trump likes these ndas.es get into sticky business with them. >> brian todd, thank you. >>> more breaking news ahead on the rare split within the senate intelligence committee over evidence of collusion in the russia probe. the panel's chairman is lashing out at michael cohen after the former trump fixer and lawyer delayed his senate testimony. will cohen pay a price? what does help for heart failure look like? it looks like george having a busy day. ♪ the beat goes on george has entresto, a heart failure medicine that helps his heart... so he can keep on doing what he loves. in the largest heart failure study ever, entresto was proven superior at helping people stay alive and out of the hospital. it helps improve your heart's ability to pump blood to the body. don't take entresto if pregnant; it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren, or if you've had angioedema with an ace or arb. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, ki

i asked an expert in ndas — mark stephens, from the howard kennedy law firm — to explain how they areep trade secrets, so your customer lists, if you were an employer, you could gag someone from talking about that. if you worked at coca—cola, you couldn't tell the formula to pepsi, for example. in those examples, commercial secrets, one understands the importance of them. of course, what has happened is that ingenious and highly paid lawyers, and as one, i can speak with authority, have expanded that, and now what they are used to do is to cover up inappropriate behaviours, often where there is a power imbalance, and that is where the vice is, really, because the people signing up to these are people who have been abused and just want to get out, and they want to leave. they'll sign anything to get out, and that is where the problem lies. i was listening to the former solicitor general saying he is not convinced by that because actually all those people have a voice too and it is down to the lawyers to negotiate with the other lawyers and there is no evidence that the lawyers negotiat

explain, why did you sign an nda?about the justification for working for a campaign why you would have to sign it? >> they presented it to me the day i was offered the job. please sign and return this nda asap. i was thinking donald trump was under attack by everyone and why shouldn't i like other supporters be eager and anxious to protect him from attacks? so i viewed it through that very mistaken and ignorant lens and signed it thinking he would be fighting for things i believed in against corruption, making american great again. >> was everyone there forced to sign it? >> as far as i know it was a fairly ubiquitous document. not only employees like myself, but also independent contractors, volunteers who were not even paid but just showed up to volunteer their time. >> was there a pervasive culture of paranoia when you worked there? >> in retrospect i think the ndas created an environment where people like sandoval who wanted to commit abuses on other people felt like they could act with immunity and engage in ille

. >> she -- did she sign an nda as the condition of her employment in that campaign? >> she signed an nda purportedly as a condition of her employment and intend to fight that. we believe it's unconscionable and unenforceable. >> why? >> it's so overbroad. not just the president, his entire family, his grandchildren. >> really? >> yes. it stifles all kinds of speech. it's so broad. i'll provide a copy if you'd like to see it. you can see how he's tried to abuse it and shut down people working in the white house. he's tried to shut down people who have made other complaints about him and in the line of work that i'm involved in where i fight corporations every day that try to shut people down and shut people up, that's what we do. we fight these sorts of abusive agreements. >> there is another aspect to the lawsuit aside from this allegation of unwanted sexual contact by the president which has to do with the way she was paid on the campaign. tell me what is that part. >> that's right. so there are two aspects. she was paid less than comparable men who were working on

the paper failed to get their nondisclosure agreements, ndas, overturned.vine is one who was not prevented from speaking out. she worked for sir philip in his las vegas store and claims he sexually harassed her on numerous occasions. i really, genuinely think he thought he could kind of get this lawsuit with the telegraph and win and again, kind of buy and push his way through, silencing people. and, you know, it didn't work out in his favour. i absolutely think that the former or current employees that have been restrained by uk ndas should be able to speak out. the telegraph's editor had been warned by sir philip the paper might end up bankrupt if it printed the allegations about him. sir philip has described these allegations as no more than banter. now, if that is so, then he could very easily lift those ndas and allow them to speak freely. that is what we urge him to do. what do you want the government to do? i would like parliament, the government to take up this issue. i would like mrs may to act. she has spoken about being uneasy about the use of nd

they will come under pressure to talk, even though one of the things about a nda is that they wa nt to they won't want future employers to know about it in case they think they are trouble. there were cases involving harvey weinstein, where they were producing ndas on a photocopier, there were so many of them. some of the women have made it abundantly clear that they do not wish to speak, and have not, but some of the people hadn't realised that there was the large number of nondisclosure agreements, and as a consequence, they do now want to speak up. this really leads me to one of the issues for reform. there is no transparency reporting. it is important that if there is just one case, that perhaps that can be dealt with, but if there is, if you like, a hotspot or cluster of ndas affecting one individual. that should be reported? that should be reported. hr should know, and the remuneration committee on any company should know that. we are seeing that kind of reporting in america. if the americans can get it right in terms of employment law, we certainly should. seven people have been

