navid, about 300 other people were also infected with this imported virus . when we told them what kind of move this is, they said , "for the advancement of our science, which science did you infect us first, then you brought it, then you started our experiments, and you are adding it to it." the companies that are selling drugs that are making drugs are now more than 54,000 people infected with hiv in iran want to investigate the case in these sanctions against diseases that are cruel . i can boldly say that the causal responsibility of 54,000 people of our country who are currently suffering from aids. are and were identified, the annulment of those identified based on the initial entry of the virus is the responsibility of france, and we seriously pursue the same responsibility of the french government in those years for the transfer of these contaminated bloods, neither condemned in human rights circles and courts nor he gave credit to our compatriots. they admitted that the drugs we have been infected. even in an interview that was aired on french tv at

navid, about 300 other people were infected with this imported virus. in iran , they want the case to be heard in international courts. france is responsible for the 54,000 people who are currently suffering from aids in our country. the french government in those years to transfer these contaminated blood, not in human rights circles and courts he was condemned and not our compatriots. the french government was never even willing to apologize to the patients who contracted the virus and unfortunately lost their lives. pursuing iran's hemophilia law these days has led to the drafting of a legal bill against the company that produces these contaminated blood products, which, of course , is being pursued by the presidential legal office and the human rights headquarters of the judiciary. with the help and support of the international law affairs of the presidency, which fortunately announced their support and support us in this case , we will take this matter to the courts as well. human rights headquarters does not provide any kind of assistance to peopl

navid, about 300 other people were also infected with this imported virus . you first infected us manually, then you brought us, then you started collecting our tests and selling them to those companies that are making medicine. now , more than 54,000 people are infected with achi virus and in iran , they want to hear the case in international courts . france is responsible for the people of our country who are currently suffering from aids. the french government in those years for the transfer of these contaminated blood was neither condemned in human rights circles and courts, nor did it benefit our compatriots. the french government never even refused to apologize to the patients who contracted the virus. and unfortunately, they did not save their lives. pursuing iran's hemophilia law these days has led to the drafting of a legal bill against the company that produces these contaminated blood products, which of course is being pursued by the presidential legal office and the human rights headquarters of the judiciary. with the help and support of the inter

about 10 years ago, navid had an accident on the street, but no one took him to the hospital.5 to 20 minutes, the emergency room came. if you see an injured person on the street, would you take him to the hospital? this is the question we asked people. not under these conditions. legally, they will be caught, why did you bring this, you have to call the emergency room or the police will come, you will get into trouble, you go there, you say, sir , you hit yourself , it was not an accident, sir, if someone is injured on the highway. if he falls, you as a driver will help him and take him to the hospital, it is 100% risky. the members of the parliament have proposed that in case of approval , a person who takes an injured person to the hospital should not be arrested and detained. do not talk about it and other people did not witness the case and do not mention any problem, but there are evidences that show that the person who transported this accused person was the cause of the accident and the cause of the problem. anyway, in order to protect the rights. people and the preserv

about 10 years ago, navid had an accident on the street, but no one took him to the hospital. after 15 to 20 minutes, the emergency room came. if you see an injured person on the street, would you take him to the hospital? this is the question we asked people , why not with these conditions? if it happens, then it will take two days to prove it. i do not take responsibility myself it is the city duty of any person to take it, i won't take it because they will be caught, legally they will be caught, why did you bring this, you have to call the emergency department, or the police will come, you will get into trouble, you go there, you say, sir , you hit this guy yourself , it was not an accident, sir, if you were on the highway if someone is injured, you as a driver will help him and take him to the hospital. it is not worth the 100% risk, or he will be caught. the report of the judicial and legal commission on my plan. parliament members have proposed that if approved, a person who takes an injured person to the hospital should not be arrested in some cases, the transferor does

about 10 years ago, navid had an accident on the street . but no one took him to the hospital. 15 to 20 minutes passed, the emergency came. if you see an injured person on the street, take him to are you going to the hospital? this is a question we asked people. under these conditions, why should your burden fall on us? then it will take two days to prove it . i will not take you, because it is the city's duty to take you. they get stuck , why did you bring these? you have to call the emergency room or the police, you get into trouble, you go there , you say, sir, you hit this guy yourself. if he falls, you as a driver will help him and take him to the hospital . it's not worth the 100% risk, or he will be caught, according to the report of the judicial commission the law regarding the plan to ban the arrest of those who take the injured to medical centers dates back to 1379. parliament members have proposed that if approved, a person who takes an injured person to the hospital should not be arrested. in our cases. the transferor should not

