all this comes as nbn — russia to carry out terror.out terror. all this comes as nbn at the un's - russia to carry out terror. all this | comes as nbn at the un's nuclear watchdog is holding an emergency meeting to discuss the attacks on zaporizhzhia at the weekend. the zaporizhzhia at the weekend. t'u2 zaporizhzhia at the weekend. t'u2 zaporizhzhia nuclear power station is europe's biggest six reactors. they are currently idling because the power station is quite literally on the front line. it has been coming under attack for the past two years. it is not exactly clear who is carrying out these attacks, there are conflicting names and counterclaims. it doesn't appear as though a major nuclear accident is imminent, because it is reasonably robust. it was designed to withstand all sorts of attacks. but nonetheless the situation is very threatening. russian forces are using it to shelter its troops and ammunition and personnel carriers, so it is definitely an object of much interest to both militaries and clearly this is an alarming sit

maybe it hasn't even been mentioned atll and that is emtala's reference to the woman's nbn child." isn't that an odd phrase to put in a statute that imposes a mandate to perfo artions? have you ever seen an abortion stute that uses the phrase "unborn child"? general prelogar: it's not an d phrase when you look at what congress was doing i19. there were well-publicized cases where women were experncg conditions, their own health and life were not in danger, but the fetus was in grave distress and hospitals weren't treating them. what congress did -- justice alito: well, have you se - general prelogar: -- is that it -- justice alito: -- have you seen abortion statutes that use the phrase "unborn child"? doesn't that tell us something? general prelogar: it tells us that congress wanted to expand the protection for pregnant won that they could get the same duties to screen and stabilize when they have a condition that'thatening the health and well-being of the unborn child. but what it doesn't suggest is that conessimultaneously displaced the independent preexisting obligation to treat