and the trump organisation used ndas extensively, isn't that right? that's correct.types of ndas where the terns we re these types of ndas where the terns were described as very broad. for instance, the terms confidential information was defined to be anything that "mr trump risen that it may consist remain private and confidential including but not limited to any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs and all business affairs of mrtrump political affairs and all business affairs of mr trump or any family member." do affairs of mr trump or any family member. " do those affairs of mr trump or any family member." do those term sound familiar to you? i've seen that document. in fact there is a class action lawsuit filed this month by former trump action lawsuit filed this month by formertrump campaign action lawsuit filed this month by former trump campaign worker jessica denson that this nda language is illegal because it is too broad, too vague, and would be used to retaliate against employees who complained of illegality or wrongdoing. would

i absolutely think that the former or current employees that have been restrained by uk ndas should be. the editor of the telegraph have been warned by sir philip that the paper might end up bankrupt ever printed the allegations about him. sir philip described the allegations as no more than banter and if that ‘s so, then he could very easily lift those ndas and allow them to speak freely and that is what we urge him to do. what do you want the government to do? i would like parliament to take up this issue and i would like mrs may to act. she has spoken about being uneasy about the use of ndas after we have identified how they have been misused but so far she has only spoken about reviews and i would like to see action. the topshop owneer has denied allegations of unlawful sexual or racist behaviour but his lawyers conceded he was hot—headed, made comments about the clothes and weight of people and put his arms around them in a nonsexual way. sir philip green in the statement accused the telegraph of pursuing a vendetta against him, his company, and of harassing staff. he called on th

cohen, the trump organization used ndas stech extensively, is that right? >> that is correct. >> i'm reading a "washington post" article where the terms of one of these ndas were described as very broad. for instance, the terms "confidential information" was defined to be anything that, quote, mr. trump insists remain private or confidential including but not limited to any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs, and/or business affairs of mr. trump or any family member, close quote. do those terms sound familiar to you? >> i've seen that document. >> in fact there's class action lawsuit filed this month by former trump chain worker jessica denson that this nda language is illegal because it is too broad, too vague, and would be used to retaliate against employees who complain of illegality or wrongdoing. would you agree that in the use of these types of ndas with this type of language, and later, when donald trump sought to enforce them, that he intended to prevent people from coming forward with claims of wrongdoing? >> yes. >> w

they are still bound by nondisclosure agreements, ndas.re witnessed by other staff and reported to hr. sir philip has accused the newspaper pursuing a vendetta against him and his employees. as well as harassing staff. he denies his behaviour amounted to any kind of crime or misconduct. caroline rigby, bbc news. joining us now is mark stephens, head of media law at howard kennedy and an expert in nondislosure agreements. people signing up to these ndas disadvantage. but a counter argument, quite useful? for their original purpose, useful. you could keep trade secrets, your customer lists, you could gag someone from telling them about that. if you worked at coca—cola, you could not sell the formula to pepsi, for example. in commercial that one understands the importance. but ingenious and highly paid lawyers, and as one i can speak with authority, have expanded that. they are used now to cover up inappropriate behaviours, often where there is a power imbalance. that is where the problem is because the people signing up to these are people w

cohen, the trump organization used ndas extensively, isn't that right? >> that's correct. >> mr. cohen, i'm reading from a recent washington post article regarding the language in one of these types of ndas where the terms were described as very broad. for instance, the terms confidential information was defined to be anything that, quote, mr. trump insists remain private or confidential including, but not limited to any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs and/or business affairs of mr. trump or any family member, closed quote. do those terms sound familiar to you? >> i've seen that document. >> in fact, there is a class action lawsuit filed this month by former trump campaign worker jessica denison that this nda language is illegal because it is too broad, too vague and would be used to retaliate against employees who complain of illegality or wrongdoing. would you agree that in the use of these types of ndas with this type of language and later when donald trump sought to enforce them that he intended to prevent people from coming forward with claim

