rebecca: wrong way to do with the navin the best interest of the city, but wrong, according to your book. many of the projects he was siphoning money off t war notot well considered. you give the e example oa local contractor, , wanted mon to invest in a retail space. he ended up guaranteeing up to $95 billion in principal plusus interest for that development, even as they were losing retailers. chris: he was getting this money to developers, and then the deveveloper was if he still, he would guarantee the debt on that money and would usehe city taxpayer as collateral, if you will.. this is what the attororney general said is completely wrong. not onlthat, what makes this even more significant, peopople may look at harrburg pennnnsylvania and say, it is a pity -- city of 50,000, it is not detroit. 50,000 people, ok. but the significance is the attorney generalaid, when thatat first round of charges came down, there is another round to come. that will be the consultants the contractors, the bond attorneys. rebecca: members of the business community benefiting from m all of this. t only lo