corruption there or something like that, and if i am not mistaken, then he could not be appointed to nazkway because there were related structures to nabu, but the question is more about him. i hope that there will be an increase in efficiency, all the more. let's take on the bankers, eh, well, i'm more or less satisfied if they still bring out the product, they will finally prove the panasirov case. well, this is a blow. i'm sorry, please. we've never had such an official put in prison. i hope that it will be brought to an end. and then it will be possible to forgive because such small uh-uh uh-uh for big sins in this case uh-uh because there is also a conflict there, there was such a rather slippery conflict there, well, it is unknown there refinancing bakhmatyuk, in my opinion , was still present there and so on. and regarding mr medgera well, the matter here is obvious, the more so. well, here is the fact that he is not a criminal, that is, an obvious criminal, which is also a plus - he is reputable, he is, for sure, this person is the best. thank you. well, we hope that the structure

these data show this scale, but they also, let's agree, are with a sufficiently vivid illustration, nazk revealed 7 of the most common schemes by which conscripted men flee ukraine false disability leaving through the occupied territories bribing the military commissariat or border guards sums from one and a half to ten thousand dollars registering as a driver of humanitarian convoys buying from international carriers the right to be a second driver or so -called letters of support when civil servants are included in the lists of needed people, an example of the antonov enterprise is essentially a strategic enterprise of march this year he also submitted the border service there and the list of employees who were supposed to go abroad to the group on a business trip included outsiders who did not have anything to do with aircraft repair and among them was a close relative of corruption at the border is facilitated by the lack of clear laws, because in the decree of the president does not have a direct ban on the departure of conscripts, if it is written in the decree and the verkhovna ra

was fired after this showcase, because it was during a full-scale war . from the point of view of nazko nothing special changes here. so here too it is necessary to change the charter of naftogaz itself so that state officials can lead it, because naftogaz, on the one hand , is supposedly a private company, on the other hand, it is not, and therefore it is not illegal. says that, in principle, there is no question that a person who worked in state structures is the head of naftogaz, the truth is not that you declared naftogaz not what it really is, but that i just think that it is not a question of the candidacy of vitrenko or chernyshov. the question is that how all our statutory norms are written, this is the first thing for you , the second point, i think that the personality of yulia vitryanka at the head of naftogaz is incorrect to evaluate from this point of view, which we do not know, what would have happened to his head if naftogaz had not been in a war situation because this is an absolutely specific situation and there was a lot to talk about if, er, one way or another, this