. >> is a former attorney you are familiar with legal documents known as ndas. nondisclosure agreements. is there? >> mr. cohen: yes. >> i'm sure you know they can be reasonable and certain business contacts. but they can also be abused to create a chilling effect to silence people, as we've seen in the #metoo movement and other places. isn't that right? >> mr. cohen: yes. >> and the trump organization used ndas extensively. isn't that right? >> mr. cohen: that is correct. >> mr. cohen, i'm reading for me recent "washington post" article regarding the linkage of one of these types of ndas when the terms were described as very broad. for instance, the term " "confidential information" was found to be anything that "mr. trump insist remain private or confidential, including but not limited to any information with respect to the personal life, political affairs, and/or business business affairs of mr. trump or any family member." do those terms that sound familiar to you? >> mr. cohen: i have seen that document. >> in fact, there is a class action lawsuit filed thi

he called on them to do the decent thing and ndas, —— respect ndas, otherwise he warned of potentialcial consequences for his former employers. his view of the confidentiality agreements, that those who signed them did willingly after getting legal advice, but some mps think change is overdue. it cannot be right that wealthy, powerful businesses can use the law to silence victims. we have to make sure that we have got better protections in place and i think that the court ruling today has shown that parliament needs to look at this and look at it quickly. the businessman decided to drop his court case against the telegraph, calling it pointless, after his identity was revealed in the house of lords by peter hain. the fact that sir philip green withdrew his injunction and refused to proceed with it is a vindication of what i did. some of sir philip's former employees are still silenced but the telegraph no longer is, so the businessmen will be back on the front page tomorrow. lizzie manning, bbc news. theresa may is travelling to dublin tonight, to meet the irish prime minister leo va

to have nda's seriously overhauled. update that legislation around that are expected entirely.rit on occasion. they can be useful when a senior executive goes off to a newjob and potentially the secrets to the new arrival. but that is about it. theresa may, in the wake of our initial reporting, talked about an ethical in the a's, and i think has happened since. the a's, and i think has happened since. we want a serious heart book. i suppose one of the questions is how is the lawyers helping to dish out these mvas?l lot of the problem is that they are not written in plain english. it is not written in plain english. it is not really understandable for a lots of people so that is something that needs to be looked at as well. let's move needs to be looked at as well. let's m ove o nto needs to be looked at as well. let's move onto the front page of the guardian, a story about a man he was fortune twice that of philip green. this is the owner of amazon. talk us through this. this is a tough line, and it is because which one do you dislike most? that has a lot of inquiry about him a

a private entity can go after a private person for the nda. but that's not what's happening here..s. government, through the office of the president of the united states, has instructed, directed, authorized, approved, whatever word you want to use, to have the campaign to use their auspices to enforce this nda, to quiet him with respect to his federal service. i mean, this agreement, this arbitration proceeding actually demands that cliff return government documents that might be in his possession, not to the government, but to the campaign. i mean, this is the white house all over it. >> but do you know for a fact that this is the white house? >> well, from my own sources that i have had and other documents that i'm aware of, it gives every indication, and i firmly believe, that this is president trump, giving instructions to the campaign, to take action. i mean, the lawyers for the campaign, from what i understand exists out there, have made it very clear that they are representing not donald j. trump, candidate, or donald trump, running for president again in 2020, they repres

. >> this gets to the nda. says he doesn't know if he signed a nondisclosure agreement when taking the job at the white house. have you tried to confirm with the white house that he signed an nda before filing this lawsuit? >> no. it really ultimately doesn't matter either way because the basis, the way in which the trump campaign through president trump is trying to silence mr. simms is based off the campaign nda. the reason they will not bother trying to use the white house nda, this new additional thing, is because it would be unenforceable. unless it is classified information you cannot censor it which is why they haven't bothered and why we didn't look into it any deeper. >> what do you hope happens and comes from this? >> i think we want toclarify and make sure that mr. simms can continue to disclose information, unclassified information about what he saw and inform the public about what he observed in the white house, continue to sell the book without fear of monetary damages and during the course of thi

you told her you couldn't remember if you had signed an nda. are you now acknowledging that, in fact, you did both for the campaign and the administration? >> in the lawsuit, it still says that i don't remember doing that. we are acting in good faith under the assumption that i did sign the same thing that so many others did. that's what the lawsuit said. bradley can get into the details on that. >> let me go to bradley on this. specifically, brad, you're saying that the campaign or the political arm is serving as a cut-out for the white house. they are doing the work the white house won't do legally? >> yeah. it's the work that the u.s. government in the white house can't do legally. under longstanding, established judicial and institutional precedent dating back to the 1970s, former federal employees cannot be censored by the u.s. government from disclosing what they learned while in service so long as it is unclassified information. nothing in "team of vipers" was classified. we don't dispute, there's never been a dispute he signed an nda du

