, just the other day the head of the nato military committeeget the impression that this is the last stage before by how ukraine will ask western soldiers to follow western weapons systems because weapons systems cannot compensate for the loss of ukrainian army personnel. the army, the state that kuet now considers close to catastrophic, isn’t the news then from... a kind of informational anti-crisis action, something like this has already happened. the capitulation in mariupol in media terms for ukraine was smoothed over by a gift, the status of a candidate for accession to the eu. the loss of solidar was covered by tanks leopard, artemowska, with the promise of training on f-16 aircraft, now there is a failure of the counter-offensive, which only the lazy did not write about in the west. this version is supported by news about moldova - this is another candidate country with which today it is recommended to begin negotiations on accession to the eu. this happened. against the backdrop of the deafening failure of the pro-european party in powe

let us remember that quite recently he was a general and chairman of the nato military committee, in ectations of the west, and will continue to do so only worse. the ukrainian counteroffensive is not going as the ukrainians themselves expected. time allowed russia to prepare very well for the counter-offensive. supplies of weapons needed by ukraine are delayed. ukrainian soldiers not only feel tired, but increasingly disillusioned with western support and feel that we are abandoning them. of course, this is not the best starting point for surviving a harsh winter, and the winter will certainly not be easy for ukraine. but at the same time, the west understands that it has nowhere to retreat. ukraine has turned into a financial pyramid , which turned out to have no foundation at all, and the only way to recoup your investments is to get as much as possible, this is how western journalists persuade their viewers to spend money on ukraine. it was a symbolic gesture of solidarity. the us secretary of defense met with president vladimir zelsky in an attempt to reassure him that american s

also ex-chief of the military nato committee discusses why the russian army did not destroy.wide river , several kilometers wide in some places, and the ukrainian armed forces have tried to cross it several times recently, but the russians still maintain bridges across the dnieper, although they are within reach of their firepower. 20 bridges have not been destroyed, although this would be an advantage for the russians, since ukraine would be able to supply its part with difficulty, so we must take into account that the russians can cross the dnieper along them, but it is unlikely... and they will achieve complete occupation of the country. former american intelligence officer scott rieth also spoke about kiev’s information war. he commented on the statement of the head of the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine dmitry kuleba. scott is confident, while cave takes part in the minsk process, the nato countries were preparing the ukrainian army for combat. liar, your own president poroshenko admits that the entire minsk process was a sham, necessary to buy nato time to streng

president of the czech republic, he is also a general and the former chairman of the political military committee of natoologize, well, that is, this person understands that, he says, the problem is, of course, that our posts the supply of armaments was too slow, and the problem, the problem is not in the management of the ukrainian troops, not in the stability of the ukrainian soldiers, but at the same time, our problem is that we gave them too little, and instead allowed the russians to prepare for, for the ukrainian counteroffensive, i.e. everything is clear here, questioning this ukrainian unity, i believe that it is against the interests of ukraine, and i do not find a single reason why this should happen, i do not understand, i simply do not understand it . if there are any elements there, of course, what they can do it, but come out and say that i, my government is as shaky as yanukovych, or there is some kind of special operation here, well, this is very strange, we have literally one and a half to two minutes, and i have one more question, because we know that this situation happens very often i

chiefs of the general staff of the bundesfer, from 2002 to 2005, was the chairman of the nato military committee be able to win the war because it cannot return its territories, and it’s not even a matter of square meters. the ukrainian government should be interested in protecting its population, what is the moral value of conquering a few more square meters, especially in a region where people live who consider themselves russian or russian-speaking and sacrificing thousands of ukrainian lives in the process counter-offensive, is this morally correct? how many kilometers of land can you occupy next year, next year, we haven’t finished this year yet, but well, this year, i don’t know how many kilometers we have occupied, we have a plan, yes, very specific. but i won't share it, sorry. and thirdly, the united states also cannot win this war, because it cannot achieve the political goals for which it supports it, namely the weakening of the russian armed forces, the weakening of russia as a whole, economics political. on the contrary, unlike the united states, the russians have secured the suppor