navid is suffering from the same widespread virus that 40 years ago in the early 1960s with contaminatedod. the government of france at that time exported to 10 countries of the world including iran

navid bahruz is press tv's baghdad bureau chief here. earlier joined us to give more details about the latest us strikes on the arab country. last night, the us carried out the strikes on three facilities used by pmu forces in babel province, located in southern iraq. the attacks have left casualties and cause damage to the facilities. the strikes show us adventurism while blatently violating iraq's sovereignty. despite the iraqi government's warnings to the us against repetition of... such attacks, washington insists on carrying out adventurous moves. some sources say that the targeted bases belong to iraq's hezbulah brigades, a resistance group working under the pmu command. the us claims that the offensives were in response to recent attacks by iraqi resistance groups on al-harir base in erbill which had left three american soldiers injured. resistance groups have underlined that they'll continue their attacks on us facilities in iraq, as long as israel keeps committing crimes in gaza, and the us, as main accomplice to those crimes, maintains its occupying presence in iraq. therefor

navid, about 300 other people were also infected with this imported virus . is the responsibility of france and we will seriously pursue this causal responsibility . in those years, the french government was not condemned in human rights circles and courts for the transfer of these contaminated bloods, nor did it reward our compatriots. they admitted that our medicines were contaminated. even in an interview on french tv at that time played the minister of health of france at that time and the general manager of the merio company who were present in that interview clearly declare that , dear people of france, we promise you that these drugs have never been used in our country, that is, in their own country, the french government. they were never even willing to apologize to the patients who were infected with this virus and unfortunately did not give up their lives . pursuing iran's hemophilia law these days has led to the drafting of a legal bill to reject blood against the company that produces these infected blood products, which is of course in the legal

es lo mismo para el frio o el calor veamos que nos cueta miriam arias llega la temporada navide;a y conerro ladra] mi espalda se siente mejor. antes de advil. advil dual action back pain combate el dolor de espalda de dos formas y dura 8 horas. puedo enseñarle un par de trucos. a la culebrilla no le importa. bailamos toda la noche. a la culebrilla no le importa. porque 1 de cada 3 personas tendrá culebrilla, necesitas protegerte. no importa qué saludable te sientas, con la edad tu sistema inmunitario se debilita y el riesgo de contraer culebrilla aumenta. ¿qué puede protegerte? shingrix. puedes protegerte con una vacuna con más del 90% de efectividad comprobada. shingrix es una vacuna usada para prevenir la culebrilla en adultos de cincuenta años o más. shingrix no protege a todos y no es para quienes tengan reacciones alérgicas graves a sus ingredientes o a una dosis previa. se observó un riesgo mayor del síndrome de guillain-barré después de recibir shingrix. también pueden ocurrir desmayos. los efectos secundarios más comunes son dolor, enrojecimiento e hinchazón en el lugar de la in

about 10 years ago, navid had an accident on the street , but no one took him to the hospital. 15 tominutes passed by the emergency room. came you if if you see an injured person on the street , do you take him to the hospital ? this is the question we asked people. under these conditions, why should you take the burden ? it will take two days to prove it. i will not take him. i won't take it because they will be caught, legally, they will be caught. why did you bring this ? you have to call the emergency room, or the police will come . you will get in trouble. you go there. you say, sir, you hit this guy yourself. it was not an accident, sir. if someone is injured on the highway, you are as the driver will help him and take him to the hospital. it is not a 100% risk erzeh adam mire gets caught in the judicial and legal commission's report on the plan to ban the arrest of those who take muslims to medical centers . in 1379, the members of the parliament brought a plan that if approved by the person who takes an injured person to the hospital. he should not be arrested and detained in

navid had an accident on the street about 10 years ago but no one took him to the hospital. 15 to 20 minutes passed, the emergency room came. if you saw an injured person on the street , would you take him to the hospital? this is the question that we asked people , why should you bother at that time? let's prove it. it will take two days. i won't take it myself. it's the responsibility of the city. any person who takes it, i won't take it, because they get stuck. legally , why did you bring this? you have to call the emergency room or call the police. dude , you did it like this, it wasn't an accident, sir, if there was someone on the highway if he is injured, you as a driver will help him , take him to the hospital, it's not worth the 100 risk, one will get caught, according to the report of the judicial commission. and the law regarding the plan to ban the arrest of those who take muslims to medical centers is from 1379. parliament members have proposed that if approved , a person who takes an injured person to the hospital should not be arrested. in some cases , the carrier shoul