there are calls to scrap ndas. what do you think about that?reements would be a practical disaster, ithink, not agreements would be a practical disaster, i think, not only to the individuals concerned, because employers would be less inclined to settle, but also for the tribunal system, which i don't think could cope with the volume of claims that would probably reach them. i don't think there is any suggestion that we will scrap settlement agreements. in fact, settlement agreements largely concern other matters such as unpaid wages, failure to give people holidays, compensation for redundancy and unfair dismissal. very few settlement agreements actually relate to sexual harassment oi’ actually relate to sexual harassment or even discrimination. so i don't think there is any suggestion we should scrap settlement agreements. there is certainly some suggestion that the law should be changed, and the law relating to settlement agreements should be changed, and there are certainly things the government could do to make things easier on individuals.

this will be a case of whether the ndas they hold up in court.y about donald trump says and pointed out was the suit gets to the heart of what the president intends to do for two years which is be a private citizen and the president at the same time. that's what this cut out gets to. that he can't do it as president but he's using the campaign to file the lawsuit. >> it will be very interesting to see what the courts have to say about it. >> thank you. thanks for having me. >> let's check in with chris to see what he's working on for cuomo primetime at the top of the hour. sir. chris cuomo. >> how are you doing, bud? >> you're on live tv. >> i didn't know which way to look. i still don't. >> at the camera. >> just what you always dreamed of. >> me, me, me, me. it's actually a nightmare for me. i always thought one of me was too many. we want to try to get castro. we're going to deal with traffic problems. people don't know the reality of tv. we're trying to get him on here. not only is he the only mexican-american in the race that wants to take o

. >> and the trump organization used ndas extensively correct? >> that is correct. >> i'm reading from an article where the terms are described as very proud. the terms confidential information was defined to be anything that, quote, insists remain private or confidential including but not limited to any information with respect to the personal life, political afairs or business afairs of mr. trump or any family member, closed quote. does that sound familiar to you? >> i've seen that document. >> there is a class action document filed by former trump campaign working jessica den son isn't legal because it is too broad, too vague and would be used to retaliate against employees who complained of illegal at or wrongdoing. would you agree that the use of these types of ndas with this type of language and later when donald trump sought to enforce them, he intended to prevent people from coming forward with claims of wrongdoing? >> yes. >> would you agree that the attempt was to have a chilling effect on people or silence them from coming forward? >>

. >> and the trump organization used ndas extensively correct? >> that is correct. >> i'm reading from an article where the terms are described as very proud. the terms confidential information was defined to be anything that, quote, insists remain private or confidential including but not limited to any information with respect to the personal life, political afairs or business afairs of mr. trump or any family member, closed quote. does that sound familiar to you? >> i've seen that document. >> there is a class action document filed by former trump campaign working jessica den son isn't legal because it is too broad, too vague and would be used to retaliate against employees who complained of illegal at or wrongdoing. would you agree that the use of these types of ndas with this type of language and later when donald trump sought to enforce them, he intended to prevent people from coming forward with claims of wrongdoing? >> yes. >> would you agree that the attempt was to have a chilling effect on people or silence them from coming forward? >>

. >> ndas and the idea that there are some people signed them and were working for the white house.g me the white house isn't trying to influence those -- oh, i should sad enforce those ndas. why is that important? i talked to lynn patton yesterday, the african-american woman mark meadows brought. there are people are saying she's talking nice about the president and not challenging him because she's under an nda. she said it's not true, she said she was there to show the president doesn't see color. >> thank you. great conversation. >>> i want to toss it back out to you. you're in the home stretch. fantastic work. you've got the big picture. >> thank you. back at you, yeah, our big picture today actually celebrates the final day of black history month with this, a photo of congressman john lewis. this is before a caps game honoring black history and hockey. orie was the first black player in the nhl. it's an awesome picture. as always, we'd love to hear your thoughts on facebook, twitter, and snapchat. i'll see you guys back in our normal spot next week. for now, it's chris jansing

having the campaign to enforce this nda to quiet him with are pt to his federal service.ctually demands that cliff returns government documents that may be in his possession, not to the government but to the campaign. i mean this is the white house all over it. >> do you know for a fact that this is the white house? >> well, from my own sources that i have had and other documents that i am aware of - it gives every indication and i firmly believe that this is president trump giving instructions to the campaign to take action. i mean the lawyers for the campaign from what i understand exists out there have made it very clear that they are representing not donald j. trump candidate or donald trump runniru running again in 2020. they represent president trump. that's the precedent. >> the focus of your book is the time at the white house and what you saw in the administration? >> that's right. in the arbitration complaint that they sent to us every single thing they listed was something from my time in the white house. so what our suit is really getting i served donald trump

