this is 60 units of housing for families located at 474 natoma. the median income is 60% for all units. i would be happy to answer any questions. >> i just have a question about when the time -- about when the project would be completed. >> i am not sure. i would have to have bridge housing give you more details. >> good morning, supervisors. the construction is 20 months. >> 20 months beginning later this month pending bond approval? >> thank you. we do not have a budget analyst report because there is no general fund liability with this item, correct? why don't we open this up for public comment, are there those that wish to speak on item number one? seeing 9, public comment is closed. this item is before us, can we move this with recommendation? we can do that without objection. item two. >> item number two, ordinance authorizing the adult probation department to retroactively except and expand a grant in the amount of $747,000 from the united states department of justice to implement reentry, a comprehensive reentry pathway for people on post

the access to the net,-- to natoma pass is not considered at all, and does not been considered the subject of action, as it is required to be. the third substantive area is the construction impact analysis. they are dismissed in the eir summarily, simply by the statement that these types of impact, because of their temporary nature, are generally considered less significant. while that may be true, that construction impacts are generally considered less than significant, that does not mean they are less than significant in every case, and certainly not in this case. you're talking about a two-year construction. even by the busy standards of san francisco downtown, that is a lazy and significant construction. the eir does not consider any of the impact of the construction other than the air quality impact. everything else is dismissed. we believe the eir must be recirculated so that the full impact of construction would be considered. again, i would ask that you send the eir back to planning for revision to comply with the law. if not, i would ask that you forgo a decision today to allow th

lo -- has launche vaughn natomas longer since not contacting of them. >>brian: a beautiful day today it is clear. this is the bay bridge with temperatures in the 40's. san francisco, look at these temperatures! it is 49 degrees in san francisco. redwood city, 43 degrees. some places are getting close to freezing for tonight. here is the satellite. there is a weather system to the north of california producing some cooler temperatures for the bay on sunday. 60s. however, things are going to get much cooler with temperatures only in the mid 50s for tomorrow. even the gusting winds. 20 m.p.h.-30 m.p.h. cooler for monday, tuesday with even cold mornings. the chance for rainfall will return on wednesday wet day. even 3 in.-6 in. on the forecast model. tomorrow, 32 in santa rosa. the highs only making it into the mid '50s it is going to be brisk. gusting winds and cooler readings. a look at your 7 day around the bay changes in the forecast. monday, tuesday mostly sunny but cooler. the chance for rain will develop late on wednesday. that beautifustrong stretch

we heard in natomas support -- unanimous support. there is some appetite for that among some folks were peÑa attention to this issue. i just saw the database of projects in the pipeline that qualify. i am not prepared to talk about that yet. i am learning about it. >> it is not that the mayor is opposed. what we could do move this so it gets incorporated in and we get two weeks to confer on this issue and for the mayor to take a position? >> sure. >> expanding the city wide means there will not need to be an official fee published so you will need to wait three weeks in order to facilitate getting an ad in the newspaper. supervisor wiener: that gives plenty of time for discussion. supervisor chiu: it is my and standing from planning staff -- understanding from planning staff that the language of a proposed for the expansion, there are no projects that you are aware of that would fall into that category, is that right? >> faris eight out of -- >> this is a spread sheet that has developed some of the projects change as we go through th

now you are standing on natoma street, looking back toward second. you can see the bus ramp coming in from the bay bridge. to your right is a wonderful concentration primarily a food- based retail. a bit closer, you will see the building is a very welcoming, transparent. storefronts are being designed to emphasize that tenant inside. as you can imagine, with a structure this impressive and imposing, there is a concern tenants will be visible with the primary design is you. this is a very interesting view to me. if any of you remember minna if you years ago, it did not look like this. to see an image like this sum of 150 years later, really speaks an enormous amount of civilization and progress, in a relatively brief span of time. minna will be full of retail and activity, full, open, and accessible. this is a few of the thunder pass through the transit center. this is an important underpass, one of the primary ways north and south through the transit center, also a site for public art and retail activity. i will go into a little bit more detail on th

circulation to the mid-block area, and illustrates in graphics and text how to access would occur from natomaseet under project conditions. specifically, the project details but 14.5 ft. tall vehicular access tunnel and a driveway on howard street, similar to existing conditions. during the roughly two year construction, access to the mid- block area would be temporarily eliminated. the eir outlines two options addressing the loading and delivery operations from either a temporary third street center or a temporary ruling on howard street. either option would fees a bleak allow access, but would not result in significant environmental impact. to the concern related to fire station operations at 935 folsom st., the product description has as part of the operation of that station signal pre-emption at sixth and folsom. it has been indicated by the fire department that the policy will be not to use fire signals when exiting are coming back to the fire station, because signal pre-emption would allow signals to clear the traffic along folsom st., and the use of sirens would not be necessary under t

the access to the net,-- to natoma pass is not considered at all, and does not been considered the subject of action, as it is required to be. the third substantive area is the construction impact analysis. they are dismissed in the eir summarily, simply by the statement that these types of impact, because of their temporary nature, are generally considered less significant. while that may be true, that construction

a regular inadequate natomas.f the address for what we call the people living on the street or under the bridge and very important that they were protected by this. but moving them toward young people, children and expanding that was very slow and we had the hard fact and working on that. i can remember that hearing. very few people there, but it was the most important hearing. one of our members of congress testified. the first time he'd ever talked about the fact that he was homeless and had been abused. i have to say we were all in tears, all five of us and had such an impact so we really were an changing the definition there. but it wasn't enough. and if you look at the high definition, the title obviously is the general definition. but then the things that you have to go through still that an individual or family will imminently lose their house -- their housing, including the housing that the rent or live in, sharing with others rooms in hotels or motels, not paid for by federal state and local government pr