but to the point about the nda, which is what cliff is claiming, what the lawsuit is about, there's noion being revealed in this book. it's about personalities. and relationships in the white house. this lawsuit is challenging whether having employees sign nondisclosure agreements is valid at all. >> in fact, the president and this white house have been selective about enforcing the nda's or with which books they get upset about because i didn't hear any problems with the sean spicer book. >> that's right. the suit outlines that saying they have used these lawsuits go after omarosa that wrote one of the first tell alls. sean spicer wrote a very flattering book about the president. no problem there. so the lawsuit is saying it's selective and it's when it's an unfavorable news cycle the president tries to go after these people and when it's not, it's just fine. he doesn't care. >> what happens next now that this suit is filed? >> we'll see. with the number case, it ended upset up settling. this will be a case of whether they hold up in court. this tells a story about donald trump says a

silvia ruÍz de una de esas organizaciones, silvia, acÉrcate, es una de esas organizaciones que van a ndana emergencia nacional, el presidente el otro dÍa dijo con sus palabras propias que no hay una emergencia, solo estÁ haciendo esto para promulgar su agenda antiinmigrante y racista. >> ¿ cuÁntas manifestaciones como esta que estamos vo hay Á manifestaciones por todo el paÍs. hoy, miles de personas en las calles protestando la acciÓn que el presidente ha tomado. >> ademÁs de la asociaciÓn de libertades civiles, tambiÉn estÁn entablando protestas otras organizaciones, residentes de la frontera, hay varios estados, hablamos por ejemplo de california, de oregon, de connecticut, de hawÁi y hasta ahora esto estÁ empezando, son muchos los congresistas que estÁn diciendo que van a dar la batalla. ¿ tÚ crees que el sentimiento aquÍ ha sido el mÁs fuerte que se ha visto a lo largo del gobierno del presidente trump?Ó que no he visto. personas de ambos partidos en el congreso, republicanos, demÓcratas todos diciendo que el presidente no debe de tomar esta acciÓn y tambiÉn la comunidad inmigrante y

in california, the attorney, he would hold it in escrow until such time as i received the executed nda nondisclosure agreement. >> did mr. trump know that you were going through this process by the payments? >> yes. >> why not just use his personal or company bank account to make the payment? why was the distraction so important outside you not wanting your wife to know? >> a check that would have his very distinct signature on it. even after it was cashed, are you would need to do is make a photocopy and then it would be proof positive what took place. the goal was to keep him as far away as possible. >> can anyone corroborate what you have shared with us? >> absolutely. >> and that is? >> keith davidson, alan weisel. president trump. >> according to federal prosecutors, "after the election: sought reimbursement or election related expenses, including the $130,000 payment. prosecutor stated that you presented an executive of the a bank with a copy of statement reflecting a $130,000 wire transfer. is that accurate? wax that is accurate. >> do you have a copy still? >> yes, it's a part

. >> despuÉs de varias fotografÍas que salieron a la angÉlica nda >> el divorcio ha causado furor enra: casi destaca el impacto de esta historia de amor que fueron muchos pacto. sin embargo la verdad sÓlo les son los protagonistas. ramÓn: y lo que marisco ensaya sobre el resto. asÍ salen las cosas. una experta nos darÁ consejos para enseÑar a ahorrar a los hijos. palmira: y les contamos el proceso de identificar los cadÁveres de migrantes en el intento por una mejor vida. ♪ ramÓn: el caso del ser de mÁs de 85 muertos. una familia hispana nos relata. ♪ >> cuando lleguÉ me gustÓ porque estaba bien verde. >> son los colores los que permanecen a su alma. >> tenÍa un aÑo de haber comprado mi casa. >> un sueÑo que se vio truncado. un incendio devoraba todo a su paso. >> nosotros manejado. todo se ocureciÓ. era muy triste. el regreso a su hogar. muchos vecinos que no pudieron escapar de llamas. poco a poco siente que lo va logrando. >> si es para volver a levantarnos. >> el paÍs estÁ al borde de otro cierre parcial. luego de 35 dÍas de cierre podrÍan implementarlo el prÓximo 15 de febrero.

in 2018 the nda included a provision that would prohibit the use of products and services developed by kanjorski lab by third-party products and it required a report to spot and address risks. so can you tell me what the status is on banning those products from third-party contracts and also what is the status of the report and what risks might still be there? >> i know we have conducted the band but i take that for the record to make sure i have an accurate response to both parts of the question.>> reporter: thank you very much. general thomas and to pick up on the questions about syria and particularly on the detainees as you are probably aware, two of those detainees are suspected in the murders of four americans, and i don't know if you have anything you can tell us today about what their status is what the potential is to make sure they can be brought back to the united states to be tried for their crimes, but certainly that's what the families of those murdered americans would like to see happen.>> i don't have an update on the status, but i would express my appreciation for your

what we are continuing to campaign for in the telegraph is a complete overhaul of ndas, because thatt of laws and legislation in the uk that protect employees, protect workers, but here is evidence, and there is ple nty of but here is evidence, and there is plenty of evidence, they are being used to cover up allegations of discrimination and harassment and abuse and racism. these nondisclosure agreements first came to light with the me too campaign. we heard about them in connection with harvey weinstein, jason. yes. they are basically gagging orders being used by those who have the money, because they can afford the lawyers and the court action to take them out, to silence people. there are cases you can see why them out, to silence people. there are cases you can see why you need a nondisclosure agreement, for example, you don't want somebody running for trade secrets. that makes sense. but they are being used, let us talk about this more widely and part philip green, they used by certain people is to cover up used by certain people is to cover upa kind used by certain people is to

into through reimbursement, a private contract of two parties known as a nondisclosure agreement or nda. the office of government ethics with responsibly over what the president needs to report is puzzled by this and skeptical that a retainer was actually in place and asked to see the retainer agreement on call of may 8th with the president. the president's personal counsel sherry dylan replied she would not permit oge staff to read the agreement because it is privileged. she would not let oge staff come to her office to review the

jesse: you write the tell-all, you burn a bunch of colleagues and violate the nda. lot of people won't trust you. they think you sold them out for a rich advance. i wouldn't hire you at this point. i wouldn't trust you. >> ultimately what i wanted to do is tell the truth. there have been people who came out of the white house and wrote books and they were full of lives. it's the most of talked about presidency in history. it's tough to wade through what is true and what is not. i am the first person to put my name on the unvarnished account. that includes a lot of good that would surprise some people and a lot of bad that would surprise people as well. i don't think there is any way to question someone's integrity when they are saying i am going too tell the truth about something. and that's what i did in this book. jesse: the entire country rooting against the patriots. is it because of donald trump? jesse: another super bowl and once again the entire country hates the patriots. basically the whole nation cheering for the l.a. rams. i don't know why. is it because

with help from the sheriff nda office, the police can dedicate 20 people to this homicide expect to have a murderer walking the streets, everyone should be concerned in napa to have justice for my dad and everyone in the committee. >> reporter: the parents describe his good heart and easy-going ways pick >> he had no problems growing up. he got into drugs that he turned his life around.>> reporter: coworkers and people he knew was life or just a short time, he is remembered as a giving man. >> he used to call me champ. he was calling me the champ. i walked two weeks. he had me leaving in myself. >> reporter: ktvu, fox 2 news . >> the oakland police department is facing a wrongful death lawsuit. the department released body camera footage of a shooting that happened last march. joshua was homeless and was unconscious between two houses with a gun in his lap. officers were called and used loudspeakers to wake him that he was not responsible but according lawsuit followed by john burris, officers opened fire when he eventually started to sit up. >> none of the officers had a gun pointed at

that -- you know to get to one is great and to get to two or three, now it's just an abu nda nce of riches. >> we have given you all the build up. now it's time for those two quarterbacks to roll that balance out onto the field in atlanta and play the game. right here a 3:30 kickoff. >>> the time now 6:27. up next the sudden surge in a half a million pg&e bills. >> a little known charge that people say pushed their latest payments through the roof. what you need to know. >> and strong storms batter the bay area overnight. we are live in the marin head lands with the latest. norcal drivers. : attenn now's the time to save big on accord. a 2018 car and driver 10 best. i love this car. i think it's the perfect combination of style, grace and attitude. man: the steering and handling is awesome. it handles like a sports car. narrator: get up to 47 mpg and cutting edge technology (car beeping) like honda sensing. all for $249 a month. it's a good car, man. i like it. it's my car, woo. narrator: see your northern california honda dealer now. rolls through this morning with heavy rain and high win

. >> do you know the department of justice nda to support cannabis research to help the safety of our citizens question must be when we had to speeded up because otherwise it would last to the end of the show so bear with us. special award for the stretch of the day goes to democrat congresswoman -- debbie mark housel powell who asked whitaker about hiske pregovernment servi, the work he did. >> i haven't worked for a fact in 16 months and in preparation -- >> thank you mr. whitaker. thank you, mr. whitaker. where they are only three board members and this infantry? i have some other questions here and all this time i'm waiting and i can't find the question.e this contains and i will finish close and dear to my heart lgbtq issues. >> laura: no, no, no, this is good. for revelation of a radical idea, radical idea that no one ever come over they really going there? the award to democrat congressman veronica escobar. >> i represent el paso, texas. unfortunately, my community has been ground zero for many of this administration's cruel anti-immigrant and anti-american policies.de mill the

argument says well, okay, we're going to try to enforce the arbitration agreement, and if you signed an ndau can quibble with whether it's legally enforceable, but if you signed the contract, then you also have to abide by the arbitration agreement clouds of the contract. when the white house or campaign said we're going to sue you or make you enforce the arbitration agreement, he said then i'm suing you. i'm telling you, this smells like nothing more than a vehicle to sell books. i'll read "time of rivals". but i'm not going to read "team of vipers". there you go. cliff, they're not buying your book and they're not into your lawsuit. >> coming up, more on a potential deal to keep the government open ahead of the deadline. new reporting this morning about an executive action that the president is considering to build more of the wall than is in the deal. we'll have those details coming up. and saying, "really?" so capital one is building something completely new. capital one cafes. inviting places with people here to help you, not sell you. and savings and checking accounts with no fees or

what more would you suggest we look at as a matter of policies going into the nda cycle? >> i think that we have to come back to the committee and identify those critical subsets. there are people within our force right now that i call 10 or 20 x type of people. they're 10 or 20 times better than the people that they work with, better coders, better malware analysts, better developers, and so how do we ensure we keep those within our force? the services do a wonderful job in recruiting. we get great recruits. we do a very, very good job in training them. our challenge will be in retaining the very best, not everyone, but the very best. this is where i think identifying those categories coming back to you to make sure we have the proper career paths an the proper enumeration will be very helpful. >> senator rounds and i talked about it in his capacity on cyber and we feed that information sooner and the private sector, i led a practice that had ethical testing and cyber security resources and they were very -- they're scarce in the environment where you can pretty much pay

some got refunds if they signed and nda. >> girl, you're doing so great.like how am i doing great, i'm not losing weight. >> i jumped into an industry that had no instruction manual. i'm basically going through uncharted territory. i'm doing the best that i can to the best of my ability. >> dawn posted an apology on youtube addressing the complaints. coming up on gma, the questions you should be asking before signing up for similar programs advertised on social media. gma starts at 7:00 a.m. it's after abc 7 mornings. >>> edna the firehouse katmai return to fire station 49. the fire commissioners tells abc 7 news he'll bring up a proposal today to revise the policy that bans animals on fire department property. station 49 unofficially adopted edna four years ago when she began visiting as a feral kitten. a staffer adopted her on monday. >>> the storm hitting the bay area right now. >>> from the north bay where everyone is seeing flooding and there's a lot of water in some areas. the danger people are facing today across the bay area. >> see how fast that p

pre-nda. green book took the best picture award on oscar night that was a demonstration of diversity in film. and working for the movie tells the story of a black classical pianist and his white driver and bodyguard traveling through the segregated american deep south of the one nine hundred sixty s. the whole story is about love it's about loving each other and despite our differences and finding out the truth about who we are we're the same people. but here she leave one best supporting actor for his role in the film as the classical musician don shirley i want to dedicate this to to my grandmother who has been in my life my ear my entire life telling me that if i first i don't succeed try try again that i could do anything i put my mind to. always always pushing me to to think positively and i know that i would not be here without her that she has got me over the hump every step of the way in a major upset a livia coleman won the best actress award for her portrayal of the bad queen and in

we're talking about the trump organization, what ndas he signed, what didn't. this is all supposed to be about russia collusion. michael cohen admitted right off the bat there was nothing substantive that he could show on russia collusion. so we wasted all this time talking about something that wasn't what the focus of this week should have been. they could have held this hearing anytime they wanted. they chose today. and as a former white house staffer, i can tell you as much as they're focused on what's going on in north korea and furthering the president's agenda and goal in making it safe for the peninsula, the region and the world, you can't help but make sure you're keeping an eye on that. that distraction means one more minute, one more second, one more hour that they're not focused on the goal of a safer world. i think that got lost in the discussion today, sean. you brought it up. some of your guests have. for one moment understand that the president and his team have to -- it would be malpractice not to listen to the charges that michael cohen is brin

he would hold it ination crow until stuch time i received the executed nda, nondisclosure agreement. >> did mr. trump know you were going through this process to hide the payment? >> yes. >> why not just use mr. trump's personal or company bank account to make the payment? why was the distraction so important beside you not wanting your wife to snow? >> what his concern was there would be a check that has his very distinct signature on to it and even after she cashed the check, all you need to do is make a photo copy of it and it's proof positive on exactly what took place. so the goal was to keep him far away from it as possible. >> can anyone corroborate what you have shared with us? >> absolutely. >> and that is? >> keith davidson, alan weisselberg, president trump. >> okay. now let's talk about the reimbursement, according to federal prosecutors and i quote, after the election, cohen sought reimbursement for election related expenses including the $130,000 payment, prosecutors stated that you and i quote, presented an executive of the company with a copy of a bank statement refle

pre-nda. green book took the best picture award on oscar night that was a demonstration of diversity in film. and working for the movie tells the story of a black classical pianist and his white driver and bodyguard traveling through the segregated american deep south of the one nine hundred sixty s. the whole story is about love it's about loving each other and despite our differences and finding out the truth about who we are we're the same people. but here she leave one best supporting actor for his role in the film as the classical musician don surely i want to dedicate this to to my grandmother who has been in my life my ear my entire life telling me that if i first i don't succeed try try again that i could do anything i put my mind to. always always pushing me to to think positively and i know that i would not be here without her that she has got me over the hump every step of the way in a major upset a livia coleman won the best actress award for her portrayal of the bad queen and in t

he would hold it in escrow until such time i received the executed nda. non disclosure review. >> mr. trump adviknows that you going through this process to hide the payment? >> yes. >> what his concern was there would be a check that had his distinct signature onto it and after she cashed the check, all you need to do is make a photo copy of it and it is going to prove positive on what took place. the goal was to keep him far away from as much as possible. >> can anyone corroborate what you have shared with us? >> absolutely. >> that is? >> pete davidson. president trump. >> after the election, including expenses and $130,000 payment, prosecutors stated that you presented an executive of a copy of the bank statement reflecting $130,000 wire transfer, is that accurate? >> that's accurate. >> yes, it is made part of the exhibit. >> you will provide it to the committee? >> yes, ma'am. >> is executives at the company then and i quote "agreed to reimburse cohen by adding $130,000 and 50,000 grossing of that amount to 360,000 for tax purposes and adding $60,00

upper-middle-class white people who care more about saving polar bears or pn does than about jobs ndas,lar bears or pa than about jobs. manuel: first, with regard to that argument about the g.o.p. having significant concerns about working-class people of color, -- [laughter] them a gonzalez, the youth organizer from the parkland shooting, who said, i call b.s. [applause] manuel: i might say that more forcefully but apparently, this is on c-span. so let me just say that one of the things that i thought was great about what bill was talking about, is talking about the differences in climate vulnerability around the world. up muche is also come as climate change is the climate gap -- so much as climate change is real, there is also a climate gap. people of color and low income committees. this has been part of my work for a number of years. i have been researching and working with committee based organizations on issues of since thetal justice mid-1990's. when i first started to work on the issue, we got a bigger grant. i was so excited so i want to tell my aunt that we have gotten a big

he would hold it in escrow until such time i received the executed nda, nondisclosure agreement. >> did mr. trump know you were going through this process to hide the payment? >> yes. >> why not just use mr. trump's bank account? why was a distraction so important, beside not wanting your wife to know? >> what he was concerned about was a check that had his very distinct signature on it. all you have to do is make a photocopy of it and it's proof positive of what took place. the goal was to keep him as far away from it as possible. >> can anyone corroborate what you have shared with us? >> absolutely. >> and that is? >> keith davidson, alan weiselberg, president trump. >> according to federal prosecutors and i quote, after the election cohen sought reimbursement for election related expenses including the $130,000 payment. prosecutors stated that you, and i quote, presented an executives a copy of a bank statement reflecting the $130,000 wire transfer. is that accurate? >> it is. >> do you have a copy of the bank statement? >> it was made part of the exhibit. >> according to federal pro